24.03.2013 Views

The Net Effect? - Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society

The Net Effect? - Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society

The Net Effect? - Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3: Annex I specifies the fishing gear, areas<br />

<strong>and</strong> periods in which pingers are compulsory,<br />

including driftnets, bottom-set<br />

gillnets <strong>and</strong> tangle nets in the Baltic Sea,<br />

wreck nets <strong>and</strong> large-mesh bottom-set<br />

gillnets in the North Sea <strong>and</strong> bottom-set<br />

gillnets <strong>and</strong> tangle nets in the Celtic Sea;<br />

Annex II sets out the technical specifications<br />

of the devices <strong>and</strong> conditions of use),<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

3 coordinated monitoring of cetacean<br />

bycatch through compulsory onboard<br />

observers for given fisheries (Articles 4<br />

<strong>and</strong> 5: Annex II specifies the fisheries to<br />

be monitored <strong>and</strong> levels of coverage<br />

required, including driftnets in the Baltic<br />

Sea, North Sea <strong>and</strong> waters west of the UK<br />

<strong>and</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong>, pelagic trawls west of the UK,<br />

Irel<strong>and</strong>, France, Spain <strong>and</strong> Portugal as well<br />

as in the North Sea, high opening trawls,<br />

<strong>and</strong> fisheries required to use pingers as<br />

listed in Annex I; also Article 5 sets out the<br />

qualifications required of observers, their<br />

tasks <strong>and</strong> reporting requirements).<br />

While the Proposal has generally been<br />

welcomed by conservationists as a good first<br />

step, a number of weaknesses <strong>and</strong> serious<br />

omissions have been highlighted (e.g. WDCS<br />

2003). Broadly, these concern the degree of<br />

emphasis on pingers, the adequacy of<br />

proposed observer coverage levels, the lack<br />

of management objectives, targets or a man-<br />

agement framework for bycatch reduction<br />

<strong>and</strong>, more specifically, the absence of any<br />

measures, or even stated intent, to reduce<br />

bycatch in pelagic trawl fisheries. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

concerns are discussed in more detail in<br />

Chapter 6 below.<br />

<strong>The</strong> proposed Regulation will go through<br />

a process of scrutiny <strong>and</strong> negotiations in<br />

Council Working Groups consisting of civil<br />

servants from the Member States, in the<br />

Fisheries Committee of the European<br />

Parliament, <strong>and</strong> then in the European<br />

Parliament itself before the final decision is<br />

made in the Council of Fisheries Ministers.<br />

This process is expected to extend well into<br />

2004 <strong>and</strong> possibly beyond, <strong>and</strong> its outcome<br />

is likely to be affected by the level of public<br />

interest <strong>and</strong> concern in the matter.<br />

In the meantime, the European Commission<br />

has issued a contract for a study, using<br />

trained observers, of the numbers of<br />

cetaceans bycaught in pelagic trawls in the<br />

north-east Atlantic (CEC 2003b). <strong>The</strong> study<br />

is directed to give priority to the winter <strong>and</strong><br />

spring fisheries of the Western Channel <strong>and</strong><br />

the Celtic Sea (various pelagic fish <strong>and</strong><br />

spawning sea bass), to the summer albacore<br />

fishery in the north-east Atlantic, <strong>and</strong> to the<br />

year-round fishery for anchovy in the Bay of<br />

Biscay. <strong>The</strong> observation of fisheries is<br />

expected to begin early in 2004.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Net</strong> <strong>Effect</strong>?<br />

A WDCS report for Greenpeace<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!