2012 IPSANZ Annual Conference Seminar ... - List G Barristers

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Exemplary damages for passing off • Perhaps under-utilised, until recently? Taleb v GM Holden (2011) 286 ALR 309, Finn and Bennett JJ: • Exemplary damages available for passing off: • to punish a respondent for conduct showing a “conscious and contumelious disregard” for the applicant’s rights • to deter repetition • See also Facton v Rifai (<strong>2012</strong>) 199 FCR 569 per Gilmour J
Passing off not limited to “trade or commerce”? • S 52 TPA / s 18 ACL apply only to conduct “in trade or commerce” • Examples of conduct not in “trade or commerce”: • Statement by employer to employee: Concrete Constructions (1990) 169 CLR 594 • Public lectures about archaeological and scientific investigations: Pilmer v Roberts (1997) 80 FCR 303 • Public advocacy of change to tax laws: Village Building (2004) 134 FCR 422 • Drug laboratory analysis for police: Cth v Griffiths (2007) 70 NSWLR 268 • Likely scenarios for passing off? • Eg claiming endorsement of views in public debates about climate change, or child vaccination?
Page 1 and 2: IPSANZ Annual Conference September
Page 3 and 4: Campomar Sociedad v Nike (2000) 200
Page 5 and 6: Statutory prohibitions against misl
Page 7 and 8: Overlap between s 52 TPA / s 18 ACL
Page 9 and 10: Relative advantages of s 52 TPA / s
Page 11: New Zealand perspective: s 9 FTA an
Page 15 and 16: Passing off not limited to “trade
Page 21 and 22: Comparison: passing off and trade m
Page 23 and 24: Parkdale v Puxu (1982) 149 CLR 191
Page 25 and 26: Parkdale v Puxu (1982) 149 CLR 191
Page 27 and 28: Interlego v Croner (1992) 39 FCR 34
Page 29 and 30: Dr Martens Cases Dr Martens v Figgi
Page 31 and 32: Philips v Remington (2000) 100 FCR
Page 33 and 34: Sydneywide v Red Bull (2002) 55 IPR
Page 35 and 36: Mars Australia v Sweet Rewards (200
Page 37 and 38: Reconcile Red Bull and Maltesers de
Page 39 and 40: Reconcile Red Bull and Maltesers de
Page 41 and 42: Bodum v DKSH (2011) 280 ALR 639 •
Page 43 and 44: Playcorp v Bodum (2010) 84 IPR 542
Page 45 and 46: Bodum v DKSH (2011) 280 ALR 639 Gre
Page 47 and 48: Bodum v DKSH (2011) 280 ALR 639 •
Page 49 and 50: Reconcile product get-up decisions?

2012 IPSANZ Annual Conference Seminar ... - List G Barristers

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?