NEW TRIER TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 203 - BoardDocs
NEW TRIER TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 203 - BoardDocs
NEW TRIER TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 203 - BoardDocs
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• Requests for future expenditures related to facilities planning will be presented to the<br />
Board in advance.<br />
Mr. Pete Ullman, Board Member, presented a PowerPoint presentation with his thoughts for<br />
consideration by the Board. His proposal is to look at the Facilities Long Range Planning over<br />
30 years in three phases. Phase One is to be addressed in the areas of most obvious and critical<br />
need: demolition and replacement of the Cafeteria Building, the Tech Arts Building and the<br />
Music Building. Phase Two would address the center portion of the Winnetka Building over the<br />
next 10 to 15 years. Phase Three looks at the east side of the Winnetka Campus ten to twelve<br />
years later. Mr. Ullman asked for the project costs and details to be defined by March 2009 and<br />
that the District plan for a capital referendum in February 2010. Mr. Ullman supported the<br />
Addition/Minor option as it best answered many issues with the greatest flexibility for the future.<br />
Ms. Carol Ducommun, Board Member, read a statement of her thoughts regarding the Facilities<br />
Project to date. She proposed further expansion of the Community Engagement process and<br />
administration of a survey of the Community about a potential project. Ms. Ducommun is in<br />
agreement with Mr. Ullman in developing a 30 year Facilities Long Range Plan with specific<br />
goals for both campuses. Other issues of concern voiced by the Community included the 1:3<br />
switch, the two school model, demographic projections, and opportunities created for students.<br />
Mr. Koch invited Board comments regarding the presentations and statement. After much<br />
discussion, the Board agreed by general consensus that the April 2009 referendum would not be<br />
considered. A referendum will not occur before February 2010. The Board also agreed that the<br />
Addition/Major Renovation Facilities Plan Option will not be pursued. The Addition/Minor<br />
Renovations Option would be further defined with design specifics and alternatives. The<br />
Board restated its intention for more Community Engagement opportunities and survey<br />
of community sentiment.<br />
III. COMMUNITY COMMENTS<br />
Mr. Koch invited members of the community to speak before the Board. Numerous members of<br />
the community attended the meeting. Four community members, Cynthia Chase Kofkin, Sharon<br />
Kristjanson, Catherine King, and Wes Bauman shared their thoughts on the facilities project.<br />
Mr. Koch thanked them for their thoughts and concerns.<br />
The next facilities study discussion will take place in November, exact time and place to be<br />
determined.<br />
IV. ADJOURNMENT<br />
Mr. Koch adjourned the meeting at 10:38 p.m.<br />
Respectfully submitted,<br />
__________________________________ _________________________________<br />
Lou Anne Kelly, Secretary James B. Koch, President<br />
2