26.03.2013 Views

habitat magazine - Australian Conservation Foundation

habitat magazine - Australian Conservation Foundation

habitat magazine - Australian Conservation Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

news<br />

Hot rocks, wind, oceans,<br />

solar: Australia has worldclass<br />

clean energy resources<br />

at its fingertips.<br />

For years now it’s been Australia’s price on<br />

pollution that’s been on everyone’s lips, but it’s<br />

the renewable energy target (RET), the younger<br />

sibling of the carbon price, that Australia needs<br />

to get moving on clean energy.<br />

The RET is a national, bipartisan target of having<br />

20 per cent of our energy generated by renewable<br />

resources by 2020. It’s arguably the most<br />

vital element of our future energy mix.<br />

Last year alone, the world saw about $260<br />

billion in investment in renewable energy,<br />

eclipsing for the first time investment in fossil<br />

fuels. There can be no clearer demonstration<br />

that burning things we dig out of the ground<br />

is yesterday’s technology, and renewable is the<br />

future. In fact, it’s the present.<br />

We in Australia — indeed everyone around<br />

the world — are living through the first stages<br />

of a global clean energy boom. If the RET, the<br />

Clean Energy Finance Corporation (CEFC) and<br />

the <strong>Australian</strong> Renewable Energy Agency can<br />

hold hands and work together they are our ticket<br />

to riding that wave to a clean, safe, prosperous<br />

future for everyone.<br />

Already, renewable energy and the price on<br />

pollution have effectively taken the place of 3,000<br />

megawatts worth of coal-fired power generation.<br />

Power companies and industry groups are<br />

lobbying for cuts to the RET. Energy providers<br />

continue to peddle coal, oil and gas as a solution,<br />

despite health risks to communities, ever-rising<br />

pollution levels and the damage posed<br />

to places we love when we dig them up.<br />

Naturally, they have an interest in slowing support<br />

for clean energy. Their most vibrant, efficient<br />

and nimble competitors are companies that are<br />

retailing clean energy. These promising upstarts<br />

are undermining the development and growth of<br />

the big polluters. Thus, opposing investment in<br />

renewables is their short-term meal ticket.<br />

For instance, some energy providers continue<br />

to claim renewable energy is driving up<br />

electricity prices. The Productivity Commission<br />

released its findings in October 2012, reporting<br />

the main contributor to rising electricity prices<br />

is ‘gold plating’ — spending on pole and wire<br />

infrastructure to deliver electricity into homes<br />

in peak periods when air conditioners chew<br />

through our electricity grid.<br />

24<br />

Energy Australia and Origin Energy have claimed the RET will<br />

lead to additional costs to government and energy customers.<br />

What they choose not to mention is that some electricity providers<br />

were wrong-footed on clean energy, missing their chance<br />

to get in early on wind power. Wind is now the most competitive<br />

source of clean energy in the market. Nor do they state that in<br />

the last five years they have considerably invested in gas, which<br />

they promote as a ‘transition’ fuel.<br />

The argument to reduce or scrap the RET was lost when the Climate<br />

Change Authority showed modelling demonstrating that exceeding<br />

the 20 per cent target will save $4.4 billion and have no<br />

significant impact on average household bills, contrary to the<br />

claims of the big power companies.<br />

Federal government modelling shows a RET helps us generate<br />

46 per cent of total power from clean energy in 2030, with a<br />

further 15 per cent from the properly unshackled CEFC. What<br />

that means is that with a little effort, it’s possible for Australia<br />

to generate at least 60 per cent of its power from clean energy by<br />

2030 without a single new policy.<br />

All we need is the long-term commitment to power it.<br />

A renewed<br />

NBM-VQ26-CMYK.pdf 1 7/12/12 11:54 AM<br />

energy high<br />

Abigail Jabines<br />

Australia is primed for a clean, vibrant economy.<br />

solar energy<br />

> Australia has the highest average<br />

solar radiation of any<br />

continent.<br />

> A 50 square kilometre area in<br />

the outback is estimated to<br />

receive enough solar energy<br />

to power the country.<br />

> There are currently over<br />

750,000 homes with roof-top<br />

solar and it is estimated to<br />

reach one million within 12<br />

months.<br />

> The first utility-scale solar farm<br />

in Western Australia opened<br />

in October 2012 and can generate<br />

enough power for 3,000<br />

homes.<br />

wind energy<br />

> South Australia has 15 wind farms operating<br />

across the state which is half of the<br />

country’s installed wind capacity.<br />

> The country’s first community-owned<br />

wind farm in Victoria (Hepburn Community<br />

Wind Park Co-operative) can<br />

generate enough power for 2,300 homes.<br />

geothermal energy<br />

> Efficiently harnessing just one per cent<br />

of Australia’s geothermal resources can<br />

power the country’s electricity needs<br />

more than 26,000 times over.<br />

wave energy<br />

> Studies show that energy from the ocean<br />

could supply 10 per cent of Australia’s<br />

demand by 2050.<br />

For more information visit www.acfonline.org.au/climate-change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!