21.03.2013 Views

Taxonomic publications: past and future - Senckenberg Museum

Taxonomic publications: past and future - Senckenberg Museum

Taxonomic publications: past and future - Senckenberg Museum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13: 1 - 109 (2005)<br />

© Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik<br />

http://senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

URN: urn:nbn:de:0028-odes0513-7<br />

Abstracts of talks <strong>and</strong> posters<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 2<br />

8 th annual meeting<br />

of the GfBS<br />

13-16 September 2005<br />

organised by<br />

in Basle<br />

NHMB: Michel Brancucci<br />

Daniel Burckhardt<br />

Rol<strong>and</strong> Mühlethaler NLU-Biogeographie: Peter Nagel<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 3<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 4<br />

Sponsored by<br />

8 th annual meeting of the GfBS<br />

13-16 September 2005 in Basle<br />

Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft Basel<br />

___________________________________<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8th Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 5<br />

th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 5<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 6<br />

CONTENTS<br />

Contents................................................................................................................6-11<br />

Preface .....................................................................................................................12<br />

Abstracts of lectures <strong>and</strong> oral presentations<br />

AGOSTI D., POLASZEK A., BOEHM K. & SAUTTER G.: <strong>Taxonomic</strong> <strong>publications</strong>: <strong>past</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>future</strong>...............................................................................................................14<br />

AHRENS D. & VOGLER A. P.: Species recognition of white grubs (Coleoptera:<br />

Scarabaeidae) through DNA barcoding in megadiverse tropical soil<br />

assemblages...................................................................................................15<br />

ARMBRUSTER G. F. J. & BÖHME M.: Loss of phylogenetic information in histone genes<br />

because of gene conversion <strong>and</strong> GC3 drive? A data analysis of mammals <strong>and</strong><br />

l<strong>and</strong> snails.......................................................................................................16<br />

ASPÖCK U. & ASPÖCK H.: Nevrorthidae – “Coelacanths” among the Neuropterida? On<br />

the phylogeny <strong>and</strong> biogeography of a relict group (Insecta: Neuropterida:<br />

Neuroptera).....................................................................................................17<br />

BALKE M.: no abstract received<br />

BEGEROW D. & LUTZ M.: DNA barcoding in the fungal world ......................................18<br />

BININDA-EMONDS O.R.P.: Rates of molecular evolution in mammals .........................19<br />

BÖCKELER W.: Ontogenesis <strong>and</strong> biology of Pentastomida as a helpful additive for their<br />

systematical assignment.................................................................................20<br />

BÖGLE M., MANNSCHRECK B., SCHNEIDER S. & MELZER A.: AFLP – a tool to separate<br />

charophyte species.........................................................................................21<br />

COWAN R.: The potential of DNA barcoding with special reference to l<strong>and</strong> plants.....22<br />

DESALLE R.: The unholy trinity: DNA barcoding, taxonomy <strong>and</strong> species delimitation 23<br />

DIKOW T.: New phylogenies <strong>and</strong> <strong>past</strong> classifications – should we compare the two? 24<br />

EKREM T., Willassen E. & Stur E.: DNA barcoding of non-biting midges (Diptera:<br />

Chironomidae) ................................................................................................25<br />

FRIESEN N.: DNA taxonomy of the genus Galanthus, species identification <strong>and</strong> illegal<br />

trade ...............................................................................................................26<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 7<br />

GEMEINHOLZER B.: Merits <strong>and</strong> limitations of DNA-barcoding in plants........................27<br />

GITTENBERGER E., GROENENBERG D. & PIEL W. H.: Conflicting phylogenetic <strong>and</strong><br />

taxonomic ranks in alpine Arianta (Gastropoda, Pulmonata)..........................28<br />

GUICKING D., FRITZ U. & WINK M.: A range-wide phylogeography of European pond<br />

turtles (genus Emys): new insights from mitochondrial sequence data ..........29<br />

HEIBL C., KOCYAN A., RENNER S. S. & GRAU J.: Rain shadow <strong>and</strong> fog desert: orogenic<br />

influences on the evolution of Oxalis in the coastal desert of Atacama, Chile 30<br />

HUNDSDÖRFER A. & WINK M.: The phylogeny of the hawkmoth genus Hyles<br />

(Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) with special emphasis on the Hyles euphorbiae-<br />

complex: evidence from mitochondrial sequences, genomic fingerprints <strong>and</strong><br />

chemical ecology ............................................................................................31<br />

ITTEN B., SCHNELLER J. & URMI E.: Genetic diversity <strong>and</strong> geographic differentiation of<br />

Sphagnum fimbriatum (Sphagnaceae, Bryophyta) .........................................32<br />

KAYß S. & OHL M.: Functional <strong>and</strong> phylogenetic implications of the sting apparatus of<br />

solitary wasps .................................................................................................33<br />

KIESELBACH D. & HAUSEN H.: 3D-Reconstructions of the chaetal arrangement<br />

contradict ideas on a common inheritance of the chaetal inversion in<br />

Sabellariidae <strong>and</strong> Sabellidae (Annelida) .........................................................34<br />

KLAUS S., SCHUBART C. & BRANDIS D.: Biogeographic hypothesis for the distribution<br />

pattern of freshwater crabs .............................................................................35<br />

LEHRKE J. & BLEIDORN C.: Phylogenetic relationships of Serpulidae (Annelida,<br />

Polychaeta) based on 18S-rRNA-sequence data <strong>and</strong> implications for opercular<br />

evolution .........................................................................................................36<br />

LIEBHERR J. K.: Conserving ecological <strong>and</strong> phylogenetic relationships as well as<br />

species............................................................................................................37<br />

LIEDE-SCHUMANN S. & RAPINI A.: Phylogenetic results <strong>and</strong> their implications for the<br />

classification of American Asclepiadeae (Apocynaceae)................................38<br />

LINDER H. P. & NYFFELER R.: Historical biogeography of alpine plants: what are the<br />

questions? ......................................................................................................39<br />

MAYER G.: Nephridial development in the Onychophora <strong>and</strong> its bearing on the<br />

Articulata hypothesis.......................................................................................40<br />

MEYER A., HAUSEN H., BLEIDORN C. & ROUSE G.: The Proscoloplos species complex<br />

(Annelida: Orbiniidae) is a single disjunctively distributed species: support from<br />

molecular <strong>and</strong> morphological ..........................................................................41<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 8<br />

MOLENDA R., SZALLIES A. & HUBER C.: Phylogeography of the Oreonebria castanea-<br />

group (Coleoptera:Carabidae): historical biogeography of alpine faunistic<br />

elements .........................................................................................................42<br />

MÜLLER P.: Rattle snake evolution – or „what really counts“......................................43<br />

NEBEL M., KOTTKE I. & PREUßING M.: New insights in the evolution of liverworts<br />

stimulated by symbiotic fungi ..........................................................................44<br />

PODSIADLOWSKI L.: Nucleotide frequency biases as a problem in phylogenetic<br />

analyses using mitochondrial gene sequences...............................................45<br />

RICHLING I.: Re-interpretation of the distribution <strong>and</strong> biogeography of helicinid snails<br />

on the Lesser Antilles <strong>and</strong> Puerto Rico (Mollusca: Gastropoda:Neritopsina)..46<br />

SCHICK S., LÖTTERS S. & VEITH M.: LBF-systematics in eastern Africa.......................47<br />

SEIFRIED S., WILLEN E., GEORGE K. H., VEIT-KÖHLER G., DREWES J., BRÖHLDICK K.,<br />

ROSE A., MOURA G., ARBIZU P. M. & SCHMINKE H. K.: Harpacticoida (Crustacea:<br />

Copepoda) from the deep sea of the Angola Basin ........................................48<br />

SPELDA J.: Millipedes as aids for the reconstruction of long-term Quaternary refugia49<br />

STEINER G., DREYER H., SATLER M. & KNAPP M.: Advances in phylogenetic inference<br />

from molluscan mitochondrial genomes .........................................................50<br />

STEINKE D., PFENNIGER M. & MEYER A.: Applications of DNA barcoding ....................51<br />

TRIBSCH A. & BROCHMANN CH.: Evolution <strong>and</strong> phylogeography of arctic-alpine plants52<br />

VAN DER NIET T., JOHNSON S. D. & LINDER H. P.: Can we reject pollinator-driven<br />

speciation as a predominant model for the Cape Floristic Region? ................53<br />

VENCES M.: DNA barcoding in amphibians: identifying tadpoles <strong>and</strong> c<strong>and</strong>idate<br />

species............................................................................................................54<br />

WAGNER T.: Revision of afrotropical Galerucinae (Chrysomelidae, Coleoptera) –<br />

Overview after ten years.................................................................................55<br />

WEIRAUCH C. & CASSIS G.: Ptilocnemus Westwood (Heteroptera, Reduviidae,<br />

Holoptilinae): first results on morphology, systematics, <strong>and</strong> biology of the ant-<br />

preying assassin bugs ....................................................................................56<br />

Abstracts of posters<br />

BLEIDORN C.: Analysis of annelid mitochondrial sequence data supports inclusion of<br />

Sipuncula within annelids................................................................................58<br />

BRÄUCHLER C., MEIMBERG H., ABELE T. & HEUBL G.: A molecular perspective for tribal<br />

concepts <strong>and</strong> generic boundaries in subfamily Nepetoideae (Lamiaceae) .....59<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 9<br />

GAD G.: A new taxon of characteristic deep-sea Loricifera. Part I: Taxonomy <strong>and</strong><br />

morphology .....................................................................................................60<br />

GAD G.: A new taxon of characteristic deep-sea Loricifera. Part II: Life cycle <strong>and</strong><br />

phylogenetic relationships...............................................................................61<br />

GALLEY C. & LINDER H. P.: Biogeographical affinities of the Cape flora......................62<br />

GEHRKE B. & LINDER H. P.: Testing diversification <strong>and</strong> radiation of the Northern<br />

Hemisphere plant elements in the Afrotemperate regions ..............................63<br />

HAAS F.: Biogeography <strong>and</strong> evolution of Eastern African Dermaptera ......................64<br />

HAAS F. & Häuser C.: New developments in the GTI process ...................................65<br />

HARING E., NITTINGER F., PINSKER W. & GAMAUF A.: Population genetic study on the<br />

Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug) .........................................................................66<br />

HEIM I., NICKEL M. & BRÜMMER F.: The COI sequence – a reliable marker to<br />

differentiate species of marine sponges, too?.................................................67<br />

HERTACH T.: Three species instead of one: provisional distribution of the species of<br />

the Cicadetta montana complex (Homoptera: Cicadidae) in Switzerl<strong>and</strong> .......68<br />

HOCHKIRCH A. & GÖRZIG Y.: Flightless versus winged – colonization <strong>and</strong> speciation<br />

processes of Orthoptera on the Canary Isl<strong>and</strong>s..............................................69<br />

HOFFMANN J.: Adaptive radiation of Hyalella (Crustacea, Amphipoda) in Lake Titicaca<br />

.................................................................................................................70<br />

HOFFMANN S. & HAUSEN H.: Arrangement of chaetae in Orbiniidae (Annelida)<br />

indicates close relationship to spiomorph polychaetes ...................................71<br />

HOLSTEIN J., STEINER A. & HÄUSER C. L.: The Global Biodiversity Information Facility<br />

GBIF ...............................................................................................................72<br />

HÜLSKEN T., CLEMMENSEN M. & HOLLMANN M.: Diversity <strong>and</strong> evolution of the gastropod<br />

family Naticidae ..............................................................................................73<br />

JÜRGENS L. & REINICKE G. B.: The soft coral genus Dendronephthya Kükenthal 1905<br />

(Octocorallia): inventory <strong>and</strong> investigations of the type material in German<br />

museum collections ........................................................................................74<br />

KLEE B., FALKNER G. & HASZPRUNAR G.: Endemic radiations of Limax (Gastropoda:<br />

Stylommatophora) slugs in Corsica – they came twice...................................75<br />

KLUG R.: Pregenital abdominal musculature <strong>and</strong> its innervation in nymphs <strong>and</strong> adults<br />

of Phasmatodea (Insecta)...............................................................................76<br />

KOCH C. & HAUSEN H.: Metameric repetition of nuchal organs in Orbiniidae (Annelida)<br />

<strong>and</strong> its systematic significance........................................................................77<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 10<br />

KOCH M. & EDGECOMBE G. D.: The peristomatic organs of Geophilomorpha<br />

(Chilopoda) <strong>and</strong> the phylogenetic position of Craterostigmus.........................78<br />

KREIER H.-P. & SCHNEIDER H.: Phylogeny <strong>and</strong> biography of Staghorn Ferns,<br />

Platycerium (Polypodiaceae) ..........................................................................79<br />

LENDEL A. & NYFFELER R.: Molecular systematics <strong>and</strong> growth form evolution in the<br />

tribe Trichocereeae (Cactaceae) ....................................................................80<br />

MAAS A., WALOSZEK D., BRAUN A., REPETSKI J. E. & MÜLLER K. J.: New finds of<br />

Cambrian parasitic pentastomids <strong>and</strong> the remaining questions about their<br />

affinities <strong>and</strong> evolutionary fate ........................................................................81<br />

MACHADO M. C., ZAPPI D. C. & BORBA E. L.: How many species are there? Species<br />

delimitation analyses in the genus Discocactus (Cactaceae) .........................82<br />

MUSTER C. & BERENDONK T. U.: Divergence <strong>and</strong> diversity: lessons from an arctic-<br />

alpine distribution (Pardosa saltuaria group, Lycosidae, Araneae) .................83<br />

OBER S. V. & BURMEISTER E.-G.: The Dragonflies of Libya ........................................84<br />

SAUER J. & HAUSDORF B.: Is DNA barcoding sufficient? Unraveling the radiation of the<br />

l<strong>and</strong> snail genus Xerocrassa on Crete ............................................................85<br />

SCHÄFER H. & RENNER S. S.: Variability of the plastid trnH-psbA intergenic spacer in<br />

Cucurbitaceae <strong>and</strong> its utility for DNA barcoding..............................................86<br />

SCHILL R. O. & NIES G.: Species identification of tardigrades through DNA sequences<br />

.................................................................................................................87<br />

SCHNEEWEISS G. M., PARK J. M., MANEN J. F., COLWELL A. E. & WEISS-SCHNEEWEISS H.:<br />

Phylogenetic relationships of Orobanche <strong>and</strong> related genera: evidence from<br />

molecular <strong>and</strong> karyological data .....................................................................88<br />

SCHÖNSWETTER P., POPP M. & BROCHMANN C.: Immigration patterns of rare arctic-<br />

alpine plants into the Alps...............................................................................89<br />

STACH T., DUPONT S., ISRAELSON O., FAUVILLE G., NAKANO H. & THORNDYKE M.:<br />

Immunocytological evidence supports the hypotheses that Xenoturbella bocki<br />

(Westblad 1949), phylum uncertain, is a deuterostome <strong>and</strong> that Ambulacraria<br />

is monophyletic ...............................................................................................90<br />

STEINER A., HOLSTEIN J. & HÄUSER C. L.: Technical st<strong>and</strong>ards for the digital imaging of<br />

Lepidoptera.....................................................................................................91<br />

SZALLIES A., MOLENDA, R. & NAGEL P.: Phylogeography of the Central European<br />

glacial relict species Leptusa simoni (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae): history of<br />

colonization of the German <strong>and</strong> Swiss mountain ranges <strong>and</strong> the Alps. ..........92<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 11<br />

VERMA R. & AGERER R.: Diversity <strong>and</strong> ecology of Ectomycorrhizae on Polygonum<br />

viviparum L. in the Bavarian Alps....................................................................93<br />

VOLZ S. M. & RENNER S. S.: Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the occurrence <strong>and</strong> causes of monoecy<br />

<strong>and</strong> dioecy in Bryonia <strong>and</strong> Ecballium (Cucurbitaceae)....................................94<br />

VON DÖHREN J. & BARTOLOMAEUS T.: Towards a phylogenetic system of the Nemertea<br />

........................................................................................................................95<br />

WALOSZEK D. & MAAS A.: Evolutionary history of crustacean segmentation <strong>and</strong><br />

tagmosis: a fossil-based perspective ..............................................................96<br />

Adresses ...........................................................................................................97-109<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 12<br />

Preface<br />

The present volume contains the abstracts of 43 short communications <strong>and</strong> 39<br />

posters presented at the 8th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biological Systematics<br />

(GfBS) (see http://www.gfbs-home.de/) in Basle, 13–16 September 2005. The<br />

meeting which took place at the Natural History <strong>Museum</strong> was organised by the<br />

"Naturhistorisches <strong>Museum</strong> Basel" <strong>and</strong> the "Institut für Natur-, L<strong>and</strong>schafts- und<br />

Umweltschutz" of the University Basle <strong>and</strong> was attended by 145 participants. The<br />

meeting was opened by PD Dr. Daniel Burckhardt (organiser), Professor Dr.<br />

Wolfgang Wägele (President of the GfBS) <strong>and</strong> PD Dr. Christian Meyer (Director of<br />

the Natural History <strong>Museum</strong> Basle).<br />

The main topics were (1) Historical biogeography with emphasis on mountains; (2)<br />

Systematics <strong>and</strong> nature conservation; (3) DNA-based identification <strong>and</strong> DNA<br />

barcoding, <strong>and</strong> (4) Free subjects. Following key note lectures were given: "Historical<br />

biogeography of alpine plants: what are the questions?" by H. P. Linder & R. Nyffeler;<br />

"Conserving ecological <strong>and</strong> phylogenetic relationships as well as species" by J. K.<br />

Liebherr; "The unholy trinity: DNA barcoding, taxonomy <strong>and</strong> species delimitation" by<br />

R. DeSalle <strong>and</strong> "Klapperschlangen-Evolution oder 'das wirklich Wichtige'" by P.<br />

Müller. The contributed presentations covered many aspects of systematics <strong>and</strong><br />

taxonomy including virtually all major clades of organisms. Workshops were offered<br />

on "Methods in Biogeography: Computer assisted instructions" by Peter Comes <strong>and</strong><br />

"Marketing for taxonomists <strong>and</strong> systematists" by Martin Kreuels. A minisymposium<br />

<strong>and</strong> a round table discussion were dedicated to the controversial issue of barcoding.<br />

During the congress special meetings were organised for the curators (by M. Kotrba)<br />

<strong>and</strong> the young systematists (by I. Richling), <strong>and</strong> the recently founded "Swiss<br />

Systematics Society" (SSS) was presented by J. Mariaux. Guided tours were offered<br />

in the Natural History <strong>Museum</strong>, the Zoo (Zoologischer Garten Basel) <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Botanical Garden of the University. The Bernhard Rensch Prize (to A. Hundsdörfer)<br />

as well as prizes for the best student poster presentations were awarded.<br />

The organisers thank all the persons who helped before <strong>and</strong> during the congress.<br />

Daniel Burckhardt & Rol<strong>and</strong> Mühlethaler, Abstract editors<br />

Naturhistorisches <strong>Museum</strong> Basel<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 13<br />

Abstracts of lectures <strong>and</strong> oral<br />

presentations<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 14<br />

<strong>Taxonomic</strong> <strong>publications</strong>: <strong>past</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>future</strong><br />

Donat Agosti, Andrew Polaszek, Klemens Boehm & Guido Sautter<br />

Systematics is communicated through highly st<strong>and</strong>ardized <strong>publications</strong> that are<br />

descriptions of taxa (species <strong>and</strong> their relationships). These descriptions follow<br />

Codes (e.g. the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature for Zoology), <strong>and</strong><br />

have resulted in a corpus of more than one million printed documents, which unlike<br />

most branches of science remain part of the currently accessed body of knowledge.<br />

In the age of the internet, it seems obvious to make this entire knowledge accessible,<br />

especially if this would come at a cost of USD 1 per page <strong>and</strong> would, for the first time<br />

ever, would make this source open access in its entirety to anybody with access to a<br />

PC. Current trends, providing simply copies of the original <strong>publications</strong> through<br />

searchable databases, are now directed towards full text publication with mark-up of<br />

the logic content, i.e. the descriptions as the basic unit of these <strong>publications</strong> using<br />

XML mark schemas. However, three main reasons call for changing this basic unit.<br />

Increasingly, copyright disallows open access to systematics content, <strong>and</strong> thus<br />

prevents the majority of the scientists to at least viewing it, <strong>and</strong> thus needs a solution.<br />

Secondly, new algorithm allow to mine <strong>and</strong> extract information from vast body of<br />

data. Thridly, descriptions as the basic unit of systematics will be replaced by<br />

databases out of which descriptions, diagnosis, distributions <strong>and</strong> other features can<br />

be generated on dem<strong>and</strong> on the fly, dem<strong>and</strong>ed by the user groups of systematics.<br />

This advanced access to systematics information, the necessary changing basic<br />

underlying units such as character data matrices, access to name authority files,<br />

search algorithms <strong>and</strong> their impact, <strong>and</strong> its consequences on <strong>future</strong> publishing <strong>and</strong><br />

disseminating of information will be discussed.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 15<br />

Species recognition of white grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) through DNA<br />

barcoding in megadiverse tropical soil assemblages<br />

D. Ahrens & A.P. Vogler<br />

White grubs are the larvae of phytophagous scarab beetles (Scarabaeidae), a highly<br />

species rich group of 10,000+ species including rose chafers, may beetles, Japanese<br />

beetles, rhinoceros beetles, <strong>and</strong> others). Numerous species are important crop pests,<br />

feeding unspecifically on leaves in the adult stages, whereas the subterranean larvae<br />

damage the root system of trees <strong>and</strong> shrubs. Most groups of scarabaeids remain<br />

very poorly understood taxonomically, in part due to the great similarity of many<br />

species which frequently are separable only by the male genitalia. In the larval<br />

stages, most species lack any diagnostic features at all, while it is also difficult to<br />

match them with adults. Due to high diversity in tropical areas, larvae cannot be<br />

identified or characterized morphologically for purposes of sustainable pest control,<br />

ecological studies, etc.<br />

DNA based procedures could provide a solution to these taxonomic problems. We<br />

demonstrate this in a cultivated tropical lowl<strong>and</strong> site of Nepal (Chitwan District) where<br />

ongoing biocontrol of these beetles using more-or-less species specific<br />

entomopathogenous fungi require solid identification of larvae <strong>and</strong> adults. We<br />

generated a database of syntopic larval <strong>and</strong> adult specimens. These were matched<br />

to each other based on phylogenetic trees built from DNA sequences of st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

gene markers. The mitochondrial genes cytochrome oxidase 1 <strong>and</strong> 16S rRNA were<br />

highly successful in discriminating between species. Many larvae could be matched<br />

with adults based on tight clusters of DNA sequences obtained from adults, but there<br />

were several cases where groups were observed in the one stage only. In a<br />

subsequent step, morphological characters can be established to build identification<br />

tools for field based species separation, greatly aiding the biocontrol efforts.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 16<br />

Loss of phylogenetic information in histone genes because of gene conversion<br />

<strong>and</strong> GC3 drive? A data analysis of mammals <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> snails<br />

G. F. J. Armbruster & M. Böhme<br />

Replication-dependent histone genes occur in all eukaryotes <strong>and</strong> provide essential<br />

proteins for cell division. Histone gene sequences are often used in phylogenetic<br />

reconstructions of animal <strong>and</strong> plant taxa. We give an introduction on genomic<br />

arrangement of histone genes, <strong>and</strong> put the focus on gene conversion <strong>and</strong> GC3 drive<br />

mechanisms. GC3 drive, i.e., the enrichment of G or C nucleotides at the third,<br />

“wobble” codon position in protein-coding regions, is a favorite explanation why<br />

mammals (human, mouse) have high GC3 values in histone gene copies. This<br />

process seems to be influenced by conversion of chromosomal neighbours of histone<br />

genes of identical function (Galtier, 2003: Trends in Genetics, 19: 65-68). Because of<br />

these mechanisms of neighbouring loci, histone gene families of mammals are<br />

subjected to a loss of phylogenetic signals (i.e., loss of A or T nucleotides at the third<br />

codon position). This loss of phylogenetic information at the third codon position<br />

usually does not alter the amino acid sequence due to the degenerated code of<br />

“wobble” bases. Hence, GC3 mechanisms are not correlated with a shift to another<br />

amino acid sequence.<br />

We then present data of the partial Histone(H3)-spacer-Histone(H4) gene cluster of<br />

l<strong>and</strong> snails. We did not find clues for strong G or C enrichment at wobble base<br />

positions. Hence, phylogenetic information with A <strong>and</strong> T (<strong>and</strong> C <strong>and</strong> G) nucleotides<br />

was still found in the H3-H4 sequence alignment. At least two hypotheses are<br />

relevant for discussing putative histone gene differences of l<strong>and</strong> snails <strong>and</strong><br />

mammals: 1) L<strong>and</strong> snails have another arrangement of histone gene copies on their<br />

chromosomes <strong>and</strong>, hence, they might not have the typical “neighbouring” effect as<br />

mammalian histone gene cluster; 2) gastropods are poikilotherm animals,<br />

presumably with no strong constraint to enrich G or C nucleotides at the third codon<br />

position. Thus, a stabilizing shift of A/TG/C could be more likely necessary in warmblooded<br />

animals because of their higher body temperature. The latter hypothesis,<br />

however, is controversially discussed (Galtier, 2003: p. 67). The data analysis shows<br />

that phylogenetic information of protein-coding gene families can be influenced by<br />

gene arrangement, chromosomal neighbourhood <strong>and</strong> gene conversion.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 17<br />

Nevrorthidae – “Coelacanths” among the Neuropterida?<br />

On the phylogeny <strong>and</strong> biogeography of a relict group<br />

(Insecta: Neuropterida: Neuroptera)<br />

U. Aspöck & H. Aspöck<br />

Recent holomorphological as well as molecular cladistic analyses have confirmed the<br />

hypothesis that the Nevrorthidae represent the sistergroup of all other families of the<br />

Neuroptera. Today the family comprises only 12 described species assigned to 3<br />

genera with a very disjunct distribution. The eidonomically inconspicuous adults<br />

impress by excessively shaped male genital sclerites, which are of high phylogenetic<br />

relevance. The aquatic larvae are equipped with a complex joint between head <strong>and</strong><br />

pronotum, the archaic head capsule plays a key role in the underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />

phylogeny of the Neuroptera. The aquatic pupa is unique among Neuropterida <strong>and</strong> a<br />

special autapomorphy of the family.<br />

The striking similarity of the three genera <strong>and</strong> their disjunct <strong>and</strong> isolated distribution in<br />

three parts of the Old World – Mediterranean region, Japanese isl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Taiwan,<br />

<strong>and</strong> along the South Eastern coast of Australia respectively – support the assumption<br />

of a high age of the group. The survival in coastal areas may have been favoured by<br />

the marine climate <strong>and</strong> environment.<br />

The scarce biological, all available morphological <strong>and</strong> especially the chorological<br />

parameters support the hypothesis of a formerly huge distribution of the<br />

Nevrorthidae. Nevertheless, the genesis of the present distribution with respect to<br />

dispersal, vicariance events <strong>and</strong> extinction remains to be clarified.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 18<br />

DNA barcoding in the fungal world<br />

D. Begerow & M. Lutz<br />

Research of the last decade has shown that biodiversity of microorganisms has been<br />

underestimated dramatically so far. This can be demonstrated by many examples for<br />

fungi. The upcoming questions are illustrated for the fungal world. Finally we discuss<br />

the <strong>future</strong> needs of DNA barcoding.<br />

Most fungi have at least two different life stages, namely the anamorph <strong>and</strong> the<br />

teleomorph. Often these two life stages exhibit quite different characteristics <strong>and</strong> it is<br />

thus difficult to reveal the unity of the respective fungi. E.g., the anamorphic yeast<br />

stages of smut fungi can be isolated from many different habitats. However, the<br />

morphological characters, which are necessary for identification <strong>and</strong> phylogenetic<br />

placement of these smuts are expressed only in the parasitic teleomorphic stage.<br />

The use of DNA sequence data revealed unexpected ecological <strong>and</strong> phylogenetical<br />

aspects of smut fungi <strong>and</strong> improved our knowledge of Ustilaginomycetes.<br />

Molecular analyses <strong>and</strong> infection experiments revealed the tripartite life-cycle of<br />

Tuberculina-Thanatophytum-Helicobasidium. Molecular typification of different<br />

isolates in combination with infection experiments demonstrated the hidden diversity<br />

within this exceptional mycoparasitic-phytoparasitic fungal group.<br />

The use of sequence data for biodiversity studies in Microbotryum showed<br />

unexpected diversity within the genus. Phylogenetic analyses in combination with<br />

ecological data allows a new interpretation of smut evolution. Based on the new data,<br />

hypotheses on characters, which are relevant for dispersal, the infection process <strong>and</strong><br />

the interaction with host plants are discussed.<br />

The use of st<strong>and</strong>ardised DNA regions <strong>and</strong> procedures will help to discuss questions<br />

related to diversity of microorganisms on a rapidly increasing database. For the<br />

fungal world nuclear SSU, LSU <strong>and</strong> ITS regions became st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong> should be at<br />

least part of <strong>future</strong> plans.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 19<br />

Rates of molecular evolution in mammals<br />

Olaf R.P. Bininda-Emonds<br />

A growing wealth of sequence data is now available for mammals, both at the level of<br />

entire genomes (nuclear <strong>and</strong> mitochondrial) <strong>and</strong> for individual genes. Despite this<br />

fact, there is a clear gap in our knowledge regarding rates of molecular evolution in<br />

this group, <strong>and</strong> the variation in <strong>and</strong> the factors determining these rates. It is clear<br />

that, at best, only a local molecular clock exists <strong>and</strong> that the rate of evolution varies<br />

both between genes <strong>and</strong> between lineages. However, beyond this, much of the<br />

available information is largely dated, remains somewhat anecdotal (e.g., “fast rats”<br />

or the “hominid slowdown”), <strong>and</strong> is based on limited sequence information that was<br />

usually not analyzed in a robust phylogenetic framework.<br />

To address this gap, I present a comprehensive, comparative investigation of rates of<br />

evolution in mammals <strong>and</strong> the variation therein at three (nested) levels: genes,<br />

individual branches, <strong>and</strong> clades. The analyses make use of the largest molecular<br />

data set yet compiled for mammals (44 genes comprising 35 427 bp distributed<br />

among 2111 species) in concert with a dated, species-level supertree for the group.<br />

Nearly all genes had evolutionary rates on the order of 10 -8 or 10 -9 mutations per site<br />

per year. In line with expectations, mtDNA was found to evolve nearly an order of<br />

magnitude faster (8.9 x) than nDNA. However, there was no difference in rate<br />

between tRNA genes <strong>and</strong> other mtDNA genes, belying the evolutionarily more<br />

conservative reputation of the former. Similarly, 18S rDNA was found to be the<br />

fastest evolving of all 44 genes, again in contrast to its conservative reputation.<br />

Branch- <strong>and</strong> clade-specific rates of evolution showed that most mammalian lineages<br />

have “slow” rates of molecular evolution in that most genes are evolving slower along<br />

a given branch or within a given clade than their average across all mammals. Only<br />

restricted groups with rodents <strong>and</strong>, to a lesser degree, bats, primates, <strong>and</strong><br />

cetartiodactyls show a noticeable speedup. Apes do indeed show a reduced rate<br />

compared to other Primates (which is among the fastest of all orders), with the<br />

branch leading to humans being even slower still, thereby confirming the existence of<br />

the “hominid slowdown”. Rodents are the fastest of the major mammalian orders,<br />

thereby supporting the “fast rat” hypothesis, although many lineages within this order<br />

do exhibit significant slowdowns.<br />

Future work will extend these observations to look for mutational hotspots within<br />

individual genes <strong>and</strong> to characterize codon-specific rates of evolution.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 20<br />

Ontogenesis <strong>and</strong> biology of Pentastomida as a helpful additive for their<br />

systematical assignment<br />

Wolfgang Böckeler<br />

Discussions on the systematic position of pentastomids have decreased, because a<br />

relationship to the Branchiura (Crustacea) became more likely supported by data on<br />

molecular analyses <strong>and</strong> comparative spermatogenesis (Wingstr<strong>and</strong>, 1972). Recently<br />

Gr<strong>and</strong>colas (2004) characterised them as „a robust sister group“ based on molecular<br />

evidence. According to Lavrov et al., (2004) pentastomids are modified crustaceans<br />

close to the branchiurans, after comparing 12 mitochondrial genes.<br />

Textbooks soon adapted this reading <strong>and</strong> pentastomids were „put away“ as<br />

branchiurans, implying an established systematic position <strong>and</strong> ignoring that neither<br />

all molecular investigations nor known morphological criteria support this<br />

classification. Arguments for their basal arthropod character (e. g. Osche, 1963;<br />

Böckeler, 1984a-c; Waloszek & Müller, 1994) diminished gradually.<br />

Although confirming a crustacean relationship on 18S- <strong>and</strong> 28S-rRNA sequences<br />

however 3 additional molecular parameter sets <strong>and</strong> morphological characteristics<br />

favour the position of the pentastomids as basal arthropods (Giribert et al., 2005).<br />

Ikuta & Makioka (1997) supported an assignment to the crustaceans, having studied<br />

the morphology of the female genital tract <strong>and</strong> the oogenesis of Argulus japonicus<br />

(Branchiura). Böckeler (1984c) already pointed out the symplesiomorphic characters<br />

of these structures, because the same similarities can be observed in acari <strong>and</strong><br />

onychophorans.<br />

The still existing contradictions require a review <strong>and</strong> assessment of morphological<br />

characters. Considering modifications of both taxa due to their parasitic way of life a<br />

comparison of embryogenetic processes seems appropriate. Respective studies on<br />

the basic pentastomid Reighardia sternae (Böckeler, 1984a-c) showed that neither a<br />

respiratory nor an excretory system nor a pericardial tube have been inherited. Free<br />

living ancestors were described as minute organisms of about 0.5 mm of length<br />

(Waloszek et al., 1994), which originally never may have needed such organs. The<br />

dorsal organ or „embryonic gl<strong>and</strong>“ - in crustaceans with a trophic function - produces<br />

a mucous layer in pentastomids. Tagmosis including nervous system <strong>and</strong> the<br />

distinctive development of the extremities cannot yet be homologised with<br />

branchiurans. Contrary to crustaceans pentastomids are epimeric <strong>and</strong> primarily<br />

opisthogoneate. The pseudo-progoneate position of the genital pore is caused by a<br />

simple elongation of the abdomen for the storage of numerous eggs, necessary for<br />

the parasitic way of life (Böckeler, 1984a). Comparable studies on digestion<br />

physiology rather suggest a correspondence with acari (Thomas & Böckeler, 1992).<br />

Parasitological studies characterise Pentastomids as endoparasites of tetrapod<br />

hosts, mostly diheteroxene, whereas branchiurans are monoxene ectoparasites on<br />

freshwater fish. Finally, the nauplius (or copepodit-stage), an obligate character of<br />

crustaceans, is totally lacking during ontogenesis of the pentastomids (Böckeler,<br />

1984a).<br />

It is suggested to clarify first the mentioned discrepancies between pentastomids <strong>and</strong><br />

crustaceans to reconsider the phylogenetic assignment of pentastomids.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 21<br />

AFLP – a tool to separate charophyte species<br />

Michael Bögle, Beate Mannschreck, Susanne Schneider & Arnulf Melzer<br />

Charophytes are macrophytic green algae, occurring in st<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> running waters.<br />

They form an ancestral lineage to l<strong>and</strong> plants. Based on morphological<br />

characteristics within the genus, various different interpretations of speciation have<br />

been made. Application of genetic analysis with AFLP-technique provided improved<br />

resolution of the relationships that exist between species.<br />

Morphological differentiation between Chara vulgaris <strong>and</strong> C. contraria is in some<br />

cases unclear. AFLP fingerprinting separated them into two groups, thus it was<br />

possible to identify a morphological characteristic that could be used to distinguish<br />

the species.<br />

Chara intermedia <strong>and</strong> C. baltica from central <strong>and</strong> northern Europe are differentiated<br />

by their restriction to fresh <strong>and</strong> brackish water, respectively. Morphologically, no<br />

characteristic could be found to provide identification, but the genetic cluster analysis<br />

follows the separation. C. baltica sampled from the Mediterranean Sea were found in<br />

a separate cluster between the other European C. intermedia <strong>and</strong> C. baltica species.<br />

C. hispida, a morphologically separated species, clustered between the C. intermedia<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Mediterranean specima.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 22<br />

The potential of DNA barcoding with special reference to l<strong>and</strong> plants<br />

Robyn Cowan<br />

A wide range of molecular ‘fingerprinting’ techniques such as DNA sequencing,<br />

single nucleotide polymorphisms, nuclear <strong>and</strong> plastid microsatellites <strong>and</strong> amplified<br />

fragment length polymorphism, are used by biologists to study evolutionary<br />

relationships, species delimitation, hybridization <strong>and</strong> population dynamics. More<br />

controversially proposals have been made to base taxonomy “purely” on sequence<br />

data <strong>and</strong> molecular phylogenetic trees, for example the phylocode<br />

(http://www.ohiou.edu/phylocode/). They have also been used, albeit on an ad hoc<br />

basis, as a tool to aid species identification in situations where this is difficult because<br />

of a lack of morphological characters.<br />

The Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL; http://www.barcoding.si.edu/) arose<br />

from discussions <strong>and</strong> meetings about the possibility <strong>and</strong> desirability of establishing a<br />

universal species level identification tool based on a short region of DNA sequence<br />

<strong>and</strong> the term ‘DNA barcoding’ was coined to describe this. The aims of CBOL are to<br />

develop ‘an accurate <strong>and</strong> reliable tool for scientific research on the taxonomy of plant<br />

<strong>and</strong> animal species, a practical, cost-effective tool for assigning unidentified<br />

specimens to their correct species, <strong>and</strong> a system for exp<strong>and</strong>ing interest <strong>and</strong> activity<br />

in taxonomy’.<br />

In a range of animal groups (<strong>and</strong> at least some algal groups), the mitochondrial<br />

cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (CO1 or cox1) is already proving to be<br />

efficacious as a DNA barcode although in some groups an additional or alternative<br />

region may be necessary. However this region is not suitable as a DNA barcode in<br />

l<strong>and</strong> plants as, with some exceptions, the rate of base mutations is too slow to<br />

distinguish between taxa at a species level. A project is underway to identify a plant<br />

DNA barcode that is as universal as possible across l<strong>and</strong> plants, whilst also providing<br />

a high rate of correct identification at the species level. Several c<strong>and</strong>idate regions will<br />

be tested on a range of densely sampled plant clades <strong>and</strong> protocols <strong>and</strong> primer<br />

information disseminated as widely as possible.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 23<br />

The unholy trinity: DNA barcoding, taxonomy <strong>and</strong> species delimitation<br />

Rob DeSalle<br />

Recent excitement over the development of an initiative to generate DNA sequences<br />

for all named species on the planet has in our opinion generated two major areas of<br />

contention as to how this "DNA barcoding" initiative should proceed. These two<br />

issues are critical to clarify <strong>and</strong> to resolve before the use of DNA as tools for<br />

taxonomy <strong>and</strong> species delimitation can be universalized. The first issue concerns<br />

how DNA data are to be used in the context of this initiative. In essence we call this<br />

the DNA barcode reader problem (or Dan Janzen's barcorder problem). Currently,<br />

many of the published studies within this initiative have used tree building methods<br />

<strong>and</strong> more precisely distance approaches to the construction of the trees that are<br />

used to place certain DNA sequences into a taxonomic context. The second problem<br />

involves the reaction of the taxomonic community to the directives of the "DNA<br />

barcoding" initiative. This issue is extremely important in that the classical taxomonic<br />

approach <strong>and</strong> the DNA approach will need to be reconciled in order for the "DNA<br />

barcoding" initiative to proceed. In fact, we feel that DNA barcoding is a misnomer<br />

<strong>and</strong> should be called as the title of the London meetings were - Barcoding Life. In this<br />

paper we discuss these two concerns generated around the DNA barcoding initiative<br />

<strong>and</strong> attempt to present a phylogenetic systematic framework for building the best<br />

barcorder possible <strong>and</strong> a taxonomically based framework for interweaving classical<br />

taxonomy with the goals of "DNA barcoding".<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 24<br />

New phylogenies <strong>and</strong> <strong>past</strong> classifications – should we compare the two?<br />

T. Dikow<br />

Recently, many phylogenies of a diverse array of taxa have been published that<br />

are solely based on DNA-sequence data. Typically, these “new” phylogenies are<br />

compared to previously established classifications that were not necessarily<br />

derived from the rigorous methodologies of current phylogenetic systematics.<br />

These comparisons often detail the support that the “new” phylogenies give to<br />

established taxa without added insight into how such molecular studies can<br />

improve our classifications. The validity of simple comparisons of long established<br />

classifications <strong>and</strong> “new” molecular phylogenies will be discussed in light of three<br />

evident theoretical problems: (1) Can we compare the two hypotheses if both are<br />

not grounded in phylogenetic methodology? (2) Can molecular characters test<br />

morphological ones? <strong>and</strong> (3) Can new phylogenies test monophyly of taxa in<br />

previous classifications?<br />

Using a recently published molecular phylogeny of robber flies (Insecta: Diptera:<br />

Asilidae) as an example, it is shown that the common line of argumentation in<br />

molecular <strong>publications</strong> is unsound for two main reasons. First, the sheer<br />

comparison of molecular <strong>and</strong> morphological hypotheses does not entail a scientific<br />

test because morphological features used as the basis for the previous<br />

classifications are not incorporated into the molecular analysis <strong>and</strong>, therefore, the<br />

morphological characters remain as yet-to-be-tested hypotheses of homology.<br />

Second, earlier classifications may be based only on a few diagnostic features<br />

without character assessment in the Hennigian sense, <strong>and</strong> accompanying<br />

published diagrams of relationships therefore are not cladograms in a strict sense.<br />

Interpretation of <strong>past</strong> classifications should go beyond a simple comparison by<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing how previous classifications <strong>and</strong> diagrams of relationships were<br />

obtained, <strong>and</strong> what information they hold that can be simultaneously tested with<br />

molecular characters. Rather than simply discussing similarities <strong>and</strong> differences,<br />

modern phylogenetic studies can improve <strong>past</strong> classifications by employing (1)<br />

many character complexes (behavioural, molecular, morphological etc.); (2) broad<br />

taxon sampling (ingroup <strong>and</strong> outgroup); <strong>and</strong> (3) combined, simultaneous<br />

phylogenetic analysis of all character complexes. Modern taxonomic research<br />

projects should translate the newly obtained information into phylogenetic<br />

classifications entailing diagnoses <strong>and</strong> identification tools, which can then be used<br />

by biologists of a variety of fields <strong>and</strong> bring light to their scientific questions. This is<br />

the central role of taxonomy in the biological sciences <strong>and</strong> we are the ones who<br />

can deliver this knowledge.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 25<br />

DNA-barcoding of non-biting midges (Diptera: Chironomidae)<br />

Torbjørn Ekrem, Endre Willassen & Elisabeth Stur<br />

The immature stages of the dipteran family Chironomidae are frequently the most<br />

diverse <strong>and</strong> abundant macroinvertebrates in freshwater ecosystems. Many species<br />

have specific habitat requirements, <strong>and</strong> chironomids are thus excellent c<strong>and</strong>idates for<br />

long term biomonitoring of freshwaters. However, the aquatic larvae of closely related<br />

species are usually difficult to distinguish by means of morphology, <strong>and</strong> species<br />

identification frequently depends on association of the larvae with identified adult<br />

males. In this study we examine the possibility of utilizing partial COI gene<br />

sequences to identify closely related chironomid species of the subtribe Tanytarsina.<br />

We analyzed DNA from 39 specimens of 28 species in the genera Cladotanytarsus,<br />

Micropsectra, Parapsectra, Paratanytarsus, Rheotanytarsus <strong>and</strong> Tanytarsus with<br />

main focus on Micropsectra. Our findings show that (1) COI is easily amplified from<br />

extracts from all life stages of Chironomidae with the st<strong>and</strong>ard barcoding primers. (2)<br />

Although uncorrected pair wise distances between con-specific sequences varied up<br />

to 4.59 %, con-specifics always clustered together with 100 % bootstrap support.<br />

This indicates that barcodes may be excellent tools to identify species that are<br />

already in a COI library. (3) However, minimum evolution clustering based on raw<br />

distances did not otherwise indicate phylogenetic relations between the species<br />

examined. This suggests that if the sequence is not already available in the library,<br />

the prospects of approximately identifying an unknown sequence, even to the correct<br />

genus of Tanytarsina, are not good.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 26<br />

DNA taxonomy of the genus Galanthus, species identification <strong>and</strong> illegal trade<br />

Nikolai Friesen<br />

The genus Galanthus L. comprises 19 species <strong>and</strong> occurs naturally in Europe,<br />

Turkey <strong>and</strong> in the Caucasus. Snowdrops are popular garden plants <strong>and</strong> millions of<br />

bulbs are sold annually, mainly G. nivalis, G. elwesii <strong>and</strong> G. woronowii. Most of the<br />

bulbs of G. elwesii <strong>and</strong> G. woronowii are collected in the wild in Georgia <strong>and</strong> Turkey,<br />

for which collecting <strong>and</strong> trade the quota is fixed, whereas G. nivalis bulbs are mostly<br />

cultivated. Galanthus species are presently on CITES Appendix II. Sometimes other<br />

species are also collected, such as those for which trade has been banned, or G.<br />

elwesii <strong>and</strong> G. woronowii are over collected, <strong>and</strong> surplus declared as G. nivalis. The<br />

monitoring of trade in Galanthus is very difficult, as plants are usually imported as<br />

bulbs <strong>and</strong> only very limited identification can be undertaken at this stage of the life<br />

cycle. The custom-houses are interested in quick species identification methods for<br />

the genus based on species specific DNA PCR-Marker.<br />

The DNA-based taxonomy of the genus Galanthus was investigated. Species of the<br />

genus Galanthus are divided into the five alliances: krasnovii-, nivalis-, elwesii-,<br />

woronowii- <strong>and</strong> alpinus-group. The species Galanthus nivalis, G. elwesii <strong>and</strong> G.<br />

woronowii, which are important for commercial trade, are genetically clearly different<br />

<strong>and</strong> build monophyletic clades on the cpDNA <strong>and</strong> nrDNA analysis. Rapid species<br />

identification method on the base of the species unique DNA PCR-Marker is<br />

developed. Primers of 18-20 base pairs are designed to amplify some short, unique<br />

fragment of DNA for most Galanthus species.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 27<br />

Merits <strong>and</strong> limitations of DNA-barcoding in plants<br />

B. Gemeinholzer<br />

DNA-barcoding might enable to assign an unidentified specimen to a known species<br />

or to discover or distinguish new species. It enables taxa identification from<br />

fragmented material during all stage of life may allow to distinguish among organisms<br />

that look alike <strong>and</strong> might facilitate rapid recognition of organisms. Compiling a library<br />

of DNA-barcodes linked to vouchered specimens will enhance public access to<br />

biological knowledge <strong>and</strong> contribute to an on-line available organism database.<br />

DNA-barcoding of plants, however, is facing limitations as the variability of molecular<br />

loci is differing among plant groups so the percentage similarity will not inevitably be<br />

related to taxonomic hierarchy levels but indicates the position of the input sequence<br />

relative to the nearest matches. The formal taxonomic interpretation of this position<br />

will depend on taxonomic information attached to these matching sequences <strong>and</strong><br />

cannot be deduced from sequence data. Identical sequences in several closely<br />

related species can limit the precision of identification. DNA-barcoding as well as<br />

common taxonomic practice requires a functional underst<strong>and</strong>ing of species concepts<br />

<strong>and</strong> the significance of signal variation to interpret discontinuities in interspecific<br />

variation. Furthermore, the various mechanisms of recombination, hybridisation,<br />

polyploidisation, concerted evolution <strong>and</strong> introgression might constitute impediments<br />

for correct DNA based taxon identification in plants.<br />

As a contribution to establish taxonomic identification methods using DNA sequence<br />

data, we evaluated to which extent the present set-up of the nucleotide databases<br />

allows to use them for reliable routine plant identification applying the implemented<br />

sequence similarity <strong>and</strong> homology search tools, screening newly determined ITS 1<br />

sequences from the Asteraceae. As result of our analysis we conclude that the<br />

nucleotide databases even though they are not being curated to serve as taxonomic<br />

identification tools are already fairly successful in correct plant identification.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 28<br />

Conflicting phylogenetic relationships <strong>and</strong> taxonomic ranks in alpine Arianta<br />

(Gastropoda, Pulmonata)<br />

E. Gittenberger, D. Groenenberg & W. H. Piel<br />

The pulmonate l<strong>and</strong> snail Arianta arbustorum is widespread in Europe, both in the<br />

lowl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> in the mountains. It varies considerably in shell shape <strong>and</strong> size. In most<br />

populations the shells are globular with a closed umbilicus. Shell size is clearly<br />

related to altitude in this globular form, which occurs from below sea level to close to<br />

3000 m in the Alps; snails at the highest altitudes may have only a quarter of the<br />

weight of their conspecifics from the lowl<strong>and</strong>. This clinal variation is usually<br />

considered ecophenotypic. Phenotypic plasticity may account for about 50 % of it,<br />

showing that contrary to the opinion of some systematists, ecophenotypic <strong>and</strong><br />

genetic are not simply alternatives. Much more locally in the Alps <strong>and</strong> Pyrenees<br />

depressed shells with an open umbilicus are found. Populations with depressed<br />

shells are not known from the lowl<strong>and</strong>. Using DNA sequences, the phylogenetic<br />

relationships of the various forms could be unraveled. On that basis the evolutionary<br />

history of the species could be reconstructed to some extent. The depressed shells<br />

represent the ancestral form, characteristic for the overwhelming majority of<br />

Ariantinae species. Arianta's with such shells survived in some relatively small<br />

refugia in the Alps during glaciations. The snails with globular shells invaded the Alps<br />

post-glacially from the relatively large lowl<strong>and</strong> refugia, resulting in hybridization with<br />

local survivors in some areas but not everywhere. Intermediate forms (globulardepressed)<br />

may occur in contact zones. The complex phylogeography of the<br />

polytypic A. arbustorum resulted in a situation with conflicting phylogenetic<br />

relationships <strong>and</strong> taxonomic ranks, i.e. when the classical species concept of Mayr is<br />

followed, sister group taxa do not always get the same taxonomic rank. This is not<br />

surprising since sister groups may differ considerably in their evolutionary history.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 29<br />

A range-wide phylogeography of European pond turtles (genus Emys): new<br />

insights from mitochondrial sequence data<br />

D. Guicking, U. Fritz & M. Wink<br />

We analysed phylogeography <strong>and</strong> population genetic variation in European pond<br />

turtles (genus Emys) using mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences of 643 individuals<br />

from the entire distribution range. We found 58 haplotypes that belong to nine wellsupported<br />

clades. The most basal clade comprises the Sicilian pond turtles, which<br />

recently have been described as a distinct species, Emys tinacris.<br />

A nested clade analysis suggests that the current lineages originated from <strong>past</strong><br />

fragmentation of a common ancestor followed by range expansion <strong>and</strong> diversification<br />

of the individual lineages. The geographic origins of the lineages are coherent with<br />

the main European Pleistocene refugia: Iberian peninsula, Italian peninsula, the<br />

Balkans, Turkish peninsula <strong>and</strong> the southern Caspian Sea. Diversification of lineages<br />

was further enhanced through restricted gene flow <strong>and</strong> subsequent isolation-bydistance.<br />

A good knowledge of the phylogeography <strong>and</strong> evolutionary history is the necessary<br />

prerequisite for any effictive conservation activity. This is particularly important for<br />

European pond turtles which are highly endangered in several European countries.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 30<br />

Rain shadow <strong>and</strong> fog desert: orogenic influences on the evolution of<br />

Oxalis in the coastal desert of Atacama, Chile<br />

C. Heibl, A. Kocyan, S. S. Renner & J. Grau<br />

The Atacama Desert is thought to have formed from the Late Miocene onwards by<br />

cooling of the Humboldt Current (HC), intensified by the rain shadow created by the<br />

uplift of the Andes during the Pleistocene. The cooling of the HC also established a<br />

thermal inversion layer over the Pacific Ocean under which stratocumulus decks are<br />

being trapped. While the resulting fog oases created refugia from the continuing<br />

desiccation for species able to live on surface condensation water, there clearly was<br />

strong selection for xeromorphic adaptations.<br />

In the present study we infer the evolution of different life forms in the genus Oxalis.<br />

Oxalis is represented in the Atacama Desert with c. 20 species. A few of them are<br />

cushion shrubs, while the majority has developed water-storing stems, leaves, <strong>and</strong><br />

root tubers. Different species appear to have opted for either belowground or<br />

aboveground storage.<br />

Specifically, we asked: Is there a single origin of succulence or are there multiple<br />

origins due to convergent evolution, <strong>and</strong> are the Atacama Oxalis a monophyletic<br />

group or not?<br />

To answer these questions we constructed a phylogeny based on two chloroplast<br />

markers (trnL-L-F <strong>and</strong> psbA-trnH) sampled for Atacama Oxalis endemics <strong>and</strong><br />

representatives of all west-Andean sections of Oxalis. The topology suggests that<br />

two lineages of Oxalis adapted to the Atacama Desert, with a single origin of<br />

succulence in one of them.<br />

We interpret these results as follows: (1) A clade of three species (section Caesiae)<br />

represents the survivors of an old lineage of cushion shrubs. This lineage failed to<br />

evolve water-storing tissues, instead relying on low ‘cushion’ growth <strong>and</strong> thick layers<br />

of epicuticular waxes. (2) A second clade (sections Giganteae <strong>and</strong> Carnosae,<br />

together 17 species) diversified after evolving water-storing tissues, apparently a key<br />

innovation. Limited genetic divergence among the species in this clade suggests a<br />

recent origin <strong>and</strong> possibly an adaptive radiation (resulting in a hard polytomy). Within<br />

this group, species that live in more arid fog desert allocate more biomass towards<br />

belowground water-storing root tubers than do species that receive winter rainfall.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 31<br />

The phylogeny of the hawkmoth genus Hyles (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae)<br />

with special emphasis on the Hyles euphorbiae-complex:<br />

evidence from mitochondrial sequences, genomic fingerprints <strong>and</strong> chemical<br />

ecology<br />

Anna Hundsdörfer & Michael Wink<br />

The hawkmoth genus Hyles is remarkably uniform in adult morphology <strong>and</strong> very<br />

variable in intra-specific larval characters, especially within the circum-Mediterranean<br />

Hyles euphorbiae-complex (HEC). Molecular data promised significant improvements<br />

in the underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the phylogeny of this genus. This thesis represents the first<br />

detailed application of mitochondrial DNA sequences, nuclear fingerprints <strong>and</strong><br />

methods of chemical ecology to the study of Hyles phylogeny.<br />

The mt-DNA sequence data revealed the genus Hyles to have separated from its<br />

sister group in the Neotropics during the Oligocene/Eocene period. The Palaearctic<br />

appears to have been colonised via the Bering route, during the Pliocene epoch. The<br />

radiation of the HEC is postulated to be as recent as the end of the<br />

Pliocene/beginning of the Pleistocene. It resulted in a clear geographical pattern of<br />

genetic differentiation into two main lineages, the European H. euphorbiae <strong>and</strong> the<br />

North African H. tithymali. I assume that ancient polymorphisms have been retained<br />

until the present within the latter, whereas the former exhibited low diversity, which<br />

was probably caused by a strong decrease of its distribution range <strong>and</strong> population<br />

size during the Ice Ages. Both introgression <strong>and</strong> a major contact zone on the<br />

Mediterranean Isl<strong>and</strong>s between these two evolutionary lineages were detected. It<br />

could be explained by climate oscillations causing north-south expansions <strong>and</strong><br />

restrictions of the hawkmoth populations in the Mediterranean, resulting in contact<br />

<strong>and</strong> hybridisation on the Mediterranean Isl<strong>and</strong>s. Although the sea is the most<br />

effective dispersal barrier in the HEC, it does not represent one that is never crossed,<br />

demonstrated by the finding of H. dahlii in Tunisia, which is a very close relative of<br />

the HEC.<br />

A common characteristic of the HEC is that they rely on Euphorbia foodplants, which<br />

contain toxic phorbol esters. However, the conspicuous larvae of the HEC appear to<br />

warn predators of their toxic gut contents only – i.e. contra common belief, they<br />

(incompletely) metabolise phorbol esters without sequestration. The conspicuous<br />

pattern occurs in two distinct morphotypes within H. tithymali on the Canary Isl<strong>and</strong>s,<br />

that are genetically not distinguishable. By the examination of laboratory-controlled<br />

siblings of H. euphorbiae, as well as field collected ones of H. tithymali, the method<br />

ISSR-PCR revealed an important amount of genomic recombination. Nevertheless,<br />

most H. euphorbiae families formed clades when the coded b<strong>and</strong> patterns of the<br />

ISSR-PCR were analysed with tree-building techniques, revealing the utility of ISSR-<br />

PCR for the level of families consisting of two generations in the HEC. These<br />

fingerprints also vary in other Lepidoptera (Pieridae und Pyralidae) <strong>and</strong> may be used<br />

as a novel source of genetic polymorphism data in studies of closely related<br />

butterflies <strong>and</strong> moths.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 32<br />

Genetic diversity <strong>and</strong> geographic differentiation of Sphagnum fimbriatum<br />

(Sphagnaceae, Bryophyta)<br />

Beatriz Itten, J. Jakob Schneller & Edwin Urmi<br />

Sphagnum fimbriatum (Sphagnopsida, Bryophyta) is a bipolar species that occurs in<br />

the northern <strong>and</strong> southern temperate zones (Eurasia, North America, South America,<br />

New Zeal<strong>and</strong>). It is a monoecious species, frequently develops sporophytes,<br />

presumably as a product of self-fertilisation.<br />

S. fimbriatum usually grows in swampy mesotrophic woodl<strong>and</strong>, mostly below 1000 m<br />

a.s.l. In Switzerl<strong>and</strong> it grows in restricted populations <strong>and</strong> is considered to be rare. In<br />

contrast, in other regions where the species occurs, it is widespread, both in the<br />

Northern <strong>and</strong> Southern hemispheres. Such an interesting geographical distribution<br />

may reflect genetic variability within the species, which up to now has not been<br />

examined so far.<br />

R<strong>and</strong>om Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers were used to measure genetic<br />

variation in twenty-two European <strong>and</strong> seven South American populations.<br />

The genetic distances/similarities between pairs of populations were calculated with<br />

BIOSYS. UPGMA of Nei’s genetic distances divided the populations in two main<br />

clusters, corresponding to geography (Europe <strong>and</strong> South America respectively). The<br />

European cluster, however, is subdivided in groups that do not fit the geographic<br />

patterns.<br />

A hierarchical analysis of variance (AMOVA) revealed relative high differentiation<br />

among continents (17.78 %). The highest partition of the variation is found within<br />

populations (59.95 %). That might be due to large effective population sizes or<br />

multiple colonisation events.<br />

The very pronounced genetic differentiation in each component of the structure<br />

(among continents, among populations within continents <strong>and</strong> within populations),<br />

supported by a high level of significance (P < 0.001), confirm that bryophytes show<br />

molecular variation, which is comparable to that of vascular plants.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 33<br />

Functional <strong>and</strong> phylogenetic implications of the sting<br />

apparatus of solitary wasps<br />

S. Kayß & M. Ohl<br />

The sting apparatus is of importance for an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of phylogenetic <strong>and</strong><br />

evolutionary processes of the aculeate Hymenoptera. Derived from the ovipositor it<br />

serves as a tool for prey paralysation in addition to its defense function. It can be<br />

assumed that the sting apparatus has evolved in close functional association to its<br />

specific biological meaning, for example in adjustment to reproduction strategies.<br />

Sphecid wasps exhibit a great diversity of foraging <strong>and</strong> parental behaviours as well<br />

as a great variation of morphological features. Modifications of the sting apparatus in<br />

sphecids may be expected to result from variation in the prey utilized <strong>and</strong> the exact<br />

behaviours associated with the stinging action. These modifications are particularly<br />

pronounced in the morphology of the stylet <strong>and</strong> lancets (valvula I + valvula II) <strong>and</strong><br />

may reflect the correlation with the mobility of the prey. The presence of spines on<br />

the distal parts of the lancets can be correlated with a less sclerotised body wall of<br />

the prey. Thorny processes on the distal part of the gonostyle are probably<br />

indications of particular modes of prey-transportation. This morphological diversity<br />

can be found on all systematic levels <strong>and</strong> is of great potential utility in phylogenetic<br />

studies in solitary wasps.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 34<br />

3D-Reconstructions of the chaetal arrangement contradict ideas on a common<br />

inheritance of the chaetal inversion in Sabellariidae <strong>and</strong> Sabellidae (Annelida)<br />

D. Kieselbach & H. Hausen<br />

Sabellida <strong>and</strong> Sabellariidae are considered to be sister groups in a number of recent<br />

investigations. This assumption is based mainly on a special distribution of certain<br />

types of chaetae along the body called chaetal inversion. In taxa, which are assumed<br />

to be close relatives of Sabellariidae <strong>and</strong> Sabellida, capillary chaetae form the<br />

notopodial bundles, whereas uncini or homologous hooked chaetae occur only in<br />

neuropodia throughout the body. This meets the situation in the thoracic setigers in<br />

Sabellida, but abdominal notopodia bear uncini <strong>and</strong> abdominal notopodia bear<br />

capillary chaetae. In Sabellariids uncini occur only in notopodia of the abdomen <strong>and</strong><br />

lack completely in the thorax <strong>and</strong> parathorax.<br />

The only correspondance between Sabellida <strong>and</strong> Sabellariidae is the notopodial<br />

position of uncini within the abdomen. To figure out, whether this unusual distribution<br />

evolved once in a common lineage to Sabellariidae <strong>and</strong> Sabellida the sabellids<br />

Branchiomma bombyx, Sabella pavonina <strong>and</strong> Fabricia stellaris <strong>and</strong> the sabellariid<br />

Sabellaria alveolata were closely examined by SEM <strong>and</strong> LM. Exact computer-aided<br />

3D models of the chaetal arrangement were performed by reconstruction of complete<br />

series of plastic embedded semi-thin sections. Like in several other polychaete taxa,<br />

all investigated sabellids show transverse rows in all noto- <strong>and</strong> neuropodia<br />

irrespective of the type of chaetae they bear. The thoracic <strong>and</strong> abdominal transverse<br />

rows have a single formative site at the ventral resp. dorsal edge of each row. In<br />

contrast to abdominal neuropodia thoracic notopodia exhibit an additional, short<br />

longitudinal row with an own caudal formative site. This character is regarded as<br />

derived having evolved after the invention of the chaetal inversion. A minor difference<br />

to Fabricia stellaris is found in Branchiomma bombyx <strong>and</strong> Sabella pavonina. Here the<br />

transverse rows of the abdominal neuropodia are transformed into semicircles or<br />

spirals shortly after segment formation. In all Sabellidae the abrupt transition of<br />

capillary chaetae <strong>and</strong> uncini between thorax <strong>and</strong> abdomen is accompanied by a<br />

sudden change of the parapodial morphology. In contrast Sabellaria alveolata shows<br />

a gradual transition that can clearly be seen in the first one to two abdominal<br />

neuropodial fascicles, since they show a mixed composition of chaetae typical for the<br />

parathoracic <strong>and</strong> abdominal region as well as a mixed growing pattern. Moreover,<br />

there is no change in parapodial morphology between parathorax <strong>and</strong> abdomen in<br />

Sabellariidae at all.<br />

Our results do not support ideas on a common evolutionary event that underlies the<br />

distribution of chaetae in Sabellida <strong>and</strong> Sabellariidae. Thus a position of Sabellariidae<br />

close to Sabellida is uncertain <strong>and</strong> further research is highly dem<strong>and</strong>ed.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 35<br />

Biogeographic hypothesis for the distribution pattern of freshwater crabs<br />

Sebastian Klaus, Christoph Schubart & Dirk Br<strong>and</strong>is<br />

The freshwater crabs of the world have in common that they are adapted to fluviatic,<br />

limnic <strong>and</strong> terrestrial ecosystems by direct development <strong>and</strong> brood care. Several<br />

biogeographic hypothesis exist to explain their present distribution, based on different<br />

assumptions on the phylogeny of freshwater crabs, their dispersal capabilities <strong>and</strong><br />

the timepoint of freshwater crab evolution.<br />

The “vicariance hypothesis” is based on the monophyly of all freshwater crabs <strong>and</strong><br />

assumes for their ancestors an early Gondwana distribution <strong>and</strong> a successsive<br />

isolation of the different groups in the course of the tectonic fragmenation of the<br />

Gondwana continent.<br />

In the “polyphyletic scenario”, unspecified marine ancestors gave rise to the<br />

respective freshwater crab taxa. Closely related to this is the “monophyletic<br />

hypothesis”, but in contrast it is assumed that all freshwater crabs form a<br />

monophylum with one ancestral marine stem group, but several colonisation events<br />

into the freshwater.<br />

Morphological data of the male reproductive apparatus <strong>and</strong> 16S rDNA sequences<br />

lead us to a new phylogeny for the freshwater crabs of the Old World. Based on this<br />

phylogeny we propose a “dispersal hypothesis” for these freshwater crabs <strong>and</strong><br />

explain their present distribution by a complex scenario of dispersal events during the<br />

Cenozoic, in accordance with palaeontological, palaeogeographical <strong>and</strong><br />

palaeoclimatological data. As an example, the dispersal hypothesis for the<br />

Gecarcinucoidea, one of the two superfamilies within the Old World freshwater crabs<br />

is presented, with the focus on the relationship between African <strong>and</strong> Asian taxa.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 36<br />

Phylogenetic relationships of Serpulidae (Annelida, Polychaeta) based<br />

on 18S-rRNA-sequence data <strong>and</strong> implications for opercular evolution<br />

J. Lehrke & C. Bleidorn<br />

The phylogenetic relationships of (19) serpulid taxa (inclusive Spirorbinae) were<br />

reconstructed based on sequence data of the ribosomal 18S-rRNA gene. On the<br />

basis of these molecular data, the hypothesis of Ten Hove (1984) which refers to the<br />

evolution of opercula, was tested. His evolutionary scenario is based on a gradual<br />

transformation series of opercula <strong>and</strong> starts with forms that lack opercula (Protula),<br />

followed by an intermediate stage where the branchial radioles develop swollen tips<br />

(Salmacina), <strong>and</strong> leads to forms that have thin horny opercula (Filograna).<br />

Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using Maximum Likelihood, Bayesian<br />

inference, <strong>and</strong> Maximum Parsimony. Regardless of the method used monophyly of<br />

Serpulidae is confirmed <strong>and</strong> four monophyletic, well supported major clades are<br />

recovered, that are not congruent with the taxonomic literature: the Spirorbinae <strong>and</strong><br />

three groups hitherto referred to as Protula-, Serpula- <strong>and</strong> Pomatoceros-group.<br />

Serpula- <strong>and</strong> Pomatoceros-group as well as Protula-group <strong>and</strong> Spirorbinae form<br />

sistergroup relationships. The Protula- group is constituted of non-operculate genera<br />

(Protula, Salmacina) as well as operculate taxa (Filograna, Vermiliopsis). Serpula-<br />

<strong>and</strong> Pomatoceros-group only include operculate genera. The last mentioned<br />

comprises Pomatoceros, Spirobranchus, Galeolaria, Ficopomatus, Ditrupa <strong>and</strong><br />

Pseudochitinopoma, <strong>and</strong> the Serpula-group is built up by Serpula, Hydroides <strong>and</strong><br />

Cruciger.<br />

It is thus reasoned that the historical classification of Serpulidae on the basis of the<br />

existence <strong>and</strong> structure of opercula into the subfamilies Spirorbinae, Serpulinae <strong>and</strong><br />

Filograninae is no longer legitimated. As evidence is given for a closer relationship<br />

between the prior filogranin member Protula <strong>and</strong> the former member of Serpulinae,<br />

Vermiliopsis, operculate Serpulinae <strong>and</strong> non/poorly-operculate Filograninae are thus<br />

paraphyletic groupings. The status of Spirorbinae as a serpulid ingroup is approved.<br />

No support is found for the evolutionary scenario that may have led from Protula, via<br />

Salmacina to Filograna. Instead the operculum was probably reduced (Protula,<br />

Salmacina) or modified (Filograna, Vermiliopsis) within the Protula-group. As a<br />

conclusion from the molecular data it is likely that the lack of opercula in some<br />

serpulids is not a plesiomorphic character state as suggested by Ten Hove (1984),<br />

but reflects special adaptations.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 37<br />

Conserving ecological <strong>and</strong> phylogenetic relationships as well as species<br />

James K. Liebherr<br />

Biodiversity conservation has focused on species exhibiting attributes consistent with<br />

endangerment. Demonstrable decreases below threshold levels for population or<br />

geographic range sizes, or consistent presence below predetermined levels have<br />

served to identify species at risk. Such criteria are difficult to fulfill for the most<br />

diverse taxon on Earth – the Insecta – by dint of their extreme levels of diversity, <strong>and</strong><br />

their often-cryptic habits. Perhaps nowhere on Earth is this dilemma more clearly<br />

apparent than in the Hawaiian Isl<strong>and</strong>s. A limited number of perhaps 200-250 initial<br />

colonists have resulted in an estimated 10,000 native insect species, nearly all<br />

precinctive to Hawaii. The most diverse radiations include taxa exhibiting extreme<br />

specializations to specific habitats <strong>and</strong> hosts. Yet Hawaii offers many favorable<br />

conditions for investigating the interaction of a diverse native biota with the primary<br />

dangers to biodiversity inherent in human society; non-sustainable resource use <strong>and</strong><br />

invasive alien species. Firstly, an historical biotic survey was undertaken in the late<br />

19th Century culminating in a comprehensive taxonomic treatment. Secondly,<br />

species-level endemism is extremely high <strong>and</strong> natural geographic ranges quite small<br />

so that modern biotic surveys can focus on precise ecotopes previously occupied by<br />

described species, allowing conclusions concerning species persistence to be drawn.<br />

Thirdly, a comprehensive system of natural areas has been maintained, though these<br />

have been impacted detrimentally in part by overexploitation <strong>and</strong> alien introductions.<br />

Given this context, ecological <strong>and</strong> phylogenetic relationships of the native Hawaiian<br />

carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) are presented, <strong>and</strong> factors associated with<br />

endangerment investigated. Factors mitigating species persistence are investigated<br />

using UPGMA cluster analysis of 19th Century specimens arrayed as a species by<br />

collecting lot matrix. Several ecologically associated species disappeared in concert<br />

at the beginning of the 20th Century. These simultaneous disappearances are<br />

consistent with detrimental impacts on suites of species that shared common habitat<br />

preferences. The relationship between endangerment risk <strong>and</strong> evolutionary<br />

relationships is studied in the carabid genus Blackburnia Sharp, a monophyletic 132species<br />

radiation. There is no association between clade subordination <strong>and</strong><br />

endangerment risk. However, in several subordinate clades all species have<br />

disappeared from the modern fauna, suggesting synapomorphies attributable to the<br />

common ancestor – i.e. defining characters of the clade – underlie the communal<br />

loss. Thus it is argued that the criteria for species endangerment should be exp<strong>and</strong>ed<br />

to allow recognition of endangered clades. A similar less powerful approach is<br />

already practiced by assigning endangered status to all species within a genus,<br />

though this approach may be weakened by failure to document monophyly, <strong>and</strong> by<br />

the mixing of relatively more abundant species with numerically or geographically<br />

more restricted species. Introduction of non-native species to Hawaii has served as a<br />

persistent threat to extant biodiversity. However, novel associations of native <strong>and</strong><br />

non-native species have also become established. Native Mecyclothorax carabid<br />

beetles now endemic to non-native forest plantations on Maui Isl<strong>and</strong> represent one<br />

such unexpected outcome. The native Mecyclothorax species in plantation forests<br />

occur at population levels equivalent to those observed for conspecific populations or<br />

sister species distributed allopatrically in conserved native forest. Conservation of<br />

these geographically restricted species depends on maintenance of their surrogate,<br />

adoptive habitat, or alternatively, complicated long-term rehabilitation of such l<strong>and</strong>s to<br />

conditions of the original native habitat.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 38<br />

Phylogenetic results <strong>and</strong> their implications for the classification of American<br />

Asclepiadeae (Apocynaceae)<br />

S. Liede-Schumann & A. Rapini<br />

Analysis of the trnT-trnL spacer, the trnL intron, the trnL-trnF spacer, <strong>and</strong> the rps16<br />

intron of 106 species in 34 of the 45 genera of New World Asclepiadeae in the former<br />

subtribes Metastelmatinae, Oxypetalinae, <strong>and</strong> Gonolobinae shows that these genera<br />

form a well-supported clade.<br />

The small Andean genus Pentacyphus is sister to the remaining MOG clade. The<br />

former Gonolobinae form a well-supported subclade closely related to members of<br />

Tassadia, Funastrum, <strong>and</strong> former Oxypetalinae. The neglected tribe Orthosieae is<br />

recognized at subtribal level, Orthosiinae. The only genera that are monophyletic as<br />

presently circumscribed are Tassadia <strong>and</strong> Funastrum. The separation of Tweedia<br />

from Oxypetalum is justified by our results. Philibertia is monophyletic only if<br />

Amblystigma, Fontellaea, Melinia, Mitostigma, <strong>and</strong> Pod<strong>and</strong>ra are also included. Most<br />

species of Blepharodon <strong>and</strong> Hemipogon are not monophyletic with the respective<br />

type species. Some former Astephanus <strong>and</strong> Cynanchum species as well as the<br />

monotypic Grisebachiella are imbedded in the hitherto monotypic Diplolepis.<br />

This study supports the previous separation of the morphologically extremely similar<br />

Old World subtribes Cynanchinae <strong>and</strong> Tylophorinae from the MOG clade. It further<br />

demonstrates surprising homoiologies both between Old World <strong>and</strong> New World<br />

subtribes <strong>and</strong> among the New World subtribes, in particular with respect to floral<br />

characters, which have long served as base for classification. Thus, it lays the base<br />

for the urgently needed generic revisions of New World Asclepiadoideae genera.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 39<br />

Historical biogeography of alpine plants: what are the questions?<br />

H. P. Linder & R. Nyffeler<br />

The alpine vegetation is defined as being above the natural high-altitude tree-line,<br />

<strong>and</strong> is characterized by a harsh environment with extreme “winters”, a usually cold<br />

growing seasons, high solar radiation, etc. Although the alpine zone is found<br />

worldwide, it is fragmented at global, regional <strong>and</strong> local scale. Consequently the zone<br />

could be described as “isl<strong>and</strong>s in the sky”. We focus on three biogeographical<br />

questions concerning the flora of the alpine zone, illustrated with examples from the<br />

European Alps (as a temperate alpine system) <strong>and</strong> the East African volcanoes (as a<br />

tropical alpine system). The first question deals with the composition of the flora:<br />

what are the geographical elements of a given alpine flora. This is answered by<br />

documenting the distribution ranges of the species, <strong>and</strong> is largely a pattern-seeking<br />

approach. The second question deals with the origins of the floras: whether derived<br />

from local radiation, or recruited from either the surrounding lowl<strong>and</strong>s, or from other<br />

alpine systems. These sorts of questions are dealt with by phylogenetic studies, <strong>and</strong><br />

is largely a process orientated approach. The last set of questions deal with the<br />

impact of Pleistocene climatic fluctuations on the alpine species, <strong>and</strong> seeks to<br />

account for variation patterns in terms of refugia <strong>and</strong> migration paths. This is<br />

addressed using phylogeographical methods. Alpine biogeography offers many<br />

opportunities to address a range of fascinating evolutionary questions.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 40<br />

Nephridial development in the Onychophora <strong>and</strong> its bearing on the Articulata<br />

hypothesis<br />

G. Mayer<br />

According to the traditional Articulata hypothesis, segmentation represents the major<br />

synapomorphy of the Annelida <strong>and</strong> Arthropoda. The homology of segmentation<br />

indeed seems to be mainly supported by serially arranged coelomic cavities <strong>and</strong><br />

nephridia only. This support, however, is ambiguous because coelomic cavities are<br />

lacking <strong>and</strong> nephridia are strongly modified in adult arthropods. In view of the recent<br />

phylogenetic analyses of molecular data, segmentation of annelids <strong>and</strong> arthropods<br />

must be either convergent or an ancestral feature of bilaterians. In order to clarify the<br />

issue, more detailed studies on segmentation in annelids <strong>and</strong> arthropods are needed.<br />

Among arthropods, onychophorans are traditionally considered to share several<br />

morphological correspondences with annelids. In order to contribute to the current<br />

discussion on the homology of segmentation, I focused on the embryogenesis in the<br />

Onychophora. Recent ultrastructural studies on mesoderm differentiation revealed<br />

that there are fundamental differences in the formation of nephridia between the<br />

Annelida <strong>and</strong> Onychophora. The metanephridia of annelids originate from single<br />

stem cells or “nephridioblasts” whereas the nephridia of onychophorans (<strong>and</strong> other<br />

arthropods) arise from large portions of embryonic coelomic walls. The present <strong>and</strong><br />

further new findings do not support the traditional Articulata hypothesis, since specific<br />

correspondences in organ systems that characterize segmentation in annelids <strong>and</strong><br />

arthropods are lacking. It remains to be elucidated, however, why serially arranged<br />

transitory coelomic cavities arise in arthropods at all.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 41<br />

The Proscoloplos species complex (Annelida: Orbiniidae) is a single<br />

disjunctively distributed species: support from molecular <strong>and</strong> morphological<br />

data<br />

Achim Meyer, Harald Hausen, Christoph Bleidorn & Greg Rouse<br />

The genus Proscoloplos comprises three species distributed on several locations of<br />

the southern hemisphere (South Africa, South America, Australia). Recently<br />

Proscoloplos specimens have been identified at the French Atlantic coast as well.<br />

According to SEM studies neither the fine structure nor the arrangement of chaetae<br />

nor molecular analysis of the ribosomal ITS1 <strong>and</strong> ITS2 region supports the<br />

separation of the three described species <strong>and</strong> the French population. Intraindividual<br />

variability of the repetitive ITS region was tested with up to ten clones per individual.<br />

These findings support the inclusion of P. confusus (Hartmann-Schröder, 1962) <strong>and</strong><br />

P. bondi (Kelaher & Rouse, 2003) in P. cygnochaetus (Day, 1954). The presumed<br />

absence of sexual reproduction with larval dispersal in combination with the<br />

disjunctive distribution suggests a neozoic origin of the French population.<br />

The distribution of branchiae <strong>and</strong> hooked chaetae are key features in orbiniid<br />

taxonomy. Regeneration experiments <strong>and</strong> comparative analysis between two<br />

samples from a single Proscoloplos population, which were exposed to different<br />

conditions, indicate environmental effects on the distribution of these characters. The<br />

reliability of segmental character distribution for use in orbiniid systematics should be<br />

investigated.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 42<br />

Phylogeography of the Oreonebria castanea-group (Coleoptera:Carabidae):<br />

historical biogeography of alpine faunistic elements<br />

R. Molenda, A. Szallies & C. Huber<br />

Species of the carabid genus Oreonebria K. Daniel, 1903 are distributed in the alpine<br />

<strong>and</strong> subalpine zone in Europe, where they preferentially live under cool <strong>and</strong> humid<br />

conditions at the border of snow fields or glacier retreat zones. The verticaldistribution<br />

of this flightless beetle usually exceeds 1500 m a.s.l. Extra-alpine<br />

populations were found in the air-conditioned scree slope ecosystems (e.g. Black<br />

Forest, Swabian Jura, Appennin Mountains). These isolated populations form a<br />

disjunct distribution. We wanted to elucidate the phyletic position <strong>and</strong> to reconstruct<br />

possible pathways of migration of population of the Oreonebria castanea-group.<br />

Therefore we studied the mitochondrial ND1 (NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1)<br />

sequence <strong>and</strong> the nuclear ITS-2 (internally transcribed spacer of rRNA) from<br />

specimen of O. picea, O. ligurica, O. macrodera, O. lugdunensis, O. castanea, O.<br />

angusticollis, O. microcephala (all belonging to the castanea-group), <strong>and</strong> O. bremii,<br />

O. angustata, O. gagates, O. atrata, O. austriaca, O. schusteri <strong>and</strong> O. diaphana.<br />

Populations of Oreonebria distributed in the Black Forest exhibited different phyletic<br />

histories during the last glacial period. The Oreonebria of the Swabian Jura <strong>and</strong> the<br />

northern part of the Black Forest – known as O. castanea boschi so far – has to be<br />

transferred to O. picea. For the Oreonebria castanea-group the geographic region of<br />

the Alpes-Maritimes <strong>and</strong> Ligurian Alps is discussed as a center of dispersal.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 43<br />

Rattle snake evolution – or "what really counts"<br />

Paul Müller<br />

The monophyletic rattle snake genera Crotalus (33 species) <strong>and</strong> Sisturus (2 species)<br />

are highly interesting from the evolutionary genetic, ethologic, toxicological <strong>and</strong><br />

population ecological point of view. These snakes represent a suitable model system<br />

to study the advantages <strong>and</strong> limits of molecular genetic <strong>and</strong> comparative<br />

morphological methods. This holds especially for the Crotalus durrissus species<br />

group from Central <strong>and</strong> South America which we analyse in our working groups for<br />

over 30 years now. This group of partially disjunct appearance inhabits more or less<br />

open l<strong>and</strong>scapes from Mexico down to Argentina <strong>and</strong> is well defined by molecular<br />

methods. The South American populations of Crotalus durrissus live in open<br />

savannah <strong>and</strong> dry forest formations from Columbia <strong>and</strong> Venezuela to the province of<br />

La Pampa (Argentina). They colonized the isl<strong>and</strong>s of Aruba (Crotalus unicolor),<br />

Margarita <strong>and</strong> Los Testigos in Venezuela (Crotalus durissus cumanensis), the isl<strong>and</strong><br />

of Marajó in the Amazon delta (Crotalus durrissus marajonensis) <strong>and</strong> savannah<br />

isl<strong>and</strong>s in the Amazon forests <strong>and</strong> in the highl<strong>and</strong>s of Guayana up to 2800 m. Some<br />

of these populations show adaptations in body length, colouration, toxicity <strong>and</strong><br />

behaviour to different l<strong>and</strong>scapes <strong>and</strong> food resources. Clinal variation from south to<br />

north, elimination of specific allelic variations in margin <strong>and</strong> isl<strong>and</strong> populations <strong>and</strong><br />

sometimes striking morphologically differentiated local populations complicated a<br />

consistent phylogenetic <strong>and</strong> biogeographic interpretation of the relationships of those<br />

species.<br />

The results of classical biogeographic approaches (centers of dispersal), molecular<br />

methods (sequencing of mtDNA: cytb, ND4, 12S,16S) <strong>and</strong> cross experiments reveal<br />

that C. durissus can be considered a semispecies within a superspecies complex,<br />

including C. simus <strong>and</strong> C. totonacus. The C. durissus populations north <strong>and</strong> south of<br />

the Amazon are genetically well defined.<br />

The evolution of the recently described subspecies (C. d. maricelae, C. d. pifanorum)<br />

north of the Amazon river can be inferred by the use of microsatellite analyses.<br />

These data show that the "pifanorum" specimens from the Orinoco river are hybrids<br />

between C. vegr<strong>and</strong>is <strong>and</strong> C. cumanensis. C. d. maricelae is considered a derivative<br />

of C. d. cumanensis, a species inhabiting the isl<strong>and</strong>s of Margarita <strong>and</strong> Los Testigos<br />

near the adjacent mainl<strong>and</strong>. The Aruba population (C. unicolor) is morphologically<br />

well but genetically (cytb) poor defined. These mtDNA data reveal older relationships<br />

<strong>and</strong> migration routes whereas data from microsatellites <strong>and</strong> morphological analyses<br />

provide an insight into later (postglacial) migrations. The phylogenetic analyses allow<br />

conclusions on climatic <strong>and</strong> vegetational fluctuations in Würm <strong>and</strong> postglacial times.<br />

The genetic data of the isolated savannah <strong>and</strong> isl<strong>and</strong> populations together with the<br />

dating of l<strong>and</strong>scape change can be used as an indicator of evolution of the C.<br />

durissus group.<br />

Overall, these facts show the importance to use all adequate methods without<br />

prejudice, <strong>and</strong> to include cross experiments to underst<strong>and</strong> the development of<br />

different morphs, dominant genetic lineages (e.g., the rattle) <strong>and</strong> differences in<br />

venom composition.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 44<br />

New insights in the evolution of liverworts stimulated by symbiotic fungi<br />

M. Nebel, I. Kottke & M. Preußing<br />

Liverworts are the sister group to all the other l<strong>and</strong>plants (mosses, hornworts, ferns<br />

<strong>and</strong> flowering plants). Liverworts, like algae, lack the specific introns which occur in<br />

all other l<strong>and</strong>plants. A fossil record (spore tetrads) from the Ordovician (460 my)<br />

appeared to belong to basal liverworts.<br />

Several studies on molecular phylogeny of liverworts were published, recently.<br />

Projecting our results of symbiotic fungi in liverworts on these molecular phylogenetic<br />

trees we found the following scenario: Glomeromycota are restricted to basal groups<br />

of liverworts (Haplomitriopsida), complex thalloid Marchantiopsida, <strong>and</strong> the basal<br />

group of the simple thalloid liverworts (Fossombroniales sensu Heinrichs). These<br />

liverworts grow mainly on mineral soil as do the Glomeromycota. Molecular <strong>and</strong> fossil<br />

data support the position of the Glomeromycota as the most ancient terrestrial fungi.<br />

We, therefore, suggest that the symbiosis with Glomeromycota was established in<br />

liverworts, first, long before Rhyniales. Later, the more derived liverworts<br />

(Metzgeriales, Jungermanniales, Porellales sensu Heinrichs) lost the symbiosis with<br />

Glomeromycota, probably at a common event.<br />

New forms of symbiosis were then established, twice <strong>and</strong> independently, by the<br />

phylogenetic younger liverwort groups: at one h<strong>and</strong> by the simple thalloid<br />

Metzgeriales associating with the basidiomycotean genus Tulasnella, at the other<br />

h<strong>and</strong> within the leafy liverworts (Jungermanniales, Porellales) forming symbiosis with<br />

the genus Sebacina (Basidiomycota) <strong>and</strong> the genus Hymenoscyphus (Ascomycota).<br />

Basidio- <strong>and</strong> Ascomycota are phylogenetic younger terrestrial fungi.<br />

Loss of the symbiosis with glomeromycotan fungi was probably connected to a<br />

change of the terrestrial habitat to epiphytism. Likely, at that time, the increase of<br />

angiosperm tree species lead to a fundamental shift in ecosystem conditions. In<br />

denser forests, light on the forest floor was reduced but angiospermean tree bark<br />

improved the conditions for an epiphytic life style. Epiphytism was correlated with the<br />

loss of the soil dependent Glomeromycota.<br />

The new fungal symbionts belonging to the genera Sebacina, Tulasnella, <strong>and</strong><br />

Hymenoscyphus are typical colonizers of rotten wood <strong>and</strong> humus. Thus liverworts<br />

obtained access to new nutrient resources. The symbiosis, thus, pushed the<br />

evolution of new taxa.<br />

If the loss of Glomeromycota <strong>and</strong> the regain of modern terrestrial fungi were the<br />

result of fundamental habitat changes, the symbiotic status can be used as an<br />

indicator for the development of former ecosystems.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 45<br />

Nucleotide frequency biases as a problem<br />

in phylogenetic analyses using mitochondrial gene sequences<br />

Lars Podsiadlowski<br />

Sequence data from mitochondrial genes are widely used in phylogenetic studies of<br />

metazoa, ranging from population level up to the major lineages of metazoa. Some of<br />

these major-level phylogenetic studies led to controversial results, e.g. the<br />

aggregation of all bony <strong>and</strong> cartilaginous fishes in one exclusive clade, a sistergroup<br />

relationship between Monotremata <strong>and</strong> Marsupialia or the separate origin of<br />

Collembola <strong>and</strong> the remaining insects with different sistergroups among Crustacea.<br />

Several problems connected with mitochondrial data sets are discussed in the<br />

literature. Some aspects of mitochondrial genome evolution are still speculative <strong>and</strong><br />

in need of further study to set the basics for appropiate evolutionary models in<br />

phylogenetic analyses. I will focus here on two kinds of nucleotide frequency bias<br />

commonly observed in mitochondrial data sets <strong>and</strong> illustrate the problems using new<br />

mitogenomic data from Chelicerata.<br />

1. Overall (AT/GC)-bias<br />

While almost all mitochondrial genomes exhibit an higher content of (A+T) versus<br />

(G+C) the proportion of (A+T) between different taxa in a phylogenetic study may<br />

vary in a considerable amount (between 55% <strong>and</strong> 85%). The causes of (A+T) bias<br />

are still not well understood. Missing or less effective repair mechanisms after uracil<br />

incorporation may be one factor affecting (A+T) content.<br />

2. Str<strong>and</strong>-specific bias<br />

A second kind of nucleotide frequency bias is found between L- <strong>and</strong> H-str<strong>and</strong> in<br />

mitochondrial genomes: the L-str<strong>and</strong> is (A+C)-rich, the H-str<strong>and</strong> is (T+G)-rich. As<br />

replication in mitochondria is an assymetric process the causes for this nucleotide<br />

bias may lie in an assymetric mutation rate between the H-str<strong>and</strong> which is singlestr<strong>and</strong>ed<br />

for comparably long time during the replication process <strong>and</strong> the L-str<strong>and</strong><br />

which is double-str<strong>and</strong>ed almost all the time. In some taxa gene translocation events<br />

have moved coding regions from one str<strong>and</strong> to the other. Therefore these genes<br />

exhibit reversals in nucleotide biases, leading to long branches <strong>and</strong>/or homoplastic<br />

changes in distantly related taxa which independently exhibit gene translocation<br />

events.<br />

Both kinds of nucleotide frequency biases may severely affect phylogenetic studies<br />

using nucleotide sequences. In protein-coding genes most of the variability is thought<br />

to be due to third codon position nucleotides, therefore not affecting amino-acid<br />

sequences. But in fact first codon positions <strong>and</strong> amino-acid sequences as well<br />

change in considerable amounts with differences in nucleotide frequency. Careful<br />

analyses of nucleotide frequencies are required to prevent misleading phylogenetic<br />

statements obtained from mitochondrial datasets.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 46<br />

Re-interpretation of the distribution <strong>and</strong> biogeography of helicinid snails on the<br />

Lesser Antilles <strong>and</strong> Puerto Rico (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Neritopsina)<br />

Ira Richling<br />

Although fairly known, the geological history of the Caribbean region still remains<br />

subject of controversial discussions. The same applies to an even higher degree to<br />

our underst<strong>and</strong>ing of distribution patterns of flora <strong>and</strong> fauna in this area where<br />

vicariance <strong>and</strong> dispersal hypotheses were repeatedly contrasted (e. g. summarised<br />

by Dávalos, 2004). Therefore exact systematics <strong>and</strong> data on the distribution of<br />

different groups of organisms are urgently needed. Due to their low mobility l<strong>and</strong><br />

snails provide an excellent example for such studies. A preliminary revision of the<br />

helicinid fauna of the Lesser Antilles <strong>and</strong> Puerto Rico will exemplarily highlight<br />

possible misinterpretations of biogeographic issues based on wrong systematic<br />

classification.<br />

Applying previous classifications (Wagner, 1907-1911; Baker, 1926, 1940) the<br />

helicinid snail fauna of the Lesser Antilles <strong>and</strong> Puerto Rico appears to be more<br />

closely related to the fauna of the Greater Antilles with a comparably similar<br />

assemblage of the present genera, although greatly depleted in the diversity. Besides<br />

others most of the Lesser Antillean species were assigned to Alcadia <strong>and</strong> subgenera<br />

<strong>and</strong> only few to Helicina.<br />

New studies based on reliable anatomical characters, such as the structure of the<br />

female reproductive system <strong>and</strong> the embryonic shell, reveal that the genus Alcadia is<br />

completely absent from these isl<strong>and</strong>s with only two exceptions, contrasting the<br />

situation on Jamaica, Cuba <strong>and</strong> Hispaniola. The helicinid assemblage is clearly<br />

dominated by the highly diversified genus Helicina. The Puerto Rican subgenus<br />

Striatemoda has to be transferred from Alcadia to Helicina. Contrary to conclusions<br />

reached by following previous classifications these results hereby render the fauna of<br />

the Lesser Antilles <strong>and</strong> Puerto Rico remarkably distinct from the Greater Antilles<br />

where the genus Helicina is only represented by very few species.<br />

Whereas Cuba, Hispaniola <strong>and</strong> Jamaica each harbours only endemic species of<br />

Helicinidae, some of the species of the Lesser Antilles show a wider distribution on<br />

several isl<strong>and</strong>s. Population-based studies of certain species mainly on Guadeloupe,<br />

Dominica <strong>and</strong> Martinique allow hypotheses about their diversification. Data will be<br />

given for Helicina fasciata, Helicina rhodostoma <strong>and</strong> Helicina platychila.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 47<br />

LBF-systematics in eastern Africa<br />

Susanne Schick, Stefan Lötters & Michael Veith<br />

The 2002-2004 Global Amphibian Assessment (www.globalamphibians.org) by<br />

IUCN, Conservation International <strong>and</strong> NatureServe identified the Amphibia as one of<br />

the globally most threatened groups of animals. This reflects not only the amount of<br />

already extinct species but also the amount of data deficient records. The latter<br />

commonly is the result of sampling limits <strong>and</strong> poorly understood systematics.<br />

Especially when species are less attractive due to cryptic life style, small body size<br />

<strong>and</strong> dull coloration as most “little brown frogs” (LBF) in eastern Africa. We provide an<br />

estimate of taxa grouped as LBF’s, give examples of taxonomic problems <strong>and</strong><br />

discuss consequences for species conservation status.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 48<br />

Harpacticoida (Crustacea: Copepoda) from the deep sea of the Angola Basin<br />

S. Seifried, E. Willen, K. H. George, G. Veit-Köhler, J. Drewes, K. Bröhldick,<br />

A. Rose, G. Moura, P. Martínez Arbizu & H. K. Schminke<br />

Multicorer samples of four stations of the DIVA-1 study contained 16350 individuals<br />

of Harpacticoida amounting to about 97 % of all sampled copepods (Angola Basin;<br />

RV “Meteor”; July 2000; depth: 5494-5433 m). Harpacticoids were the second most<br />

abundant metazoans after the nematodes <strong>and</strong> the relative presence of these<br />

copepods in the samples was 100 %. Compared with the other stations the median<br />

density was highest at station 346 (19.9 individuals/10 cm 2 ).<br />

Analyses at species-level focused on the adult Harpacticoida of 75 replicates at<br />

stations 325 <strong>and</strong> 346 only. These yielded 7082 Harpacticoida of which 31.3 % were<br />

adults (2215 ind.) <strong>and</strong> 68.7 % copepodids (4867 ind.). Of the adults 76 % were<br />

females <strong>and</strong> 24 % males. The collected species belong to 19 known harpacticoid<br />

families <strong>and</strong> a few new harpacticoid taxa (Aegisthidae, Ameiridae, Ancorabolidae,<br />

Argestidae, Canuellidae, Canthocamptidae, Cletodidae, Dactylopusiidae,<br />

Ectinosomatidae, Huntemanniidae, Idyanthidae, Miraciidae, Neobradyidae,<br />

Paramesochridae, Pseudotachidiidae, Rhizothricidae, Rometidae, Tisbidae,<br />

Zosimidae <strong>and</strong> Harpacticoida incertae sedis).<br />

A species list of the adult harpacticoids in the 75 replicates of stations 325 <strong>and</strong> 346<br />

will be presented. Altogether, 673 species have been determined. Four are described<br />

species <strong>and</strong> 469 are new to science (99.4 %). Eighteen new species of Harpacticoida<br />

are described in the DIVA 1 project. On average, there are three individuals per<br />

species in the 75 cores. Half of the species are represented by only one individual.<br />

However, Paradanielssenia sp. 1 (Pseudotachidiidae) <strong>and</strong> Argestes sp. 1<br />

(Argestidae) are represented by 67 respectively 95 individuals.<br />

The two replicatively sampled deep-sea multicorer stations, which are 262 nautical<br />

miles apart, were compared as to the abundance, dominance, <strong>and</strong> diversity of all<br />

adult Harpacticoida at species-level. Apart from an analysis on the regional scale,<br />

analyses on the local scale will be presented.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 49<br />

Millipedes as aids for the reconstruction of long-term Quaternary refugia<br />

J. Spelda<br />

In spite of the assumption that distribution areas have moved during climatic<br />

changes, several present researchers favour the hypothesis that animals <strong>and</strong> plants<br />

have nearly become extinct in such cases. They only survived in small areas where<br />

ecological conditions differ within short distances. There they were able to avoid<br />

unsuitable conditions by short distance evasion. These areas are called long-term<br />

refugia. They are important for studies in evolutionary biology <strong>and</strong> nature<br />

conservation. Long-term refugia can be discovered by studying the present<br />

distribution of animals <strong>and</strong> plants. An organism that might be used to discover such<br />

refugia has to fulfil four preconditions: 1. It should have a low tendency of<br />

outspreading; 2. It should have a small distribution = it should be an endemic<br />

species; 3. It should be easy to record; 4. The distribution pattern should be<br />

congruent with that of other non-related taxa.<br />

Millipedes fulfil these dem<strong>and</strong>s in general. Among them the order Chordeumatida is<br />

the most suitable one for the reconstruction of Quaternary refugia. Quaternary<br />

refugia fall into two categories: nunataks above <strong>and</strong> massifs de refuge at the border<br />

of glaciers. Different species of chordeumatids are characteristic for these two types<br />

of refugia. Nunatak chordeumatids (e.g. Pterygophorosoma, Trimerophorella) occur<br />

only distinctly above the timberline in the inner Alps, while those millipedes<br />

characterising massifs de refuge occur both, at low <strong>and</strong> alpine level, but only at the<br />

border of the Alps. In chordeumatids speciation has been thriven by sexual selection.<br />

This means that species of this order differ only slightly in external morphological<br />

characters <strong>and</strong> ecological requirements. Several species show parapatric distribution<br />

patterns, although they are only distant relatives. If several endemisms of the same<br />

species group occur nearby, we have to assume, that the refugium was polycentric,<br />

meaning it consisted of smaller subunits.<br />

Two long-term refugia of the type “massif de refuge” have been studied extensively<br />

at the northern border of the Alps. Both can be delimited by the presence of endemic<br />

chordeumatids <strong>and</strong> also of other animals <strong>and</strong> plants, either also endemic species or<br />

isolated poulations. The Salzburg refugium is characterised by the presence of an<br />

endemic chordeumatid genus (Syngonopodium, two species), two futher<br />

chodeumatid species (Listrocheiritium noricum, Haasea norica) <strong>and</strong> two millipedes of<br />

other orders (Typhloiulus seewaldi, Polydesmus xanthocrepis). We have also support<br />

for this refugium by endemic beetles, endemic plants <strong>and</strong> isolated populations of<br />

snails. The Basel refugium is characterised by five endemic chordeumatids north of<br />

the Rhine valley (Pyrgocyphosoma titianum, Xylophageuma vomrathi, Rhymogona<br />

serrata, R. verhoeffi, R. wehrana) <strong>and</strong> an endemic polydesmid in caves south of<br />

Basel (Polydesmus rothi). An earthworm, snails of the genus Bythiospeum <strong>and</strong><br />

isolated populations of alpine plants <strong>and</strong> beetles occur also north of the Rhine <strong>and</strong><br />

support the presence of a refugium there. More endemisms of cave animals are<br />

known from the Jura Mountains of Switzerl<strong>and</strong>, but no endemic millipedes. Instead<br />

we have several taxa shared with the adjacent Alps (e.g. the chordeumatid genus<br />

Helvetiosoma, Rhymogona montivaga montivaga) supporting an easy faunal<br />

exchange with the Jura.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 50<br />

Advances in phylogenetic inference from molluscan mitochondrial genomes<br />

Gerhard Steiner, Hermann Dreyer, Miriam Satler, Martina Knapp<br />

The use of complete mitochondrial genomes – both their nucleotide sequences <strong>and</strong><br />

the gene arrangements – for phylogenetic inference has steadily increased during<br />

the <strong>past</strong> years. Although the Mollusca are the most species-rich phylum second to<br />

Arthropoda, there are only 20 complete molluscan mitochondrial genomes published<br />

compared to about 100 arthropod <strong>and</strong> almost 500 vertebrate genomes. This low<br />

number may result from peculiarities of molluscan mt-genomes that make them<br />

difficult to analyze. Genome size <strong>and</strong> gene order vary considerably among molluscs.<br />

Gene duplications <strong>and</strong>, at least in bivalves, heteroplasmy due to distinct female <strong>and</strong><br />

male mt-genome lineages (doubly uniparental inheritance) complicate template<br />

generation, sequencing <strong>and</strong> phylogenetic analyses. As a consequence, the<br />

molluscan taxon sample has been insufficient to recover plausible phylogenies from<br />

mt-gene order data. We present 12 additional mt-genomes, ten from Bivalvia <strong>and</strong><br />

one each from Scaphopoda <strong>and</strong> Caudofoveata respectively, with the main purpose to<br />

assess gene order variability within bivalves. The trees resulting from parsimony <strong>and</strong><br />

Bayesian analyses of amino acid sequence data show a well supported cephalopod<br />

clade but the other major taxa appear diphyletic. This is caused by the most basally<br />

branching species in each taxon, Nucula (Bivalvia), Haliotis (Gastropoda), <strong>and</strong><br />

Graptacme (Scaphopoda) clustering together with the polyplacophoran Katharina<br />

<strong>and</strong> the caudofoveate Chaetoderma at the base of the molluscan subtree. Similar<br />

topologies result from the parsimony <strong>and</strong> Bayesian analyses of gene order data with<br />

the same species in a basal position due to their conserved plesiomorphic gene<br />

order. The corresponding positions of these species in the amino acid <strong>and</strong> gene<br />

order trees suggest similar substitution <strong>and</strong> rearrangement rates. This is corroborated<br />

by the significant correlation of the relative change rates of both parameters, as has<br />

previously been shown also for mt-genomes of Hexapoda. With a near-plesiomorphic<br />

gene order present in most major molluscan groups, accelerated rearrangement<br />

rates must have arisen independently within each group. However, we can show that<br />

the improvement of the taxon sample increased the quality <strong>and</strong> reliability of<br />

phylogenies inferred from mt-genomes. Especially in fast evolving taxa as the<br />

bivalves, these data hold great promise to resolve their deep phylogeny when more<br />

mt-genomes become available.<br />

Supported by the Austrian Science Fund, FWF project P16954-B12.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 51<br />

Applications of DNA barcoding<br />

D. Steinke, M. Pfenninger & A. Meyer<br />

According to Ernst Mayr, the first task of a taxonomist is to “sort that portion of the<br />

diversity of the individuals which he encounters into easily recognisable <strong>and</strong> internally<br />

homogeneous groups, <strong>and</strong> to find constant differences between such groups”. In a<br />

second step, the identified groups he called “phena” can be assigned to species,<br />

either already known to science or not, based on the degree of reproductive isolation<br />

to other such groups. The aim of the recently proposed framework of DNA-taxonomy<br />

is to find such “phena”, sometimes called Molecular Defined Operational <strong>Taxonomic</strong><br />

Units (MOTU) on the basis of sequence differences at short, orthologous marker<br />

gene sequences. This follows the general definition of Operational <strong>Taxonomic</strong> Units<br />

(OTU) as groups of organisms used in a taxonomic study without designation of<br />

taxonomic rank. Just as in traditional taxonomy, MOTUs do not necessarily equate to<br />

biological species, but should be treated rather as taxonomical hypotheses in need<br />

for additional evidence of their reproductive isolation. The conceptual slightly different<br />

approach of DNA-barcoding tries to assign unknown specimen to known taxa with<br />

the aid of the same type of widely applicable markers used. Presently, some<br />

controversy exists over the value of DNA barcoding. It has been raised that this<br />

identification method would diminish rather than improve traditional morphologybased<br />

taxonomy. Critics argue that species determinations based solely on the<br />

amount of genetic divergence could result in incorrect species recognition, although<br />

the concept of MOTUs is taking this into account. It has also been stated that DNA<br />

barcoding is a means to reconstruct phylogenies when it is actually a tool to be used<br />

largely for identification purposes.<br />

Practical assets of DNA taxonomy approaches <strong>and</strong> tools to use DNA barcodes will<br />

be reviewed in this talk. In addition we will introduce a statistical approach to derive<br />

distance thresholds for MOTU identification empirically from the data. Currently,<br />

‘rules of thumb’ are employed to delineate MOTUs on the basis of sequence<br />

divergences. These ‘rules of thumb’ are derived from comparing intraspecific versus<br />

interspecific variation in taxa where species borders assumed to be well known. In<br />

zoology, this assumption may be met for certain vertebrate taxa; for the majority of<br />

biodiversity, however, it is certainly not. Therefore, in order to obtain reliable,<br />

objective thresholds for MOTU delineation in various taxa, the effort should not<br />

necessarily focus on whether a given marker can resolve an existing taxonomy, but<br />

rather whether this marker can resolve the individuals under scrutiny into statistically<br />

supported MOTUs.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 52<br />

Evolution <strong>and</strong> phylogeography of arctic-alpine plants<br />

Andreas Tribsch & Christian Brochmann<br />

During the Quaternary large areas in the Arctic were repeatedly <strong>and</strong> heavily<br />

glaciated. Populations of arctic plants must have survived in unglaciated northern<br />

refugia <strong>and</strong>/or in more southerly mountain ranges, most likely in areas that provided<br />

suitable habitats all the way through the severe <strong>and</strong> rapid climatic fluctuations.<br />

Palaeoenvironmental <strong>and</strong> biogeographical data suggest that glacial refugia existed<br />

not only in Beringia, but also in other regions, such as in northwestern Siberia. We<br />

present phylogeographic/phylogenetic case studies based on cpDNA sequences <strong>and</strong><br />

nuclear AFLPs markers for Eritrichium sect. Eueritrichium (Boraginaceae), Thalictrum<br />

alpinum (Ranunculaceae), <strong>and</strong> the Saxifraga stellaris group (Saxifragaceae). The<br />

molecular data, combined with palaeoenvironmental evidence for potential refugia in<br />

Eurasia, show that Northern Siberia acted as a refugium for arctic <strong>and</strong> arctic-alpine<br />

plants <strong>and</strong> might be of general importance for long-term maintenance of arctic-alpine<br />

biota. The data also show that biogeographical connections between European <strong>and</strong><br />

Asian mountains happened repeatedly in the <strong>past</strong>, during or after the last glacial<br />

maximum, in the case of Thalictrum alpinum, <strong>and</strong> in earlier periods of the<br />

Pleistocene, in the case of Eritrichium. Saxifraga stellaris colonized the amphiatlantic<br />

Arctic region <strong>and</strong> Sc<strong>and</strong>inavia from a Western European refugium, possibly<br />

after the Last Glacial Maximum.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 53<br />

Can we reject pollinator-driven speciation as a predominant<br />

model for the Cape Floristic Region?<br />

Timotheüs van der Niet, Steven D. Johnson & H. Peter Linder<br />

Many lines of evidence point towards a recent burst in speciation in a few large<br />

lineages in the Cape Floristic Region. This begs the question as to what was the<br />

main mechanism that generated this biodiversity. Historically, two competing<br />

hypotheses have been put forward to explain this pattern. Either adaptation of<br />

diverging conspecific populations to the ecologically heterogeneous environment was<br />

the main factor driving speciation, with adaptation to different pollinators only being<br />

necessary upon secondary contact to protect species integrity. Alternatively, adaption<br />

to different pollinators was a primary factor driving speciation. To test these, we<br />

review all the available evidence. by combining phylogenies, ecological data, <strong>and</strong><br />

pollinator data of lineages centered in the Cape Floristic Region. Support for either<br />

hypothesis is provided by comparing ecological divergence <strong>and</strong> pollination mode<br />

between sister species pairs.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 54<br />

DNA barcoding in amphibians: identifying tadpoles <strong>and</strong> c<strong>and</strong>idate species<br />

Miguel Vences<br />

Amphibian communities, especially in the tropics, are characterized by a high degree<br />

of cryptic diversity. On one h<strong>and</strong>, many syntopic species, especially of frogs, can only<br />

be distinguished by faint morphological characters, if at all. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, a<br />

major life-history stage of frogs, the aquatic larva (tadpole) has a unique<br />

morphological bauplan, <strong>and</strong> a tadpole cannot be assigned to the adult stage of a frog<br />

species based on morphological considerations alone. DNA barcoding has the<br />

potential to play a very important role in deciphering these two levels of cryptic<br />

diversity, as exemplified by pilot projects in Madagascar. Amphibians are known to<br />

show phenomena of mitochondrial introgression <strong>and</strong> haplotype sharing among<br />

closely related (allopatric) species, but mitochondrial barcoding is nevertheless a<br />

reliable method to (1) assign unknown life-history stages or sexes (tadpoles,<br />

juveniles, females) to species, <strong>and</strong> (2) as a preliminary tool to identify entities which<br />

may represent new species, <strong>and</strong> on which further research should be focused:<br />

c<strong>and</strong>idate species. However, mitochondrial data alone should not be used as main<br />

diagnostic character in species descriptions due to often divergent geographical<br />

signatures of mitochodnrial <strong>and</strong> nuclear markers. It seems reasonable to gather<br />

amphibian COI data to support the goal of a global DNA barcoding database of this<br />

gene, but for particular applications in amphibian barcoding, other markers such as<br />

16S rDNA are more reliable.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 55<br />

Revision of afrotropical Galerucinae (Chrysomelidae, Coleoptera) – Overview<br />

after ten years<br />

Thomas Wagner<br />

Afrotropical Galerucinae which have been traditionally assigned to the “Monoleptites”<br />

have been recently revised. Many changes in taxonomy <strong>and</strong> systematics became<br />

necessary, since the original generic allocation of most species was very inconsistent<br />

<strong>and</strong> often typological. Also the elongated basi-metatarsus, name-bearing character of<br />

the “Monoleptites” is obviously evolved several times, <strong>and</strong> other galerucine taxa have<br />

been included in the revision. Next to studies on external morphology, in particular<br />

genital structures <strong>and</strong> molecular data could be found as very useful for a better<br />

characterization of species <strong>and</strong> monophyletic groups.<br />

After the taxonomic revision of about 60,000 specimens, mainly of Monolepta<br />

Chevrolat, 1837, C<strong>and</strong>ezea Chapuis, 1879, Bonesioides Laboissière, 1925,<br />

Galerudophia Hincks, 1949, Afromaculepta Hasenkamp & Wagner, 2000 <strong>and</strong><br />

Afroc<strong>and</strong>ezea Wagner & Scherz, 2002, detailed data on distribution patterns,<br />

speciation processes <strong>and</strong> phylogenetic relationships are possible. Centers of<br />

diversity are the montane regions of Central <strong>and</strong> East Africa <strong>and</strong> speciation<br />

processes have been probably strongly influenced by habitat isolation during the<br />

quaternary period.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 56<br />

Ptilocnemus Westwood (Heteroptera, Reduviidae, Holoptilinae): first results on<br />

morphology, systematics, <strong>and</strong> biology of the ant-preying assassin bugs<br />

C. Weirauch & G. Cassis<br />

Reduviidae (Insecta: Heteroptera) other than haematophagous Triatominae are often<br />

assumed to feed on a diverse diet of insects <strong>and</strong> other arthropods. This may be true<br />

for many species of Harpactorinae, but prey specializations are known for a certain<br />

number of reduviid taxa. Members of the palaeotropical Holoptilini (Reduviidae:<br />

Holoptilinae) are said to attract <strong>and</strong> paralyze ants through secretions released from a<br />

sternal structure on the abdomen termed trichome. This behavior was first reported<br />

almost a century ago for the south-east Asian Ptilocerus ochraceus <strong>and</strong> corroborated<br />

by an observation made on the Australian Ptilocnemus femoralis 40 years later.<br />

Nevertheless, no follow-up studies of this case of myrmecophily <strong>and</strong> the striking<br />

structures involved have been made, <strong>and</strong> systematics of the taxon Holoptilinae is<br />

poorly understood.<br />

Building on our ongoing revision of the genus Ptilocnemus Westwood, we present<br />

the first <strong>and</strong> as yet preliminary phylogenetic analysis of Ptilocnemus <strong>and</strong> allied<br />

genera of Holoptilinae using morphological characters. Ptilocnemus, which now<br />

comprises at least 12 species, is supported as a monophyletic group, with the<br />

monotypic Smiliopus as its sister taxon. Monophyletic Holoptilini fall into two groups,<br />

an Afrotropical-Asian clade that includes Holoptilus <strong>and</strong> Ptilocerus <strong>and</strong> the Australian<br />

Ptilocnemus-Smiliopus clade.<br />

Trichome structures are studied in a comparative context <strong>and</strong> are shown to be<br />

species-specific, but also to possess group-defining characteristics. Our phylogenetic<br />

analysis allows us to generate a hypothesis for the evolution of trichome structures in<br />

Holoptilinae. Furthermore, SEM <strong>and</strong> histological studies reveal that gl<strong>and</strong>s – a<br />

potential source for ant-attracting secretions – are not restricted to the trichome in<br />

Holoptilini, but occur in some taxa on paired areas on the abdominal sternites.<br />

As recent field work in Australia enabled us to collect <strong>and</strong> observe Ptilocnemus<br />

lemur, we chose this species as our starting point for behavioral <strong>and</strong> ecological<br />

studies in Holoptilini. These preliminary results indicate that nymphs <strong>and</strong> adults are<br />

gregarious <strong>and</strong> live underneath bark of Eucalyptus, that nymphs are often found<br />

close to spider webs, that tapping of the plumose hind legs on the ground is frequent<br />

in all stages, <strong>and</strong> that prey capture involves a rather complex sequence of events.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 57<br />

Abstracts of posters<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 58<br />

Analysis of annelid mitochondrial sequence data supports inclusion of<br />

Sipuncula within annelids<br />

C. Bleidorn<br />

Annelid relationships are controversially discussed <strong>and</strong> additional markers are<br />

necessary to get further insights into their evolution. Today, the widely used<br />

classification found in most textbooks on general zoology or annelids goes back on a<br />

cladistic analysis of morphological data. In this analysis, Sipuncula <strong>and</strong> Echiura are<br />

excluded from the annelids, clitellates <strong>and</strong> polychaetes are reciprocal monophyletic<br />

sister groups, <strong>and</strong> three major polychaete clades (Scolecida, Canalipalpata, <strong>and</strong><br />

Aciculata) are recovered. None of these results are supported by any of the available<br />

molecular studies.<br />

Due to their high content of information mitochondrial genomes have been proven<br />

very useful in phylogenetic analyses. Whereas many complete mitochondrial<br />

genomes of arthropods are available, lophotrochozoan taxa are only scarcely<br />

represented <strong>and</strong> this is especially true for annelids. Only four complete <strong>and</strong> three<br />

partial annelid mitochondrial genomes are known today. Here I present the complete<br />

mitochondrial genome of the orbiniid polychaete Orbinia latreillii. The circular genome<br />

is 15,558 bp in size <strong>and</strong> contains the same 37 genes as found in most other<br />

metazoans. As in the case for all studied annelids all genes are transcribed from the<br />

same str<strong>and</strong>. This is unusual compared to other lophotrochozoans (but see the<br />

brachiopod Terebratalia transversa) <strong>and</strong> could be regarded as apomorphic for the<br />

Annelida. Compared with the known data from other annelids at least five gene<br />

rearrangements must be hypothesized for Orbinia latreillii. Although complete<br />

mitochondrial genomes are still underrepresented for annelids, it can be concluded<br />

from the sparsely known data that gene rearrangements in this group may be less<br />

frequent than in molluscs, but more frequent than previously assumed. It is supposed<br />

that searching for synapomorphies using gene order data is a promising approach to<br />

shed light on annelid ingroup relationships.<br />

A phylogenetic analysis of the available mitochondrial DNA sequence data <strong>and</strong><br />

amino acid data supports an inclusion of Echiura <strong>and</strong> Sipuncula within Annelida <strong>and</strong><br />

a closer relationship to orbiniids is recovered for the latter taxon. A secondary loss of<br />

segmentation must be assumed for Sipuncula, as well as for the Echiura.<br />

This study was supported by the DFG (BL 787/1-1).<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 59<br />

A molecular perspective for tribal concepts <strong>and</strong> generic boundaries in<br />

subfamily Nepetoideae (Lamiaceae)<br />

C. Bräuchler, H. Meimberg, T. Abele & G. Heubl<br />

Within Lamiaceae subfamily Nepetoideae is one of the most clearly defined groups<br />

based on both pollen morphology <strong>and</strong> molecular data. The recognition of three tribes<br />

(Elsholtzieae, Ocimeae <strong>and</strong> Mentheae) seems to get accepted more <strong>and</strong> more <strong>and</strong> is<br />

corroborated by different molecular analyses. The Basils (Ocimeae) have been<br />

investigated recently revealing confusing news on generic relationships. While<br />

almost nothing has been done on Elsholtzieae, some preliminary analyses were<br />

performed to test relationships within the Mints (Mentheae), e.g. Salvia, Monarda,<br />

Mentha or Bystropogon (with restricted taxon sampling or more or less narrow focus).<br />

A more comprehensive attempt was undertaken in this study with strong emphasis<br />

on subtribe Menthinae (including the former Satureja s.l. complex). Based on<br />

comparative sequencing of plastid trnL-F <strong>and</strong> trnK for 158 accessions from 62<br />

genera tribal, subtribal <strong>and</strong> generic concepts were tested <strong>and</strong> compared with<br />

morphological <strong>and</strong> biogeographical data.<br />

According to our results some of the confusion concering taxonomy could be<br />

resolved while in other cases the situation became even worse. Micromeria <strong>and</strong> to a<br />

lesser extent Satureja are polyphyletic assemblies of taxa. Problems in the<br />

delimitations of Thymus, Thymbra <strong>and</strong> Origanum are as well discovered as the<br />

paraphyly of Clinopodium in its current circumscription. To solve these problems<br />

there are two alternatives: 1. either lumping all taxa in one big genus or 2. splitting all<br />

up in separate genera. The first approach in part has been attempted before by<br />

including many species in Satureja or Clinopodium. However this would require<br />

inclusion of groups as distinct as Monarda, Bystropogon, Mentha <strong>and</strong> Ziziphora in<br />

just one genus, which does not seem an appropriate strategy following morphology.<br />

The second option would result in a number of genera which partly are still to be<br />

created. In some cases synapomorphies will easily be recognised <strong>and</strong><br />

circumscription will be unproblematic, in other cases not.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 60<br />

A new taxon of characteristic deep-sea Loricifera.<br />

Part I: Taxonomy <strong>and</strong> morphology<br />

Gunnar Gad<br />

Knowledge of deep-sea Loricifera has increased rapidly lately so that more is known<br />

about them than about shallow water Loricifera which were discovered first. The<br />

majority of specimens found in the samples of DIVA I (Diversity of the deep sea in<br />

the Atlantic) expedition belong to two new taxa. Every second specimen represents a<br />

characteristic Higgins-larva of a new taxon which seems to be exclusively <strong>and</strong> widely<br />

distributed in the deep sea. They have been found at several other deep-sea sites in<br />

the world oceans but so far not in shallow waters. All Higgins-larvae show<br />

unmistakable characters as e.g. a trunk totally divided into transversal rows of<br />

numerous plates so that a lorica as a typical amour of the abdominal region is<br />

lacking. These larvae resemble micro detectors because the cuticle of their trunk is<br />

covered with innumerable probably sensory structures – kind of special derivatives of<br />

flosculi. Adults which are very rarely found have an extremely long pipette-like mouth<br />

cone <strong>and</strong> a flexible, vermiform lorica. That adults are found so rarely even for<br />

loriciferan st<strong>and</strong>ards may have something to do with their life cycle.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 61<br />

A new taxon of characteristic deep-sea Loricifera.<br />

Part II: Life cycle <strong>and</strong> phylogenetic relationships<br />

Gunnar Gad<br />

The hypothetical life cycle of the new taxon of deep-sea loriciferans seems to<br />

comprise a bisexual phase <strong>and</strong> a unisexual phase in which aberrant cyst-like stages<br />

produce unfertilised eggs. These cyst-like stages are strongly morphologically<br />

simplified, the trunk being a simple sack which mainly contains the mature ovary<br />

producing a series of large eggs. From the head only a ring of eight large hooks is<br />

left. It is difficult to recognize which instar these cysts are. They could be strongly<br />

simplified parthenogenetic adults or paedogenetic larvae. The sixth instar Higginslarva<br />

moults into a slightly different seventh or last instar Higgins-larva which differs<br />

mainly in the structure of the toes. This seventh instar Higgins-larva has two<br />

possibilities of further development: it can either moult into a reduced postlarva <strong>and</strong><br />

further into bisexual adults or into the simplified cyst-like stage with unisexual<br />

reproduction. This new deep-sea taxon is most closely related to the genus<br />

Rugiloricus. Although they don't look very similar the Higgins-larvae of both taxa<br />

share some clearly apomorphic features: reduction of the second row of spinoscalids<br />

<strong>and</strong> lack of the posteroterminal setae.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 62<br />

Biogeographical affinities of the Cape flora<br />

Chloé Galley & H. Peter Linder<br />

The flora characteristic of the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) is dominated by a<br />

relatively small number of clades that have been proposed as ‘Cape clades’. These<br />

clades have variously been suggested to have African or Austral affinities. We<br />

present work that evaluates the support for these hypotheses using data from<br />

published <strong>and</strong> unpublished phylogenetic analyses. We further test the hypothesis<br />

that these clades share a common time of differentiation from their geographical<br />

neighbours.<br />

Many Cape clades show Austral rather than African relationships <strong>and</strong> relatively few<br />

Cape clades show a sister-relationship to South America <strong>and</strong> tropical Africa, despite<br />

their relative geographical proximity. These <strong>and</strong> other numerous patterns are<br />

suggestive of a cosmopolitan flora <strong>and</strong> there is no simple hypothesis that can<br />

account for the geographical sources of the currently distinctive Cape flora. This<br />

spatial variation is echoed in the temporal data; although there is wide variance<br />

around the dates of disjunctions, it seems that the Cape flora has been assembled<br />

over a long time period.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 63<br />

Testing diversification <strong>and</strong> radiation of the Northern Hemisphere plant<br />

elements in the Afrotemperate regions<br />

Berit Gehrke & H. Peter Linder<br />

Many plant elements of the Tropical <strong>and</strong> Southern African mountains or highl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

are derived from the Northern Temperate areas. The greater diversity of these taxa is<br />

found in Europe or Asia. In Africa they are sometimes represented only by solitary<br />

species, like Rosa abyssinica or Primula sinensis. However there are also several<br />

more species rich taxa, such as Ranunculus, Alchemilla, Carex <strong>and</strong> Carduus. These<br />

groups all include several species in the upper montane to alpine regions throughout<br />

continental Africa <strong>and</strong> in most cases Madagascar. We will address questions of<br />

migrations <strong>and</strong> timing of diversification of the more speciose Northern Hemisphere<br />

Afrotemperate floral elements mentioned above by phylogenetic <strong>and</strong> biogeographical<br />

analyses. We will test if the diversity of these taxa derived from multiple dispersals<br />

into Africa or from a single migration followed by speciation <strong>and</strong> in situ radiation. We<br />

will also attempt to time these events.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 64<br />

Biogeography <strong>and</strong> evolution of Eastern African Dermaptera<br />

F. Haas<br />

The biogeography of the Eastern African Dermaptera was examined using a broad<br />

approach. First, the available literature of 111 papers (local faunas, species<br />

description, agriculture reports) was analysed. Then, the Eastern Africa specimens in<br />

several museum collections (MNHN, NHM, NMB, NMK, SMNS, ZMUC, Linz) were<br />

registered. Finally, new material became available through donations by colleagues<br />

from basic <strong>and</strong> applied research <strong>and</strong> by a personal collecting trip in Kenya. This<br />

approach resulted in a total of 1202 records, with 761 records from the literature, 356<br />

from collections, 83 are new collecting records.<br />

A total of 167 species was registered, with following data for single countries:<br />

(species [genera](endemic/cosmopolitan) ) Burundi 8 [8] (0/2), Djibouti 1 [1] (0/1),<br />

Eritrea 10 [7] (0/3), Ethiopia 26 [13] (9/3), Kenya 46 [23] (5/6), Rw<strong>and</strong>a 20 [14] (0/2),<br />

Socotra 9 [6] (2/3), Somalia 4 [4] (0/2), Sudan 13 [7] (2/2), Tanzania 107 [34] (31/7),<br />

Ug<strong>and</strong>a 52 [24] (7/5); Germany 6 [6] (0/3). The data are in accordance with the<br />

“biodiversity hot spots” identified in Eastern Africa.<br />

These extensive data were analysed further. 41 species were found only once in a<br />

single country, another 22 species were recorded only once for the whole region. All<br />

mentioned museums have only a fraction of the whole earwig fauna: for Eritrea it is 1<br />

out of 10 species, Ethiopia 19 of 26, Kenya 28 of 46, Socotra 3 of 9, Sudan 1 of 13,<br />

Tanzania 53 of 107 <strong>and</strong> Ug<strong>and</strong>a 26 of 52. For all remaining countries no specimens<br />

were available. “Accidental collectors” found only few species: 1 of 26 species in<br />

Ethiopia, 2 of 13 in Sudan, 1 in Tanzania, 2 in Ug<strong>and</strong>a (Germany 1). Specialised<br />

collecting efforts produced 12 of 46 species in Kenya <strong>and</strong> 7 of 9 in Socotra.<br />

It was also found that the countries were subject to different collecting efforts: for<br />

Djibouti there seems to be only 1 record at all, while there are 458 for Tanzania<br />

(Germany 187). Accordingly, the number of <strong>publications</strong> varies from 0 to 22 (for<br />

Tanzania) in the years of 1901-20. The total of <strong>publications</strong> in 20 years periods are<br />

54, 16, 39, 48 <strong>and</strong> 27 (Germany 13, 5, 10, 12, >60).<br />

These data have major implications for inventory programmes. Complete inventories<br />

must be based on all available information stored in collections <strong>and</strong> literature, since<br />

new collecting, even with specialised techniques, gathers only fractions of the fauna.<br />

With regards to financial resources it would be a mistake to neglect the accumulated<br />

collecting efforts stored in the museums. This does not change with molecular<br />

techniques. No less than 37 % of the species were recorded only once. Although, a<br />

number of 1200 records seems reasonable it is low for an area as vast <strong>and</strong> diverse<br />

as Eastern Africa.<br />

The data are available on www.earwigs-online.de. This research was supported by<br />

the BIOTA E06 programme.<br />

Poster as pdf-file on www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 65<br />

New developments in the GTI process<br />

F. Haas & C. Häuser<br />

After adopting the Decision in 2002, the Global Taxonomy Initiative GTI has<br />

developed significantly. The latest steps in the process are reported at this meeting.<br />

The GTI is undergoing a so-called in depth review to further develop <strong>and</strong> shape the<br />

Programme of Work for the GTI.<br />

The GTI is by origin not an initiative by the broad scientific community, but has been<br />

founded, as the need arose, to support the other cross-cutting issues <strong>and</strong> thematic<br />

programmes of the CBD. However, the GTI yielded successes by lobbying several<br />

projects of which we scientists profit by additional resources. Examples are the<br />

SYNTHESYS programme, the EDIT network of excellence (starting early next year)<br />

<strong>and</strong> other significant projects were enhanced. Furthermore, the CBD is funding<br />

significant taxonomic research through the Global Environmental facility GEF.<br />

The number of available taxonomists has been examined. It was possible to collect<br />

data from many sources, such as ETI <strong>and</strong> the Zoological Record, directories of<br />

taxonomy-related societies, national directories, directories of initiatives such as the<br />

FaunaEuropaea, <strong>and</strong> data from the fellow national focal points. This information<br />

covers the global level in case of ETI, taxon-related societies or Zoological Record,<br />

the regional level through the FaunaEuropaea, <strong>and</strong> national levels by national<br />

societies <strong>and</strong> GTI national focal points.<br />

The directories have different scope <strong>and</strong> reliability. Not all taxonomists are members<br />

of taxon-dedicated societies, not all of them register in open-access directories such<br />

as ETI, <strong>and</strong> not all of the members/registered persons are professional taxonomists.<br />

Many of them pursue a different job, often not even at an academic institution. The<br />

situation is further complicated by the fact that several possible <strong>and</strong> valid definitions<br />

of “taxonomist” exist. Is a taxonomist a person describing species (but cf. mammals<br />

<strong>and</strong> birds!), doing revisions, or is he or she simply able to identify organisms? Is one<br />

criterion for taxonomist to be employed by an academic institution?<br />

Taking a broader view we suggest that there are no more than 20,000-30,000 people<br />

with taxonomic qualification worldwide, <strong>and</strong> probably 5,000-7,000 professionals. The<br />

detailed data are collected <strong>and</strong> continuously exp<strong>and</strong>ed on our website under<br />

http://www.gti-kontaktstelle.de/taxonomy_E.html<br />

Poster as pdf-file on www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 66<br />

Population genetic study on the Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug)<br />

E. Haring, F. Nittinger, W. Pinsker & A. Gamauf<br />

The Hierofalcons form a group of ecologically <strong>and</strong> morphologically similar falcon<br />

species. Four species have been ascribed to this complex: Falco cherrug (Central<br />

Europe to Eastern Asia), F. biarmicus (Africa to Near East <strong>and</strong> Southern Europe), F.<br />

jugger (Indian subcontinent), <strong>and</strong> F. rusticolus (circumpolar). In the present study we<br />

investigated the phylogenetic relationships within <strong>and</strong> among the Hierofalcons, their<br />

phylogeographic history, <strong>and</strong> the role of interspecific gene flow. Sequence variation<br />

in a section of the mitochondrial (mt) control region was determined. In addition,<br />

seven microsatellite loci were analysed. Hierofalcon specimens covering the whole<br />

distribution ranges were studied. In the mt haplotype network all Hierofalcons appear<br />

closely related <strong>and</strong> none of the species represents a monophyletic group, suggesting<br />

a rather recent radiation of the species complex. The microsatellite loci confirm the<br />

low genetic differentiation found among these four species, in particular between F.<br />

cherrug <strong>and</strong> F. rusticolus. The occurrence of common micorsatellite alleles in<br />

different Hierofalcon species <strong>and</strong> the distribution of mt haplotypes could be explained<br />

either by ancestral polymorphisms of by sporadic gene flow. We assume that both<br />

mechanisms are responsible for the observed pattern. Moreover, in Central Europe<br />

recent gene flow mediated through artificial hybrids escaped from falconry may be<br />

involved.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 67<br />

The COI sequence – a reliable marker to differentiate species of marine<br />

sponges, too?<br />

I. Heim, M. Nickel & F. Brümmer<br />

Sponges are sessile filter feeders <strong>and</strong> colonize mainly marine environments, also<br />

found in freshwater habitats. They evolved back more than 580 million years <strong>and</strong><br />

divided in Calcarea, Hexactinellida <strong>and</strong> Demospongiae. To identify sponges on<br />

genus level spicules <strong>and</strong> spongin fibres are adequate morphological markers. But in<br />

some cases it is difficult to identify them only with morphological criteria, because of<br />

their plasticity <strong>and</strong> form variety. Genetic markers on species level would be useful to<br />

solve this problem.<br />

We tested if the Cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) is suitable for species<br />

differentiation in the genera Aplysina <strong>and</strong> Tethya.<br />

The family of Aplysinidae live in tropical <strong>and</strong> subtropical waters, with two species in<br />

the Mediterranean Sea (A. aerophoba <strong>and</strong> A. cavernicola). For the genus Aplysina<br />

we have detected only one base pair difference between A. aerophoba <strong>and</strong> A.<br />

cavernicola.<br />

The geographical distribution of the genus Tethya is cosmopolitan, predominantly<br />

tropic, with the highest biodiversity in the Indo-Pacific. Four years ago three new<br />

species were detected in German aquaria. The geographic origins of these species<br />

are unknown. In case of the COI the specimens of the genus Tethya e.g. T. wilhelma<br />

<strong>and</strong> T. minuta have partially more than 60 base pair exchanges.<br />

For the sponge genus Tethya it is possible to differentiate the species, but for the<br />

genus Aplysina it is necessary to find a better molecular marker for the differentiation<br />

of species.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 68<br />

Three species instead of one: provisional distribution of the species of the<br />

Cicadetta montana complex (Homoptera: Cicadidae) in Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />

Thomas Hertach<br />

At the end of the 20th century leading entomologists still considered all morphological<br />

varieties of the mountain cicada (Cicadetta montana s. l.) in Central Europe being<br />

one single species. During the last few years the study of the calling songs<br />

suggested that at least three different species can be found in Central Europe. These<br />

species can be separated by genetic characteristics as well. The morphological<br />

distinction is still very difficult due to high intraspecific variability.<br />

Geographic distribution of the mountain cicadas now has to be reinvestigated in the<br />

whole Palaearctic. In the Swiss central data bank, managed by the „Centre suisse de<br />

cartographie de la faune“ (CSCF), only about 25 records of Cicadetta montana s. l.<br />

are available. In the meantime, there are observations proven by calling song from<br />

nine European countries, but most of them geographically isolated. For the first time,<br />

this study presents provisional maps of distribution for a whole country. Maps are<br />

based on over 100 observations proven by calling song (about 90 registered by the<br />

author <strong>and</strong> 20 by Bruno Keist <strong>and</strong> Georg Artmann, all of them unpublished). For<br />

some of the records also genetic analyses were performed.<br />

Despite of some areas not yet visited, the maps show a characteristic geographic<br />

distribution pattern for each species: Cicadetta montana s. str. is widely distributed in<br />

all regions of Switzerl<strong>and</strong> apart from the high alps <strong>and</strong> main parts of the hilly lowl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

between the Jura mountains <strong>and</strong> the Alps. But it occurs only moderately frequently in<br />

some areas of the Valais. Cicadetta cerdaniensis is mainly spread in the eastern part<br />

of the Jura mountains <strong>and</strong> southern Ticino. The occurrence of this species in<br />

Switzerl<strong>and</strong> now can be definitely confirmed after its first uncertain description in<br />

1985 <strong>and</strong> its “rediscovery” in 2003. In some parts of the Jura mountains <strong>and</strong> Ticino C.<br />

cerdaniensis was observed even more frequently than C. montana s. str. Finally,<br />

Cicadetta brevipennis was discovered in 2005 at one location in southern Ticino for<br />

the first time in Switzerl<strong>and</strong>. Although C. brevipennis appears to be quite abundant<br />

there, it is most probably the rarest of the three species. All species of Cicadetta<br />

montana complex can be found in Switzerl<strong>and</strong> in dry habitats, mainly sparse<br />

woodl<strong>and</strong>s with Pinus silvestris, Quercus pubescens or Ostrya carpinifolia.<br />

These observations are leading to the conclusion that the cicada fauna of<br />

Switzerl<strong>and</strong> consists of seven species instead of five. This may be amazing<br />

considering the fact that Swiss fauna generally is well investigated <strong>and</strong> that cicadas<br />

can be identified acoustically by their distinct songs.<br />

Poster as pdf-file on www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 69<br />

Flightless versus winged – colonization <strong>and</strong> speciation processes of<br />

Orthoptera on the Canary Isl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

A. Hochkirch & Y. Görzig<br />

Old volcanic archipelagos represent excellent areas for the study of colonization <strong>and</strong><br />

speciation processes, but also for examining the genetic diversification of<br />

morphologically conserved taxa. The Canary Isl<strong>and</strong>s are known for their high<br />

biodiversity, containing a fauna mixed of Afrotropical, Mediterranean <strong>and</strong> endemic<br />

elements. The phylogeography of two Orthoptera genera with Canarian radiations<br />

have been studied <strong>and</strong> compared. The Canarian endemic genus Arminda is flightless<br />

<strong>and</strong> morphologically conserved, containing seven species, each of which is endemic<br />

to a single isl<strong>and</strong>. The fully winged genus group Sphingonotus (s.l.) occurs with<br />

approximately ten species of three genera on the Canary Isl<strong>and</strong>s, five of which are<br />

endemic.<br />

The phylogenetic relationships were analysed based on DNA sequences (Arminda:<br />

mtDNA: ND5, 12s rRNA, nDNA: ITS2, 28s rRNA; Sphingonotus: mtDNA: ND5). The<br />

species of the flightless genus Arminda are comparatively old <strong>and</strong> represent a typical<br />

example for stepwise colonization <strong>and</strong> speciation from east to west. This example<br />

shows, that DNA barcoding could be very useful for such old but morphologically<br />

conserved species. A new endemic species from La Palma has been discovered by<br />

DNA sequencing.<br />

The winged species of the genus Sphingonotus <strong>and</strong> its allies show multiple<br />

independent colonization events. The genera Wernerella <strong>and</strong> Pseudosphingonotus<br />

turn out to be polyphyletic. Two main lineages within the Sphingonotus group could<br />

be resolved. The African lineage is related to S. airensis from Niger, including the<br />

Gran Canarian endemic S. sublaevis, W. pachecoi from Lanzarote, Fuerteventura<br />

<strong>and</strong> Morocco, the widespread species P. savignyi <strong>and</strong> S. azurescens, the northwest<br />

African S. finotianus <strong>and</strong> W. rugosa, which is endemic to Lanzarote <strong>and</strong><br />

Fuerteventura. The two species S. sublaevis <strong>and</strong> W. pachecoi show only minor<br />

genetic divergence. The species rank is rather doubtful, since the morphological<br />

differences are also minimal - although they have been assigned even to two genera<br />

(Sphingonotus <strong>and</strong> Wernerella). A second (Eurasian) lineage includes the ancient<br />

relics W. picteti (endemic to Tenerife <strong>and</strong> La Gomera), W. guancha (endemic to Gran<br />

Canaria) <strong>and</strong> the young S. caerulans group, including a high number of<br />

Mediterranean taxa (S. rubescens, S. uvarovi, S. corsicus, several subspecies of<br />

S. caerulans <strong>and</strong> the Tenerifan endemic S. willemsei). This latter group could not be<br />

clearly resolved, although a fast evolving gene has been used (ND5). Apparently, the<br />

group represents a young radiation with clear bioacoustic differences, but poor<br />

genetic resolution, comparable to the Chorthippus biguttulus group. This example<br />

shows, that DNA barcoding could be difficult in some young radiations.<br />

The endemic Sphingonotus species have probably reached the Canary Isl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

independently, without any radiation pattern within the archipelago. S. willemsei, a<br />

species endemic to the Cañadas on Tenerife, is a very young branch of the<br />

S. caerulans group, S. sublaevis from Gran Canaria is possibly only a subspecies of<br />

W. pachecoi, while the other three endemics (W. guancha, W. picteti, W. rugosa) are<br />

ancient relics.<br />

Poster as pdf-file on www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 70<br />

Adaptive radiation of Hyalella (Crustacea, Amphipoda) in Lake Titicaca<br />

Jana Hoffmann<br />

Lake Titicaca is a high altitude tropical lake in Peru <strong>and</strong> Bolivia. A unique <strong>and</strong><br />

distinctive fauna of amphipod crustaceans belonging to the genus Hyalella (Smith,<br />

1874) can be found there. The earliest work on these amphipods was carried out by<br />

Faxon (1876) who described about 7 endemic species <strong>and</strong> one non-endemic<br />

species. Up to now there are 14 endemic <strong>and</strong> 4 non-endemic species known from<br />

Lake Titicaca. One of the most important surveys was the Percy Sladen Trust<br />

Expedition in 1937 (Gilson, 1939). This material, about 20,000 specimens, was<br />

collected <strong>and</strong> provisionally sorted by G.I. Crawford <strong>and</strong> deposited in The Natural<br />

History <strong>Museum</strong>, London. Crawford suggested that there could be a species flock of<br />

Hyalella of about one hundred species. Thus Lake Titicaca offers, beside Lake<br />

Baikal, a second example of adaptive radiation among amphipods in an ancient lake.<br />

Many of these Titicaca amphipod species have a striking body armature; convergent<br />

with species in Lake Baikal (Martens, 1997). The armature is possibly important in<br />

defence mechanisms against predation by fish (Orestias, Trichomycterus). Another<br />

aspect is the high degree of endemism within the lake; 14 of the 18 described<br />

amphipod species are endemic to Lake Titicaca. The number of endemic species will<br />

probably increase as a result of our <strong>future</strong> investigations.<br />

Unfortunately only a few species have been described <strong>and</strong> the known species are<br />

insufficiently documented so there is a need for thorough taxonomic revision. I<br />

started my work by investigating Hyalella longipes (Faxon, 1876) <strong>and</strong> Hyalella<br />

lucifugax (Faxon, 1876). Both were poorly described <strong>and</strong> need redescription, <strong>and</strong><br />

show the same unique mode of spines on their tergites. Interestingly H. longipes is a<br />

very variable species, whereas H. lucifugax is homogeneous in all its morphological<br />

characters.<br />

However, some of the most interesting questions cannot be answered with a purely<br />

taxonomic approach: e.g. are there sibling species? Do the morphological differences<br />

reflect the genetic diversity of the species? What is the function of the body<br />

processes? For this reason I will analyse new ecological data <strong>and</strong>, in <strong>future</strong>, use<br />

other techniques like molecular analysis.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 71<br />

Arrangement of chaetae in Orbiniidae (Annelida) indicates close relationship to<br />

spiomorph polychaetes<br />

S. Hoffmann & H. Hausen<br />

There are only few characters known in the Orbiniidae that yet proved to be<br />

informative for annelid systematics. Therefore, the phylogenetic position of the<br />

Orbiniidae within the polychaetes is still uncertain. Recent work on the arrangement<br />

of chaetae within the parapodial rami of several polychaete taxa revealed a whole set<br />

of new characters that seem to have evolved in gradual sequence within Annelida.<br />

Meanwhile several larger polychaete subgroups can effectively be characterized by<br />

specific arrangement patterns of the parapodial chaetae.<br />

This approach was used to contribute to a clarification of orbiniid interrelationships.<br />

Thoracic <strong>and</strong> abdominal neuro- <strong>and</strong> notopodia of Scoloplos armiger, Orbinia latreillii,<br />

Orbinia bioreti <strong>and</strong> Pettibonella multiuncinata were examined by SEM <strong>and</strong> computer<br />

aided 3D-reconstructions of serial sections. The taxon sampling includes<br />

representatives of the main orbiniid subgroups. Shared characters are therefore<br />

assumed to represent the organization of the last common ancestor.<br />

In all species studied, the chaetae form a rather complex pattern within each<br />

parapodium. In thoracic neuropodia, patches of several rows of chaetae can be<br />

found, generated by two formative sites, one situated at the dorsal <strong>and</strong> one at the<br />

caudal edge. This mode of formation differs from that found in Apistobranchidae <strong>and</strong><br />

Oweniidae, the only other polychaete taxa that have chaetal patches in thoracic<br />

neuropodia. Previous assumptions of a close relationship between Orbiniidae <strong>and</strong><br />

Apistobranchidae are thus not supported by the obtained data. The abdominal<br />

neuropodia in orbiniids are stabilised by large chaetae that originate deeply inside the<br />

body. Such chaetae are also present in Apistobranchidae, situated ventrally to a<br />

small chaetal fascicle. In Orbiniidae, however, the abdominal neuropodia reside<br />

dorsally of a caudally formed double row. Again, there are significant differences in<br />

position <strong>and</strong> relation to adjacent chaetae in both taxa.<br />

The second formative site in thoracic neuropodia points to a relationship of<br />

Orbiniidae with groups like Spionidae, Trochochaetidea, Poecilochaetidae <strong>and</strong><br />

Paraonidae. A relationship of this kind was recently corroborated by findings on the<br />

ultrastructure of sense organs in Orbiniidae (Koch & Hausen, unpubl.). Our analyses<br />

on chaetal formation showed that these taxa in addition share the peculiarities that<br />

the dorsal formative site of the thoracic neuropodia generates transverse rows, while<br />

the caudoventral formative site builds up longitudinally directed rows. This is an<br />

apomorphic condition, since most sedentary polychaetes only have transverse rows<br />

of chaetae in their parapodia.<br />

Poster as pdf-file on www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 72<br />

The Global Biodiversity Information Facility GBIF<br />

J. Holstein, A. Steiner & C. L. Häuser<br />

After more than three years of preparatory work by the OECD Megascience Forum,<br />

the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) was officially established in 2001<br />

with the goal to make scientific biodiversity data freely available <strong>and</strong> more useful by<br />

linking databases through the internet. As a worldwide research endeavour, GBIF<br />

currently has 47 countries <strong>and</strong> 29 international organisations as its members, all of<br />

which have committed themselves to share freely biodiversity data according to<br />

common st<strong>and</strong>ards through their own data nodes. The organisation is controlled by a<br />

Governing Board consisting of representatives from all members, supported by<br />

several committees <strong>and</strong> advisory groups. The GBIF Secretariat has been established<br />

since 2002 in Copenhagen, Denmark, which develops the international GBIF portal<br />

<strong>and</strong> assists members by coordinating <strong>and</strong> supporting activities, which are focussed<br />

on four program areas: Data Access <strong>and</strong> Database Interoperability (DADI),<br />

Digitisation of Natural History Collection Data (DIGIT), Electronic Catalogue of<br />

Names of Known Organisms (ECAT), <strong>and</strong> Outreach <strong>and</strong> Capacity Building (OCB).<br />

For the national contribution to GBIF, seven data nodes have been established at<br />

different research institutions in Germany with support from the Federal Government<br />

(BMBF), which are responsible for different groups of organisms: 1. Insects<br />

(Evertebrata 1) at the State <strong>Museum</strong> of Natural History Stuttgart; 2. Terrestrial<br />

invertebrates (Evertebrata 2) at the Bavarian State Collection of Zoology in Munich;<br />

3. Marine invertebrates (Evertebrata 3) at <strong>Senckenberg</strong> Research Institute <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Museum</strong> in Frankfurt; 4. Vertebrates at the Zoological Research Institute <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Museum</strong> Alex<strong>and</strong>er Koenig in Bonn; 5. Plants (botany) at the Botanic Gardens <strong>and</strong><br />

Botanical <strong>Museum</strong> Berlin-Dahlem; 6. Fungi (mycology) at the Bavarian State<br />

Collection of Botany in Munich; 7. Microorganisms (Prokaryota) at the German<br />

National Resource Centre for Biological Material in Braunschweig. Different database<br />

systems currently in use at these differently oriented institutions for capturing<br />

specimen based information are briefly introduced.<br />

For further information about GBIF International <strong>and</strong> GBIF Germany see<br />

www.gbif.net <strong>and</strong> www.gbif.de.<br />

Poster as pdf-file on www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 73<br />

Diversity <strong>and</strong> evolution of the gastropod family Naticidae<br />

T. Hülsken, Marina Clemmensen & M. Hollmann<br />

There are an estimated 260-270 Recent species in the family Naticidae which belong<br />

to the Neomesogastropoda within the Caenogastropoda (B<strong>and</strong>el, 1991) <strong>and</strong> arose<br />

during the mid-Mesozoic 180-220 million years ago (Kabat, 1991, 1996). The<br />

Naticidae is a cosmopolitan family of carnivorous prosobranch snails found in<br />

tropical, temperate <strong>and</strong> arctic waters (Marincovich, 1977). They live chiefly within the<br />

intertidal region between shallow water <strong>and</strong> 20 meters depth. The greatest species<br />

<strong>and</strong> generic diversity is found in tropical waters (Kabat, 1996). Different<br />

arrangements of the genera of the Naticidae have been proposed over time as<br />

reviewed by Kabat in 1991. In more recent classifications, four subfamilies are<br />

recognized (Marincovich, 1977, Kabat, 1990, B<strong>and</strong>el 1999): Naticinae, Polinicinae,<br />

Sininae <strong>and</strong> Ampullospirinae. While a world-wide review of the families has not been<br />

attempted in well over 100 years several excellent regional or stratigraphical reviews<br />

of Recent <strong>and</strong> fossil species by Cernohorsky (1971), Kilburn (1976), Marincovich<br />

(1977), Majima (1989), Kabat (1991, 2000) <strong>and</strong> B<strong>and</strong>el (1999) illustrate the<br />

controversial discussion of the phylogenetic derivation <strong>and</strong> evolutionary history of the<br />

Naticidae. Kabat (1996) suggested that only the Naticinae represent a monophyletic<br />

clade, while Polinicinae are a grade <strong>and</strong> the extant species <strong>and</strong> genera of the<br />

Polinicinae should either be placed with the Naticinae or with the Sininae (B<strong>and</strong>el,<br />

2000). Currently, evolutionary classification within the Naticidae is based on<br />

morphological characters, particularly shell morphology. This analysis suggests<br />

polytomic clades due to unspecific morphological characters which have been<br />

formed convergently <strong>and</strong> which appear to be only specific for genera. For example,<br />

Popenoe et al. (1987) noted that the umbilical area is formed convergently in the<br />

different groups of Naticidae <strong>and</strong> cannot be used for differentiation among the<br />

subfamilian groups. The subfamilian groups are solely separated by the material <strong>and</strong><br />

size of their opercula (corneous = Polinicinae, corneous <strong>and</strong> reduced = Sininae,<br />

calcareous = Naticinae). It is unclear at present whether these characters will suffice<br />

to affirm the evolution of the Naticidae plausibly. For a more detailed investigation<br />

sequence analysis of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA (16S) <strong>and</strong> cytochrome oxidase<br />

subunit I (COI) genes shall help to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationship of the<br />

different groups within the Naticidae. Our data indicate that the Polinicinae can be<br />

separated based on partial COI, ITS <strong>and</strong> 16S rRNA gene using distance, ML <strong>and</strong> MP<br />

calculations under LogDet conditions. Within the Polinicinae, species who belong to<br />

the genus Neverita are grouped in a monophyletic clade as a sister group to species<br />

of the genus Polinices. Additionally, sequence analysis was used for species<br />

separation. Two different forms of Neverita duplicata (Say, 1822) showing different<br />

umbilical characters can be separated from each other as Neverita duplicata <strong>and</strong> the<br />

reestablished taxon Neverita delessertiana (Recluz, 1843) which previously have<br />

been synonymized due to their similar morphological appearance (Tryon, 1886,<br />

Kabat, 1997). Sequences within the four different genes COI, 16S rRNA, 18S rRNA<br />

<strong>and</strong> a small intron in the calmodulin gene show highly significant differences.<br />

Poster as pdf-file on www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 74<br />

The soft coral genus Dendronephthya Kükenthal 1905 (Octocorallia):<br />

inventory <strong>and</strong> investigations of the type material<br />

in German museum collections<br />

Lars Jürgens & Götz B. Reinicke<br />

Species of the azooxanthellate soft coral genus Dendronephthya are distributed<br />

throughout tropical waters of the Indopacific Ocean. The genus was described by<br />

Kükenthal (1905) <strong>and</strong> 248 species are known today. Colonies are branched <strong>and</strong><br />

grow up to sizes over 1 m in height. On the ends of the branches the polyps are<br />

united in bundles. 112 type specimens of 58 Dendronephthya species were<br />

exanimated in the German scientific museum collections of Jena, Frankfurt, Berlin,<br />

Hamburg <strong>and</strong> Munich during the subproject “GBIF-D Cnidaria” <strong>and</strong> data were<br />

provided for the GBIF internet platform.<br />

Often the described specimens were cut in fragments by the author <strong>and</strong> colony<br />

sections were dispatched to colleagues in other collections. Therefore it is more<br />

difficult to describe the variability of characters. For some taxa the variability of the<br />

taxonomical important characters was demonstrated, like the specification of<br />

anthocodial sclerites or bundles of polyps. For example, regarding the type of D.<br />

savignyi (Ehrenberg 1834) some characters resemble those of the genus<br />

Stereonephthya. In the type colony, some polyps are st<strong>and</strong>ing isolated <strong>and</strong> aren‘t<br />

united in bundles. The tubercles of the supporting bundles sclerites of this colony are<br />

formed with an orientation towards the end. But the general morphology of the type is<br />

more similar to the habits of Dendronephthya species. In 1905 Kükenthal divided the<br />

genus Spongodes Lesson 1834 into the new genera Dendronephthya <strong>and</strong><br />

Stereonephthya. To Dendronephthya Kükenthal referred all Spongodes species with<br />

polyps arranged in bundles. Shortly after, many authors described new species, e.g.<br />

Henderson (1909) published a study with 53 new species. Sherriffs (1922) fired a<br />

formula to characterise the anthocodial sclerites, which has since been used by<br />

taxonomists until today. In the latest revision by Tixier-Durivault & Prevorsek (1959,<br />

1960, 1962), the genus Dendronephthya was divided into the genera Spongodes,<br />

Roxasia <strong>and</strong> Morchellana. However, their system was not accepted by other<br />

colleagues because the large similarity of the “genera” <strong>and</strong> wide variability of<br />

species. Today these categories are used as subgenera. The first <strong>and</strong> only<br />

systematic study based on molecular methods so far was published by Song & Lee<br />

(2000) covering 7 species from the Northern Pacific.<br />

Some studies proved the variability of characters <strong>and</strong> transition between species. A<br />

possible explanation could be hybridization events that are currently discussed by<br />

different authors. Another explanation of the transitions in some described “species”<br />

might be that the specimens belong to one polymorphic species. A precise<br />

description of population structures of the Dendronephthya species <strong>and</strong> their<br />

phylogenetic relationships doesn’t exist until today. For such studies it is necessary<br />

to use a combination of traditional morphological <strong>and</strong> molecular methods. A suitable<br />

starting point will be an investigation of the limited number of Dendronephthya<br />

species the Red Sea. 29 species have been reported (Benayahu 1985), of which10<br />

species are commonly distributed. For an initial survey samples were collected from<br />

different locations in the Golf of Aqaba to identify suitable genetic techniques <strong>and</strong><br />

compare morphological characters of the colonies.<br />

Poster as pdf-file on www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 75<br />

Endemic radiations of Limax (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora) slugs in Corsica<br />

– they came twice<br />

Barbara Klee, Gerhard Falkner & Gerhard Haszprunar<br />

Limax comprises about 50 nominal slug species in Europe, most of them in south<br />

Europe <strong>and</strong> with alpine distributions (Falkner et al. 2001). Species range from 10-30<br />

cm body length <strong>and</strong> are traditionally defined by external morphology <strong>and</strong> mainly by<br />

their complex genital anatomy correlating with a unique, highly complex, <strong>and</strong><br />

sensitive strategy of copulation with copulatory organs up to 80 cm (!) length.<br />

Accordingly, Limax is extremely well suited to serve as an example of ad hoc,<br />

possibly even sympatric speciation.<br />

The well known geohistory of the Mediterranean Isl<strong>and</strong> Corsica provides the<br />

possibility to place the inferred phylogeny of a largely unknown species complex <strong>and</strong><br />

radiation of about 15 species (up to now defined by morphological <strong>and</strong> reproduction<br />

biology) within a geohistoric context. We integrate genital morphology, breeding<br />

experiments, <strong>and</strong> molecular methods (COI-sequences, AFLP-technique) in order to<br />

provide a phylogenetic tree <strong>and</strong> - based on it - an evolutionary <strong>and</strong> phylogeographic<br />

scenario of Limax in Corsica.<br />

The current state of investigations is mainly based on sequence analyses of the<br />

mitochondrial COI-gene <strong>and</strong> includes: (1) Limacidae <strong>and</strong> Limax are both<br />

monophyletic taxa, with exclusion of Lehmannia (diphyletic) <strong>and</strong> Limacus from the<br />

latter. (2) Within Limax there are two largely endemic (? possibly also Sardinian)<br />

radiations of Limax in Corsica, each of different age <strong>and</strong> origin <strong>and</strong> with about 6 to 8<br />

species, most of them new to science. Thus, nearly all Corsican Limax-species are<br />

highly endangered to become extinct, because of their very limited distributions<br />

combined with sustainable destruction of their habitat (particularly by burnings of the<br />

woods). (3) The younger radiation (corsicus-group) probably came - maybe enabled<br />

by the Messinian salinity crisis 5-6 mio years ago - from the Italian peninsula, with an<br />

extant sister-taxon retained at the Isle of Elba. (4) The older one (“unicolores” =<br />

wolterdorffi-group) is restricted to the (geologically old) NW-part of Corsica <strong>and</strong><br />

possibly originated in the western Mediterranean (Iberian?) area, where Corsica <strong>and</strong><br />

Sardinia were attached until the Oligocene (25-30 Mio years ago). However, this<br />

needs to be verified by the finding of actual sister-taxa, hopefully retained in<br />

particular in the Pyrenees.<br />

Future studies should confirm the presented results on the basis of AFLP-technique<br />

concerning the nuclear genome. This methodology also should enable us to detect<br />

possible hybrid species <strong>and</strong> should differentiate the species of the corsicus-group,<br />

where the COI-sequences appear largely homogeneous, whereas details of the<br />

genital morphology strongly suggests distinct species under the biological species<br />

concept. In addition we want to establish a combined morphological – genetic<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard for describing slug-species, which are notoriously difficult to determine,<br />

combined with key-sequences for re-determination.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 76<br />

Pregenital abdominal musculature <strong>and</strong> its innervation<br />

in nymphs <strong>and</strong> adults of Phasmatodea (Insecta)<br />

Rebecca Klug<br />

The monophyly of Phasmatodea (stick <strong>and</strong> leaf insects) <strong>and</strong> the basal sistergroup<br />

relationship (Timema is the sister group of Euphasmatodea) are well supported by<br />

both morphological <strong>and</strong> molecular data (Kristensen 1975, Bradler 2003, Whiting et al.<br />

2003), e.g. by the muscle arrangement in the abdomen. For example, the division of<br />

the lateral muscles into several fibers distributed along the abdominal segments<br />

(Kristensen 1975, Bradler 2003) is a convincing apomorphic character of the group.<br />

Generally, the longitudinal muscles span the entire abdominal segment in insects.<br />

This is retained in Timema. Within the Euphasmatodea most members have short<br />

longitudinal muscles restricted to the posterior part of each abdominal segment<br />

(Bradler 2003, Bradler et al. 2003). In some Euphasmatodea, however, e.g.<br />

Agathemera or Haaniella dehaani, several muscles do span the entire segment.<br />

According to the innervation of these muscles, neglected in the <strong>past</strong>, it seems to be<br />

doubtful that the ventral longitudinal muscles of Timema are homologous to those of<br />

Agathemera. The inner ventral longitudinal muscles of insects including Timema are<br />

generally supplied by a branch of the dorsal nerve. In Agathemera, however, they are<br />

innervated by the ventral nerve. It is concluded that the inner ventral muscles were<br />

lost <strong>and</strong> replaced by secondarily elongated externals. This also applies to the long<br />

ventral muscles of Haaniella dehaani. Investigations of nymphal anatomy show that<br />

female Haaniella dehaani nymphs possess short external ventral muscles that are<br />

elongated during postembryonic development. The elongation of these external<br />

muscles could be correlated to the egg-laying technique of Haaniella which requires<br />

a downward flexion of the abdomen to insert the eggs into soil.<br />

In Agathemera, the ventral muscles are already elongated in the nymphs. Hence, this<br />

derived state in Agathemera might have evolved independently from that in<br />

Haaniella.<br />

Financially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.<br />

Poster as pdf-file on www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 77<br />

Metameric repetition of nuchal organs in Orbiniidae (Annelida) <strong>and</strong> its<br />

systematic significance<br />

C. Koch & H. Hausen<br />

Paired prostomial nuchal <strong>and</strong> segmentally arranged dorsal organs are the most<br />

conspicious external sense organs in Orbiniidae. Whereas nuchal organs are very<br />

common in polychaetes, dorsal organs, which are in any sense comparable to those<br />

of Orbiniidae, are only known from Spionidae. The present investigation reveals<br />

basically the same cellular composition <strong>and</strong> ultrastructure of nuchal <strong>and</strong> dorsal<br />

organs in Scoloplos armiger. Evidenced by the high degree of similarity the dorsal<br />

organs are interpreted as being metameric repetitions of the nuchal organs as<br />

already proposed by Söderström (1920) <strong>and</strong> Gustafson (1930). Data on the<br />

innervation strongly support this view. Both organs are retractable <strong>and</strong> consist of<br />

heavily ciliated supportive cells <strong>and</strong> sensory cells, which send cilia <strong>and</strong> microvilli into<br />

an enlarged extracellular space beneath the cuticle, the so-called olfactory chamber.<br />

The cuticle shows a peculiar cover. Here, microvilli of the underlying supportive cells<br />

branch, penetrate <strong>and</strong> dilate strongly above the cuticle. Due to the characteristic<br />

pattern such a formation is referred to as paving-stone-like microvillar cover<br />

(Purschke 1997). It is known for nuchal organs of Spionidae, Trochochaetidae,<br />

Poecilochaetidae, Protodrilida, Paraonidae <strong>and</strong> Capitellidae (Schlötzer-Schrehardt<br />

1986, 1987; Rhode 1990; Purschke 1990, 1997; Hausen 2001) <strong>and</strong> indicates close<br />

affinities of all these taxa. The data obtained argue for an integration of Orbiniidae<br />

into this relationship <strong>and</strong> are congruent with data on the chaetal arrangement. The<br />

findings contradict a systematic position of Orbiniidae within a basal, larger<br />

polychaete taxon Scolecida encompassing forms without head appendages like it is<br />

assumed by Rouse & Fauchald (1997). In Spionidae the dorsal organs as well are<br />

thought to be serially homologous to the nuchal organs (Jelsing 2002, 2003).<br />

Moreover the dorsal organs of Spionidae are similar in structure to those of<br />

Orbiniidae. Accordingly the metameric repetition of nuchal organs most likely evolved<br />

once in a common lineage.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 78<br />

The peristomatic organs of Geophilomorpha (Chilopoda) <strong>and</strong> the phylogenetic<br />

position of Craterostigmus<br />

M. Koch & G.D. Edgecombe<br />

A survey of the peristomatic organs (epipharynx <strong>and</strong> hypopharynx) of Chilopoda by<br />

light <strong>and</strong> scanning electron microscopy was performed with representatives of each<br />

of the major subgroups <strong>and</strong> presently includes 34 taxa in total. Scutigeromorpha,<br />

Lithobiomorpha, <strong>and</strong> Scolopendromorpha are each distinguished by a specific shape<br />

of the hypopharynx. In the Geophilomorpha, at least three different hypopharyngeal<br />

forms are recognized. A more primitive, tongue-like hypopharynx is present in the<br />

Mecistocephalidae (sampled by Mecistocephalus) as well as in the Oryidae (sampled<br />

by Orphnaeus). The transformation of the originally unpaired tongue into a bipartite<br />

structure supports a close relationship between Himantariidae, Ballophilidae <strong>and</strong><br />

Schendylidae (a grouping also united by m<strong>and</strong>ible morphology <strong>and</strong> nuclear ribosomal<br />

gene sequences). Within the Geophilidae sensu Attems (1929) a more pointed <strong>and</strong><br />

sucker-like hypopharynx is shared by Zelanophilus, Ribautia <strong>and</strong> Strigamia. An<br />

apparently intermediate state between the primitive <strong>and</strong> the sucker-type of<br />

hypopharynx is present in Aphilodon (Aphilodontidae).<br />

The most primitive state of the epipharynx also seems to be maintained in the<br />

Mecistocephalidae. This concerns the maintenance of a single median labral tooth<br />

which is laterally borderd by bristles on the distal part of the epipharynx. Apomorphic<br />

transformations of the epipharynx in all remainining geophilomorphs concern the<br />

replacement of the labral tooth by a row of small denticles or fimbriate spines <strong>and</strong> the<br />

loss of the bristles on the distal part of the epipharynx. These transformations support<br />

the view that Geophilomorpha basally branch into Placodesmata (= Mecistocephalidae)<br />

<strong>and</strong> Adesmata (= remaining geophilomorphs). Based on a broader taxon<br />

sampling, further insights into geophilomorph interrelationships are expected from the<br />

variable distribution of sensilla <strong>and</strong> gl<strong>and</strong>ular pore fields on the hypo- <strong>and</strong><br />

epipharynx.<br />

Interestingly, the peristomatic organs in Craterostigmus tasmanianus<br />

(Craterostigmomorpha) strongly resemble those of geophilomorphs. Potentially<br />

synapomorphic characters of Craterostigmus <strong>and</strong> Geophilomorpha are in conflict with<br />

the Epimorpha hypothesis (= Scolopendromorpha + Geophilomorpha) but are<br />

congruent with results from some molecular <strong>and</strong> combined cladistic analyses.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 79<br />

Phylogeny <strong>and</strong> biography of Staghorn Ferns, Platycerium (Polypodiaceae)<br />

H.-P. Kreier & H. Schneider<br />

The polygrammoid fern genus Platycerium Desv. (Engl.: staghorn ferns, Germ.:<br />

Geweihfarne) consists of 18 species growing as epiphytes in subtropical to tropical<br />

lowl<strong>and</strong> forests. Their most conspicuous adaptation to epiphytic growth is the leaf<br />

differentiation into unbranched litter collectors <strong>and</strong> dichotomously forked<br />

trophosporophylls, making them attractive ornamental plants. Another disctintive<br />

character is the presence of stellate hairs on the lamina.<br />

Two studies have explored the relationships of Platycerium species using a cladistic<br />

analysis base on morphological evidence (Hoshizaki 1972, Hennipman & Roos<br />

1982). The results of these studies were in strong conflict to each other. In the<br />

present study, sequence data of four chloroplast DNA regions were used to<br />

reconstruct the phylogeny of these ferns.<br />

The topology found by Maximum Parsimony <strong>and</strong> Maximum Likelihood analyses is<br />

similar to that proposed by Hoshizaki, which is highly congruent with the species'<br />

geographical distribution. Platycerium was found to be monophyletic <strong>and</strong> sister to<br />

Pyrrosia (felt ferns). Platycerium falls into three well supported clades.<br />

- An African-American clade (7 species): Three Madagascan endemics form a well<br />

supported sub-clade which is sister to the Madagascan/continental Pl. alcicorne. The<br />

two strictly continental African species form another well supported subclade. The<br />

neotropical Pl. <strong>and</strong>inum is most closely affiliated with the Madagascan taxa.<br />

- A Javan-Australian clade (4 species): This clade is synonymous to the Pl.<br />

bifurcatum complex. The species are found throughout the Sunda Isl<strong>and</strong>s, New<br />

Guinea <strong>and</strong> Eastern Australia.<br />

- A Malayan-Asian clade (7species): The species are distributed from Indochina to<br />

Eastern Australia, comprising a subclade of two almost sympatric species (Pl.<br />

coronarium <strong>and</strong> P. ridleyi) <strong>and</strong> a subclade of five species whose relationships were<br />

poorly resolved.<br />

The current distribution of Platycerium appears to be best explained as the result of a<br />

combination of long distance dispersals <strong>and</strong> subsequent speciation(s) in Madagascar<br />

<strong>and</strong> Australasia. Its area of origin could not be determined.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 80<br />

Molecular systematics <strong>and</strong> growth form evolution in the tribe Trichocereeae<br />

(Cactaceae)<br />

A. Lendel & R. Nyffeler<br />

Cacti are very remarkable for their great diversity of specialized growth forms. The<br />

typical cactus growth form characteristics (i.e., lack of leaves, green stems, spine<br />

clusters, reduced branching pattern) are also found in some other unrelated groups<br />

of dicotyledonous flowering plant families (i.e., Euphorbiaceae) <strong>and</strong> present one of<br />

the classical textbook example for „convergence” in evolution. The evolution of these<br />

characteristics, however, is still not understood. The traditional idea formulated by<br />

Buxbaum in his „law of the abbreviation of the vegetative phase” is that there is a<br />

general „trend“ in cactus evolution leading from branched, columnar forms to<br />

unbranched, globular types. This is the still widely prevailing concept in current<br />

classification systems.<br />

The tribe Trichocereeae comprises about 25 genera <strong>and</strong> at least some 200 distinct<br />

species, including some of the most diverse <strong>and</strong> attractive cacti from southern South<br />

America (i.e., Cleistocactus, Echinopsis, Rebutia). Trichocereeae species are found<br />

at localities from sea level to more than 4000 m in various different habitats ranging<br />

from extremely arid areas in the Atacaman desert of Peru to savanna areas in<br />

Uruguay <strong>and</strong> southern Brazil. The wide spectrum of growth forms found in<br />

Trichocereeae, ranging from trees <strong>and</strong> shrubs to caespitose or single globular stems,<br />

makes this group an ideal subject to investigate in greater details the pattern of<br />

evolution in these characters.<br />

Preliminary results from molecular systematic analyses indicate that some lineages<br />

with exclusively globular growth forms (in particular Gymnocalycium <strong>and</strong> Rebutia),<br />

which previously have been thought to be “highly derived” within Trichocereeae, are<br />

not part of the core group of the tribe. Furthermore, the genus Echinopsis sensu lato<br />

is found to be polyphyletic.<br />

The patterns of character transition among the different growth form types in<br />

Trichocereeae will be investigated on the basis of a detailed molecular phylogeny<br />

with the help of phylogenetic correlation analyses <strong>and</strong> the estimation of<br />

transformation rate differences in the study group. The latter will be done in a<br />

likelihood framework using the software program MULTISTATE.<br />

Currently, project work is focusing on producing a detailed phylogeny of the tribe<br />

Trichocereeae in order to use this hypothesis of interspecific relationships to work out<br />

a well founded taxonomic treatment at the generic <strong>and</strong> infrageneric rank.<br />

Poster as pdf-file on www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 81<br />

New finds of Cambrian parasitic pentastomids <strong>and</strong> the remaining questions<br />

about their affinities <strong>and</strong> evolutionary fate<br />

A. Maas, D. Waloszek, A. Braun, J. E. Repetski & K. J. Müller<br />

The relationships of the exclusively parasitic tongue worms are still controversial. Of<br />

the two major alternatives, one sees the group close to branchiuran crustaceans<br />

(based on molecular <strong>and</strong> sperm data), <strong>and</strong> the other, very different from the first,<br />

regards them as derivatives of the stem lineage toward the crown group of<br />

Arthropoda s. str., i.e. not even to crown group Euarthropoda. This view has been<br />

founded on data from embryological <strong>and</strong> postembryological development, the nerve<br />

system, <strong>and</strong> various aspects of outer <strong>and</strong> inner morphology. The discovery, between<br />

1989 <strong>and</strong> 1994, of exceptionally preserved <strong>and</strong> three-dimensionally preserved larvae<br />

of Upper Cambrian (ca. 500 Million year old) stem-lineage representatives of the<br />

Pentastomida demonstrated a) a high degree of adaptation to parasitism, b) a<br />

striking morphological conservatism, but c) a high diversification in the Cambrian,<br />

requiring a likewise diversified host group.<br />

To this set of fossils we could recently add a new pentastomid species of Late<br />

Cambrian or Early Ordovician age from Sweden (in press). Based on this <strong>and</strong> newly<br />

collected material from Västergötl<strong>and</strong>, Sweden, in 2004 – approx. 60 specimens of<br />

different sizes – we raise again the questions about the ontogeny, systematic<br />

affinities <strong>and</strong> possible co-evolution of pentastomids with the craniote/vertebrate<br />

clade. First results are presented here, suggesting, e.g., at least three successive<br />

larval stages that simply elongate without adding segments.<br />

The new material, increasing our knowledge of preservational impact on details, will<br />

be used for a re-evaluation of the known fossil taxa in terms of taxonomic validity. We<br />

also hope to contribute more to the discussion about the phylogenetic relationships of<br />

this unusual taxon within Arthropoda. Our current hypothesis is that pentastomids,<br />

initially living as somewhat protected ectoparasites in the gill chambers of early<br />

craniotes, “just” adapted to a life in lungs, mouth openings <strong>and</strong> nostrils, when the<br />

descendants of those hosts, the tetrapods, went onto l<strong>and</strong>. Therefore, pentastomids<br />

never became truly endoparasitic <strong>and</strong> retained their layered cuticle <strong>and</strong> other<br />

morphological characteristics. This idea has to be tested in the <strong>future</strong>, not the least<br />

including investigation of extant taxa.<br />

Poster as pdf-file on www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 82<br />

How many species are there? Species delimitation analyses in the genus<br />

Discocactus (Cactaceae)<br />

M. C. Machado, D. C. Zappi & E. L. Borba<br />

The taxonomy of the genus Discocactus has been controversial, with a five-fold<br />

difference in the number of taxa recognized by competing classifications. In order to<br />

make taxonomic decisions on the specific <strong>and</strong> infraspecific rank of taxa occuring in<br />

the state of Bahia, Brazil, the variation of 22 quantitative morphological characters<br />

was analysed for 337 individuals from 17 populations, covering most of the taxa<br />

described for the state. We employed the character-based species delimitation<br />

method of Davis & Nixon (PAA - Population Aggregation Analysis) <strong>and</strong> the treebased<br />

species delimitation method of Wiens & Penkrot. The results were compared<br />

with those obtained from multivariate <strong>and</strong> statistical analysis. The methods employed<br />

disagree on the number of distinct taxa to be recognized; however, the disagreement<br />

is restricted to the level of inclusiveness achieved. We took a conservative view <strong>and</strong><br />

recognized only the taxa resolved by all methods: D. bahiensis, D. catingicola <strong>and</strong> D.<br />

zehntneri, the latter with two subspecies, zehntneri <strong>and</strong> boomianus.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 83<br />

Divergence <strong>and</strong> diversity: lessons from an arctic-alpine distribution<br />

(Pardosa saltuaria group, Lycosidae, Araneae)<br />

C. Muster & T. U. Berendonk<br />

Wolf spiders of the Pardosa saltuaria group constitute a textbook example of arcticalpine<br />

distributions in Europe. According to current taxonomic concepts, five<br />

allopatric species occur in Sc<strong>and</strong>inavia <strong>and</strong> the Bohemian Forest, the Alps <strong>and</strong><br />

Pyrenees, the Giant Mountains, the Carpathians, <strong>and</strong> the Balkans. Sequence<br />

comparisons (mtND1, 921 bp) of 130 individuals from 13 populations across the<br />

entire European range revealed three deep phylogeographic splits, which are not<br />

concordant with currently recognized species. Populations from the Pyrenees <strong>and</strong><br />

the Balkans are reciprocally monophyletic <strong>and</strong> clearly distinct from a “northern clade”,<br />

which comprises the haplotypes from all other localities. Adoption of a 2.3 %<br />

divergence rate per million years suggests separation of the three major clades since<br />

the early Pleistocene. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, lineage sorting within the “northern clade”<br />

is still incomplete, indicating a common gene pool in the late Pleistocene. These<br />

results contradict conventional wisdom about the origin of arctic-alpine disjunctions –<br />

late Pleistocene fragmentation of a single widespread ancestor – but support the<br />

hypothesis of a “multiglacial origin” of such distribution patterns, with the southern<br />

populations being separated some Ice ages earlier.<br />

In contrast to traditional predictions, according to which divergence (between<br />

populations) <strong>and</strong> diversity (within populations) should peak together in refugial areas,<br />

these parameters are negatively correlated in our study system. The complex pattern<br />

of within population diversity probably results from different processes at different<br />

temporal horizons. Below average nucleotide diversity could result from (i) ancient<br />

bottlenecking in a warm interglacial period (as seen in populations from the Pyrenees<br />

<strong>and</strong> Balkans) (ii) recent bottlenecking in small modern areas (as seen in populations<br />

from the Giant mountains <strong>and</strong> the Bohemian Forest) <strong>and</strong> (iii) from dispersal<br />

bootlenecking as in northern Sc<strong>and</strong>inavia.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 84<br />

The Dragonflies of Libya<br />

S. V. Ober & E.-G. Burmeister<br />

With nearly 1.8 million km² Libya is the fourth largest country in Africa. More than<br />

90 % of the northern African state are desert. Because of the unfavourable<br />

hydrogeographic conditions for freshwater organisms, the Odonata fauna of Libya<br />

has been studied only insufficiently. For several decades, an additional obstacle used<br />

to be the political isolation of the country.<br />

To establish a base for <strong>future</strong> research of the Libyan dragonfly fauna, a summary of<br />

all known Libyan data is provided. The records are based on a three-week collecting<br />

expedition by the authors through the western parts of the country in spring 2004.<br />

These data are supplemented by an analysis of literature information. The study also<br />

includes unpublished data on voucher specimens from the natural history museums<br />

of Berlin, Bonn, Genoa, Milan <strong>and</strong> Vienna. Published data based on the material<br />

deposited in these collections was confirmed by the senior author.<br />

Our study resulted in a total number of 27 species (8 Zygoptera <strong>and</strong> 19 Anisoptera)<br />

recorded at about 80 localities. The findings are presented in a list of species <strong>and</strong> a<br />

locality list. The sites are also shown in a distribution map. Erroneous interpretations<br />

of earlier authors have been clarified, <strong>and</strong> a few localities are illustrated by<br />

photographs. Finally, a comparison of the Libyan Odonata with the dragonfly fauna of<br />

the northern African littoral states is presented. Climatic <strong>and</strong> topographic differences<br />

are discussed as possible reasons for the lower diversity so far known from Libya.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 85<br />

Is DNA barcoding sufficient?<br />

Unraveling the radiation of the l<strong>and</strong> snail genus Xerocrassa on Crete<br />

Jan Sauer & Bernhard Hausdorf<br />

The radiation of the l<strong>and</strong> snail genus Xerocrassa on Crete was analysed using COI<br />

<strong>and</strong> 16S rDNA sequences as well as morphological characters to evaluate the merits<br />

<strong>and</strong> shortcomings of DNA barcoding. The combination of morphological <strong>and</strong><br />

molecular data suggests that there are about 20 endemic Xerocrassa species on<br />

Crete of which only six have been described so far. With morphological data alone 24<br />

species pairs cannot be distinguished. With mtDNA sequences alone the<br />

discrimination of 7 species pairs is impossible because of incomplete lineage sorting.<br />

The placement of some specimens in the COI tree was strongly contradicted by<br />

morphological characters. In some of these cases 16S rDNA sequences confirmed<br />

the morphological results. The wrong placement of these specimens in the COI tree<br />

might indicate that the obtained sequences represent nuclear pseudogenes (numts)<br />

in these cases. DNA sequences represent valuable data for taxonomy that may help<br />

to discriminate morphologically cryptic species. However, our results show that<br />

basing taxonomy on a single DNA fragment may result in erroneous conclusions,<br />

because pseudogene lineages may be misinterpreted as cryptic species <strong>and</strong><br />

because recently diverged species may not be distinguishable because of incomplete<br />

lineage sorting. Moreover, it is hardly possible to decide which clades in a phylogeny<br />

of a single DNA fragment represent species without independent evidence. Thus, we<br />

recommend a combination of morphological <strong>and</strong> molecular approaches to unravel<br />

biodiversity.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 86<br />

Variability of the plastid trnH-psbA intergenic spacer in Cucurbitaceae<br />

<strong>and</strong> its utility for DNA barcoding<br />

Hanno Schäfer & Susanne S. Renner<br />

We sequenced the trnH-psbA intergenic spacer region of 75 species from the seven<br />

genera that make up the Thladianthinae (Baijiania, Indofevillea, Microlagenaria,<br />

Momordica, Sinobaijiania, Siraitia, <strong>and</strong> Thladiantha). This constitutes c. 90 % of the<br />

species of Thladianthinae, <strong>and</strong> given the recent finding that the trnH-psbA spacer<br />

may be the best plastid region for DNA-based taxon identification (Kress et al., PNAS<br />

2005), we decided to test its utility in the Cucurbitaceae. We also compared four<br />

other commonly used plastid markers (trnL intron <strong>and</strong> trnL-F spacer; rpl20-rps12<br />

spacer, matK gene). Species specificity of the trnH-psbA spacer was tested in seven<br />

species with 2-4 accessions each. Because of its short length (200-500 bp),<br />

amplification of the trnH-psbA spacer region was possible even from degraded DNA<br />

of herbarium material from 1833, while amplification of the other markers failed in a<br />

few (rpl20-rps12) or several accessions (matK), requiring additional internal primers.<br />

The trnH-psbA spacer was the most variable of the markers studied due to an indel<br />

of up to 300 bp in Baijiania, Indofevillea, <strong>and</strong> Thladiantha. This indel, however, was<br />

alignable unambiguously only within these genera. The trnH-psbA spacer sequences<br />

were species-specific in all tested instances. Easy amplification, high variability <strong>and</strong><br />

high species specificity thus make the trnH-psbA spacer a suitable marker for DNA<br />

barcoding in Cucurbitaceae.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 87<br />

Species identification of tardigrades through DNA sequences<br />

Ralph O. Schill & Georg Nies<br />

In the last decades the number of tardigrade species has considerably increased to<br />

more than 960 species <strong>and</strong> every year new species becoming discovered. However,<br />

the study of tardigrade species presents a general problem which is frequently<br />

encountered in the study of small invertebrates. Due to their small size, phenotypic<br />

plasticity, <strong>and</strong> genomic variability in the characters, may not allow a definite<br />

identification of the species. Further more, morphological keys are often effective<br />

only for a particular life stage. Tardigrade cysts or single parts of tardigrades seem to<br />

be undistinguishable by classical morphological methods. For a molecular-based<br />

identification system we utilized the mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase I<br />

(COI), a fragment of the 18S, <strong>and</strong> 28S ribosomal RNA gene, whose nucleotide<br />

sequences have been shown to be useful in resolving phylogenetic relationships<br />

among closely-related taxa in different phyla. The 28S have not been analyzed as a<br />

molecular taxonomic tool in tardigrades so far. This st<strong>and</strong>ard markers might serve as<br />

a molecular identification system of tardigrades.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 88<br />

Phylogenetic relationships of Orobanche <strong>and</strong> related genera: evidence from<br />

molecular <strong>and</strong> karyological data<br />

G. M. Schneeweiss, J.-M. Park, J.-F. Manen, A. E. Colwell & H. Weiss-Schneeweiss<br />

Orobanche in its current circumscription is the largest genus of exclusively<br />

holoparasitic members in the Orobanchaceae. Its ca. 170 species are traditionally<br />

grouped into four sections Gymnocaulis, Myzorrhiza (both New World), Trionychon<br />

<strong>and</strong> Orobanche (both Old World). These groups are sometimes treated as separate<br />

genera, <strong>and</strong> additionally a close relationship of O. sect. Orobanche to the small SW<br />

Asian genus Phelypaea has been suggested, implying non-monophyly of Orobanche.<br />

We used DNA-sequences from the nuclear ribosomal DNA region (ITS 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 <strong>and</strong><br />

5.8S) <strong>and</strong> from the plastid genes rbcL <strong>and</strong> rps2 to infer the phylogenetic relationships<br />

both within Orobanche <strong>and</strong> of Orobanche to the related genera Boschniakia,<br />

Cistanche, Conopholis, Epifagus <strong>and</strong> Phelypaea. In addition, we obtained<br />

karyological data for Orobanche, Boschniakia, Cistanche <strong>and</strong> Phelypaea as well as<br />

genome size data on Orobanche, Cistanche <strong>and</strong> Phelypaea <strong>and</strong> interpreted those in<br />

a phylogenetic context.<br />

Phylogenetic analyses of the sequence data (using maximum parsimony, maximum<br />

likelihood <strong>and</strong> Bayesian methods) yielded grossly congruent results. Phylogenetic<br />

patterns very likely arising from non-vertical transmission of plastid sequences in<br />

some members of the genus Orobanche do not negatively affect the overall<br />

conclusions. These are: (i) Orobanche in its current circumscription is not<br />

monophyletic, but falls into two phylogenetically distinct clades including (1) O. sect.<br />

Orobanche <strong>and</strong> the genus Phelypaea <strong>and</strong> (2) O. sects. Gymnocaulis, Myzorrhiza,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Trionychon; (ii) this bipartition is congruent with the distribution of chromosome<br />

base numbers, being x = 19 in the first <strong>and</strong> x = 12 in the second group; (iii) within O.<br />

sect. Orobanche, three distinct lineages with uncertain relationships to each other are<br />

found, (1) O. latisquama from the Iberian Peninsula <strong>and</strong> adjacent NW Africa, (2) the<br />

SW Asian O. anatolica <strong>and</strong> O. colorata, <strong>and</strong> (3) the remainder of sect. Orobanche;<br />

(iv) the distinctness of O. anatolica/colorata is supported by significantly larger<br />

chromosomes <strong>and</strong> correspondingly larger genome size compared to other species of<br />

sect. Orobanche; (v) Cistanche constitutes a distinct lineage (supported by the<br />

chromosome base number x = 20 <strong>and</strong> by far the largest chromosomes <strong>and</strong> highest<br />

genome size) with uncertain relationships; (vi) Conopholis <strong>and</strong> Epifagus are sistertaxa,<br />

but virtually nothing is known about their karyological characteristics; (vii)<br />

Boschniakia in its current circumscription is paraphyletic relative to Conopholis <strong>and</strong><br />

Epifagus; (viii) at least B. hookeri is karyologically distinct by its chromosome base<br />

number of x = 41.<br />

A re-classification of Orobanche <strong>and</strong> related genera is obviously necessary to retain<br />

monophyletic genera. We suggest splitting Orobanche <strong>and</strong> Boschniakia into several<br />

genera each because this (i) retains morphologically diagnosable units, <strong>and</strong> (ii)<br />

validly published names for these segregates <strong>and</strong> for the majority of their species are<br />

already avialable, requiring only very few additional nomenclatural changes. These<br />

groups are: Aphyllon (O. sect. Gymnocaulis), Myzorrhiza (O. sect. Myzorrhiza),<br />

Phelipanche (O. sect. Trionychon), Orobanche (O. sect. Orobanche p. p. max.),<br />

Boulardia (O. latisquama), Boschniakia s. str. (B. rossica), Xylanche (B. himalaica),<br />

Kopsiopsis (B. strobilacea <strong>and</strong> hookeri).<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 89<br />

Immigration patterns of rare arctic-alpine plants into the Alps<br />

Peter Schönswetter, Magnus Popp & Christian Brochmann<br />

A considerable number of plant species of predominantly arctic distribution grow in<br />

non-Arctic mountain ranges as well, a distribution type referred to as arctic-alpine.<br />

There are strong differences between taxa regarding the extent of their distribution<br />

area outside the Arctic. While some arctic-alpine plants occur frequently in many<br />

mountain ranges of the northern hemisphere, others are very rare <strong>and</strong> sometimes<br />

only a few populations outside of the Arctic are known. In my presentation I will<br />

unravel the immigration history of five rare arctic-alpine model taxa (Carex atrofusca,<br />

Carex bigelowii, Juncus biglumis, Minuartia biflora, Ranunculus pygmaeus) into the<br />

Alps, applying molecular methods (fingerprinting <strong>and</strong> sequencing) <strong>and</strong> genome size<br />

measurements. I will focus on the circumpolar phylogeographical pattern, the source<br />

areas for the colonisation of the Alps, the mode of origin of the Alpine populations<br />

(single vs. multiple introductions) <strong>and</strong> the phylogeographical structure within the Alps.<br />

As some of the rare arctic-alpine plants in the Alps are critically endangered, I will<br />

also touch on conservation strategies.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 90<br />

Immunocytological evidence supports the hypotheses that Xenoturbella bocki<br />

(Westblad 1949), phylum uncertain, is a deuterostome <strong>and</strong> that Ambulacraria is<br />

monophyletic<br />

Thomas Stach, Samuel Dupont, Olle Israelson, Geraldine Fauville, Hiroaki Nakano &<br />

Mike Thorndyke<br />

The phylogenetic position of Xenoturbella spp. has been uncertain since their first<br />

discovery in 1949. It has been recently suggested that worms in this taxon could be<br />

related to Ambulacraria within Deuterostomia. Ambulacraria is a taxon that has been<br />

suggested to consist of Hemichordata <strong>and</strong> Echinodermata. The hypothesis that X.<br />

bocki was related to Ambulacraria as well as the hypothesis of a monophyletic<br />

Ambulacraria was primarily based on the analysis of DNA sequence data. We tested<br />

both hypotheses using antibodies raised against SALMFamide 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 (S1, S2),<br />

neuropeptides isolated from echinoderms, on X. bocki <strong>and</strong> the enteropneust<br />

Harrimania kupfferi, as well as numerous marine invertebrates from different high<br />

ranking taxonomic groups. While immunoreactivity against S1 was widespread<br />

indicating an early evolutionary origin, immunoreactivity against S2 was restricted to<br />

nervous structures in the taxa traditionally considered non-chordate deuterostomes<br />

plus X. bocki. This finding supports the Ambulacraria-hypothesis <strong>and</strong> suggests a<br />

close phylogenetic relationship of X. bocki to Ambulacraria.<br />

Poster as pdf-file on www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 91<br />

Technical st<strong>and</strong>ards for the digital imaging of Lepidoptera<br />

A. Steiner, J. Holstein & C. L. Häuser<br />

In the course of the projects GART / GloBIS-D (Globales Artregister Tagfalter /<br />

Global Butterfly Information System – Deutschl<strong>and</strong>:<br />

http://www.s2you.com/platform/lex/globis/) we established a set of technical<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards for the photography of pinned <strong>and</strong> spread Lepidoptera specimens. The<br />

intention was to provide reproducible conditions <strong>and</strong> thus allow researchers<br />

worldwide to produce digital images which are directly comparable.<br />

Light source: One of the most serious problems in the photography of spread<br />

Lepidoptera is the presence of shadows cast by the specimen itself. There should be<br />

as little shadow as possible – ideally none at all – so as not to distract from the<br />

specimen. A ringlamp is the best way to ensure an almost shadow-free image (a<br />

ringflash mounted on the lens causes a diffuse shadow around the specimen due to<br />

its small diameter). We use a commercially available fluorescent lamp with a socalled<br />

“full spectrum” (VITA-LITE, DURO-TEST) with a light temperature of 5.500 K,<br />

near to daylight. An electronic ballast provides flicker-free light. Lighting set-up: To<br />

prevent light from entering the lens the light tube is mounted inside an aluminium box<br />

("light box") with an opening in the top slightly smaller in diameter than the tube <strong>and</strong><br />

with a structured surface to reflect <strong>and</strong> further diffuse the light. This “light box” is now<br />

commercially marketed (www.fritz-weber-entomologiebedarf.de/21904.html). There is<br />

also a collapsible model in which the side boards can be folded inside protecting the<br />

lamp <strong>and</strong> resulting in a size of 39 x 33 x 7 cm. Specimen set-up: To maximize<br />

h<strong>and</strong>ling speed <strong>and</strong> minimize damage risk the following set-up is recommended: The<br />

specimen is not – as usual – pinned to the background. Instead it is placed with its<br />

wings on two parallel str<strong>and</strong>s of the finest type of fishing line available (diameter 0,06<br />

mm). Most small- to middle-sized Lepidoptera are lightweight enough for this method.<br />

Specimens with a large <strong>and</strong> heavy abdomen sometimes require additional support to<br />

prevent them toppling over. Other objects such as locality labels, printed scale bars<br />

or bar codes can be placed on the fishing lines to be photographed together with the<br />

specimens. Against a grey background the fishing line is often invisible. Sometimes it<br />

shows as a white or dark grey line <strong>and</strong> has to be eliminated from the image manually.<br />

With this method even specimens that are obliquely pinned are automatically in the<br />

correct position for photographing. Both upperside <strong>and</strong> underside photographs have<br />

the same distance between the specimen <strong>and</strong> the background. As there is no contact<br />

with the background the background itself can be easily <strong>and</strong> rapidly exchanged.<br />

Background: As a background we use a light grey plastic sheet commercially<br />

available as index sheets for loose-leaf binders which turned out both neutral in<br />

colour <strong>and</strong> with a structure that does not cause reflections (Herlitz Article No.:<br />

05961107, EAN No.: 4008115961106).<br />

Meanwhile the "light box" has been acquired by major museums <strong>and</strong> is available for<br />

use by researchers (London, Berlin, Bonn, Dresden, Frankfurt, Karlsruhe, München,<br />

Stuttgart).<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 92<br />

Phylogeography of the Central European glacial relict species Leptusa simoni<br />

(Coleoptera, Staphylinidae): history of colonization of the German <strong>and</strong> Swiss<br />

mountain ranges <strong>and</strong> the Alps<br />

A. Szallies, R. Molenda & P. Nagel<br />

The staphylinid genus Leptusa contains many psychrophilic <strong>and</strong> wingless species<br />

restricted to limited locations in the Alps, where they preferentially live in rocky<br />

habitats in the alpine <strong>and</strong> subalpine zone. The species under study here, Leptusa<br />

simoni Eppelsheim, possesses one of the most extended distribution ranges of all the<br />

alpine wingless Leptusa. In the Alps L. simoni is limited to the northern ranges of the<br />

Swiss Alps. It is distributed throughout the Swiss Jura <strong>and</strong> occurs in the French<br />

Vosges mountains as well. All the latter populations belong to ssp. inopinata<br />

Scheerpeltz, differing from the nominate form in having a more slender male<br />

aedoeagus. The nominate form is distributed all over the Black Forest <strong>and</strong> the<br />

adjacent Swabian Jura <strong>and</strong> Odenwald, reaching the Saar- <strong>and</strong> Rhinel<strong>and</strong> in the<br />

northwest <strong>and</strong> the Thuringian Forest in the northeast. In the north L. simoni also<br />

inhabits the Vogelsberg, Rhön, <strong>and</strong> certain mountains in Hessen <strong>and</strong> Hannover. In its<br />

extra-alpine distribution L. simoni exclusively occurs in the air-conditioned scree<br />

slope ecosystem with an exceptionally cold microclimate, indicating they were most<br />

likely populated during the glacial periods.<br />

We studied the mitochondrial COI (cytochrome oxidase I) sequence <strong>and</strong> the nuclear<br />

ITS-2 (internally transcribed spacer of rRNA) from specimens collected all over the<br />

distribution range of L. simoni to elucidate the phyletic history of the populations of<br />

contemporary localities. Only 3 bases of ITS-2 were found to be informative, mainly<br />

reflecting <strong>and</strong> validating the division of L. simoni into its two subspecies. Of the 620<br />

bases of COI under investigation, 29 positions were found to be potentially<br />

informative. COI sequences in the northern populations of L. simoni were highly<br />

similar to each other, indicating a recent dispersal into this area, probably around the<br />

last Glacial. Likewise, the populations in the Alps <strong>and</strong> Vosges were found to be highly<br />

similar to those of the Swiss Jura, where the highest sequence variability in L. simoni<br />

ssp. inopinata could be found. Therefore, the Swiss Jura qualifies as a center of<br />

dispersal or as “massif de refuge” for L. simoni ssp. inopinata during the Glacials,<br />

whereas the colonization of the Alps appears to be a recent event. The highest<br />

sequence variability by far was seen amongst populations of the Black Forest,<br />

Odenwald <strong>and</strong> Vogelsberg. Southwestern Germany therefore qualifies for the center<br />

of origin of the contemporary L. simoni. Populations sharing relevant phyletic traits<br />

with ssp. inopinata from the Swiss Jura were found in the Northern Black Forest <strong>and</strong><br />

Odenwald. COI sequence variety in the southern Black Forest rarely conformed to<br />

spatial distance, probably reflecting a complex history of colonization in this region.<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 93<br />

Diversity <strong>and</strong> ecology of Ectomycorrhizae on Polygonum viviparum L.<br />

in the Bavarian Alps<br />

R. Verma & R. Agerer<br />

In the Northern hemisphere ectomycorrhizae are mainly formed by trees <strong>and</strong> shrubs<br />

of the families Betulaceae, Pinaceae, Fagaceae <strong>and</strong> Salicaceae. There are,<br />

however, a few herbaceous species of angiosperms known to form this symbiosis,<br />

too. One of these, Polygonum viviparum L. (Polygonaceae), has been known to be<br />

ectomycorrhizal for a long time, but little is known about the diversity of associated<br />

fungi. Several ECM morphotypes have been reported, but so far only two fungal<br />

partners have been identified: Cenococcum geophilum Fr. [Syn. Cenococcum<br />

graniforme (Sow.) Ferd & Winge] <strong>and</strong> Russula emetica Fr. var. alpestris Boud.<br />

Furthermore, the genera Amanita <strong>and</strong> Inocybe have been mentioned.<br />

This PhD-project aims at describing the ectomycorrhizal diversity of P. viviparum at<br />

alpine sites in the Bavarian nature reserve "Allgäuer Hochalpen” at approx. 1300-<br />

2100 m height. We will also examine whether proximity to woody ectomycorrhizal<br />

plants influences the ECM community. Therefore plants plus their whole root systems<br />

will be sampled both on alpine meadows without any woody plants <strong>and</strong> in proximity<br />

to Picea abies (Pinaceae), Salix spp. (Salicaceae), Dryas octopetala (Rosaceae) or<br />

Pinus mugo (Pinaceae).<br />

Fungal species will be identified via morphological <strong>and</strong> anatomical features <strong>and</strong><br />

sequencing of ITS regions of ribosomal DNA. ECM communities of Picea abies, Salix<br />

spp., Dryas octopetala (Rosaceae) <strong>and</strong> Pinus mugo will be examined for similarities<br />

in ECM diverstiy with P. viviparum.<br />

P. viviparum samples will be compared for relative ECM abundance (i.e. %<br />

occurrence of each ECM type/species). Correlation analyses will be carried out to<br />

determine the involvement of soil characteristics (i.e. nutrient content, pH, etc.) on<br />

ECM diversity.<br />

Future plans include describing extracellular enzyme activity on excised ECM tips<br />

using a microplate multiple enzyme test system (using methylumbelliferone-labelled<br />

fluorescent substrate analogues) <strong>and</strong> comparing above said ECM communities.<br />

Poster as pdf-file on www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 94<br />

Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the occurrence <strong>and</strong> causes of monoecy <strong>and</strong> dioecy in Bryonia<br />

<strong>and</strong> Ecballium (Cucurbitaceae)<br />

S. M. Volz & S. S. Renner<br />

We are using the small West Eurasian genera Bryonia <strong>and</strong> Ecballium to study the<br />

occurrence <strong>and</strong> causes of within-species sexual system switches, in this case<br />

between monoecy <strong>and</strong> dioecy. Bryonia <strong>and</strong> Ecballium form an isolated <strong>and</strong> relatively<br />

basal clade in the Cucurbitaceae family tree. Both genera consist of taxonomically<br />

problematic species/subspecies of which most are dioecious. Even the monoecious<br />

species have dioecious populations in parts of their range. To underst<strong>and</strong> species<br />

boundaries in Bryonia, we are sequencing the psbA-trnH spacer, the trnH-atpA<br />

spacer, <strong>and</strong> the trnL intron <strong>and</strong> spacer from a geographically dense sample of<br />

accessions, using a related Himalayan clade as an outgroup. At this time, our<br />

phylogenetic analysis relies on 1849 aligned bases <strong>and</strong> comprises 53 accessions.<br />

We have also cloned <strong>and</strong> sequenced the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of<br />

nuclear ribosomal DNA <strong>and</strong> have found up to 7 paralogous copies per accession.<br />

Judging from the GC content <strong>and</strong> the number of mutations in the 5.8S rRNA coding<br />

region, most of them are non-functional. Chloroplast DNA haplotypes group<br />

according to their geographic provenience, <strong>and</strong> monoecy seems to have arisen at<br />

least twice independently from dioecy in Bryonia. The morphologically distinct<br />

Canary Isl<strong>and</strong> endemic, B. verrucosa, is sister to all other species of Bryonia; it is<br />

dioecious as are the majority of closely related Cucurbitaceae.<br />

Poster as pdf-file on www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 95<br />

Towards a phylogenetic system of the Nemertea<br />

J. von Döhren & T. Bartolomaeus<br />

The Nemertea (Rhynchocoela) form a monophyletic subtaxon of the Spiralia with<br />

about 1200 described species. The present knowledge of their phylogeny is reviewed<br />

to point out unsolved problems on their evolution. Main autapomorphy of the<br />

Nemertea is a unique eversible proboscis that is situated dorsally of the intestine in a<br />

fluid filled coelomic cavity, the rhynchocoel. While the monophyly of this taxon is<br />

beyond any doubt its sister taxon has not yet been clearly identified (Turbeville 2002;<br />

Halanych 2004).<br />

Nemertea are traditionally classified into two high-ranking taxa, Anopla <strong>and</strong> Enopla.<br />

In the Anopla the proboscis pore <strong>and</strong> the mouth are separate whereas there is only a<br />

single, common opening, the rhynchodaeum, in the Enopla. Recent results from<br />

developmental studies showed that the Anopla maintained the primitive state.<br />

Molecular data (Thollesson & Norenburg 2003) in addition confirmed that the<br />

monophyly of this group is highly unlikely in contrast to earlier assumptions (Ax<br />

1995). Anoplan interrelationships are not fully resolved either. Within the Anopla, the<br />

Heteronemertea are undoubtedly monophyletic due to the presence of an additional<br />

subepidermal tissue layer (dermis) consisting of gl<strong>and</strong> cells <strong>and</strong> muscles. The second<br />

anoplan subtaxon Palaeonemertea comprises the Carinomidae, Cephalotricidae,<br />

Tubulanidae <strong>and</strong> Hubrechtidae. This assemblage is most likely paraphyletic. The<br />

presence of a pilidium larva links the Hubrechtidae with the Heteronemertea in a unit<br />

Pilidiophora. The monophyly of a unit of this kind is also supported by molecular data<br />

(Thollesson & Norenburg 2003). The relationships among the remaining<br />

palaeonemertean taxa remain unclear, but available molecular data suggest that the<br />

Tubulanidae <strong>and</strong> the Cephalotricidae form a monophylum.<br />

The Enopla comprise the commensal Bdellonemertea with only one genus<br />

Malacobdella <strong>and</strong> the Hoplonemertea. Their phylogeny poses two main problems.<br />

Firstly, it is uncertain whether Bdellonemertea is the sister group of the remaining<br />

Enopla. This view is mainly based on the absence of a stylet apparatus in the<br />

proboscis in contrast to all Hoplonemertea. Molecular data, however, suggest that<br />

Malacobdella belongs into the Monostilifera, a subtaxon of the Hoplonemertea.<br />

According to this view, the stylet in Malacobdella has secondarily been lost.<br />

Secondly, the relationships between the two subtaxa of the Hoplonemertea,<br />

Monostilifera <strong>and</strong> Polystilifera, remain to be clarified. The primitive state of the stylets<br />

– single versus multiple spikes on a common basis – cannot yet be reconstructed.<br />

Available molecular data indicate that both hoplonemertean subtaxa are<br />

monophyletic (Thollesson & Norenburg 2003).<br />

In order to contribute to a clarification of these questions substantial gaps in our<br />

knowledge on the internal anatomy of Nemertea need to be filled. We expect that<br />

comparative analyses of the structure <strong>and</strong> development of the nervous <strong>and</strong> muscular<br />

system as well as of the eyes will provide new insights.<br />

Poster as pdf-file on www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 96<br />

Evolutionary history of crustacean segmentation <strong>and</strong> tagmosis:<br />

a fossil-based perspective<br />

Dieter Waloszek & Andreas Maas<br />

Evolution of crustacean segmentation – the formation of jointed body segments, the<br />

formation of groups of segments (tagmosis), <strong>and</strong> the formation of jointed articles<br />

along segmental appendages – cannot be viewed independently from historical traits<br />

<strong>and</strong> functional constraints. Much of this complex feature originated from ground<br />

patterns established early in segmented arthropods that bore sclerotic stiffenings of<br />

the dorsal parts of the chitin-bearing cuticle (= arthrodization) <strong>and</strong> similar organization<br />

along their appendages, i.e. articles connected by pivot joints (= arthropodization) –<br />

the Arthropoda s. str.<br />

Various Cambrian arthropods newly described in the last 20 years have updated<br />

considerably our view of early arthropod morphology <strong>and</strong> phylogeny. One important<br />

source comprises the minute Lower to Upper Cambrian ’Orsten’ 3d arthropod fossils<br />

from Sweden <strong>and</strong> other sites worldwide. Such well-preserved fossilized animals,<br />

including ontogenetic stages, can serve as empirical evidence of ancient<br />

morphologies (as opposed to hypothetical models). Moreover, they provide us with<br />

an insight into the morphogenetic development of segments – the so-called terminal<br />

addition – <strong>and</strong> their equipment, i.e. particularly the limbs. This holds true at even<br />

different evolutionary levels from members of Euarthropoda (e.g., Agnostus<br />

pisiformis) to derivatives of the stem-lineage (e.g., Martinssonia elongata) <strong>and</strong> crown<br />

group of Crustacea (e.g., Rehbachiella kinnekullensis, with 30 successive larval<br />

stages). Another major source are the flattened fossils of the Lower Cambrian<br />

Maotianshan-Shale Lagerstätten in China (also known as Chengjiang fossils) that<br />

continue to yield spectacular new items. These <strong>and</strong> the ‘Orsten’ evidence are the<br />

major sources of our review of aspects of structural <strong>and</strong> functional development<br />

toward the crown group of Crustacea, Eucrustacea.<br />

Poster as pdf-file on www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-13.htm<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Mühlethaler & Burckhardt (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 97<br />

Tilmann Abele<br />

LMU München<br />

Department Biologie I<br />

Biodiversitätsforschung<br />

Menzinger Str. 67<br />

D-80638 München<br />

Reinhard Agerer<br />

Department Biology I<br />

Biodiversity - Systematic Mycology<br />

Ludwig-Maximilans-University<br />

Menzinger Str. 67<br />

D-80638 Munich<br />

myrrhmyk@lrz.uni-muenchen.de<br />

Donat Agosti<br />

Dalmaziquai 45<br />

CH-3005 Bern<br />

agosti@amnh.org<br />

Dirk Ahrens<br />

Deutsches Entomologisches Institut<br />

(ZALF)<br />

Eberswalder Strasse 84<br />

D-15374 Müncheberg<br />

ahrens.dirk_col@gmx.de<br />

Pedro Martínez Arbizu<br />

Forschungsinstitut <strong>Senckenberg</strong><br />

Abteilung DZMB<br />

Südstr<strong>and</strong> 44<br />

D-26382 Wilhelmshaven<br />

Georg F. J. Armbruster<br />

University of Basel<br />

Department of Integrative Biology<br />

Section of Conservation Biology<br />

St. Johanns Vorstadt 10<br />

CH-4056 Basel<br />

g.armbruster@unibas.ch<br />

Ulrike Aspöck<br />

Department of Entomology<br />

<strong>Museum</strong> of Natural History Vienna<br />

Burgring 7,<br />

A-1010 Vienna<br />

ulrike.aspoeck@ nhm-wien.ac.at<br />

Addresses<br />

Horst Aspöck<br />

Clin. Institute of Hygiene<br />

<strong>and</strong> Med. Microbiology<br />

Medical University Vienna<br />

Kinderspitalg.15<br />

A-1095 Vienna<br />

horst.aspoeck@meduniwien.ac.at<br />

Michael Balke<br />

Zoologische Staatssammlung<br />

Münchhausenstrasse 21<br />

D-81247 München<br />

michb@nhm.ac.uk<br />

Thomas Bartolomaeus<br />

Institute of Biology<br />

Dep. Animal Systematics <strong>and</strong><br />

Evolution<br />

Freie Universität Berlin<br />

Königin-Luise-Str. 1-3<br />

D-14195 Berlin<br />

tbartol@zoosyst-berlin.de<br />

Dominik Begerow<br />

Lehrstuhl Spezielle Botanik/Mykologie<br />

Universität Tübingen<br />

Auf der Morgenstelle 1<br />

D-72076 Tübingen<br />

dominik.begerow@uni-tuebingen.de<br />

Thomas U. Berendonk<br />

Universität Leipzig<br />

Institut für Biologie II<br />

Molekulare Evolution und Systematik<br />

der Tiere<br />

Talstraße 33<br />

D-04103 Leipzig<br />

tberendonk@rz.uni-leipzig.de<br />

Olaf R.P. Bininda-Emonds<br />

Lehrstuhl für Tierzucht<br />

Technische Universität München<br />

Hochfeldweg 1<br />

D-85354 Freising-Wehenstephan<br />

Olaf.Bininda@tierzucht.tum.de<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 14 (2005


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 98<br />

Christoph Bleidorn<br />

FB Biologie/Chemie/Pharmazie<br />

Systematik und Evolution der Tiere<br />

Freie Universität Berlin<br />

Koenigin-Luise-Str. 1-3<br />

D-14195 Berlin<br />

cbleidorn@zoosyst-berlin.de<br />

Wolfgang Böckeler<br />

Zoologisches Institut der Universität<br />

Am Botanischen Garten 9<br />

D-24118 Kiel<br />

wboeckeler@zoologie.uni-kiel.de<br />

Michael Bögle<br />

Limnologische Station<br />

TU-München<br />

Hofmark 1-3<br />

D-82393 Iffeldorf<br />

michael.boegle@wzw.tum.de<br />

Klemens Böhm<br />

Universität Karlsruhe (TH)<br />

Fakultät für Informatik<br />

Institut für Programmstrukturen und<br />

Datenorganisation<br />

Kaiserstraße 12<br />

D-76131 Karlsruhe<br />

boehm@ipd.uka.de<br />

Manja Böhme<br />

University of Leipzig,<br />

Department of Zoology<br />

Talstr. 33<br />

D-04103 Leipzig<br />

maboehme@rz.uni-leipzig.de<br />

Eduardo Leite Borba<br />

Departamento de Ciências Biológicas<br />

Universidade Estadual de Feira de<br />

Santana<br />

Rodovia BR 116, km 03<br />

Feira de Santana, Bahia<br />

BRA-CEP 44031-460<br />

Dirk Br<strong>and</strong>is<br />

Institut für Zoologie<br />

Universität Heidelberg<br />

INF 230<br />

D-69120 Heidelberg<br />

Christian Bräuchler<br />

LMU München<br />

Department Biologie I<br />

Biodiversitätsforschung<br />

Systematische Botanik<br />

Menzinger Str. 67<br />

D-80638 München<br />

braeuchler@lrz.uni-muenchen.de<br />

Andreas Braun<br />

Institute for Palaeontology<br />

University of Bonn<br />

Nussallee 8<br />

D-53115 Bonn<br />

braun@uni-bonn.de<br />

Christian Brochmann<br />

NCB - National Centre for<br />

Biosystematics<br />

Natural History <strong>Museum</strong><br />

University of Oslo<br />

P.O. Box 1172 Blindern<br />

N-0318 Oslo<br />

christian.brochmann@nhm.uio.no<br />

Karin Bröhldick<br />

AG Zoosystematik und Morphologie<br />

Fakultät 5<br />

Universität Oldenburg<br />

D-26111 Oldenburg<br />

Franz Brümmer<br />

Biologisches Institut<br />

Abtl. Zoologie<br />

Pfaffenwaldring 57<br />

D-70569 Stuttgart<br />

franz.bruemmer@bio.uni-stuttgart.de<br />

Ernst-Gerhard Burmeister<br />

Zoologische Staatssammlung<br />

Münchhausenstraße 21<br />

D-81247 München<br />

burmeister@zsm.mwn.de<br />

Gerasimos Cassis<br />

Australian <strong>Museum</strong><br />

6 College Street<br />

AU-Sydney 2010<br />

gerryc@austmus.gov.au<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 99<br />

Marina Clemmensen<br />

Lehrstuhl für Biochemie I<br />

Rezeptorbiochemie<br />

Fakultät für Chemie<br />

Ruhr-Universität Bochum<br />

Universitätsstrasse 150<br />

D-44870 Bochum<br />

Alison E. Colwell<br />

Western Fisheries Research Center<br />

US Geological Survey<br />

US-Seattle, WA<br />

Robyn Cowan<br />

Jodrell Laboratory<br />

Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew<br />

Richmond<br />

GB-Surrey TW9 3AB<br />

r.cowan@kew.org<br />

Robert DeSalle<br />

American <strong>Museum</strong> of Natural History<br />

Central Park West at 79th Street<br />

US-New York, NY 10024-5192<br />

desalle@amnh.org<br />

Torsten Dikow<br />

American <strong>Museum</strong> of Natural<br />

History<br />

Division of Invertebrate Zoology<br />

Central Park West at 79th Street<br />

US-New York, NY 10024<br />

torsten@tdvia.de<br />

Jan Drewes<br />

AG Zoosystematik und Morphologie<br />

Fakultät 5<br />

Universität Oldenburg<br />

D-26111 Oldenburg<br />

Hermann Dreyer<br />

Molecular Phylogenetics<br />

Department Evolutionary Biology<br />

University of Vienna<br />

Althanstr. 14<br />

A-1090 Vienna<br />

hermann.dreyer@univie.ac.at<br />

Samuel Dupont<br />

Kristineberg Marine Research Station<br />

S-45034 Fiskebäckskil<br />

Gregory D. Edgecombe<br />

Australian <strong>Museum</strong><br />

6 College Street<br />

AU-Sydney NSW 2010<br />

greged@austmus.gov.au<br />

Torbjørn Ekrem<br />

Section of Natural History<br />

<strong>Museum</strong> of Natural History <strong>and</strong><br />

Archaeology<br />

Norwegian University of<br />

Science <strong>and</strong> Technology<br />

N-7491 Trondheim<br />

Torbjorn.Ekrem@vm.ntnu.no<br />

Gerhard Falkner<br />

Raiffeisenstr. 5<br />

D-85457 Hörlkofen<br />

Falkner@malaco.de<br />

Geraldine Fauville<br />

Kristineberg Marine Research Station<br />

S-45034 Fiskebäckskil<br />

Nikolai Friesen<br />

Botanical Garden of<br />

the University of Osnabrueck<br />

Albrechtstr. 29<br />

D-49076 Osnabrueck<br />

nfriesen@uni-osnabrueck.de<br />

Uwe Fritz<br />

<strong>Museum</strong> für Tierkunde<br />

Staatliche Naturhistorische<br />

Sammlungen Dresden<br />

A.-B. Meyer-Bau<br />

Königsbrücker L<strong>and</strong>str. 159<br />

D-01109 Dresden<br />

uwe.fritz@snsd.smwk.sachsen.de<br />

Anita Gamauf<br />

Naturhistorisches <strong>Museum</strong> Wien<br />

Burgring 7<br />

A-1010 Wien<br />

anita.gamauf@nhm-wien.ac.at<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 100<br />

Gunnar Gad<br />

AG Zoosystematik und Morphologie<br />

Fakultät V<br />

Institut für Biologie und<br />

Umweltwissenschaften<br />

Carl von Ossietzky<br />

Universität Oldenburg<br />

D-26111 Oldenburg<br />

gunnar.gad@mail.uni-oldenburg.de<br />

Chloé Galley<br />

Institute of Systematic Botany<br />

University of Zurich<br />

Zollikerstrasse 107<br />

CH-8008 Zurich<br />

Berit Gehrke<br />

Institut for Systematic Botany<br />

University of Zurich<br />

Zollikerstrasse 107<br />

CH-8008 Zürich<br />

gehrke@systbot.unizh.ch<br />

Birgit Gemeinholzer<br />

Botanischer Garten und<br />

Botanisches <strong>Museum</strong> Berlin-Dahlem<br />

Freie Universität Berlin<br />

Königin-Luise-Straße 6-8<br />

D-14191 Berlin<br />

b.gemeinholzer@bgbm.org<br />

Kai Horst George<br />

Forschungsinstitut <strong>Senckenberg</strong><br />

Abteilung DZMB<br />

Südstr<strong>and</strong> 44<br />

D-26382 Wilhelmshaven<br />

Edmund Gittenberger<br />

Institute of Biology<br />

Leiden University & Nationaal<br />

Natuurhistorisch <strong>Museum</strong><br />

P.O. Box 9517<br />

NL-2300 RA Leiden<br />

gittenberger@naturalis.nnm.nl<br />

Yvonne Görzig<br />

Universität Osnabrück<br />

Fachbereich Biologie/Chemie<br />

Fachgebiet Ökologie<br />

Barbarastr. 11<br />

D-49076 Osnabrück<br />

yvonne.goerzig@biologie.uniosnabrueck.de<br />

Jürke Grau<br />

Department I<br />

Systematische Botanik<br />

LMU München<br />

Menzinger Straße 67<br />

D-80638 München<br />

j.grau@lrz.uni-muenchen.de<br />

Dick S.J. Groenenberg<br />

Institute of Biology<br />

Leiden University<br />

P.O. Box 9516<br />

NL-2300 RA Leiden<br />

groenenberg@rulsfb.leidenuniv.nl<br />

Daniela Guicking<br />

Univ. Kassel<br />

FB18, Naturwissenschaften<br />

Systematik und<br />

Morphologie der Pflanzen<br />

Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40<br />

D-34132 Kassel<br />

daniela.guicking@uni-kassel.de<br />

Fabian Haas<br />

Staatliches <strong>Museum</strong> für Naturkunde<br />

Rosenstein 1<br />

D-70191 Stuttgart<br />

haas.smns@naturkundemuseumbw.de<br />

Elisabeth Haring<br />

Naturhistorisches <strong>Museum</strong> Wien<br />

Burgring 7<br />

A-1010 Wien<br />

Elisabeth.Haring@nhm-wien.ac.at<br />

Gerhard Haszprunar<br />

Zoologische Staatssammlung<br />

Münchhausenstr. 21<br />

D-81247 München<br />

haszi@zsm.mwn.de<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 101<br />

Bernhard Hausdorf<br />

Universität Hamburg<br />

Zoologisches <strong>Museum</strong><br />

Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3<br />

D-20146 Hamburg<br />

Hausdorf@zoologie.uni-hamburg.de<br />

Harald Hausen<br />

Freie Universität Berlin<br />

Institut für Biologie/Zoologie<br />

Evolution und Systematik der Tiere<br />

Königin-Luise-Str. 1-3<br />

D-14195 Berlin<br />

hhausen@zoosyst-berlin.de<br />

Christoph L. Häuser<br />

National Focal Point of the Global<br />

Taxonomy Initiative<br />

Staatliches <strong>Museum</strong> für Naturkunde<br />

Rosenstein 1<br />

D-70191 Stuttgart<br />

chaeuser@gmx.de<br />

Isabel Heim<br />

Biologisches Institut<br />

Abt. Zoologie<br />

Pfaffenwaldring 57<br />

D-70569 Stuttgart<br />

isabel.heim@bio.uni-stuttgart.de<br />

Christoph Heibl<br />

Department I<br />

Systematische Botanik<br />

LMU München<br />

Menzinger Straße 67<br />

D-80638 München<br />

christoph.heibl@campus.unimuenchen.de<br />

Thomas Hertach<br />

Untere Mühle<br />

Oberdorfstr. 2<br />

CH-8112 Otelfingen<br />

hertach@gmx.ch<br />

Günther Heubl<br />

LMU München<br />

Department Biologie I<br />

Biodiversitätsforschung<br />

Systematische Botanik<br />

Menzinger Str. 67<br />

D-80638 München<br />

heubl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de<br />

Axel Hochkirch<br />

Universität Osnabrück<br />

Fachbereich Biologie/Chemie<br />

Fachgebiet Ökologie<br />

Barbarastr. 11<br />

D-49076 Osnabrück<br />

hochkirch@biologie.uni-osnabrueck.de<br />

Jana Hoffmann<br />

Institut für Systematische Zoologie<br />

<strong>Museum</strong> für Naturkunde Berlin<br />

Invalidenstraße 43<br />

D-10115 Berlin<br />

jana_hoffmann80@freenet.de<br />

Sabine Hoffmann<br />

Freie Universität Berlin<br />

Institut für Biologie / Zoologie<br />

AG Systematik & Evolution der Tiere<br />

Königin-Luise-Straße 1-3<br />

D-14195 Berlin<br />

email: sahoffma@zoosyst-berlin.de<br />

Michael Hollmann<br />

Lehrstuhl für Biochemie I<br />

Rezeptorbiochemie<br />

Fakultät für Chemie<br />

Ruhr-Universität Bochum<br />

Universitätsstrasse 150<br />

D-44870 Bochum<br />

Joachim Holstein<br />

Staatliches <strong>Museum</strong> für<br />

Naturkunde Stuttgart<br />

Rosenstein 1<br />

D-70191 Stuttgart<br />

holstein.smns@naturkundemuseumbw.de<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 102<br />

Charles Huber<br />

Naturhistorisches <strong>Museum</strong> Bern<br />

Bernastrasse 15<br />

CH-3005 Bern<br />

charles.huber@nmbe.unibe.ch<br />

Thomas Hülsken<br />

Lehrstuhl für Biochemie I<br />

Rezeptorbiochemie<br />

Fakultät für Chemie<br />

Ruhr-Universität Bochum<br />

Universitätsstrasse 150<br />

D-44870 Bochum<br />

Anna Hundsdörfer<br />

<strong>Museum</strong> für Tierkunde<br />

Staatliche Naturhistorische<br />

Sammlungen Dresden<br />

L<strong>and</strong>strasse 159<br />

D-01109 Dresden<br />

anna.hundsdoerfer@snsd.smwk.sachs<br />

en.de<br />

Olle Israelson<br />

<strong>Museum</strong> of Evolution<br />

Uppsala University<br />

Norbyv. 16<br />

S-752 36 Uppsala<br />

Beatriz Itten<br />

Institute for Systematic Botany<br />

University of Zurich<br />

Zollikerstrasse 107<br />

CH-8008 Zurich<br />

b.itten@access.unizh.ch<br />

Stefen D. Johnson<br />

University of Natal<br />

School of Botany <strong>and</strong> Zoolgy<br />

P.O. Box X0 1, Scottsill<br />

SA-Pietermaritzburg 3209<br />

Lars Jürgens<br />

German Oceanographic <strong>Museum</strong><br />

Katharinenberg 14-20<br />

D-18439 Stralsund<br />

lars.juergens@meeresmuseum.de<br />

Silke Kayß<br />

<strong>Museum</strong> für Naturkunde<br />

der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin<br />

Institut für Systematische Zoologie<br />

Invalidenstraße 43<br />

D-10115 Berlin<br />

silke.kayss@museum.hu-berlin<br />

Dominik Kieselbach<br />

Freie Universität Berlin<br />

Institut für Biologie/Zoologie<br />

Evolution und Systematik der Tiere<br />

Königin-Luise-Str. 1-3<br />

D-14195 Berlin<br />

dkieselbach@zoosyst-berlin.de<br />

Sebastian Klaus<br />

Institut für Zoologie<br />

Universität Heidelberg<br />

INF 230<br />

D-69120 Heidelberg<br />

sebastian.klaus@uni-bayreuth.de<br />

Barbara Klee<br />

Zoologische Staatssammlung<br />

Münchhausenstr. 21<br />

D-81247 München<br />

Barbara.Klee@zsm.mwn.de<br />

Rebecca Klug<br />

Abt. Morphologie & Systematik<br />

Institut für Zoologie, Anthropologie &<br />

Entwicklungsbiologie<br />

Georg-August-Universität Göttingen<br />

Berliner Str. 28<br />

D-37073 Göttingen<br />

rklug@gwdg.de<br />

Martina Knapp<br />

Molecular Phylogenetics<br />

Department Evolutionary Biology<br />

University of Vienna<br />

Althanstr. 14<br />

A-1090 Vienna<br />

a9909062@unet.univie.ac.at<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 103<br />

Carsten Koch<br />

Inst. f. Biologie/Zoologie, FU-Berlin<br />

Systematik und Evolution der Tiere<br />

Königin-Luise-Str. 1-3<br />

D-14195 Berlin<br />

misterkoch@gmx.de<br />

Markus Koch<br />

Institute of Biology<br />

Dep. Animal Systematics<br />

<strong>and</strong> Evolution<br />

Freie Universität Berlin<br />

Königin-Luise-Str. 1-3<br />

D-14195 Berlin<br />

mkoch@zoosyst-berlin.de<br />

Ingrid Kottke<br />

Institut für Spezielle Botanik und<br />

Mykologie<br />

Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen<br />

Auf der Morgenstelle 1<br />

D-72076 Tübingen<br />

Ingrid.Kottke@uni-tuebingen.de<br />

Alex<strong>and</strong>er Kocyan<br />

Department I<br />

Systematische Botanik<br />

LMU München<br />

Menzinger Straße 67<br />

D-80638 München<br />

kocyan@lrz.uni-muenchen.de<br />

Hans-Peter Kreier<br />

Albrecht-von-Haller-Institut<br />

Systematische Botanik<br />

Untere Karspüle 2<br />

D-37073 Göttingen<br />

hkreier@gwdg.de<br />

Janina Lehrke<br />

Systematik und Evolution der Tiere,<br />

Inst. für Biologie/ Zoologie, FU Berlin<br />

Königin-Luise-Str.1-3<br />

D-14195 Berlin<br />

jlehrke@zoosyst-berlin.de<br />

Anita Lendel<br />

Institut für Systematische Botanik<br />

Zollikerstrasse 107<br />

CH-8008 Zürich<br />

lendel@systbot.unizh.ch<br />

James Kenneth Liebherr<br />

Department of Entomology<br />

Comstock Hall<br />

Cornell University<br />

Ithaca<br />

US-New York 14853-0901<br />

JKL5@Cornell.edu<br />

Sigrid Liede-Schumann<br />

Department of Plant Systematics<br />

University of Bayreuth<br />

D-95440 Bayreuth<br />

sigrid.liede@uni-bayreuth.de<br />

Peter H. Linder<br />

Institute for Systematic Botany<br />

University of Zurich<br />

Zollikerstrasse 107<br />

CH-8008 Zürich<br />

plinder@systbot.unizh.ch<br />

Stefan Lötters<br />

Zoologisches Institut<br />

Abteilung Ökologie<br />

Universität Mainz<br />

Saarstrasse 21<br />

D-55099 Mainz<br />

Matthias Lutz<br />

Lehrstuhl Spezielle Botanik/Mykologie<br />

Universität Tübingen<br />

Auf der Morgenstelle 1<br />

D-72076 Tübingen<br />

matthias.lutz@uni-tuebingen.de<br />

Andreas Maas<br />

Section for Biosystematic<br />

Documentation<br />

University of Ulm<br />

Helmholtzstraße 20<br />

D-89081 Ulm<br />

<strong>and</strong>reas.maas@uni-ulm.de<br />

Marlon Câmara Machado<br />

Institut für Systematische Botanik<br />

Zollikerstrasse 107<br />

CH-8008 Zürich<br />

machado@systbot.unizh.ch<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 104<br />

Jean-François Manen<br />

Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques<br />

Impératrice 1<br />

CH-1292 Chambésy/Genéve<br />

Beate Mannschreck<br />

Limnologische Station<br />

TU-München<br />

Hofmark 1-3<br />

D-82393 Iffeldorf<br />

mannschreck@gmx.net<br />

Georg Mayer<br />

Systematik und Evolution der Tiere<br />

Institut für Biologie / Zoologie<br />

Freie Universität Berlin<br />

Königin-Luise-Str. 1-3<br />

D-14195 Berlin<br />

georg.mayer@zoosyst-berlin.de<br />

Harald Meimberg<br />

LMU München<br />

Department Biologie I<br />

Biodiversitätsforschung<br />

Menzinger Str. 67<br />

D-80638 München<br />

Achim Meyer<br />

Freie Universität Berlin<br />

Institut für Biologie / Zoologie<br />

Evolution und Systematik der Tiere<br />

Königin-Luise-Str. 1-3<br />

D-14195 Berlin<br />

apimuler@zedat.fu-berlin.de<br />

Axel Meyer<br />

Lehrstuhl Evolutionsbiologie<br />

Universität Konstanz<br />

Universitätsstrasse 10<br />

D-78457 Konstanz<br />

Axel.Meyer@uni-konstanz.de<br />

Arnulf Melzer<br />

Limnologische Station<br />

TU-München<br />

Hofmark 1-3<br />

D-82393 Iffeldorf<br />

arnulf.melzer@wzw.tum.de<br />

Rol<strong>and</strong> Molenda<br />

Institut NLU-Biogeographie<br />

St. Johanns-Vorstadt 10<br />

CH-4056 Basel<br />

rol<strong>and</strong>.molenda@uinbas.ch<br />

Gisela Moura<br />

Forschungsinstitut <strong>Senckenberg</strong><br />

Abteilung DZMB<br />

Südstr<strong>and</strong> 44<br />

D-26382 Wilhelmshaven<br />

Klaus J. Müller<br />

Institute for Palaeontology<br />

University of Bonn<br />

Nussallee 8<br />

D-53115 Bonn<br />

Paul Müller<br />

Institut für Biogeographie<br />

Universität Trier<br />

D-54286 Trier<br />

muellerp@uni-trier.de<br />

Christoph Muster<br />

Universität Leipzig<br />

Institut für Biologie II<br />

Molekulare Evolution und Systematik<br />

der Tiere<br />

Talstraße 33<br />

D-04103 Leipzig<br />

muster@rz.uni-leipzig.de<br />

Peter Nagel<br />

Institut NLU-Biogeographie<br />

St. Johanns-Vorstadt 10<br />

CH-4056 Basel<br />

peter.nagel@unibas.ch<br />

Hiroaki Nakano<br />

Kristineberg Marine Research Station<br />

S-45034 Fiskebäckskil<br />

Martin Nebel<br />

Abteilung Botanik<br />

Staatliches <strong>Museum</strong> für Naturkunde<br />

Rosenstein 1<br />

D-70191 Stuttgart<br />

nebel.smns@naturkundemuseumbw.de<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 105<br />

Michael Nickel<br />

Biologisches Institut<br />

Abtl. Zoologie<br />

Pfaffenwaldring 57<br />

D-70569 Stuttgart<br />

michael.nickel@bio.uni-stuttgart.de<br />

Georg Nies<br />

Institute for Genetics<br />

University of Cologne<br />

Weyertal 121<br />

D-50931 Cologne<br />

Franziska Nittinger<br />

Naturhistorisches <strong>Museum</strong> Wien<br />

Burgring 7<br />

A-1010 Wien<br />

franziska.nittinger@nhm-wien.ac.at<br />

Reto Nyffeler<br />

Institut für Systematische Botanik<br />

Zollikerstrasse 107<br />

CH-8008 Zürich<br />

nyffeler@systbot.unizh.ch<br />

Stefan V. Ober<br />

Zoologische Staatssammlung<br />

München<br />

Münchhausenstraße 21<br />

D-81247 München<br />

Stefan.Ober@zsm.mwn.de<br />

Michael Ohl<br />

<strong>Museum</strong> für Naturkunde<br />

der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin<br />

Institut für Systematische Zoologie<br />

Invalidenstraße 43<br />

D-10115 Berlin<br />

michael.ohl@museum.hu-berlin.de<br />

Jeong-Mi Park<br />

Dep. Botanische Systematik u.<br />

Evolutionsforschung<br />

Universität Wien<br />

Rennweg 14<br />

A-1030 Wien<br />

Parkj9@univie.ac.at<br />

Markus Pfenninger<br />

Abteilung Ökologie & Evolution<br />

J.W. Goethe-Universität, Bio Campus<br />

Siesmayerstraße 70<br />

D-60054 Frankfurt/Main<br />

Pfenninger@zoology.uni-frankfurt.de<br />

William H. Piel<br />

Department Biological Sciences<br />

University at Buffalo<br />

608 Cooke<br />

US-Buffalo, NY 14260<br />

wpiel@buffalo.edu<br />

Wilhelm Pinsker<br />

Institut für medizinische Biologie<br />

Universität Wien<br />

Währinger Str. 10<br />

A-1090 Wien<br />

wilhelm.pinsker@univie.ac.at<br />

Lars Podsiadlowski<br />

FU Berlin<br />

Institut für Zoologie<br />

Königin-Luise-Str. 1-3<br />

D-14195 Berlin<br />

podsi.lars@t-online.de<br />

Andrew Polaszek<br />

Departement of Entomology<br />

The Natural History <strong>Museum</strong><br />

GB-London SW7 5BD<br />

ap@nhm.ac.uk<br />

Magnus Popp<br />

National Centre for Biosystematics<br />

Natural History <strong>Museum</strong><br />

University of Oslo<br />

P.O. Box 1172 Blindern<br />

N-0318 Oslo<br />

magnus.popp@nhm.uio.no<br />

Markus Preußing<br />

Abteilung Botanik<br />

Staatliches <strong>Museum</strong> für Naturkunde<br />

Rosenstein 1<br />

D-70191 Stuttgart<br />

preussing@gmx.de<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 106<br />

Aless<strong>and</strong>ro Rapini<br />

Pós-Graduação de Botânica<br />

Departamento de Ciências Biológicas<br />

Universidade Estadual de Feira de<br />

Santana, BR-116, Km 3<br />

Av. Universitária s/n<br />

BRA-44031-460 Feira de Santana<br />

Bahia<br />

rapinibot@yahoo.com.br<br />

Götz B. Reinicke<br />

German Oceanographic <strong>Museum</strong><br />

Katharinenberg 14-20<br />

D-18439 Stralsund<br />

goetz.reinicke@meeresmuseum.de<br />

Susanne S. Renner<br />

Systematic Botany<br />

LMU Munich<br />

Menzingerstr. 67<br />

D-80638 Munich<br />

renner@lrz.uni-muenchen.de<br />

John E. Repetski<br />

Branch of Paleontology <strong>and</strong><br />

Stratigraphy<br />

U.S. Geological Survey<br />

Mail Stop 970 Natl. Center<br />

12201 Sunrise Valley Drive<br />

US-Reston, VA 20191<br />

jrepetski@usgs.gov<br />

Ira Richling<br />

Zoologisches Institut<br />

Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel<br />

Olshausenstr. 40<br />

D-24098 Kiel<br />

ira@richling.de<br />

Armin Rose<br />

Forschungsinstitut <strong>Senckenberg</strong><br />

Abteilung DZMB<br />

Südstr<strong>and</strong> 44<br />

D-26382 Wilhelmshaven<br />

Greg Rouse<br />

Marine Invertebrates<br />

South Australian <strong>Museum</strong><br />

Nth Terrace<br />

AU-5000 Adelaide, SA<br />

rouse.greg@saugov.sa.gov.au<br />

Miriam Satler<br />

Molecular Phylogenetics<br />

Department Evolutionary Biology<br />

University of Vienna<br />

Althanstr. 14<br />

A-1090 Vienna<br />

miriam@satler.cc<br />

Jan Sauer<br />

Universität Hamburg<br />

Zoologisches <strong>Museum</strong><br />

Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3<br />

D-20146 Hamburg<br />

Ja_Sa@web.de<br />

Hanno Schäfer<br />

Systematic Botany<br />

LMU Munich<br />

Menzingerstr. 67<br />

D-80638 Munich<br />

hschaefer@lrz.uni-muenchen.de<br />

Guido Sautter<br />

Universität Karlsruhe (TH)<br />

Fakultät für Informatik<br />

Institut für Programmstrukturen und<br />

Datenorganisation<br />

Kaiserstraße 12<br />

D-76131 Karlsruhe<br />

sautter@ipd.uka.de<br />

Susanne Schick<br />

Zoologisches Institut<br />

Universität Mainz<br />

Saarstrasse 21<br />

D-55099 Mainz<br />

phrynobatrachus@web.de<br />

Ralph O. Schill<br />

Institut of Biology, Zoology<br />

University of Stuttgart<br />

Pfaffenwaldring 57<br />

D-70569 Stuttgart<br />

ralph.schill@bio.uni-stuttgart.de<br />

Horst Kurt Schminke<br />

AG Zoosystematik und Morphologie<br />

Fakultät 5<br />

Universität Oldenburg<br />

D-26111 Oldenburg<br />

schminke@uni-oldenburg.de<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 107<br />

Gerald M. Schneeweiss<br />

Dep. Biogeographie<br />

Universität Wien<br />

Rennweg 14<br />

A-1030 Wien<br />

Gerald.schneeweiss@univie.ac.at<br />

Harald Schneider<br />

Albrecht-von-Haller-Institut<br />

Systematische Botanik<br />

Untere Karspüle 2<br />

D-37073 Göttingen<br />

hschnei3@gwdg.de<br />

Susanne Schneider<br />

Limnologische Station<br />

TU-München<br />

Hofmark 1-3<br />

D-82393 Iffeldorf<br />

susanne.schneider@wzw.tum.de<br />

J. Jakob Schneller<br />

Institute for Systematic Botany<br />

University of Zurich<br />

Zollikerstrasse 107<br />

CH-8008 Zurich<br />

schnell@systbot.unizh.ch<br />

Peter Schönswetter<br />

Abteilung für Biogeographie der<br />

Pflanzen<br />

Fakutätszentum Botanik<br />

Rennweg 14<br />

A-1030 Wien<br />

peter.schoenswetter@univie.ac.at<br />

Christoph Schubart<br />

Institut für Biologie 1 (Zoologie)<br />

Universität Regensburg<br />

D-93040 Regensburg<br />

Sybille Seifried<br />

AG Zoosystematik und Morphologie<br />

Fakultät 5<br />

Universität Oldenburg<br />

D-26111 Oldenburg<br />

sybille.seifried@mail.uni-oldenburg.de<br />

Jörg Spelda<br />

Zoologische Staatssammlung<br />

Münchhausenstr. 21<br />

D-81247 München<br />

spelda@t-online.de<br />

Thomas Stach<br />

Freie Universität Berlin<br />

Fachbereich Biologie<br />

Lehrstuhl für Systematik und<br />

Evolutionsbiologie<br />

Königin –Luise-Strasse 1-3<br />

D-14195 Berlin<br />

tstach@zoosyst-berlin.de<br />

Axel Steiner<br />

Staatliches <strong>Museum</strong> für<br />

Naturkunde Stuttgart<br />

Rosenstein 1<br />

D-70191 Stuttgart<br />

a-steiner@web.de<br />

Gerhard Steiner<br />

Molecular Phylogenetics<br />

Department Evolutionary Biology<br />

University of Vienna<br />

Althanstr. 14<br />

A-1090 Vienna / Austria<br />

gerhard.steiner@univie.ac.at<br />

Dirk Steinke<br />

Universität Konstanz<br />

Abteilung Evolutionsbiologie<br />

Universitätstrasse 10<br />

D-78457 Konstanz<br />

Dirk.Steinke@uni-konstanz.de<br />

Elisabeth Stur<br />

Section of Natural History<br />

<strong>Museum</strong> of Natural History <strong>and</strong><br />

Archaeology<br />

Norwegian University of<br />

Science <strong>and</strong> Technology<br />

N-7491 Trondheim<br />

Elisabeth.Stur@vm.ntnu.no<br />

Alex<strong>and</strong>er Szallies<br />

Institut NLU-Biogeographie<br />

St. Johanns-Vorstadt 10<br />

CH-4056 Basel<br />

alex<strong>and</strong>er.szallies@unibas.ch<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 108<br />

Mike Thorndyke<br />

Kristineberg Marine Research Station<br />

S-45034 Fiskebäckskil<br />

Andreas Tribsch<br />

NCB - National Centre for<br />

Biosystematics<br />

Natural History <strong>Museum</strong><br />

University of Oslo<br />

P.O. Box 1172 Blindern<br />

N-0318 Oslo<br />

<strong>and</strong>reas.tribsch@nhm.uio.no<br />

Edwin Urmi<br />

Institute for Systematic Botany<br />

University of Zurich<br />

Zollikerstrasse 107<br />

CH-8008 Zurich<br />

urmi@systbot.unizh.ch<br />

Timotheüs van der Niet<br />

Institute for Systematic Botany<br />

University of Zurich<br />

Zollikerstrasse 107<br />

CH-8008 Zürich<br />

niet@systbot.unish.ch<br />

Gritta Veit-Köhler<br />

Forschungsinstitut <strong>Senckenberg</strong><br />

Abteilung DZMB<br />

Südstr<strong>and</strong> 44<br />

D-26382 Wilhelmshaven<br />

Michael Veit<br />

Zoologisches Institut<br />

Universität Mainz<br />

Saarstrasse 21<br />

D-55099 Mainz<br />

Miguel Vences<br />

Institute for Biodiversity <strong>and</strong><br />

Ecosystem Dynamics<br />

Zoological <strong>Museum</strong><br />

University of Amsterdam<br />

Mauritskade 61<br />

NL-1092 AD Amsterdam<br />

vences@science.uva.nl<br />

Rita Verma<br />

Department Biology I<br />

Biodiversity - Systematic Mycology<br />

Ludwig-Maximilans-University<br />

Menzinger Str. 67<br />

D-80638 Munich<br />

r.verma@gmx.net<br />

Alfried P. Vogler<br />

Department of Entomology<br />

The Natural History <strong>Museum</strong><br />

Cromwell Road,<br />

UK-London SW7 5BD<br />

apv@nhm.ac.uk<br />

Stefanie M. Volz<br />

Department Biologie I der LMU<br />

München<br />

Bereich Biodiversitätsforschung:<br />

Systematische Botanik<br />

Menzingerstraße 67<br />

D-80638 München<br />

volz@lrz.uni-muenchen.de<br />

Jörn von Döhren<br />

Institute of Biology<br />

Dep. Animal Systematics <strong>and</strong><br />

Evolution<br />

Freie Universität Berlin<br />

Königin-Luise-Str. 1-3<br />

D-14195 Berlin<br />

biojoern@web.de<br />

Thomas Wagner<br />

Universität Koblenz-L<strong>and</strong>au<br />

Institut für Integrierte<br />

Naturwissenschaften – Biologie<br />

Universitätsstr. 1<br />

D-56070 Koblenz<br />

thwagner@uni-koblenz.de<br />

Dieter Waloszek<br />

Section for Biosystematic<br />

Documentation<br />

University of Ulm<br />

Helmholtzstraße 20<br />

D-89081 Ulm<br />

dieter.waloszek@uni-ulm.de<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)


Burckhardt & Mühlethaler (eds): 8 th GfBS Annual Conference Abstracts 109<br />

Christiane Weirauch<br />

Division of Invertebrate Zoology<br />

American <strong>Museum</strong> of Natural History<br />

Central Park West at 79th Street<br />

US-New York, NY 10024<br />

weirauch@amnh.org<br />

Hanna Weiss-Schneeweiss<br />

Dep. Botanische Systematik u.<br />

Evolutionsforschung<br />

Universität Wien<br />

Rennweg 14<br />

A-1030 Wien<br />

Hanna.schneeweiss@univie.ac.at<br />

Endre Willassen<br />

Natural History Collections<br />

Bergen <strong>Museum</strong><br />

University of Bergen<br />

Muséplass 3<br />

N-5007 Bergen<br />

Endre.Willassen@zmb.uib.no<br />

Elke Willen<br />

AG Zoosystematik und Morphologie<br />

Fakultät 5<br />

Universität Oldenburg<br />

D-26111 Oldenburg<br />

Michael Wink<br />

Univ. Heidelberg<br />

Institut für Pharmazie und Molekulare<br />

Biotechnologie<br />

Im Neuenheimer Feld 364<br />

D-69120 Heidelberg<br />

wink@uni-hd.de<br />

Daniela Cristina Zappi<br />

Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew<br />

GB-Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB<br />

d.zappi@rbgkew.org.uk<br />

Org. Divers. Evol. 5, Electr. Suppl. 13 (2005)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!