2012 IPSANZ Annual Conference Seminar ... - List G Barristers
2012 IPSANZ Annual Conference Seminar ... - List G Barristers
2012 IPSANZ Annual Conference Seminar ... - List G Barristers
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Parkdale v Puxu (1982) 149 CLR 191<br />
Brennan J:<br />
• The freedom to copy and sell any article on the market is a<br />
corollary of the policy of the law against monopolies<br />
• Similarity in get-up may evidence passing off, but<br />
(statutory monopoly apart) all are free to copy the goods<br />
themselves<br />
• “It would be surprising if s 52 of the TPA were to alter<br />
the “careful balance” of the Patents Act 1952 and the<br />
Designs Act by a side-wind, and, after four centuries,<br />
open the way to the creation of prescriptive monopolies<br />
for the manufacture of goods. In my view, it does not<br />
have that effect.”<br />
• S 52 TPA applies by reference to this external legal order<br />
• Consumer’s erroneous belief that first manufacturer has<br />
monopoly does not render conduct of later manufacturer