07.03.2013 Views

Pharmaceutical antibiotic compounds in soils - a review - Susane.info

Pharmaceutical antibiotic compounds in soils - a review - Susane.info

Pharmaceutical antibiotic compounds in soils - a review - Susane.info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148 Thiele-Bruhn J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2003, 166, 145±167<br />

The TCs strongly absorb light and thus, are susceptible to<br />

photodegradation (Mitscher, 1978).<br />

Sulfonamides<br />

Sulfonamides (SAs) are relatively <strong>in</strong>soluble <strong>in</strong> water. They are<br />

characterized by two pK a values <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g protonation of the<br />

am<strong>in</strong>o group at a pH of 2 to 3 and deprotonation of the<br />

R 1 SO 2 NHR 2 moiety at a pH of 5 to 11 (Ingerslev and Hall<strong>in</strong>g-<br />

Sùrensen, 2000). In general, the amphoteric SAs behave as<br />

weak acids and form salts <strong>in</strong> strongly acidic or basic<br />

solutions. Mostly, SAs, substituted at the am<strong>in</strong>o-N, have<br />

greatly reduced antibacterial activity.<br />

Am<strong>in</strong>oglycosides<br />

Antibiotics from the class of am<strong>in</strong>oglycosides are basic,<br />

strongly polar polycationic <strong>compounds</strong>. Their molecular<br />

structure is characterized by two or more am<strong>in</strong>o sugars that<br />

are glycosidically bound to am<strong>in</strong>ocyclitol. They are water<br />

soluble, mostly hydrophilic, and susceptible to photodegradation.<br />

b-Lactams<br />

Penicill<strong>in</strong>s and cephalospor<strong>in</strong>s are the two major sub-classes<br />

of the b-lactams. The <strong>antibiotic</strong> effect of penicill<strong>in</strong>s is directly<br />

connected to the b-lactam r<strong>in</strong>g. This r<strong>in</strong>g is easily cleaved <strong>in</strong><br />

acidic and basic media. Cephalospor<strong>in</strong>s are derivatives of 7am<strong>in</strong>o-cephalosporanic<br />

acid, condensed with a six-membered<br />

heterocycle <strong>in</strong> contrast to the five-membered heterocycle<br />

of penicill<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

Macrolides<br />

Macrolides are def<strong>in</strong>ed as lactone structures with cycles of<br />

more than 10 C-atoms. Many macrolides are weak bases and<br />

are unstable <strong>in</strong> acids. Their water solubility varies considerably<br />

between the different derivatives.<br />

Fluorqu<strong>in</strong>olones<br />

Most fluorqu<strong>in</strong>olones (FQs), also known as qu<strong>in</strong>olones,<br />

exhibit large chemical stability. They are <strong>in</strong>sensitive to<br />

hydrolysis and <strong>in</strong>creased temperatures, but are degraded<br />

by UV light. Their <strong>antibiotic</strong> potency depends mostly on the<br />

aromatic fluor<strong>in</strong>e substituent at the C-6 position (Wetzste<strong>in</strong>,<br />

2001).<br />

3 Extraction and determ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Numerous <strong>antibiotic</strong>s are comprised of a non-polar core and<br />

polar functional groups (Juhel-Gauga<strong>in</strong> et al., 2000). They are<br />

sensitive to bases and strong acids and dissociate or<br />

protonate depend<strong>in</strong>g on the pH of the medium. Thereby,<br />

their distribution behavior changes considerably (Holten<br />

Lützhùft et al., 2000). Consequently, <strong>in</strong>complete extraction<br />

of <strong>antibiotic</strong>s with very polar and non-polar extractants and<br />

strong adsorption to polar and non-polar solid phase<br />

extractants (SPE) pose serious analytical problems. Thus,<br />

for the extraction of most <strong>antibiotic</strong>s, the use of weakly acidic<br />

buffers <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with organic solvents is recommended<br />

(Tab. 3). In food analysis, a 0.1 M EDTA-McIlva<strong>in</strong>e buffer (pH<br />

4.0) is often used (Weimann and Bojesen, 1999; Juhel-<br />

Gauga<strong>in</strong> et al., 2000). Cooper et al. (1998) and Kühne et al.<br />

(2000) suggested citric ethylacetate (pH 5.0) for the<br />

extraction of TCs. This method was adopted for soil samples<br />

by Hamscher et al. (2002a). At least <strong>in</strong> the case of TCs, this<br />

extractant yields better recovery rates from soil samples,<br />

although the solubility of numerous <strong>antibiotic</strong>s of different<br />

structural classes is considerably smaller <strong>in</strong> pure ethylacetate<br />

as compared to methanol or DMSO (Salvatore and Katz,<br />

1993). Oka et al. (2000) <strong>review</strong>ed techniques for the<br />

extraction and analysis of TCs and a compilation of methods<br />

can be found <strong>in</strong> Juhel-Gauga<strong>in</strong> et al. (2000). The use of 0.01<br />

M CaCl 2 to extract the mobile, non-adsorbed fraction of<br />

xenobiotics as prescribed by OECD (1997), cannot be<br />

recommended for TCs. These <strong>compounds</strong> form spar<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

soluble complexes with Ca 2+ (Wessels et al., 1998). As an<br />

alternative to CaCl 2 , 0.1 M NH 4 NO 3 was successfully used<br />

(Thiele-Bruhn, unpublished data).<br />

In general, the sample clean-up is done by SPE or 0.45 lm<br />

filtration; extracts from centrifugation and liquid/liquid separation<br />

are usually concentrated by evaporation (Tab. 3). For<br />

SPE of SAs, reversed phases are very effective. In contrast,<br />

the usage of reversed phase materials for SPE of TCs<br />

requires pre-treatment of the solid phase with EDTAor<br />

silylat<strong>in</strong>g agents whereas for condition<strong>in</strong>g and elution, acidic<br />

buffered solvents are recommended (Oka et al., 1991; Zhu et<br />

al., 2001; Loke et al., 2002). The TCs b<strong>in</strong>d so strongly to free<br />

silanol groups that they cannot be eluted by the usual organic<br />

solvents. L<strong>in</strong>dsey et al. (2001) suggested a macroporous<br />

copolymer comb<strong>in</strong>ed with Na 2 EDTAas the chelat<strong>in</strong>g agent.<br />

To overcome the problems result<strong>in</strong>g from the amphoteric<br />

character of many <strong>antibiotic</strong>s, new functionalized SPE<br />

materials that separate analytes by their hydrophobic as<br />

well as polar properties, e.g. hydrophilic-lipophilic balance<br />

cartridges (HLB) and mixed-mode HLB-cation exchange<br />

cartridges (MCX), appear to be advantageous (e.g. Kolp<strong>in</strong><br />

et al., 2002). Golet et al. (2001) extracted FQs from<br />

wastewater with a mixed-mode silica based sorbent consist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of a non-polar phase and a strong cation exchanger<br />

<strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g with the aromatic moiety of the core and the<br />

charged am<strong>in</strong>o groups of the substituents.<br />

Antibiotics are usually separated by chromatographic techniques<br />

and subsequently detected. To avoid dissociation of<br />

the <strong>compounds</strong> or b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g to free silanol groups from the<br />

widely used silica based chromatographic columns, dilute<br />

acids or weakly acidic buffers, e.g. phosphoric, citric, formic,<br />

and oxalic acid or EDTA, are commonly used (Oka et al.,<br />

2000). Alternatively ion pair-chromatography is applied.<br />

Currently, the time and solvent consum<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong> layer<br />

chromatography has been mostly replaced by high performance<br />

liquid chromatography comb<strong>in</strong>ed with UV and Diode-<br />

Array Detection (HPLC-UV, -DAD). Increas<strong>in</strong>gly, liquid<br />

chromatography with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) or tandem<br />

mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (Thomashow et al., 1997;<br />

Oka et al., 2000; Hamscher et al., 2002a) with chemical

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!