Homeless Count Tables - City of Prince George
Homeless Count Tables - City of Prince George
Homeless Count Tables - City of Prince George
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Prince</strong> <strong>George</strong> <strong>Homeless</strong> <strong>Count</strong> Report 2010<br />
3.7 Defining <strong>Homeless</strong>ness<br />
<strong>Homeless</strong> <strong>Count</strong> respondents were asked to self-identify with either <strong>of</strong> two definitions <strong>of</strong> homelessness,<br />
or, if they felt both definitions to be unsuitable, to provide their own definition <strong>of</strong> homelessness.<br />
Definition A:<br />
Absolute <strong>Homeless</strong>ness – is a situation where an individual or family has no housing at all or is staying in<br />
a temporary form <strong>of</strong> shelter or in locations not fit for people to live in.<br />
Definition B:<br />
Relative <strong>Homeless</strong>ness – is a situation where people have a home but are at risk <strong>of</strong> becoming homeless:<br />
this includes those that are living in places that are unsafe, inadequate or too expensive; and people<br />
who for different reasons are not able to, or don’t feel comfortable, living on their own in typical<br />
housing.<br />
In response to this question, 88 respondents (26.8%) felt that they fit the definition <strong>of</strong> homelessness<br />
represented by Definition A; 28 respondents (39.0) felt that they fit the definition <strong>of</strong> homelessness<br />
represented by Definition B; and 50 respondents (15.2%) answered with “No”. 55 respondents (16.8%)<br />
answered with “Don’t know” and 7 responses (1.9%) were coded as invalid. Table 15 provides a<br />
summarized overview <strong>of</strong> the responses.<br />
Table 15 Definition <strong>of</strong> <strong>Homeless</strong>ness<br />
Definition <strong>of</strong> <strong>Homeless</strong>ness<br />
# <strong>of</strong> respondents<br />
(n = 328) %<br />
Definition A 88 26.8<br />
Definition B 128 39.0<br />
No (don’t fit either definition) 50 15.2<br />
Don’t Know 55 16.8<br />
Invalid response 7 2.2<br />
Total 328 100.0<br />
The survey questionnaire provided an opportunity for those respondents who felt that neither definition<br />
<strong>of</strong> homelessness (Definition A or B) applied to them to provide their own definition <strong>of</strong> homelessness.<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> this question was to gain insights to the meaning <strong>of</strong> homelessness to homeless<br />
individuals in <strong>Prince</strong> <strong>George</strong>. Sixty-two (62) respondents provided an individual definition <strong>of</strong><br />
homelessness in response to this question. A qualitative thematic analysis resulted in six major themes<br />
describing homelessness (Table 16). The three major themes identified were:<br />
Not having a place to live or no home (i.e., affordable housing, living in shelters) – 27 responses<br />
(44.3%);<br />
Living a hard life/a hopeless life/being lost – 15 responses (24.6%); and<br />
Living life on the street/ street lifestyle – 8 responses (13.1%).<br />
30