2010 GLASGOW, UK - AMEE

1130-1145 2D4 Incorporating real patients in undergraduate teaching: The success story
K Egan*, J Moyes, S Smith, V Tallentire & H S Cameron (Medical Teaching Organisation,
The University of Edinburgh, UK)
1145-1200 2D5 Participation of medical students in patient care – a qualitative study on
learning experiences in a clinical education ward
C Scheffer* 1,2 , M Neumann 1,2 , D Tauschel 1,2 , F Edelhäuser 1,2 & M Bertram 2
(University of Witten/Herdecke, 1 Integrated Curriculum for Anthroposophic Medicine,
2 Center for Integrative Medicine, Witten, Germany)
1200-1215 2D6 Would you consent to being examined by a medical student? A Western
Australian survey
C McMenamin* 1 & N Koehler 2 ( 1 Monash University, Nursing & Health Science, Melbourne,
2 University of Western Australia, Discipline of General Practice, Perth, Australia)
1215-1230 2D7 “They just had a queue of medical students doing a rectal examination”:
Analysing medical students’ narratives of intimate examination dilemmas
involving inadequate patient consent
C E Rees* 1 & L V Monrouxe 2 ( 1 University of Dundee, 2 Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK)
1230-1245 2D8 Students’ and teachers’ views on the roles of students in giving information,
advice, and counselling to patients
A Jaiyesimi* & A Cushing (Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry,
London, UK)
No Discussion
1045-1245 2E SHORT COMMUNICATIONS: Virtual Patients
Chairperson: to be announced
Location: Alsh 1, Loch Suite
1045-1100 2E1 Writing virtual patients; table d’hôte or à la carte?
David Davies* 1 & Rachel Ellaway* 2 ( 1 University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School,
Coventry, UK; 2 Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Canada)
1100-1115 2E2 Comparison of assessments of medical student achievement utilizing a
web-based Virtual Patient for a Problem-Based Learning course
W T Gunning* 1 , K A Crist 2 , N Zary 3 & U G Fors 3 (University of Toledo; 1 Department of
Pathology; 2 Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio USA; 3 Virtual
Patients Lab, Department of LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden)
1115-1130 2E3 Using the Nominal Group Technique to identify students’ views regarding
the use of virtual patients to expand clinical knowledge
A Hemani*, N Parvizi, M Toro-Troconis* & D McIntosh (Imperial College London,
Faculty of Medicine, London, UK)
1130-1145 2E4 Blended learning and summative assessment with virtual patients in clinical
clerkships: a focus group study among students
S Huwendiek* 1,2 , C Brasch 1 , F Reichert 1 , H M Bosse 2 , M Haag 1 & G F Hoffmann 2
( 1 Centre for Virtual Patients, Heidelberg University Hospital; 2 University Children’s Hospital
Heidelberg, Germany)
1145-1200 2E5 Effectiveness of Virtual Patients in medical education: a meta-analysis
F Consorti*, R Mancuso, M Nocion & A Piccolo (Università “Sapienza”, Rome Dept of
Surgery “Francesco Durante” Italy)
1200-1215 2E6 Estimation of time efforts for repurposing Virtual Patients – empirical data from
the electronic Virtual Patient Project (eViP)
D Kempkens 1 , I Hege 2 , C Balasubramaniam 3 , U Fors, S Huwendiek, A Kononowicz,
V Muntean & M R Fischer* ( 1 Witten/Herdecke University, Institute for Teaching and
Educational Research in Health Sciences, Witte; 2 Ludiwg-Maximilian-University, Medical
Education Unit, Munich, Germany; 3 St George’s University London, e-learning Unit,
London)
– 35 –
2
MONDAY 6 SEPTEMBER