Public Attitudes and Preferences for Upland Landscapes - Defra

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Swannick, C Hanley, N and Termansen, M Hanley, N., Colombo, N., Mason, P., and Johns, H. The same study is also included in EFTEC (2006) “Economic Valuation of Environmental Impacts in the Severely Disadvantaged Areas” 14 . Dougill, AJ., Fraser, EDG., Holden, J., Hubacek, K., Prell, C., Reed, MS., Stagl, S., Stringer, LC. Scottish Agricultural College Scoping study on agricultural landscape valuation The Reform of Support Mechanisms for Upland Farming: Paying for Public Goods in the Severely Disadvantaged Areas of England Learning from Doing Participatory Rural Research: Lessons from the Peak District National Park Measuring public preferences for the uplands Harvey, D.R Agri-Environmental Relationships & Multi-functionality: Further Considerations 14 http://www.defra.gov.uk/evidence/economics/foodfarm/reports/documents/SDA.pdf 2007 Defra Literature review and guidance on valuing agricultural landscapes 2007 Journal of Agricultural Economics 58: 433–453 Primary research uplands 2006 Journal of Agricultural Economics 57: 259-275 Primary research with key stakeholders (not members 2005 Commissioned by the Centre for Uplands http://www.theuplandcentre.org.uk/pubs.htm of the public) Primary research - uplands 2003 The World Economy, 26: 705 – 725 Theoretical consideration of agricultural support 26
Grijalva T.C., Berrens, R. P., Bohara, A. K. and others Valuing the loss of rock climbing access in wilderness areas: A national-level, random-utility model Hodge, I Agri-environmental Relationships and the Choice of Policy Mechanism White, P. C. L. and J. C. Lovett Heyes, C and A. Heyes Hanley, N. MacMillan, D. Wright, R.E., Bullock, C., Simpson, I., Parsissons, D., and Crabtree, B. Willis, K.G. and G.D.Garrod Public preferences and willingness-to- pay for nature conservation in the North York Moors National Park, UK Willingness to Pay Versus Willingness to Travel: Assessing the Recreational Benefits from Dartmoor National Park Contingent Valuation V. Choice Experiments. Estimating the value of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland. Valuing Landscape – A contingent Valuation Approach Defa -forthcoming a National Ecosystem Assessment Scenarios Defra – forthcoming b Participation and deliberative techniques to embed an ecosystems approach into decision making 2002 Land Economics, Vol. 78, Issue: 1, 103-120. US based study synthesising existing research 2000 The World Economy, 23:257-273 Theoretical consideration of agricultural support 1999 Journal of Environmental Management 55: 1–13 Primary research - uplands 1999 Journal of Agricultural Economics 50:124-139 Primary research - uplands 1998 Journal of Agricultural Economics 49:1-15 Primary Research ESA, uplands in Scotland 1993 Journal of Environmental Management 37: 1-22 Primary research - uplands n/a New analysis based on existing evidence n/a New analysis based on existing evidence 27
Page 1 and 2: Public Attitudes and Preferences fo
Page 3 and 4: 1. Introduction 1.1. Background The
Page 5 and 6: Although care must be taken not to
Page 7 and 8: landscape (e.g. food and production
Page 9 and 10: context for how we interpret the pu
Page 11 and 12: (for biomass energy) and extensive
Page 13 and 14: Black (2009) Rank† Landscape Biod
Page 15 and 16: Hanley et al. (1998) employed a Cho
Page 17 and 18: cover over the current landscape wh
Page 19 and 20: Table 3 Economic valuation studies
Page 21 and 22: Hanley et al. (1998) Hanley et al.
Page 23 and 24: 7.2. Limitations of Contingent Valu
Page 25: 9. Overview of referenced studies (

Public Attitudes and Preferences for Upland Landscapes - Defra

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?