25.02.2013 Views

Laundry Detergent Tablets - Sepawa

Laundry Detergent Tablets - Sepawa

Laundry Detergent Tablets - Sepawa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Laundry</strong> <strong>Detergent</strong> <strong>Tablets</strong><br />

SEPAWA Norden<br />

Göteborg 13-14 May<br />

2002


Patent Search


35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Field Patents<br />

Nr. of Patents<br />

1976-1980 1981-1985 1986-1990 1991-1995 1996-2002


History<br />

• 60’s <strong>Tablets</strong> introduced in the north<br />

American market – discontinued in<br />

1978. (Savo by P&G)<br />

• Re-launched in Europe by Unilever in<br />

1998<br />

• Been sold in Spain since the mid-80’s


” What's not likely to catch on with U.S.<br />

consumers, though, is washing tablets. While<br />

their popularity is growing in Europe, no major<br />

marketer here plans to roll them out,<br />

especially considering that previous attempts<br />

have failed miserably, several marketers said.<br />

Furthermore, tablets require that they be<br />

placed in a bag. Other product forms include<br />

washing gel, introduced in Europe, but there is<br />

little discussions about a possible U.S.<br />

introduction.”<br />

Happi magazine cover story January 2000


History<br />

• September 2000 P&G introduced Tided<br />

<strong>Tablets</strong><br />

• January 2001 Lever launched Wisk <strong>Tablets</strong><br />

• March 2001 Purex tablets by Dial Corp.<br />

• By summer 2001 tablets reportedly<br />

achieved nearly 10% market share in the<br />

U.S - REVOLUTION


90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Market Trends<br />

Eropean laundry market (%)<br />

1998 2000 2001<br />

Powder<br />

Liquid<br />

Other


Compaction and Dissolution<br />

Strong enough to withstand handling and<br />

transport<br />

Vs.<br />

Should be readily dissolved and<br />

dispersed


•Use of a binder<br />

Remedy<br />

• Coating the tablet<br />

• Use of disintegrants<br />

• Avoiding gel formation


Binder<br />

• Helps holding the tablet together -<br />

lower compact pressure<br />

Example: PEG1500


Coating<br />

• Increased surface hardness<br />

•Improved aesthetics<br />

• Applied as melt or solution<br />

• Improved hydrophobicity<br />

• Should include a disintegrant


• Four classes<br />

Disintegrants<br />

– (i) cause disintegration by evolving gas, such as sodium<br />

bicarbonate in the presence of citric acid or tartaric acid<br />

– (ii) those which promote water absorption, such as<br />

starch, colloidal silicon dioxide, carbocymethyl cellulose<br />

and rice starch<br />

– (iii) those which swell, for example crossed linked<br />

polyacrylic acids, cross linked gum arabic, carboxymethyl<br />

cellulose<br />

– (iv) those which increase porosity such as potato and<br />

corn starch, an finally those which undergo<br />

physiochemical bonding such as cellulose and kaolin.


Disintegrants<br />

Used in combination<br />

– Same class: swellable cellulose and<br />

polyacrylic acids<br />

– Different classes: swellable polyacrylic<br />

acid with water transporting colloidal<br />

silica.


Disintegrants<br />

Highly water soluble salts<br />

Material Water solubility<br />

(g/l)<br />

Sodium citrate dihydrat 720<br />

Potassium carbonate 1120<br />

Urea >1000<br />

Sodium acetat, anhydrous 1190<br />

Sodium acetat, trihydrat 760<br />

Magnesium sulphate, heptahydrat 710<br />

Potassium acetat >2000


Avoiding Gel Formation<br />

• Acute when using spray-dried<br />

powders, surfactant evenly<br />

distributed in tablet.<br />

• Better to keep the anionic surfactant<br />

in discrete regions.


Tower vs. Non-tower<br />

• Tower process<br />

powders<br />

– Involves drying<br />

– Homogeneous product – no segregation<br />

problems<br />

• Non-tower process<br />

– Dry blend, post addition, no drying<br />

– Heterogeneous product – segregation<br />

problems


<strong>Tablets</strong><br />

• Compressed in to a single element –<br />

segregation can not occur.<br />

• Preferably produced by dry blending<br />

• No drying necessary – cost efficient


The Future<br />

• <strong>Tablets</strong> have settled at 10-15% market<br />

share<br />

• Market characterized by ever-new<br />

products<br />

• <strong>Tablets</strong> give formulation freedom<br />

• Platform for new products

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!