Toward A Christian Worldview - Faith Presbyterian Church Reformed
Toward A Christian Worldview - Faith Presbyterian Church Reformed
Toward A Christian Worldview - Faith Presbyterian Church Reformed
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 2: <strong>Christian</strong>ity and the Basic Elements of Philosophy<br />
know anything at all? If we cannot talk intelligently about God,<br />
can we talk intelligently about morality, about our own ideas,<br />
about art, politics – can we even talk about science? How can<br />
we know anything? The answer to this question, technically<br />
called the theory of epistemology, controls all subject matter<br />
claiming to be intelligible or cognitive.<br />
In the history of philosophy, there have been three major non-<br />
<strong>Christian</strong> theories of knowledge: (pure) rationalism, empiricism, and<br />
irrationalism.<br />
FIRST, pure rationalism avers that reason, apart from revelation<br />
or sensory experience, provides the primary, or the only, source of<br />
truth. The senses are untrustworthy, and our apriori knowledge (the<br />
knowledge we have before any observation or experience) must be<br />
applied to our experience in order for our experience to be made intelligible.<br />
In a Biblical epistemology (which may be called <strong>Christian</strong> rationalism,<br />
or Scripturalism), knowledge comes through reason, as one<br />
studies the revealed propositions of Scripture. In pure rationalism, on<br />
the other hand, knowledge comes from reason alone. Unaided human<br />
reason becomes the ultimate standard by which all beliefs are judged.<br />
Even revelation must be judged by reason. One false assumption<br />
made here by the rationalist is that man, apart from revelation, is capable<br />
of coming to a true knowledge of at least some things, including<br />
the knowledge of God.<br />
There are several errors fundamental to the rationalist system of<br />
thought. First, fallen men can and do err in their reasoning. The possibility<br />
of formal errors in logic is one example. Second, there is the<br />
issue of a starting point. Where does one start in pure rationalism?<br />
<strong>Toward</strong> A <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Worldview</strong> 23