04.03.2013 Views

2012 IPSANZ Annual Conference Seminar ... - List G Barristers

2012 IPSANZ Annual Conference Seminar ... - List G Barristers

2012 IPSANZ Annual Conference Seminar ... - List G Barristers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Parkdale v Puxu (1982) 149 CLR 191<br />

Parkdale v Puxu considered by NZ Court of Appeal in<br />

Taylor Bros Ltd v Taylors Group Ltd [1988] 2 NZLR 1:<br />

NZCA:<br />

• Noted differing approaches of Federal and High Court<br />

• Saw “great force” in Mason J’s approach not to read down<br />

s 52 by reference to patents and designs legislation<br />

• Explained different verdicts in Parkdale as essentially<br />

factual, not legal<br />

• Doubted whether HCA’s decision gives rise to a general<br />

principle that a manufacturer avoids s 52 by selling an<br />

identical product properly labelled

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!