03.03.2013 Views

Oct 2012 Compendium 1 - Armada

Oct 2012 Compendium 1 - Armada

Oct 2012 Compendium 1 - Armada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NANOcERAMIcS “GlASS” FROM IBd dEISENROTH<br />

At Eurosatory <strong>2012</strong> IBD Deisenroth, the well known German armour solutions<br />

company unveiled a new member of its ceramic products based on nanotechnologies<br />

that might well have a considerable impact on light armoured vehicles protection levels.<br />

The Bonn-based company has been displaying its nanotech-based armour solutions<br />

that halve weights for any given protection level for at least a year. The new family<br />

member, however, makes a genuine breakthrough in the light armoured vehicle<br />

world as it is transparent and thus appears as perfect lightweight replacement for<br />

armoured glass as the author’s picture herewith shows.<br />

The transparent surface is made of a series of tiles of about 50x50 mm made of<br />

synthetic ceramics; the crystal structure is in the low nanorange as a very fine grain<br />

is needed to ensure transparency. The tile size depends very much on the threat<br />

to be countered, a special bonding process being used to joint the tiles together.<br />

Boundaries are invisible, producing a large transparent surface. Those tiles are then<br />

sandwiched with a front glass side to bar abrasion, and a plastic back carrier that<br />

absorbs the residual kinetic energy. The key point here is again weight: the Level 3<br />

transparent ceramic protection shown by IBD Deisenroth boasts a weight of 56 kg/<br />

m2, which is nearly a quarter of the 200 kg/m2 of standard armoured glass rated<br />

at the same protection level. According to potential users sources the price is still<br />

considerably higher than the armoured glass, but industrialisation combined with<br />

the increasing use of transparent nanoceramics should eventually make costs drop<br />

to challenging levels.<br />

protected command and control vehicle<br />

(and which still falls in the light armoured<br />

vehicles category examined here). Some<br />

initial batches of General Dynamics<br />

Eagle IVs were acquired through urgent<br />

operation requirement procedures, but for<br />

new acquisitions the New Eagle has to run<br />

against the KMW/Rheinmetall Armoured<br />

Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV).<br />

Both vehicles were qualified by the<br />

BWB in late 2011 and a decision should<br />

have already been made. However,<br />

European law obliged Germany to issue<br />

a European-wide tender. Downselection<br />

is expected in the near future, which<br />

will prelude to a further round of testing<br />

before selection, which will then lead to<br />

a contract negotiation, for final approval<br />

by Parliament.<br />

AMpV: The available time was used<br />

by the KMW/Rheinmetall consortium<br />

to further hone the vehicle’s payload<br />

capacity and protection, especially against<br />

mines and roadside bombs. In the build<br />

process KMW is responsible for the<br />

armour plates while Rheinmetall handles<br />

the monocoque construction. The gross<br />

weight increase from 9.3 to 10 tonnes<br />

results from a 700 kg increase evenly split<br />

between protection and payload capacity.<br />

Four AMPVs have been produced, one<br />

having been sold to the German Army for<br />

internal tests while three have been used<br />

for company testing.<br />

Latest internal improvements include<br />

new seats that have been specifically<br />

designed with removable cushions on<br />

the higher part of the backrest to offer<br />

optimal seating for personnel wearing the<br />

Gladius (the name adopted last June for<br />

the IdZ-2 soldier system). A screen has<br />

been added to the dashboard to give the<br />

driver a view from the rear-facing camera.<br />

With KMW and Rheinmetall focussing<br />

on the GFF2 version, other versions of the<br />

AMPV are on the backburner for the time<br />

being. At Eurosatory <strong>2012</strong> the vehicle<br />

was exhibited with a Rheinmetall Istar<br />

system. Rheinmetall of course eyes the<br />

export market, but is well aware that the<br />

very high protection level of the AMPV<br />

(namely Level 3A/2B against mines) has a<br />

cost and that this might be a problem for<br />

certain countries. European armies are<br />

awaiting the German decision, but given<br />

the fact that the KMW/Rheinmetall<br />

consortium has already developed the<br />

industrialisation process, first production<br />

items could roll out of the assembly line<br />

in late 2013.<br />

MRV-p: With the MRV-P moving<br />

ahead the Ministry of Defence having<br />

started contract award procedures for the<br />

first phase of the programme (covering<br />

pre-concept demonstration), numerous<br />

companies are already standing in line.<br />

The MRV-P succeeds to the defunct<br />

Operational Utility Vehicle System<br />

programme and should include vehicles<br />

aimed at support roles.<br />

A tentative date for entry into<br />

service is given as around 2018 and<br />

the two companies that met the LLPV<br />

requirements are of course among the<br />

current contenders.<br />

OcElOT-FOxHOUNd: Deployed to<br />

Afghanistan in early June <strong>2012</strong> the Ocelot,<br />

developed by Force Protection Europe<br />

(now part of General Dynamics Land<br />

Systems) and known in the British Army<br />

as Foxhound, was delivered in 18 months<br />

armada <strong>Compendium</strong> Light Armoured Vehicles <strong>2012</strong><br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!