The Net Effect? - Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society
The Net Effect? - Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society
The Net Effect? - Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3: Annex I specifies the fishing gear, areas<br />
<strong>and</strong> periods in which pingers are compulsory,<br />
including driftnets, bottom-set<br />
gillnets <strong>and</strong> tangle nets in the Baltic Sea,<br />
wreck nets <strong>and</strong> large-mesh bottom-set<br />
gillnets in the North Sea <strong>and</strong> bottom-set<br />
gillnets <strong>and</strong> tangle nets in the Celtic Sea;<br />
Annex II sets out the technical specifications<br />
of the devices <strong>and</strong> conditions of use),<br />
<strong>and</strong><br />
3 coordinated monitoring of cetacean<br />
bycatch through compulsory onboard<br />
observers for given fisheries (Articles 4<br />
<strong>and</strong> 5: Annex II specifies the fisheries to<br />
be monitored <strong>and</strong> levels of coverage<br />
required, including driftnets in the Baltic<br />
Sea, North Sea <strong>and</strong> waters west of the UK<br />
<strong>and</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong>, pelagic trawls west of the UK,<br />
Irel<strong>and</strong>, France, Spain <strong>and</strong> Portugal as well<br />
as in the North Sea, high opening trawls,<br />
<strong>and</strong> fisheries required to use pingers as<br />
listed in Annex I; also Article 5 sets out the<br />
qualifications required of observers, their<br />
tasks <strong>and</strong> reporting requirements).<br />
While the Proposal has generally been<br />
welcomed by conservationists as a good first<br />
step, a number of weaknesses <strong>and</strong> serious<br />
omissions have been highlighted (e.g. WDCS<br />
2003). Broadly, these concern the degree of<br />
emphasis on pingers, the adequacy of<br />
proposed observer coverage levels, the lack<br />
of management objectives, targets or a man-<br />
agement framework for bycatch reduction<br />
<strong>and</strong>, more specifically, the absence of any<br />
measures, or even stated intent, to reduce<br />
bycatch in pelagic trawl fisheries. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
concerns are discussed in more detail in<br />
Chapter 6 below.<br />
<strong>The</strong> proposed Regulation will go through<br />
a process of scrutiny <strong>and</strong> negotiations in<br />
Council Working Groups consisting of civil<br />
servants from the Member States, in the<br />
Fisheries Committee of the European<br />
Parliament, <strong>and</strong> then in the European<br />
Parliament itself before the final decision is<br />
made in the Council of Fisheries Ministers.<br />
This process is expected to extend well into<br />
2004 <strong>and</strong> possibly beyond, <strong>and</strong> its outcome<br />
is likely to be affected by the level of public<br />
interest <strong>and</strong> concern in the matter.<br />
In the meantime, the European Commission<br />
has issued a contract for a study, using<br />
trained observers, of the numbers of<br />
cetaceans bycaught in pelagic trawls in the<br />
north-east Atlantic (CEC 2003b). <strong>The</strong> study<br />
is directed to give priority to the winter <strong>and</strong><br />
spring fisheries of the Western Channel <strong>and</strong><br />
the Celtic Sea (various pelagic fish <strong>and</strong><br />
spawning sea bass), to the summer albacore<br />
fishery in the north-east Atlantic, <strong>and</strong> to the<br />
year-round fishery for anchovy in the Bay of<br />
Biscay. <strong>The</strong> observation of fisheries is<br />
expected to begin early in 2004.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Net</strong> <strong>Effect</strong>?<br />
A WDCS report for Greenpeace<br />
55