24.02.2013 Views

NEW TRIER TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 203 - BoardDocs

NEW TRIER TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 203 - BoardDocs

NEW TRIER TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 203 - BoardDocs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Requests for future expenditures related to facilities planning will be presented to the<br />

Board in advance.<br />

Mr. Pete Ullman, Board Member, presented a PowerPoint presentation with his thoughts for<br />

consideration by the Board. His proposal is to look at the Facilities Long Range Planning over<br />

30 years in three phases. Phase One is to be addressed in the areas of most obvious and critical<br />

need: demolition and replacement of the Cafeteria Building, the Tech Arts Building and the<br />

Music Building. Phase Two would address the center portion of the Winnetka Building over the<br />

next 10 to 15 years. Phase Three looks at the east side of the Winnetka Campus ten to twelve<br />

years later. Mr. Ullman asked for the project costs and details to be defined by March 2009 and<br />

that the District plan for a capital referendum in February 2010. Mr. Ullman supported the<br />

Addition/Minor option as it best answered many issues with the greatest flexibility for the future.<br />

Ms. Carol Ducommun, Board Member, read a statement of her thoughts regarding the Facilities<br />

Project to date. She proposed further expansion of the Community Engagement process and<br />

administration of a survey of the Community about a potential project. Ms. Ducommun is in<br />

agreement with Mr. Ullman in developing a 30 year Facilities Long Range Plan with specific<br />

goals for both campuses. Other issues of concern voiced by the Community included the 1:3<br />

switch, the two school model, demographic projections, and opportunities created for students.<br />

Mr. Koch invited Board comments regarding the presentations and statement. After much<br />

discussion, the Board agreed by general consensus that the April 2009 referendum would not be<br />

considered. A referendum will not occur before February 2010. The Board also agreed that the<br />

Addition/Major Renovation Facilities Plan Option will not be pursued. The Addition/Minor<br />

Renovations Option would be further defined with design specifics and alternatives. The<br />

Board restated its intention for more Community Engagement opportunities and survey<br />

of community sentiment.<br />

III. COMMUNITY COMMENTS<br />

Mr. Koch invited members of the community to speak before the Board. Numerous members of<br />

the community attended the meeting. Four community members, Cynthia Chase Kofkin, Sharon<br />

Kristjanson, Catherine King, and Wes Bauman shared their thoughts on the facilities project.<br />

Mr. Koch thanked them for their thoughts and concerns.<br />

The next facilities study discussion will take place in November, exact time and place to be<br />

determined.<br />

IV. ADJOURNMENT<br />

Mr. Koch adjourned the meeting at 10:38 p.m.<br />

Respectfully submitted,<br />

__________________________________ _________________________________<br />

Lou Anne Kelly, Secretary James B. Koch, President<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!