28.02.2013 Views

Full Report - Food, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Cancer

Full Report - Food, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Cancer

Full Report - Food, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Cancer

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 8 • DETERMINANTS OF WEIGHT GAIN, OVERWEIGHT, AND OBESITY<br />

plausible mechanisms by which dietary fat could lead to positive<br />

energy balance <strong>and</strong> obesity. The efficiency <strong>of</strong> nutrient<br />

use is higher for fat than carbohydrate or protein. When<br />

energy balance is positive <strong>and</strong> fat is being stored, <strong>the</strong> storage<br />

<strong>of</strong> this fat only requires a small degree <strong>of</strong> oxidation<br />

(approximately 3 per cent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> energy stored). The high<br />

energy density <strong>of</strong> fat may promote passive overconsumption.<br />

Prolonged consumption <strong>of</strong> a high-fat diet may desensitise <strong>the</strong><br />

individual to a number <strong>of</strong> appetite controls. The palatability<br />

<strong>of</strong> fat may induce voluntary overconsumption.<br />

The evidence on animal fats is assessed here as a<br />

marker for energy-dense foods. For this reason, no<br />

separate judgement is made for animal fats.<br />

High energy-dense foods are probably a cause <strong>of</strong><br />

weight gain, overweight, <strong>and</strong> obesity, particularly<br />

when large portion sizes are consumed regularly. They<br />

have this effect by promoting excess energy intake.<br />

Also see entries on sugary drinks (8.8.6), ‘fast foods’<br />

(8.8.7), <strong>and</strong> television viewing (8.8.8).<br />

The Panel is aware that since <strong>the</strong> conclusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SLR, one<br />

cohort 219 <strong>and</strong> one case-control study 180 have been published.<br />

This new information does not change <strong>the</strong> Panel judgement (see<br />

box 3.8).<br />

8.8.6 Sugary drinks<br />

The evidence on sugary drinks is reviewed separately due to<br />

its independent effect on body fatness. It also contributes to<br />

<strong>the</strong> judgement on energy-dense foods <strong>and</strong> drinks.<br />

One RCT220 <strong>and</strong> four cohort studies investigated sugary<br />

drinks. 115 221-223 Two cohort studies were in adults115 223 ; <strong>the</strong><br />

trial <strong>and</strong> two o<strong>the</strong>r cohort studies were in children.<br />

221 222<br />

The single trial included 644 children r<strong>and</strong>omised by class<br />

to receive teaching sessions to discourage consumption <strong>of</strong><br />

sugary, carbonated drinks or to control. After 12 months,<br />

change in BMI z-score was non-significantly lower in <strong>the</strong><br />

intervention group, with a change <strong>of</strong> 0.7 (SD 0.2) compared<br />

with 0.8 (SD 0.3) in <strong>the</strong> control group. 220<br />

Three cohort studies showed increased risk <strong>of</strong> weight gain<br />

when frequency <strong>of</strong> sugary drink intake increased,<br />

115 222 223<br />

which was statistically significant in two. 115 222 One study<br />

showed no association. 221 This study was in children, <strong>and</strong><br />

investigated intake <strong>of</strong> ‘fruit drinks’, but excluded fruit juice,<br />

soda (fizzy drinks), or diet soda. The effect estimates for <strong>the</strong><br />

two adult studies were mean weight gain <strong>of</strong> 4.69 kg for 1991<br />

to 1995 <strong>and</strong> 4.20 kg for 1995 to 1999 in women who<br />

increased <strong>the</strong>ir sugar-sweetened s<strong>of</strong>t drink consumption, <strong>and</strong><br />

1.34 kg <strong>and</strong> 0.15 kg in women who decreased <strong>the</strong>ir consumption<br />

223 ; regression coefficients <strong>of</strong> 0.20 (p value for trend<br />

< 0.01) for <strong>the</strong> univariate model relating weight gain to<br />

increase in intake <strong>of</strong> sugar-sweetened s<strong>of</strong>t drinks <strong>and</strong> 0.12<br />

(p value for trend 0.05) for <strong>the</strong> multivariable model (this<br />

study also reported a statistically significant relationship with<br />

increased waist circumference). 115 The cohort study in children<br />

that reported an effect estimate showed that BMI<br />

increased by 0.24 kg/m 2 (95% CI 0.10–0.30; p value for<br />

trend 0.03) per sugary drink (not including fruit juice)/day<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> effect estimate for <strong>the</strong> frequency <strong>of</strong> obesity was 1.60<br />

(95% CI 1.14–2.24; p value for trend 0.02), also per drink/<br />

day. 222<br />

There is considerable variation in <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> ‘sugary<br />

drinks’ between studies. The study that reported no association<br />

excluded fizzy drinks.<br />

Studies have demonstrated that, when consumed as part<br />

<strong>of</strong> a s<strong>of</strong>t drink, <strong>the</strong> energy from sugars may not be compensated<br />

for in <strong>the</strong> same way as when consumed as part <strong>of</strong> a<br />

solid meal. 224 Limited studies have shown that in adults,<br />

short-term (10-week) intake <strong>of</strong> sugar-sweetened foods <strong>and</strong><br />

drinks (<strong>of</strong> which 80% were drinks) promoted weight gain,<br />

whilst consumption <strong>of</strong> artificially sweetened foods resulted<br />

in weight loss. 28<br />

The epidemiological <strong>and</strong> mechanistic evidence that<br />

drinks containing added sugars, including sucrose <strong>and</strong><br />

high-fructose corn syrup, are a cause <strong>of</strong> weight gain,<br />

overweight, <strong>and</strong> obesity is substantial <strong>and</strong> consistent.<br />

Sugary drinks probably cause weight gain, overweight,<br />

<strong>and</strong> obesity. Like energy-dense foods <strong>and</strong> drinks, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

have this effect by promoting excess energy intake.<br />

The Panel is aware that since <strong>the</strong> conclusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SLR, one<br />

RCT, 225 one cohort, 226 <strong>and</strong> one case-control study 180 have been<br />

published. This new information does not change <strong>the</strong> Panel<br />

judgement (see box 3.8).<br />

8.8.7 ‘Fast foods’<br />

The evidence on ‘fast foods’ is reviewed separately due to<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir independent effect on body fatness. It also contributes<br />

to <strong>the</strong> judgement on energy-dense foods <strong>and</strong> drinks.<br />

Six cohort studies investigated ‘fast foods’ (see box 8.2),<br />

four in adults <strong>and</strong> two in children.<br />

165 227-231<br />

All six cohort studies showed increased risk <strong>of</strong> weight gain<br />

with increased intake <strong>of</strong> ‘fast foods’, which was statistically<br />

significant in four, 165 227 229 230 <strong>and</strong> in women but not men in<br />

an additional study. 231 Effect estimates in adults were a<br />

regression coefficient <strong>of</strong> 0.85 (95% CI 0.43–1.27; p value for<br />

trend < 0.05) in low-income women <strong>and</strong> 0.39 (95% CI<br />

0.15–0.64; p value for trend < 0.05) for <strong>the</strong> association<br />

between number <strong>of</strong> ‘fast-food meals’ per week <strong>and</strong> BMI 231 ;<br />

a 0.85 (95% CI 0.75–0.96) chance <strong>of</strong> maintaining weight<br />

(equivalent to a 15 per cent increased risk <strong>of</strong> weight gain) 165 ;<br />

a weight gain <strong>of</strong> 1.72 kg (95% CI 0.52–2.92; p value for<br />

trend 0.005) greater for black people who visited ‘fast-food<br />

restaurants’ frequently compared to those who visited infrequently,<br />

<strong>and</strong> 1.84 kg (95% CI 0.86–2.82; p value for trend<br />

< 0.0013) greater for <strong>the</strong> same comparison in white people<br />

230 ; <strong>and</strong> a 0.72 kg (95% CI 0.33–1.11; p value for trend<br />

< 0.01) greater weight gain for people who visited fast-food<br />

restaurants more than twice a week compared to those who<br />

visited infrequently. 229 One study in children showed a statistically<br />

significant greater increase in BMI z-scores <strong>of</strong> 0.82<br />

for those who ate food from quick-service outlets more than<br />

twice a week compared to 0.28 for those who never ate<br />

quick-service foods (p value for trend 0.0023). 227 One study<br />

in children stated that <strong>the</strong>re was a statistically significant<br />

association between increased ‘takeaway food’ intake <strong>and</strong><br />

BMI at <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> 8, but that after multivariable adjustment<br />

339

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!