Pharmaceutical antibiotic compounds in soils - a review - Susane.info
Pharmaceutical antibiotic compounds in soils - a review - Susane.info
Pharmaceutical antibiotic compounds in soils - a review - Susane.info
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
148 Thiele-Bruhn J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2003, 166, 145±167<br />
The TCs strongly absorb light and thus, are susceptible to<br />
photodegradation (Mitscher, 1978).<br />
Sulfonamides<br />
Sulfonamides (SAs) are relatively <strong>in</strong>soluble <strong>in</strong> water. They are<br />
characterized by two pK a values <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g protonation of the<br />
am<strong>in</strong>o group at a pH of 2 to 3 and deprotonation of the<br />
R 1 SO 2 NHR 2 moiety at a pH of 5 to 11 (Ingerslev and Hall<strong>in</strong>g-<br />
Sùrensen, 2000). In general, the amphoteric SAs behave as<br />
weak acids and form salts <strong>in</strong> strongly acidic or basic<br />
solutions. Mostly, SAs, substituted at the am<strong>in</strong>o-N, have<br />
greatly reduced antibacterial activity.<br />
Am<strong>in</strong>oglycosides<br />
Antibiotics from the class of am<strong>in</strong>oglycosides are basic,<br />
strongly polar polycationic <strong>compounds</strong>. Their molecular<br />
structure is characterized by two or more am<strong>in</strong>o sugars that<br />
are glycosidically bound to am<strong>in</strong>ocyclitol. They are water<br />
soluble, mostly hydrophilic, and susceptible to photodegradation.<br />
b-Lactams<br />
Penicill<strong>in</strong>s and cephalospor<strong>in</strong>s are the two major sub-classes<br />
of the b-lactams. The <strong>antibiotic</strong> effect of penicill<strong>in</strong>s is directly<br />
connected to the b-lactam r<strong>in</strong>g. This r<strong>in</strong>g is easily cleaved <strong>in</strong><br />
acidic and basic media. Cephalospor<strong>in</strong>s are derivatives of 7am<strong>in</strong>o-cephalosporanic<br />
acid, condensed with a six-membered<br />
heterocycle <strong>in</strong> contrast to the five-membered heterocycle<br />
of penicill<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
Macrolides<br />
Macrolides are def<strong>in</strong>ed as lactone structures with cycles of<br />
more than 10 C-atoms. Many macrolides are weak bases and<br />
are unstable <strong>in</strong> acids. Their water solubility varies considerably<br />
between the different derivatives.<br />
Fluorqu<strong>in</strong>olones<br />
Most fluorqu<strong>in</strong>olones (FQs), also known as qu<strong>in</strong>olones,<br />
exhibit large chemical stability. They are <strong>in</strong>sensitive to<br />
hydrolysis and <strong>in</strong>creased temperatures, but are degraded<br />
by UV light. Their <strong>antibiotic</strong> potency depends mostly on the<br />
aromatic fluor<strong>in</strong>e substituent at the C-6 position (Wetzste<strong>in</strong>,<br />
2001).<br />
3 Extraction and determ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
Numerous <strong>antibiotic</strong>s are comprised of a non-polar core and<br />
polar functional groups (Juhel-Gauga<strong>in</strong> et al., 2000). They are<br />
sensitive to bases and strong acids and dissociate or<br />
protonate depend<strong>in</strong>g on the pH of the medium. Thereby,<br />
their distribution behavior changes considerably (Holten<br />
Lützhùft et al., 2000). Consequently, <strong>in</strong>complete extraction<br />
of <strong>antibiotic</strong>s with very polar and non-polar extractants and<br />
strong adsorption to polar and non-polar solid phase<br />
extractants (SPE) pose serious analytical problems. Thus,<br />
for the extraction of most <strong>antibiotic</strong>s, the use of weakly acidic<br />
buffers <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with organic solvents is recommended<br />
(Tab. 3). In food analysis, a 0.1 M EDTA-McIlva<strong>in</strong>e buffer (pH<br />
4.0) is often used (Weimann and Bojesen, 1999; Juhel-<br />
Gauga<strong>in</strong> et al., 2000). Cooper et al. (1998) and Kühne et al.<br />
(2000) suggested citric ethylacetate (pH 5.0) for the<br />
extraction of TCs. This method was adopted for soil samples<br />
by Hamscher et al. (2002a). At least <strong>in</strong> the case of TCs, this<br />
extractant yields better recovery rates from soil samples,<br />
although the solubility of numerous <strong>antibiotic</strong>s of different<br />
structural classes is considerably smaller <strong>in</strong> pure ethylacetate<br />
as compared to methanol or DMSO (Salvatore and Katz,<br />
1993). Oka et al. (2000) <strong>review</strong>ed techniques for the<br />
extraction and analysis of TCs and a compilation of methods<br />
can be found <strong>in</strong> Juhel-Gauga<strong>in</strong> et al. (2000). The use of 0.01<br />
M CaCl 2 to extract the mobile, non-adsorbed fraction of<br />
xenobiotics as prescribed by OECD (1997), cannot be<br />
recommended for TCs. These <strong>compounds</strong> form spar<strong>in</strong>gly<br />
soluble complexes with Ca 2+ (Wessels et al., 1998). As an<br />
alternative to CaCl 2 , 0.1 M NH 4 NO 3 was successfully used<br />
(Thiele-Bruhn, unpublished data).<br />
In general, the sample clean-up is done by SPE or 0.45 lm<br />
filtration; extracts from centrifugation and liquid/liquid separation<br />
are usually concentrated by evaporation (Tab. 3). For<br />
SPE of SAs, reversed phases are very effective. In contrast,<br />
the usage of reversed phase materials for SPE of TCs<br />
requires pre-treatment of the solid phase with EDTAor<br />
silylat<strong>in</strong>g agents whereas for condition<strong>in</strong>g and elution, acidic<br />
buffered solvents are recommended (Oka et al., 1991; Zhu et<br />
al., 2001; Loke et al., 2002). The TCs b<strong>in</strong>d so strongly to free<br />
silanol groups that they cannot be eluted by the usual organic<br />
solvents. L<strong>in</strong>dsey et al. (2001) suggested a macroporous<br />
copolymer comb<strong>in</strong>ed with Na 2 EDTAas the chelat<strong>in</strong>g agent.<br />
To overcome the problems result<strong>in</strong>g from the amphoteric<br />
character of many <strong>antibiotic</strong>s, new functionalized SPE<br />
materials that separate analytes by their hydrophobic as<br />
well as polar properties, e.g. hydrophilic-lipophilic balance<br />
cartridges (HLB) and mixed-mode HLB-cation exchange<br />
cartridges (MCX), appear to be advantageous (e.g. Kolp<strong>in</strong><br />
et al., 2002). Golet et al. (2001) extracted FQs from<br />
wastewater with a mixed-mode silica based sorbent consist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of a non-polar phase and a strong cation exchanger<br />
<strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g with the aromatic moiety of the core and the<br />
charged am<strong>in</strong>o groups of the substituents.<br />
Antibiotics are usually separated by chromatographic techniques<br />
and subsequently detected. To avoid dissociation of<br />
the <strong>compounds</strong> or b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g to free silanol groups from the<br />
widely used silica based chromatographic columns, dilute<br />
acids or weakly acidic buffers, e.g. phosphoric, citric, formic,<br />
and oxalic acid or EDTA, are commonly used (Oka et al.,<br />
2000). Alternatively ion pair-chromatography is applied.<br />
Currently, the time and solvent consum<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong> layer<br />
chromatography has been mostly replaced by high performance<br />
liquid chromatography comb<strong>in</strong>ed with UV and Diode-<br />
Array Detection (HPLC-UV, -DAD). Increas<strong>in</strong>gly, liquid<br />
chromatography with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) or tandem<br />
mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (Thomashow et al., 1997;<br />
Oka et al., 2000; Hamscher et al., 2002a) with chemical