The-Man-Who-Folded-Himself-David-Gerrold
The-Man-Who-Folded-Himself-David-Gerrold
The-Man-Who-Folded-Himself-David-Gerrold
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
I’d been fooled once by the illusion of the duplicated check, but this time the check had been<br />
duplicated! And if I could duplicate the check, then couldn’t I have duplicated myself?<br />
<strong>The</strong>re was another side to it too.<br />
I’d already eliminated two possible futures: the one where I’d worn slacks and a sweater and the one<br />
where I’d won a million and a half dollars.<br />
As far as I knew, both of those Dons had ceased to exist along with their futures. Neither seemed to be<br />
still around.<br />
And if I could eliminate them—<br />
• what was to keep some other Dan from eliminating<br />
me?<br />
Perhaps even now—<br />
* * *<br />
No. <strong>The</strong>re must be something I was misunderstanding. Danny drove. He babbled incessantly; he was<br />
like a schoolgirl. But I wasn’t listening anyway. I was too preoccupied with my own thoughts.<br />
I knew there was an answer.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re had to be.<br />
For one thing, paradoxes were supposed to be impossible. Oh, sure, I know—time travel makes the<br />
most horrendous of paradoxes possible, even probable; but that’s just not so. A paradox would be a<br />
violation of the laws of nature. By definition, they’re the laws of nature. And inviolable.<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore, paradoxes are impossible.<br />
Because if paradoxes were possible, then time travel would have to be impossible—otherwise, we’d<br />
have people killing their grandfathers right and left. We’d have people seducing their mothers or<br />
kidnapping their fathers. We’d have time travelers killing the inventors of time machines. We’d have<br />
all manner of anachronisms and flukes, and the laws of nature would be violated in so many different<br />
ways, it would take the invention of a whole new science to catalog them all. But time travel was<br />
possible. I had proved it myself So paradoxes were impossible.<br />
It sounded all very neat when I explained it to myself that way. Paradoxes had to be impossible;<br />
therefore, they were. Everything could be worked out logically—<br />
<strong>The</strong>n, dammit, why couldn’t I work this one out? If this wasn’t a paradox, it was still way ahead of<br />
whatever was in second place.<br />
* * *<br />
All right. Let’s assume that paradoxes are impossible—then where do I go from here?<br />
<strong>The</strong> checks, for instance. Obviously, Danny’s check was the good one, the one we would have to cash<br />
in order to collect our winnings. But the question was how? Should I take it forward with me into the<br />
future? But then what would Danny have to show himself when he was Don? (Of course, I hadn’t<br />
made a point of comparing the checks this time around, had I?) But if I left it here in the past, how<br />
would I get it in the future? My check shouldn’t exist. It was from a canceled world. Danny’s check<br />
was the only valid one here because I had done things differently from the way they had originally<br />
occurred. If I had done things the way Don had done, I would have had the “duplicate” of Danny’s<br />
check.<br />
But I hadn’t. I had tampered with the timestream and didn’t have a valid check at all. And that meant—<br />
• that I was a canceled check too.<br />
Because whatever I did now, this Danny—when he