22.03.2013 Views

GCE History Teachers' Guide - Unit 3 - WJEC

GCE History Teachers' Guide - Unit 3 - WJEC

GCE History Teachers' Guide - Unit 3 - WJEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>GCE</strong> AS and A HISTORY UNIT 3 <strong>Teachers'</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> 28<br />

DOCUMENT 5<br />

'It must be clear that the Great Reform Act was not based upon any accurate knowledge of<br />

the nature of contemporary society. A major point in the arguments of the reformers was<br />

their acceptance of a broad, but extremely vague, notion of a middle class, endued with<br />

certain values. Closer scrutiny reveals that it is very difficult to find the 'middle classes' that<br />

the Whigs talked so much about in the 1830s.<br />

The principal support for Parliamentary reform came from within the government<br />

minorities in the highly unequal society. The kind of reform that the Whigs were proposing in<br />

1831 evoked widespread support amongst powerful and influential interests. The 'country'<br />

interest had long regarded the pocket and rotten boroughs as a basis for government<br />

corruption and the Whig Bill seemed to meet these objections. The proposers were people<br />

like Durham and Grey, who were themselves leading aristocratic landowners. Furthermore<br />

the Bill would entail a reduction in the number of borough seats and a considerable<br />

extension of county representation.<br />

The Tories knew that by opposing the Bill they had alienated much of their support.<br />

The Whigs knew that they could count on not merely the noisy and embarrassing support of<br />

radicals but also on the bulk of respectable opinion. The 1831 general election provided the<br />

Whigs with a decisive majority for reform on the old unreformed franchise and on the old<br />

unreformed distribution of seats. In some places, enthusiasm and agitation for reform<br />

played some part, but the overwhelming swing of the county seats to reform in 1831 is not to<br />

be explained by a reaction to the threat from working-class movements.'<br />

[Norman McCord, an academic historian and specialist in nineteenth century British history,<br />

writing in a specialist book, The Age of Reform (1991)]<br />

DOCUMENT 6<br />

'It may be asked,<br />

Will a reform of Parliament give the labouring man a cow or a pig?<br />

Will it put bread and cheese into his satchel instead of infernal cold potatoes?<br />

Will it give him a bottle of beer to carry to the field instead of making him lie down on his<br />

belly to drink out of the brook?<br />

Will it put upon his back a Sunday coat and send him to Church instead of leaving him to<br />

stand lounging about shivering with an unshaven face and a carcass covered with a ragged<br />

smock-frock, with a filthy cotton shirt beneath it as yellow as a kite's foot?<br />

Will it put an end to the harnessing of men and women by a hired overseer to draw carts like<br />

beasts of burden?<br />

The enemies of reform jeeringly ask us, whether reform would do these things for us, and I<br />

answer distinctly that IT WOULD DO THEM ALL !'<br />

[William Cobbett, a radical journalist and activist, writing in his newspaper,<br />

The Political Register (April 1831)]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!