Sabbath
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
laws, <strong>Sabbath</strong>s and festivals? The word translated “elements” here is the Greek word stoicheia, the same word<br />
translated “elements” earlier in verse 3. There Paul described his readers as having been “in bondage under the<br />
elements of the world.” For this to refer to Yahweh’s law in verse 9, it would also have to refer to His law in<br />
verse 3, since the same word is used.<br />
To say that verse 3 refers to biblical law is insupportable, because “in this case there are two further<br />
difficulties: (1) It does not seem to apply to the gentiles, for the difficulty of the gentiles, is not that they were<br />
under the law in the past…and (2) it does not explain why or how Paul could add the phrase ‘of the world’ to<br />
the term stoicheia. All Jewish thought would emphasize the other-worldly character of the law resulting from<br />
its divine origin” (Boice, p. 472).<br />
“It would seem that in Paul’s time this exceedingly early and primitive view had been expanded to the point at<br />
which the stoicheia also referred to the sun, moon, stars, and planets---all of them associated with gods or<br />
goddesses and, because they regulated the progression of the calendar, also associated with the great pagan<br />
festivals honoring the gods. In Paul’s view these gods were demons. Hence, he would be thinking of a<br />
demonic bondage in which the Galatians had indeed been held prior to the proclamation of the gospel.<br />
“…In the verses that follow, Paul goes on to speak of these three crucial subjects in quick succession: (1)<br />
‘those who by nature are not gods,’ presumably false gods or demons; (2) ‘those weak and miserable<br />
principles,’ again stoicheia; and (3) ‘days and months and seasons and years’ (vv 9,10). No doubt Paul goes on<br />
to speak of these demons in ways entirely different from the former thinking of the Galatians…Thus, this whole<br />
issue takes on a cosmic and spiritual significance. The ultimate contrast to freedom in Messiah is bondage to<br />
Satan and the evil spirits” (Boice, p. 472).<br />
Superstitious observance of days and times<br />
It is in this context that the Galatians were observing special “days and months and seasons and years.” The<br />
word translated here as “observe” or “observing” is the Greek word paratereo, meaning “to watch closely, [or]<br />
observe narrowly” (W.E. Vine, Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words,<br />
1985, “Observation, Observe”).<br />
This word “seems to have the sense of ‘anxious, scrupulous, well-informed observance in one’s interest,’<br />
which…fit[s] regard for points or spans of time which are evaluated positively or negatively from the standpoint<br />
of the calendar or astrology” (Gerhard Kettil, Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, 1995, Vol. 8, p.<br />
148).<br />
Whatever “days and months and seasons and years” the Galatians were observing, they were apparently<br />
observing them in a superstitious manner, as they had observed days and times before their conversion.<br />
From the context, we see it is simply not logical to conclude that Paul was criticizing the observance of the<br />
biblical <strong>Sabbath</strong> and festivals, since they were not even mentioned. Instead, he was attacking misguided efforts<br />
to attain salvation through unnecessary superstitious observances.<br />
Is the <strong>Sabbath</strong> obsolete? Colossians 2:16-17<br />
A third passage from Paul’s writings, Colossians 2:16-17, is also used to support the claim that observance of<br />
the <strong>Sabbath</strong> is no longer necessary. “Then do not let anyone judge you in eating or in drinking, or in respect of<br />
a feast, or the new moon or of <strong>Sabbath</strong>s, which are a shadow of coming things; but the body is of Messiah,” he<br />
wrote.<br />
Again, let’s examine these verses’ context and historic setting to see if they support that view.<br />
Did Paul intend to say that <strong>Sabbath</strong>-keeping is abolished? If so, we encounter some immediate problems with<br />
this interpretation. To accept this position, it is difficult to explain how Paul could leave the issue so muddled<br />
by not stating that these practices were unnecessary, when these verses indicate that the Colossians were, in<br />
fact, observing them. After all, the Colossian church was primarily gentile (Colossians 1:27; 2:13), so Paul<br />
could have used this epistle to make it plain that these practices were not binding on gentile or other Christians.<br />
However, Paul nowhere said that. Regarding the practices of festivals, new moons and <strong>Sabbath</strong>s, he said only<br />
21