90-day Monitoring Report - National Marine Fisheries Service - NOAA
90-day Monitoring Report - National Marine Fisheries Service - NOAA
90-day Monitoring Report - National Marine Fisheries Service - NOAA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6.1.1. Spotted seal<br />
There were three detection events of spotted seals (detection numbers: 15, 16 &17) totalling a<br />
minimum of three animals that were exposed to noise levels constituting Level-B harassment<br />
during the Coakley marine geophysical survey. Two of these animals were observed within the<br />
160 dB safety radius while the third was observed within the 1<strong>90</strong> dB safety radius, while the<br />
array was firing full power, resulting in a mitigation power-down of the acoustic source.<br />
6.1.2. Ringed seal<br />
There were five detection events of ringed seals (detection numbers: 29, 30, 31, 32 &36)<br />
totalling a minimum of five animals that were exposed to noise levels constituting Level-B<br />
harassment. Four of these animals were observed within the 160 dB safety radius while one<br />
was observed within the 1<strong>90</strong> dB safety radius, while the array was firing full power, resulting in a<br />
mitigation power-down of the acoustic source.<br />
6.1.3. Bearded seal<br />
There were six detections events of bearded seals (detection numbers: 19, 21, 22, 23, 24 &26)<br />
totalling a minimum of seven animals that were exposed to noise levels constituting Level-B<br />
harassment. Five of these animals were observed within the 160 dB safety radius while one<br />
animal was observed within the 1<strong>90</strong> dB safety radius, while the array was firing full power,<br />
resulting in a mitigation power-down of the acoustic source.<br />
6.1.4. Pacific walrus<br />
There were three detection events of Pacific walruses (detection numbers: 25, 27 & 28) totalling<br />
a minimum of four animals (three adults and one juvenile) that were exposed to noise levels<br />
constituting Level-B harassment. All four of these animals were observed within the 160 dB<br />
safety radius and no mitigation actions were necessary.<br />
6.2. IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE BIOLOGICAL<br />
OPINIONS’S ITS AND IHA<br />
In order to minimize the Level-B incidental taking of marine mammals during the Coakley<br />
marine geophysical survey, mitigation measures were implemented whenever these protected<br />
species were seen near or within the safety radii designated in the IHA. Throughout this survey<br />
five power-downs were implemented, all for species of pinnipeds.<br />
Additional mitigation measures were implemented voluntarily by UAGI after consultation with<br />
Alaska Department of Fish & Wildlife <strong>Service</strong> for Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divirgens)<br />
and polar bears (Ursus maritimus). The 1<strong>90</strong> dB safety radius was to be applied for both species<br />
and they were to be given an 800 meter buffer zone from the vessel when possible. Airgun<br />
operations were also to be suspended if subsistence hunting was actively occurring within 5 km<br />
of the R/V Langseth. Giving the walruses an 800m buffer zone was often not possible due to the<br />
low turning radius of the vessel when the seismic gear is deployed and the fact that sightings of<br />
Pacific walrus usually occurred when they were already closer than 800m to the vessel. The<br />
1<strong>90</strong> dB safety radius was also to be applied to walrus and polar bears, but neither species was<br />
ever observed within the 1<strong>90</strong> dB safety radius. Four Pacific walruses, during three detection<br />
events, were exposed to received sound levels greater than 160 dB<br />
UME04085<br />
R.V Marcus G. Langseth<br />
L-DEO/NMFS<br />
05 January 2012<br />
31