22.02.2013 Views

Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila ... - Columba.us

Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila ... - Columba.us

Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila ... - Columba.us

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

63 187 SCRA 377 (1990).<br />

64 180 SCRA 496 (1989).<br />

65 Supra note 25.<br />

66 Supra note 23.<br />

67 Civil Liberties Union v. Executive Secretary, supra note 38 at 330-331.<br />

68 Id. at 158-159.<br />

69 IBP v. Zamora, 338 SCRA 81 (2000) citing Joya v. PCGG, 225 SCRA 568 (1993);<br />

Ho<strong>us</strong>e International Building Tenants Association, Inc. v. Intermediate Appellate Court,<br />

151 SCRA 703 (1987); Baker v. Carr, supra note 57.<br />

70 Citing Kilosbayan, Inc. v. Morato, 250 SCRA 130 (1995).<br />

71 Citing Tatad v. Secretary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Energy, 281 SCRA 330 (1997).<br />

72 Citing Kapatiran ng mga Naglilingkod sa Pamahalaan ng Pilipinas, 163 SCRA 371,<br />

378 (1988).<br />

73 Rule 3, Section 2. Parties in interest. — A real party in interest is <strong>the</strong> party who stands<br />

to be benefited or injured by <strong>the</strong> judgment in <strong>the</strong> suit, or <strong>the</strong> party entitled to <strong>the</strong> avails <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> suit. Unless o<strong>the</strong>rwise authorized by law or <strong>the</strong>se Rules, every action m<strong>us</strong>t be<br />

prosecuted or defended in <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> real party in interest.<br />

74 JG Summit Holdings, Inc. v. Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals, 345 SCRA 143, 152 (2000).<br />

75 246 SCRA 540 (1995).<br />

76 Id. at 562-564.<br />

77 Agan v. PIATCO, G.R. No. 155001, May 5, 2003 citing BAYAN v. Zamora, 342 SCRA<br />

449, 562-563 (2000) and Baker v. Carr, supra note 57; Vide Gonzales v. Narvasa, 337<br />

SCRA 733 (2000); TELEBAP v. COMELEC, 289 SCRA 337 (1998).<br />

78 Chavez v. PCGG, supra note 15.<br />

79 Del Mar v. PAGCOR 346 SCRA 485, 501 (2000) citing Kilosbayan, Inc., et.al. v.<br />

Morato, supra note 70; Dumlao v. COMELEC, 95 SCRA 392 (1980); Sanidad v.<br />

Comelec, 73 SCRA 333 (1976); Philconsa v. Mathay, 18 SCRA 300 (1966); Pascual v.<br />

Secretary <strong>of</strong> Public Works, 110 Phil 331 (1960); Vide Gonzales v. Narvasa, supra note<br />

77; Pelaez v. Auditor General, 15 SCRA 569 (1965); Philconsa v. Gimenez, 15 SCRA<br />

479 (1965); Iloilo Palay & Corn Planters Association v. Feliciano, 13 SCRA 377 (1965).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!