22.03.2013 Views

CHRISTIAN PSYCHOLOGY DR. E. C. BRAGG - Trinity College

CHRISTIAN PSYCHOLOGY DR. E. C. BRAGG - Trinity College

CHRISTIAN PSYCHOLOGY DR. E. C. BRAGG - Trinity College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

meaning. Here is the reason why they say, "A liar must have a good memory."<br />

He learns the particulars by rote. He who tells the truth of events learned them<br />

by association. Here is the reason why writing out a sermon will aid to<br />

memorizing it. Its logical relations will also be committed. Utilize all the mental<br />

faculties to associate the newly-acquired knowledge with that which you<br />

already possess. Notice how this law, coupled with the last, helps in theme<br />

writing and sermon composition using time passage and repetition and<br />

association. This is like my sermon vat for soaking sermons. Reading up on a<br />

subject as much as possible, filling the mind with the subject, writing down all<br />

the thoughts possible, letting time elapse, and going over again, new ideas will,<br />

spring forth. The law of association is like that of attention and interest,<br />

studying and learning with mental activity, rationalizing, discriminating, and<br />

thinking. Here is the reason why a poem should be learned as a whole, not by<br />

stanza; get the connection, so Bible memorizing should be not by verse but by<br />

paragraph (complete thought).<br />

2. Retention<br />

We cannot add anything here to our study as to how we retain. That recollection<br />

which now floods the mind with familiar scenes, thoughts, reminiscences,- where was<br />

it five seconds ago, before we recalled it to awareness or consciousness? How does<br />

the mind retain its vast store of impressions? When one thinks of the multiplied<br />

thousands of memory tracts needed for the simplest daily tasks and work, the<br />

accumulated impressions of a lifetime, plus the acquired learned material of school<br />

and reading, a little insight is gained in how rich this treasure house is, but it seems<br />

that the actual mechanism of retention, as in all the thought processes, eludes and<br />

maybe always will elude the searcher.<br />

It is well to keep in mind in this consideration of retention, that material learned<br />

need not be within the range of recall to still be retained in the mind as lasting<br />

material. Much that we learn is forgotten as far as recollection is concerned, but its<br />

value is not lost. It remains as mental enrichment, cumulative knowledge, which<br />

makes for greater understanding. How much of the actual schooling of a doctor or<br />

engineer is forgotten; yet that same forgotten material leaves its residue in the mind!<br />

They are what we call "trained" and so better able to tackle the problem than others.<br />

The only problem attached to retention which can engage our attention is that of<br />

forgetting, and how to keep from forgetting. Why do we forget? Once written, why<br />

does the record fade? There are three causes of forgetting:<br />

a. Poor learning or weak impressions (which we have been studying)<br />

b. Decay through the passage of time<br />

c. Interference caused by retroactive inhibition, concussion, or repression<br />

The first we can to a great degree control by better degree of impression. The<br />

second, the passage of time causing a natural decay, is open to some question. Would<br />

time itself erase an impression if new impressions did not intervene to partially<br />

obliterate the old? If time itself does wear away with the years an impression, we can

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!