Chapter 3 Puberty and Biological Foundations - The McGraw-Hill ...
Chapter 3 Puberty and Biological Foundations - The McGraw-Hill ...
Chapter 3 Puberty and Biological Foundations - The McGraw-Hill ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
76 <strong>Chapter</strong> 3 <strong>Puberty</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Biological</strong> <strong>Foundations</strong><br />
CAREERS<br />
in ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT<br />
Anne Petersen<br />
Researcher <strong>and</strong> Administrator<br />
Anne Petersen has had a distinguished career as a researcher<br />
<strong>and</strong> administrator with a main focus on adolescent development.<br />
Anne obtained three degrees (B.A., M.A., <strong>and</strong> Ph.D.)<br />
from the University of Chicago in math <strong>and</strong> statistics. Her<br />
first job after she obtained her Ph.D. was as a research associate/professor<br />
involving statistical consultation, <strong>and</strong> it was on<br />
this job that she was introduced to the field of adolescent development,<br />
which became the focus of her subsequent work.<br />
Anne moved from the University of Chicago to Pennsylvania<br />
State University, where she became a leading researcher in<br />
adolescent development. Her research included a focus on puberty<br />
<strong>and</strong> gender. Anne also has held numerous administrative<br />
positions. In the mid-1990s, Anne became deputy director of the<br />
National Science Foundation <strong>and</strong> since 1996 has been senior<br />
vice-president for programs at the W. K. Kellogg Foundation.<br />
Anne says that what inspired her to enter the field of adolescent<br />
development <strong>and</strong> take her current position at the Kellogg<br />
Foundation was her desire to make a difference for people,<br />
especially youth. In her position at Kellogg, Anne is responsible<br />
for all programming <strong>and</strong> services provided by the foundation<br />
for adolescents. Her goal is to make a difference for youth in<br />
this country <strong>and</strong> around the world. She believes that too often<br />
adolescents have been neglected.<br />
Anne Petersen, interacting with adolescents.<br />
Copyright © <strong>The</strong> <strong>McGraw</strong>-<strong>Hill</strong> Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.<br />
In the Milwaukee study, more mixed <strong>and</strong> complex<br />
findings emerged for girls (Simmons & Blyth, 1987).<br />
Early-maturing girls had more problems in school, were<br />
more independent, <strong>and</strong> were more popular with boys<br />
than late-maturing girls were. <strong>The</strong> time at which maturation<br />
was assessed also was a factor. In the sixth grade,<br />
early-maturing girls were more satisfied with their body<br />
image than late-maturing girls were, but by the tenth<br />
grade, late-maturing girls were more satisfied (see figure<br />
3.8). Why? Because by late adolescence, early-maturing<br />
girls are shorter <strong>and</strong> stockier, while late-maturing girls<br />
are taller <strong>and</strong> thinner. <strong>The</strong> late-maturing girls in late adolescence<br />
have body images that more closely approximate<br />
the current American ideal of feminine beauty—tall<br />
<strong>and</strong> thin.<br />
In recent years an increasing number of researchers<br />
have found that early maturation increases girls’ vulnerability<br />
to a number of problems (Brooks-Gunn & Paikoff,<br />
1993; McCabe & Ricciardelli, 2003; Sarigiani & Petersen,<br />
2000; Stattin & Magnusson, 1990; Waylen & Wolke,<br />
2004). Early-maturing girls are more likely to smoke,<br />
drink, be depressed, have an eating disorder, request earlier<br />
independence from their parents, <strong>and</strong> have older<br />
friends; <strong>and</strong> their bodies are likely to elicit responses from<br />
males that lead to earlier dating <strong>and</strong> earlier sexual experiences.<br />
In one study, the early-maturing girls had lower<br />
educational <strong>and</strong> occupational attainment in adulthood<br />
(Stattin & Magnusson, 1990). In a recent study, early maturing<br />
females had a higher incidence of mental disorders<br />
than late maturing females (Graber & others, 2004).<br />
Apparently as a result of their social <strong>and</strong> cognitive immaturity,<br />
combined with early physical development. earlymaturing<br />
girls are easily lured into problem behaviors,<br />
not recognizing the possible long-term effects of these on<br />
their development.<br />
Are <strong>Puberty</strong>’s Effects Exaggerated? Some researchers<br />
have begun to question whether puberty’s effects<br />
are as strong as was once believed. Have the effects<br />
of puberty been exaggerated? <strong>Puberty</strong> affects some adolescents<br />
more strongly than others, <strong>and</strong> some behaviors<br />
more strongly than others. Body image, interest in dating,<br />
<strong>and</strong> sexual behavior are quite clearly affected by pubertal<br />
change. In one study, early-maturing boys <strong>and</strong> girls reported<br />
more sexual activity <strong>and</strong> delinquency than late<br />
maturers (Flannery, Rowe, & Gulley, 1993). Yet, if we<br />
look at overall development <strong>and</strong> adjustment over the human<br />
life span, puberty <strong>and</strong> its variations have less dramatic<br />
effects than is commonly thought for most<br />
individuals. For some young adolescents, the path<br />
through puberty is stormy, but for most it is not. Each period<br />
of the human life span has its stresses <strong>and</strong> puberty is<br />
no different. While it poses new challenges, the vast majority of adolescents weather<br />
the stresses effectively. Besides the biological influences on adolescent development,<br />
cognitive <strong>and</strong> social or environmental influences also shape who we become (Sarigiani<br />
& Petersen, 2000; Susman & Rogol, 2004). Singling out biological changes as the dominant<br />
influence during adolescence may not be wise.