INTO EUROPE The Speaking Handbook - Lancaster University
INTO EUROPE The Speaking Handbook - Lancaster University
INTO EUROPE The Speaking Handbook - Lancaster University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
20 <strong>INTO</strong> <strong>EUROPE</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Speaking</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong><br />
instructions or information. However, in other cases s/he may be asked to speak<br />
from notes, or from visual aids. In interactive activities, the language user acts<br />
alternately as speaker and then as listener with one or more partners in order to<br />
realise a specific communicative goal.<br />
In order to ensure the validity of any speaking examination, the speaking<br />
activities should be carefully selected, taking into account the language needs of<br />
the target population and the purpose of the examination. <strong>Speaking</strong> activities must<br />
always be relevant for the candidates who take the given exam. For example, if the<br />
speaking examination is intended for young adults who have no specific purpose<br />
for the use of English, it is highly unlikely that any of the following activities<br />
would be valid language use activities: giving speeches at public meetings, giving<br />
sales presentations or negotiating a business transaction. All these language use<br />
activities are unusual as it is only a specific group of language users (business<br />
people) who may be required to perform them in real life. In modern speaking<br />
exams that aim to assess candidates’ overall speaking ability in English for no<br />
specific purpose, the following one-way information flow tasks are frequently<br />
employed: describing experiences, events, activities, habits, plans, people;<br />
comparing and contrasting pictures; sequencing activities, events, pictures; giving<br />
instructions or directions. Interactive or two-way information flow activities, on<br />
the other hand, include transactions to obtain goods and services, casual<br />
conversation, informal or formal discussion, interview, etc.<br />
Modern European speaking examinations should provide candidates with<br />
appropriate opportunities to demonstrate that they can communicate in the target<br />
language in order to convey messages and realise their communicative goals, and<br />
in order to make themselves understood and to understand others. Naturally,<br />
learners at different levels of proficiency will perform different speaking activities<br />
with more or less accuracy and fluency. Learners at low levels of proficiency<br />
cannot be expected to perform the same range of language activities as learners at<br />
higher levels. In order to ensure that language proficiency is understood in similar<br />
terms and achievements can be compared in the European context, the Council of<br />
Europe has devised a common framework for teaching and assessment, which is<br />
called ‘<strong>The</strong> Common European Framework of Reference for Languages’, or CEF<br />
for short (Council of Europe, 2001). When assessing learners’ oral abilities,<br />
examination tasks should be designed in such a way that they are closely related to<br />
the oral production and interactive activities that represent specific levels of<br />
language proficiency within the Council of Europe Framework.<br />
<strong>The</strong> CEF scale has six major levels, which start with “beginner” or “false<br />
beginner” and go up to “highly advanced”. <strong>The</strong> levels are labelled with letters and<br />
numbers since what is considered “false beginner” or “highly advanced” varies<br />
greatly in different contexts. In the Framework, the lowest level is marked as A1<br />
and the highest level is labelled as C2. Each level should be taken to include the<br />
levels below it on the scale. <strong>The</strong> descriptors report typical or likely behaviours of<br />
learners at any given level by stating what the learner can do rather than what s/he<br />
cannot do.