04.03.2013 Views

2012 IPSANZ Annual Conference Seminar ... - List G Barristers

2012 IPSANZ Annual Conference Seminar ... - List G Barristers

2012 IPSANZ Annual Conference Seminar ... - List G Barristers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Parkdale v Puxu (1982) 149 CLR 191<br />

Brennan J:<br />

• The freedom to copy and sell any article on the market is a<br />

corollary of the policy of the law against monopolies<br />

• Similarity in get-up may evidence passing off, but<br />

(statutory monopoly apart) all are free to copy the goods<br />

themselves<br />

• “It would be surprising if s 52 of the TPA were to alter<br />

the “careful balance” of the Patents Act 1952 and the<br />

Designs Act by a side-wind, and, after four centuries,<br />

open the way to the creation of prescriptive monopolies<br />

for the manufacture of goods. In my view, it does not<br />

have that effect.”<br />

• S 52 TPA applies by reference to this external legal order<br />

• Consumer’s erroneous belief that first manufacturer has<br />

monopoly does not render conduct of later manufacturer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!