20.03.2013 Views

Essentials of water treatment in hemodialysis - Penn Medicine

Essentials of water treatment in hemodialysis - Penn Medicine

Essentials of water treatment in hemodialysis - Penn Medicine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hemodialysis International 2005; 9: 127–134<br />

Core Curriculum<br />

<strong>Essentials</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>hemodialysis</strong><br />

Suhail AHMAD<br />

Dialysis/Apheresis, University <strong>of</strong> Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, Scribner Kidney Center, Northwest Kidney Center, Seattle,<br />

Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, U.S.A.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Water purity for dialysis is <strong>of</strong> critical importance for patient<br />

health and outcome, and <strong>in</strong> this regard there are three major<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts to consider: 1) Hemodialysis (HD) patients are<br />

exposed to more than 400 L <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong> per week. Contrast<br />

this with a person with normal kidney dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g only less<br />

than 15 L <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong> per week. 2) The stomach acid and<br />

<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al barrier protect from the ills <strong>of</strong> contam<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

<strong>water</strong> more effectively than the barrier imposed by the<br />

dialyzer membrane. 3) The function<strong>in</strong>g kidney can further<br />

protect the normal <strong>in</strong>dividual from the contam<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>water</strong> by elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g these, this protection be<strong>in</strong>g absent for<br />

the HD patient. Thus the regulations govern<strong>in</strong>g the purity <strong>of</strong><br />

dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>water</strong> are further modified by the above considerations:<br />

exposure <strong>of</strong> only 10 to 15 L per week and the efficacy<br />

<strong>of</strong> gut and kidney to protect the <strong>in</strong>dividual. Whereas the<br />

dialysis <strong>water</strong> is regulated by more strict purity guidel<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

failure <strong>in</strong> observ<strong>in</strong>g any <strong>of</strong> these guidel<strong>in</strong>es has had disastrous<br />

consequences. The use <strong>of</strong> modern more permeable<br />

dialyzer membranes has <strong>in</strong>creased the risk <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong> contam<strong>in</strong>ation,<br />

and more str<strong>in</strong>gent purity standards must be strictly<br />

followed to avoid harm to the patient.<br />

To make <strong>water</strong> healthier and relatively pure, <strong>water</strong><br />

authorities <strong>of</strong>ten add chemicals such as fluoride, alum<strong>in</strong>um,<br />

chlor<strong>in</strong>e, and chloram<strong>in</strong>es. This makes <strong>water</strong> unsafe<br />

for HD use, because these chemicals have been known to<br />

accumulate <strong>in</strong> dialysis patients lead<strong>in</strong>g to significant morbidity<br />

and mortality. Thus, alum<strong>in</strong>um <strong>in</strong> the dialysis<br />

Correspondence to: Suhail Ahmad, MD, Associate<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Medic<strong>in</strong>e, Medical Director, Dialysis/Apheresis,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, Medical Director, Scribner<br />

Kidney Center, Northwest Kidney Center, Seattle, WA<br />

98133 U.S.A.<br />

E-mail: sahmad@u.wash<strong>in</strong>gton.edu<br />

<strong>water</strong> has caused severe alum<strong>in</strong>um <strong>in</strong>toxications <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g to death. Similarly fluoride <strong>in</strong>toxication has also<br />

led to significant cl<strong>in</strong>ical catastrophes. Chemicals leach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from <strong>water</strong> pipes have also led to chemical <strong>in</strong>toxications;<br />

thus, pipes made <strong>of</strong> lead, copper, or brass z<strong>in</strong>c are<br />

not suitable for deliver<strong>in</strong>g <strong>water</strong> for dialysis.<br />

WATER CONTAMINANTS<br />

The contam<strong>in</strong>ants can be divided <strong>in</strong>to three major categories:<br />

1) particulate matter, 2) chemicals, and 3) microorganisms<br />

and endotox<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

1 Particulate matter (Figure 1, P ): These cause turbidity<br />

and <strong>in</strong>clude clay, iron, sand, chalk, silica, etc.<br />

2 Chemicals: These <strong>in</strong>clude dissolved <strong>in</strong>organic ions and<br />

salts (Figure 1, I ) such as Na, Cl, Al, Ca, Mg, and Fl.<br />

Organic matter <strong>in</strong>cludes (Figure 1, O ) <strong>in</strong>dustrial and agricultural<br />

tox<strong>in</strong>s such as fertilizers, pesticides, and oils.<br />

3 Microorganisms (Figure 1, M ) and endotox<strong>in</strong>s (Figure 1,<br />

E ): These <strong>in</strong>clude predom<strong>in</strong>antly bacteria and occasionally<br />

fungi, viruses, protozoa, spores, and endotox<strong>in</strong>s<br />

produced by the organisms.<br />

DEVICES TO CLEAN WATER<br />

Figure 1 shows various methods <strong>of</strong> clean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>water</strong> and the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> product <strong>water</strong> from these devices. The most<br />

effective method, distillation, is not used for dialysis<br />

<strong>water</strong> for two major reasons: it requires large amounts<br />

<strong>of</strong> energy and the yield is relatively small compared to the<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> required <strong>water</strong> consumption.<br />

Table 1 summarizes the advantages and disadvantages<br />

<strong>of</strong> all the purification methods. It is clear that not any<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle method purifies <strong>water</strong> completely, and a comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

ª 2005 International Society for Hemodialysis 127


Ahmad<br />

<strong>of</strong> several devices is needed to produce <strong>water</strong> that can be<br />

used for dialysis.<br />

TYPICAL WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM<br />

The design <strong>of</strong> a <strong>water</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> system is dependent on<br />

the quality <strong>of</strong> feed <strong>water</strong> and local requirements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

purity standards. One typical scheme commonly used is<br />

shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2; this system will be first discussed and<br />

then common variations would be further elaborated.<br />

BACKFLOW-PREVENTING DEVICE (BFD)<br />

The feed <strong>in</strong> <strong>water</strong> first comes <strong>in</strong> the unit and goes through<br />

a backflow-prevent<strong>in</strong>g device; this is essentially a valve<br />

that prevents the dialysis unit <strong>water</strong> flow<strong>in</strong>g back <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

city/build<strong>in</strong>g supply <strong>water</strong>. Often this device is supported<br />

by an additional booster pump that helps ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the<br />

necessary m<strong>in</strong>imum pressure despite fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g pressure<br />

and flow from the feed l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

TEMPERATURE-BLENDING VALVE (TBV)<br />

The reverse osmosis (RO) unit works most efficiently if<br />

feed <strong>water</strong> temperature is 77 F. A heater and blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

valve assures a constant desired temperature by blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

heated <strong>water</strong> with cold <strong>water</strong>. This unit is sometimes<br />

placed right at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the <strong>water</strong> system and<br />

sometimes more distally.<br />

FILTERS<br />

Table 1 Comparison <strong>of</strong> advantages and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> various <strong>water</strong> purification devices<br />

A series <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly tighter filters (with smaller pores)<br />

are placed <strong>in</strong> the <strong>water</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e. In Figure 2, these are shown<br />

Benefits Limitations<br />

1. S<strong>of</strong>teners<br />

Effectively removes Ca, Mg (hardness) Ineffective at remov<strong>in</strong>g other contam<strong>in</strong>ants<br />

Inexpensive Difficult to sanitize<br />

Easy to regenerate Needs frequent regeneration<br />

Res<strong>in</strong> exhaustion leads to hard <strong>water</strong><br />

Promotes bacterial growth<br />

2. Activated carbon<br />

Effective at remov<strong>in</strong>g organic contam<strong>in</strong>ants,<br />

Exhaustable adsorptive capacity, risk <strong>of</strong> spillover<br />

chlor<strong>in</strong>e, and chloram<strong>in</strong>e<br />

I<br />

O<br />

City Water<br />

Feed Water<br />

E M E M<br />

O P I O P I<br />

Product Water<br />

Ultrafiltration<br />

(1000 Da)<br />

M<br />

P<br />

E<br />

O<br />

M O O<br />

E<br />

I<br />

E M E M<br />

O P I O P I<br />

Deionizer Reverse<br />

Osmosis<br />

Distillation<br />

Figure 1 Commonly used <strong>water</strong> purification devices. P ¼<br />

particulate matter; I ¼ <strong>in</strong>organic ions and salts; O ¼ organic<br />

matter; M ¼ microorganisms; E ¼ endotox<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

Inexpensive Promotes bacterial growth<br />

Difficult to sanitize<br />

Releases ‘‘f<strong>in</strong>es’’ (abrasive particles)<br />

3. DI<br />

Effective at remov<strong>in</strong>g ions Ineffective at remov<strong>in</strong>g organics and microorganism<br />

Low ma<strong>in</strong>tenance cost Facilitates bacterial growth<br />

Easy to regenerate Release <strong>of</strong> particles<br />

Risk <strong>of</strong> spillover with exhaustion <strong>of</strong> res<strong>in</strong>s<br />

4. RO<br />

Removes almost all dissolved ions Needs pre<strong>treatment</strong><br />

Removes almost all organisms and fragments Uses large quantities <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong><br />

Life <strong>of</strong> membrane depends on quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong><br />

128 Hemodialysis International 2005; 9: 127–134


City<br />

Water<br />

BFD<br />

TBV<br />

5 µm<br />

F-1<br />

Carbon<br />

1.0 0.45<br />

µm µm<br />

as F-1 through F-4 with the filter size listed <strong>in</strong> micrometers.<br />

The very first, F-1, is basically to remove large<br />

particulate matter from the feed <strong>water</strong> and <strong>of</strong>ten this<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes mud with large silica and clay particles.<br />

ACTIVATED CARBON FILTERS (TANK/<br />

COLUMN)<br />

Granules <strong>of</strong> activated carbon are packed <strong>in</strong> a cartridge<br />

and <strong>water</strong> is allowed to flow around these granules. The<br />

microporous structure <strong>of</strong> the carbon permits adsorption<br />

<strong>of</strong> organic matter and chlor<strong>in</strong>e and chloram<strong>in</strong>es over its<br />

large surface area relative to weight. Activated carbon<br />

columns are not effective filters. The carbon columns<br />

tend to release ‘‘f<strong>in</strong>es,’’ which are abrasive particles. A<br />

series <strong>of</strong> micr<strong>of</strong>ilters (F-2, F-3) are <strong>in</strong>serted after the<br />

carbon column to remove these f<strong>in</strong>es. Often there are<br />

two activated carbon tanks <strong>in</strong> series: the first is called<br />

the primary and second the polisher carbon tank (not<br />

shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2). Two very important issues related to<br />

carbon filters are the exhaustion <strong>of</strong> the carbon and the<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> microbial organisms. The exhaustion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

adsorptive capacity leads to <strong>in</strong>creased concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />

chlor<strong>in</strong>e, chloram<strong>in</strong>es, and organic matter <strong>in</strong> the postcarbon<br />

<strong>water</strong>. To prevent this, the postcarbon <strong>water</strong> should<br />

be monitored for chlor<strong>in</strong>e and chloram<strong>in</strong>es, and its presence<br />

<strong>in</strong> concentrations beyond the acceptable range<br />

(Table 2) should lead to the change <strong>of</strong> carbon filter. The<br />

carbon columns are a major source <strong>of</strong> bacterial and endo-<br />

F-2<br />

F-3<br />

S<strong>of</strong>tener<br />

Dialysis Stations<br />

0.22 µm<br />

Figure 2 One <strong>of</strong> the commonly used schemes <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>treatment</strong>. (For abbreviation, see text.)<br />

F-4<br />

Dra<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Essentials</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>hemodialysis</strong><br />

tox<strong>in</strong> contam<strong>in</strong>ation because the porous surface, the presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> organic matter, and the removal <strong>of</strong> chlor<strong>in</strong>e all<br />

favor microbial growth. Monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the carbon filter<br />

and periodic flush<strong>in</strong>g with chlor<strong>in</strong>e keeps the microorganism<br />

growth under control.<br />

WATER SOFTENER<br />

RO<br />

To protect the downstream <strong>water</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> device <strong>of</strong><br />

choice, reverse osmosis (RO) or deionizer (DI), large<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> divalent cations must be removed<br />

from the <strong>water</strong>. The high concentrations <strong>of</strong> Ca and Mg<br />

<strong>in</strong> the city <strong>water</strong> cause hardness and limit the life <strong>of</strong> DI or<br />

RO devices. Water s<strong>of</strong>teners use res<strong>in</strong> beads fixed with<br />

Na. As <strong>water</strong> is allowed to pass around these fixed-bead<br />

cations <strong>in</strong> <strong>water</strong> (Ca, Mg, iron and manganese) are<br />

exchanged with Na, thus mak<strong>in</strong>g the product <strong>water</strong> s<strong>of</strong>ter<br />

with


Ahmad<br />

Table 2 Contam<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>in</strong> <strong>water</strong> and their toxic effects and maximum allowable concentrations<br />

Maximum<br />

Contam<strong>in</strong>ant Toxic effect concentration (mg/L)<br />

Alum<strong>in</strong>um<br />

Known to be toxic to dialysis patients<br />

Encephalopathy, bone disease, anemia < 0.01<br />

Chloram<strong>in</strong>es Hemolysis, anemia, methemoglob<strong>in</strong>emia < 0.10<br />

Chlor<strong>in</strong>e 0.5<br />

Copper Hemolysis, fever, headache, hepatitis < 0.10<br />

Fluoride Bone disease, osteomalacia < 0.20<br />

Nitrate Cyanosis, methemoglob<strong>in</strong>emia, hypotension, nausea < 2.0<br />

Sulfate Nausea, vomit<strong>in</strong>g, acidosis 100<br />

Z<strong>in</strong>c Anemia, nausea, vomit<strong>in</strong>g, fever<br />

Normally present <strong>in</strong> dialysate<br />

0.1<br />

Calcium Nausea, vomit<strong>in</strong>g, weakness, headache, hypertension, malaise, cardiac problems < 2 (0.1 mEq/L)<br />

Magnesium Nausea, vomit<strong>in</strong>g, weakness, headache, hypertension, malaise, cardiac problems < 4.0 (0.3 mEq/L)<br />

Potassium Muscle symptoms, bradyrrhythmia, death 8 (0.2 mEq/L)<br />

Sodium Hypertension, pulmonary edema, headache, thirst, confusion, seizure, coma<br />

Unsafe even <strong>in</strong> dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>water</strong><br />

70 (3.0 mEq/L)<br />

Arsenic Nausea, vomit<strong>in</strong>g, diarrhea, hepatitis, polyneuropathy, sk<strong>in</strong> lesions 0.005<br />

Barium Hypokalemia 0.1<br />

Beryllium Pulmonary granulomatous disease with cough, weight loss 0.0004<br />

Cadmium Bone disease, renal disease 0.001<br />

Chromium Carc<strong>in</strong>ogen 0.014<br />

Lead Abdom<strong>in</strong>al pa<strong>in</strong>, neuropathy, nephropathy, encephalopathy, hypertension 0.005<br />

Mercury Tremors, g<strong>in</strong>givitis, psychiatric symptoms 0.0002<br />

Selenium Nausea, vomit<strong>in</strong>g, diarrhea 0.09<br />

Silver Vomit<strong>in</strong>g, diarrhea, shock, coma, convulsions, death 0.005<br />

Thallium Neuropathy 0.002<br />

RO or mixed-bed DI. The advantages and disadvantages<br />

<strong>of</strong> these two devices are listed <strong>in</strong> the Table 1. Some<br />

units use both devices, either <strong>in</strong> a series, less commonly,<br />

or more commonly, a DI as a back up for the reverse<br />

osmosis.<br />

Feed Water<br />

Ca & Mg Na<br />

Hard<br />

Figure 3 Water s<strong>of</strong>tener.<br />

Product Water<br />

S<strong>of</strong>t<br />

Na<br />

Water Conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Ca & Mg<br />

Na<br />

Ca Mg<br />

Res<strong>in</strong> Beads with Na<br />

Ca & Mg Exchanged with Na<br />

Product Water with Na<br />

(Ca Mg Removed)<br />

RO SYSTEM<br />

RO is the most cost-effective method for <strong>water</strong> purification<br />

from both organic and <strong>in</strong>organic solutes, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

organisms and endotox<strong>in</strong>s. This is a filtration process <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>water</strong> across a very tight membrane with ionic rejection <strong>of</strong><br />

90% to 99%. When <strong>water</strong> is filtered across this tight<br />

membrane, the filtered <strong>water</strong> is called ‘‘permeate’’ or<br />

‘‘RO <strong>water</strong>’’ and <strong>water</strong> conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g rejected solutes and<br />

other substances is called ‘‘rejection,’’ ‘‘concentrate,’’ or<br />

‘‘br<strong>in</strong>e.’’ The osmolarity <strong>of</strong> br<strong>in</strong>e (conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g solutes) is a<br />

lot higher than the osmolarity <strong>of</strong> permeate; normally the<br />

<strong>water</strong> would move from permeate to br<strong>in</strong>e because <strong>of</strong><br />

higher osmotic pressure. Enough mechanical force<br />

(hydraulic pressure) with a pump, however, is applied<br />

on the br<strong>in</strong>e side; <strong>water</strong> is thus forced (filtered) aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

the osmolar force across the membrane. RO membranes<br />

are like dialyzer membranes except the pores are so small<br />

that they do not even allow any solute <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Na or<br />

other ions and any organic matter (Figure 4). Three<br />

different types <strong>of</strong> membranes, cellulosic, synthetic, and<br />

th<strong>in</strong> composite membranes, similar to dialyzers, are fitted<br />

130 Hemodialysis International 2005; 9: 127–134


RO Water<br />

(Permeate)<br />

Figure 4 RO cyl<strong>in</strong>der.<br />

<strong>in</strong> different designs, parallel plates, hollow fibers, or<br />

spiral wounds.<br />

Chlor<strong>in</strong>e, chloram<strong>in</strong>es, the pH <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong>, dis<strong>in</strong>fectants,<br />

and bacteria all potentially destroy the membrane. Chemicals<br />

are more harmful to synthetic membranes and bacteria<br />

to cellulosic membranes, and generally composite membranes<br />

are more resistant. The performance <strong>of</strong> the RO<br />

membrane must be monitored by measur<strong>in</strong>g the resistivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the RO <strong>water</strong>. Pure <strong>water</strong> is highly resistant to an electrical<br />

current; this electrical conductivity <strong>in</strong>creases if more<br />

ions are present. The acceptable production to rejection<br />

ratio is >0.85; a value below 0.80 means that the membrane<br />

must be changed. The rejection ratio is calculated<br />

from conductivity <strong>in</strong> the feed <strong>water</strong> and the product (RO)<br />

<strong>water</strong>, by us<strong>in</strong>g the formula, 1 – (RO <strong>water</strong> conductivity/<br />

feed <strong>water</strong> conductivity) 100. Conductivity is dependent<br />

on total dissolved solutes <strong>in</strong> parts per million (ppm).<br />

For example,<br />

Conductivity feed <strong>water</strong> ¼ 100 ppm<br />

Conductivity RO <strong>water</strong> ¼ 8 ppm<br />

Rejection ratio ¼f1 ð8=100Þg 100 :<br />

¼ð1 0:08Þ 100<br />

¼ 92 %:<br />

If after 6 months the feed <strong>water</strong> conductivity is<br />

unchanged but the RO <strong>water</strong> conductivity <strong>in</strong>creases to<br />

20, this means that the rejection ratio is only 80% and it is<br />

time to change the membrane.<br />

DI<br />

Rejection<br />

(Br<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

Feed Water (s<strong>of</strong>t)<br />

R/O Membrane<br />

RO Water<br />

(Permeate)<br />

This process removes <strong>in</strong>organic ions dissolved <strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>water</strong> by an ion-exchange process us<strong>in</strong>g cationic and<br />

anionic res<strong>in</strong>s. When <strong>water</strong> is passed through the DI<br />

first, the cationic res<strong>in</strong> exchanges dissolved cations<br />

Na + Cl<br />

H + Cl<br />

Cationic Exchange<br />

Res<strong>in</strong> Exchanges<br />

Dissolved Cations<br />

(Na, Ca etc) With H<br />

Figure 5 Mixed-bed DI.<br />

<strong>Essentials</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>hemodialysis</strong><br />

H + OH = H 2O<br />

Anionic Exchange<br />

Res<strong>in</strong> Exchanges<br />

Dissolved Anions<br />

(Cl, SO 4 etc) With OH<br />

(Na þ , Ca þ , Al þ , Mg þ , etc.) with H þ ions (Figure 5).<br />

Water conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g H þ ions and very little other cations<br />

then percolates around the anionic res<strong>in</strong> where the<br />

dissolved anions are exchanged with OH – ions, and H þ<br />

and OH – ions comb<strong>in</strong>e to form pure <strong>water</strong>, free <strong>of</strong> all<br />

cations and anions. This product <strong>water</strong> has high resistivity<br />

(> 1 MOhm/cm); monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> resistivity alerts if<br />

res<strong>in</strong> beds are exhausted because the presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>organic<br />

ions would decrease the resistivity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>water</strong>. The<br />

res<strong>in</strong>s are regenerated by us<strong>in</strong>g HCl and NaOH or bleach.<br />

DI are very effective <strong>in</strong> remov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>organic ions but are<br />

<strong>in</strong>effective <strong>in</strong> remov<strong>in</strong>g organic and other contam<strong>in</strong>ants.<br />

In fact, DI may become a site for bacterial growth and<br />

may lead to downstream contam<strong>in</strong>ation. The DI<br />

described above is a mixed-bed solid-phase DI. The cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

electric deionizer (CDI) is the other type <strong>of</strong> DI<br />

recently be<strong>in</strong>g used that utilizes electric current and ionexchange<br />

membranes and res<strong>in</strong>s to remove ions from<br />

<strong>water</strong>. CDI produces very high quality <strong>water</strong> with resistivity<br />

as high as 20 MOhm/cm. This type <strong>of</strong> DI also has<br />

less bacterial growth because <strong>of</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>water</strong> flux.<br />

ULTRAVIOLET (UV) TREATMENT<br />

UV radiation is an effective way to kill all types <strong>of</strong> bacteria<br />

<strong>in</strong> all states. Its efficacy, however, depends on the depth<br />

<strong>of</strong> penetration and <strong>water</strong> flow rates. Germicidal UV lamps<br />

are commercially available but have a limited life span.<br />

UV is effective but <strong>in</strong>creases lipopolysaccharides and fragments<br />

by bacterial kill<strong>in</strong>g. UV alone is not an effective<br />

<strong>water</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> device and is normally used <strong>in</strong> conjunction<br />

Hemodialysis International 2005; 9: 127–134 131


Ahmad<br />

with DI and should be followed by ultrafiltration to<br />

remove bacterial fragments.<br />

WATER DELIVERY LOOP<br />

Purified <strong>water</strong> is run through the dialysis unit <strong>in</strong> a loop as<br />

shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2, the term<strong>in</strong>al end <strong>of</strong> the loop end<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

the pipe feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>water</strong> <strong>in</strong>to the RO or DI unit. Dialysis<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>es are connected to this loop <strong>in</strong> parallel withdraw<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>water</strong> for proportion<strong>in</strong>g with dialysate concentrate.<br />

The second arrangement is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 6 where the<br />

purified <strong>water</strong> is delivered <strong>in</strong>to a hold<strong>in</strong>g tank from which<br />

the <strong>water</strong> is pumped <strong>in</strong>to the distribution loop that<br />

returns <strong>water</strong> back <strong>in</strong>to the tank.<br />

MATERIAL FOR PIPE AND FITTINGS<br />

Substances for <strong>water</strong> pipes and surfaces exposed to <strong>water</strong><br />

can leach <strong>in</strong> the <strong>water</strong> and have been known to cause<br />

toxicity <strong>in</strong> dialysis patients. For example, copper <strong>in</strong>toxication<br />

from copper pipes and the accumulation <strong>of</strong> alum<strong>in</strong>um<br />

dissolved <strong>in</strong> <strong>water</strong> has happened. It is therefore<br />

required, that all the <strong>water</strong> pipes <strong>in</strong> dialysis units should<br />

be free <strong>of</strong> metals and are constructed <strong>of</strong> polyv<strong>in</strong>ylchloride.<br />

Similarly, all the surfaces exposed to <strong>water</strong> such as<br />

storage tank or cas<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the devices should be constructed<br />

<strong>of</strong> materials that do not readily leach <strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>water</strong>.<br />

Dra<strong>in</strong><br />

R/O<br />

Dialysis Stations<br />

0.1-µm<br />

filter<br />

Storage<br />

Tank<br />

Pump<br />

0.1-µm<br />

filter<br />

Figure 6 Water loop connected to a storage tank.<br />

WATER QUALITY STANDARDS<br />

Even <strong>in</strong> the early days <strong>of</strong> dialysis it was known that s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

<strong>water</strong> should be used to avoid problems with excess Ca<br />

and Mg, the ‘‘hard <strong>water</strong> syndrome.’’ With time, the<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical syndromes associated with accumulations <strong>of</strong> various<br />

ions com<strong>in</strong>g from the <strong>water</strong> gradually forced tighter<br />

purity standards. Most dramatic and damag<strong>in</strong>g was the<br />

alum<strong>in</strong>um <strong>in</strong>toxications caus<strong>in</strong>g severe morbidity and<br />

even mortality. As we learn more about the harmful<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> less pure <strong>water</strong>, particularly with the use <strong>of</strong><br />

very permeable dialyzers, the purity standards are becom<strong>in</strong>g<br />

more str<strong>in</strong>gent. At present, the <strong>water</strong> purity standards<br />

can be divided <strong>in</strong> three broad categories:<br />

1 Standards for <strong>in</strong>organic solutes;<br />

2 Standards for microorganisms and other organics; and<br />

3 Standards for lipopolysaccharide and endotox<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

Standards for <strong>in</strong>organic solutes<br />

Table 2 describes the cl<strong>in</strong>ical effects <strong>of</strong> accumulation <strong>of</strong><br />

various <strong>in</strong>organic substances and the acceptable maximum<br />

concentrations <strong>in</strong> dialysis <strong>water</strong> (as recommended<br />

by Advancement <strong>of</strong> Medical Instrumentation [AAMI]).<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> knowledge about <strong>water</strong>-related cl<strong>in</strong>ical problems<br />

is quite <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>of</strong>ten based on anecdotal<br />

experiences. Some <strong>of</strong> the important cl<strong>in</strong>ical issues would<br />

be discussed <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g examples.<br />

Alum<strong>in</strong>um <strong>in</strong>toxication<br />

Outbreaks <strong>of</strong> unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed, progressive dementia <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g to death occurred <strong>in</strong> areas with significant alum<strong>in</strong>um<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> local <strong>water</strong> supply. Also noted was<br />

the higher prevalence <strong>in</strong> units not us<strong>in</strong>g adequate <strong>water</strong><br />

purification systems. One <strong>of</strong> the most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cidences<br />

occurred <strong>in</strong> Portugal <strong>in</strong> 1993, when city <strong>water</strong><br />

authorities decided to add alum<strong>in</strong>um sulfate as flocculent<br />

to remove particulate matters from the <strong>water</strong>. This subsequently<br />

led to HD patients develop<strong>in</strong>g dementia, and<br />

many deaths occurred. Subsequently, it was discovered<br />

that encephalopathy was caused by alum<strong>in</strong>um <strong>in</strong>toxication<br />

with blood levels as high as 500 mg/L (normal,<br />


Dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1980s dialysis encephalopathy, low-turnover<br />

bone disease, and anemia were common manifestations<br />

<strong>of</strong> alum<strong>in</strong>um <strong>in</strong>toxication. Only a few years ago, on<br />

an island <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands Antilles, 15 patients died <strong>of</strong><br />

alum<strong>in</strong>um <strong>in</strong>toxication caused by the contam<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

cement that was used to patch up <strong>water</strong> pipes. Similarly,<br />

endemics <strong>of</strong> alum<strong>in</strong>um problems have been noticed after<br />

volcanic ashes conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g alum<strong>in</strong>um-contam<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>water</strong>.<br />

Chloram<strong>in</strong>e exposure<br />

In 1987, several dozen patients <strong>in</strong> Philadelphia suffered<br />

from nausea, low blood pressure, dyspnea, and anemia.<br />

Eventually the cause was attributed to chloram<strong>in</strong>e exposure.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce then, several centers <strong>in</strong> this country and<br />

abroad have experienced problems with chloram<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

Chloram<strong>in</strong>e (comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> chlor<strong>in</strong>e and ammonia) provides<br />

growth control at a lower cost. Often <strong>water</strong> authorities<br />

add chloram<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> chlor<strong>in</strong>e to control<br />

bacterial growth <strong>in</strong> the city <strong>water</strong>. Unfortunately it is not<br />

removed by either RO or DI. An activated charcoal column<br />

effectively removes it; however, if <strong>water</strong> flow is very<br />

rapid or if the charcoal is exhausted the removal <strong>of</strong><br />

chloram<strong>in</strong>es is <strong>in</strong>effective, lead<strong>in</strong>g to the exposure <strong>of</strong><br />

patients. Several states have mandated that chloram<strong>in</strong>e<br />

levels must be checked <strong>in</strong> the product <strong>water</strong> frequently<br />

(every day to every shift <strong>of</strong> dialysis).<br />

Taken orally chloram<strong>in</strong>e does not cause any cl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />

problems; however, <strong>in</strong> the blood it leads to oxidation <strong>of</strong><br />

hemoglob<strong>in</strong> and destruction <strong>of</strong> red cells by spleen result<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> He<strong>in</strong>z body anemia. Acute <strong>in</strong>travascular hemolysis<br />

can be recognized by not<strong>in</strong>g dark blood <strong>in</strong> the blood<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es, shortness <strong>of</strong> breath, palpitation, headache, vomit<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

and severe anemia. Laboratory evidence <strong>of</strong> hemolysis,<br />

He<strong>in</strong>z body anemia, is suggestive and the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

chloram<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> <strong>water</strong> or dialysate is confirmatory. Other<br />

causes <strong>of</strong> hemolytic anemia <strong>in</strong> this population are exposure<br />

to copper and nitrate (Table 2).<br />

Fluoride exposure<br />

Fluoride is added to city <strong>water</strong> and if not removed can<br />

cause toxicity. Normally the RO and DI remove fluoride.<br />

In contrast, if anion res<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the mixed-bed DI, which<br />

normally exchanges fluoride with OH ions, gets<br />

exhausted the anion res<strong>in</strong> then can release large quantities<br />

<strong>of</strong> bound fluoride <strong>in</strong> exchange for chloride, sulfate,<br />

and nitrate. This <strong>water</strong> with very high quantities <strong>of</strong> fluoride<br />

can cause severe <strong>in</strong>toxication or death. This happened<br />

<strong>in</strong> Chicago and with<strong>in</strong> 24 hr, three patients died with<br />

arrhythmias. The problem was with the monitor light<br />

which was the same color for safe as for unsafe.<br />

<strong>Essentials</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>hemodialysis</strong><br />

In the body, fluoride b<strong>in</strong>ds to calcium disrupt<strong>in</strong>g cell<br />

membrane lead<strong>in</strong>g to the leakage <strong>of</strong> potassium and hyperkalemia.<br />

The latter causes cardiac arrhythmia and death.<br />

This hyperkalemia is refractory to the usual management<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g kayexelate, and the only effective <strong>treatment</strong> is zero<br />

potassium dialysis. The other earlier toxic effects <strong>of</strong> fluoride<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude itch<strong>in</strong>g, pa<strong>in</strong>, gastro<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al problems, syncope,<br />

tetany (from hypocalcemia), and neurologic symptoms.<br />

The standards recommended by AAMI for various<br />

<strong>in</strong>organic solutes <strong>in</strong> the <strong>water</strong> and the potential toxic<br />

effects are listed <strong>in</strong> Table 2. It is important that close<br />

vigilance to these standards are constantly ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed to<br />

prevent major catastrophes as exemplified above.<br />

Standards for microorganisms and other<br />

organics<br />

Water and dialysate do not have to be completely free <strong>of</strong><br />

microorganisms because the dialyzer membrane provides an<br />

effective barrier to <strong>in</strong>fectious agents. The AAMI recommends<br />

the maximum acceptable level <strong>of</strong> bacteria to be 200 colonyform<strong>in</strong>g<br />

units (CFU) per milliliter <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong>. The recommendation<br />

by the European Pharmacopoeia is 100 CFU/mL.<br />

In 1996, more than 60 dialysis patients died from liver<br />

failure caused by the overgrowth <strong>of</strong> blue/green alga Microcystis<br />

aerog<strong>in</strong>osa <strong>in</strong> the <strong>water</strong> supply <strong>in</strong> Brazil. This alga<br />

produced a cyanotox<strong>in</strong> which is potent hepatic tox<strong>in</strong>. It is<br />

clear that the <strong>water</strong> for the dialysis should be clean, pure,<br />

and free <strong>of</strong> organic contam<strong>in</strong>ants.<br />

Standards for lipopolysaccharide and<br />

endotox<strong>in</strong>s<br />

Endotox<strong>in</strong> levels <strong>in</strong> <strong>water</strong> should be frequently monitored<br />

from different sites to prevent patients gett<strong>in</strong>g exposed to it.<br />

This leads to febrile reactions and may contribute to ongo<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>flammation. The endotox<strong>in</strong> is monitored by a LAL test, and<br />

the acceptable level is less than 0.1 EU/mL. Recently, short<br />

DNA fragments have been found <strong>in</strong> the dialysate, capable <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terleuk<strong>in</strong>-6 and may be responsible for chronic<br />

<strong>in</strong>flammation. 1 Unfortunately, these can pass through the<br />

diayzer membrane and are undetectable by the LAL test.<br />

These oligosaccharides are the fragments <strong>of</strong> bacteria and<br />

more attention may have to be paid to these <strong>in</strong> future.<br />

MONITORING OF WATER SYSTEM<br />

A well-planned monitor<strong>in</strong>g program is the only way to<br />

prevent <strong>water</strong>-related catastrophes <strong>in</strong> the dialysis unit.<br />

Hemodialysis International 2005; 9: 127–134 133


Ahmad<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g is a very brief summary <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

major areas <strong>of</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g. Each unit must develop a wellorganized<br />

program which is specific for its situation.<br />

Major areas to monitor are:<br />

1) Water s<strong>of</strong>tener:<br />

a. Total hardness <strong>in</strong> the product <strong>water</strong>: The total<br />

<strong>water</strong> hardness should not exceed 1 ppm. This<br />

should be checked once a day, preferably at the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> the day.<br />

b. Pressure drop: If pressure drop changes more<br />

than 10 PSI between pres<strong>of</strong>tener and posts<strong>of</strong>tener<br />

sites, the s<strong>of</strong>tener may need back-flush<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Most units have an automated setup to back-flush<br />

periodically.<br />

c. Br<strong>in</strong>e tank salt level: Next to the s<strong>of</strong>tener sits a br<strong>in</strong>e<br />

tank that regenerates the s<strong>of</strong>tener periodically. It is<br />

important to make sure that the salt level is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> the br<strong>in</strong>e tank. A timer should be <strong>in</strong>stalled<br />

that regenerates the tank while unit is not operat<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

2) Carbon tanks:<br />

a. Chlor<strong>in</strong>e and chloram<strong>in</strong>e levels after the last carbon<br />

tank, preferably each shift.<br />

b. Pressure drop change <strong>of</strong> more than 10 PSI lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to back-flush when unit is not operat<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

3) RO<br />

a. Water pressure and flow rates through the unit to<br />

ensure optimum efficiency and life <strong>of</strong> membrane. A<br />

drop <strong>in</strong> <strong>water</strong> flow rate may mean that membrane is<br />

plugg<strong>in</strong>g up.<br />

b. Resistivity and rejection ratio: As discussed above<br />

under the description <strong>of</strong> RO system.<br />

4) DI<br />

a. Water pressure before and after the unit: a change<br />

<strong>of</strong> more than 10 PSI may mean that tanks may be<br />

gett<strong>in</strong>g plugged up.<br />

b. Resistivity and conductivity: See above under the<br />

description <strong>of</strong> DI.<br />

5) Filters: All the filters should be regularly monitored<br />

for pressure drop across the device.<br />

6) Ancillary devices: temperature-blend<strong>in</strong>g valve, backflow<br />

prevention device, booster pump, and acid feed pump<br />

should also be regularly monitored and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

In light <strong>of</strong> our current knowledge it is clear that highly<br />

purified <strong>water</strong> close to the pharmaceutical grade is<br />

needed for use <strong>in</strong> dialysis. For higher-grade <strong>water</strong>, the<br />

term ‘‘ultrapure <strong>water</strong>’’ has been co<strong>in</strong>ed; for chemical<br />

purity, the <strong>water</strong> resistivity should be greater than 5<br />

MOhm/cm rather than the current standard <strong>of</strong> 1<br />

MOhm/cm. More importantly the bacterial and organic<br />

standards would be more str<strong>in</strong>gent. The bacterial count <strong>of</strong><br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!