BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS - Mossack Fonseca & Co.
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS - Mossack Fonseca & Co.
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS - Mossack Fonseca & Co.
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
30<br />
(i) the direct or indirect transfer of an asset, other than the<br />
company’s own shares, to or for the benefit of the member,<br />
or<br />
(ii) the incurring of a debt to or for the benefit of a member,<br />
in relation to shares held by a shareholder, or the entitlements to<br />
distributions of a member who is not a shareholder, and whether<br />
by means of the purchase of an asset, the purchase, redemption<br />
or other acquisition of shares, a transfer of indebtedness or<br />
otherwise, and includes a dividend.<br />
57. (1) Subject to this Part and to the memorandum and articles of the<br />
company, the directors of a company may, by resolution, authorise a<br />
distribution by the company to members at such time and of such an<br />
amount, as they think fit if they are satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that the<br />
company will, immediately after the distribution, satisfy the solvency test.<br />
(2) A resolution of directors passed under subsection (1) shall contain a<br />
statement that, in the opinion of the directors, the company will,<br />
immediately after the distribution, satisfy the solvency test.<br />
(3) If, after a distribution is authorised and before it is made, the directors<br />
cease to be satisfied on reasonable grounds that the company will,<br />
immediately after the distribution is made, satisfy the solvency test,<br />
any distribution made by the company is deemed not to have been<br />
authorised.<br />
58. (1) A distribution made to a member at a time when the company did not,<br />
immediately after the distribution, satisfy the solvency test may be recovered<br />
by the company from the member unless<br />
(a) the member received the distribution in good faith and without<br />
knowledge of the company’s failure to satisfy the solvency test;<br />
(b) the member has altered his position in reliance on the validity<br />
of the distribution; and<br />
(c) it would be unfair to require repayment in full or at all.<br />
(2) If, by virtue of section 57(3), a distribution is deemed not to have been<br />
authorised, a director who<br />
(a) ceased, after authorisation but before the making of the<br />
distribution, to be satisfied on reasonable grounds for believing<br />
AE/ET/Pub./bg/03.2007<br />
26/2005<br />
Recovery of<br />
distribution<br />
made when<br />
company did<br />
not satisfy<br />
solvency test.