20.03.2013 Views

Toward A Christian Worldview - Faith Presbyterian Church Reformed

Toward A Christian Worldview - Faith Presbyterian Church Reformed

Toward A Christian Worldview - Faith Presbyterian Church Reformed

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2: <strong>Christian</strong>ity and the Basic Elements of Philosophy<br />

SECOND, empiricism maintains that all knowledge originates in<br />

the senses. According to the empiricist, ordinary experience from our<br />

physical senses yields knowledge. In empiricism, the scientific<br />

method of investigation is stressed. Surely, it is alleged, the numerous<br />

triumphs of science in the modern age demonstrate the truth of the<br />

empirical method. Science, of course, is based on observation, and<br />

repetitive and supposedly independent observation is emphasized.<br />

The idea being, that with repetitive observation, knowledge and certainty<br />

are increased.<br />

In a consistent empirical epistemology, the mind is considered to<br />

be a tabula rasa (“blank tablet”) at birth. It has no innate structure,<br />

form, or ideas. Therefore, all knowledge must come through the<br />

senses.<br />

While rationalists proceed by deduction, empiricists use inductive<br />

reasoning as well. One collects his experiences and observations and<br />

draws inferences and conclusions from them. This empirical knowledge<br />

is aposteriori, i.e., it comes after and through experience. One<br />

must be able to smell, taste, feel, hear, or see something in order to<br />

know it. Once something is experienced (or “sensed”), then the mind,<br />

which is a blank tablet prior to experience, somehow remembers,<br />

imagines, combines, transposes, categorizes, and formulates the sensory<br />

experience into knowledge.<br />

The philosophical problems with empiricism are legion, some of<br />

which will be exposed here. First, all inductive arguments are formal<br />

logical fallacies. In inductive study, each argument begins with particular<br />

premises and ends with a universal conclusion. The difficulty is<br />

that it is not possible to collect enough experiences on any subject to<br />

reach a universal conclusion. Simply because the system depends on<br />

<strong>Toward</strong> A <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Worldview</strong> 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!