20.03.2013 Views

A traders guide: the law relating to the - DTI Home

A traders guide: the law relating to the - DTI Home

A traders guide: the law relating to the - DTI Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Rejection of Goods<br />

Buyers can reject <strong>the</strong> goods and require<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir money back provided <strong>the</strong>y complain<br />

within "a reasonable time" (usually a short<br />

period).<br />

The Sale of Goods Act does not define what<br />

amounts <strong>to</strong> a "reasonable time" but buyers<br />

have <strong>to</strong> be given a reasonable time <strong>to</strong><br />

examine <strong>the</strong> goods <strong>to</strong> see if <strong>the</strong>y were<br />

satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry. Ultimately, <strong>the</strong> matter can<br />

only be decided by a court after taking in<strong>to</strong><br />

account all <strong>the</strong> circumstances. An important<br />

fac<strong>to</strong>r might be that <strong>the</strong> buyer was not in<br />

a position <strong>to</strong> check <strong>the</strong> goods for a longer<br />

time after <strong>the</strong> sale than usual, because,<br />

for example, he was admitted <strong>to</strong> hospital<br />

immediately after he purchased <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Where a buyer is entitled <strong>to</strong> reject <strong>the</strong><br />

goods, he must tell <strong>the</strong> retailer immediately.<br />

He is not obliged <strong>to</strong> send <strong>the</strong>m back but<br />

must make <strong>the</strong>m available for collection.<br />

However, most buyers would return goods<br />

<strong>the</strong>y had <strong>the</strong>mselves taken away <strong>to</strong> assist<br />

<strong>the</strong>m convince <strong>the</strong> retailer <strong>the</strong>ir claim was<br />

legitimate and so speed things up.<br />

Where <strong>the</strong> buyer is not a consumer and <strong>the</strong><br />

problem is a slight one (e.g. <strong>the</strong>re is only<br />

a minor defect) <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> goods cannot be<br />

rejected although compensation can be<br />

claimed (see below).<br />

Claim for Compensation<br />

Buyers can instead claim compensation<br />

known as "damages", if <strong>the</strong>y are not entitled<br />

<strong>to</strong> reject <strong>the</strong> goods, or if <strong>the</strong>y choose not<br />

<strong>to</strong> request this.<br />

Compensation by way of damages is<br />

designed <strong>to</strong> compensate for actual losses<br />

and so normally amounts <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost of<br />

repair or replacement (with goods of a<br />

similar age). Any direct and predictable<br />

expense arising as a result of being<br />

supplied with faulty goods can also<br />

be claimed by <strong>the</strong> cus<strong>to</strong>mer (see<br />

"Consequential Loss" on page 16).<br />

This could include <strong>the</strong> cost of returning<br />

<strong>the</strong> goods, for example. In some instances<br />

<strong>the</strong> cus<strong>to</strong>mer could get <strong>the</strong> defect remedied<br />

by someone else and claim <strong>the</strong> cost from<br />

<strong>the</strong> retailer as compensation for breach<br />

of contract. However, this is not advised<br />

as it might make it difficult <strong>to</strong> prove <strong>the</strong><br />

problem dated from <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> sale.<br />

For a broken four-year-old clock with<br />

an inherent fault, a claim would<br />

typically be for <strong>the</strong> amount necessary<br />

<strong>to</strong> have it repaired or <strong>to</strong> purchase a<br />

similar four-year-old model (but in<br />

working order, of course).<br />

Repair and Replacement<br />

Consumers (see definition above) can,<br />

if purchases do not conform <strong>to</strong> contract<br />

and <strong>the</strong>y do not wish (or are not entitled)<br />

<strong>to</strong> reject <strong>the</strong> goods or claim compensation,<br />

specifically request a repair or a replacement.<br />

Confronted with a five-year-old piano<br />

with an inherent fault, <strong>the</strong> consumer<br />

can request that it be repaired ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than pursuing compensation <strong>to</strong> pay for<br />

a repair that he <strong>the</strong>n has <strong>to</strong> arrange<br />

himself. Alternatively, he could request<br />

a replacement five - year-old piano of<br />

<strong>the</strong> same/similar specification,<br />

assuming that finding one was<br />

practicable (perhaps only so for a<br />

dealer of both new and second-hand<br />

products).<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!