Download Yindjibarndi Newsletter 15 March 2011
Download Yindjibarndi Newsletter 15 March 2011
Download Yindjibarndi Newsletter 15 March 2011
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE THEFT OF THE FMG<br />
AGREEMENT<br />
While Wirlumurra and their Lawyer, Ron Bower, seem happy to sign<br />
FMG’s Agreement [downloadable from http://yindjibarndi.org.au/],<br />
<strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> Aboriginal Corporation are strongly opposed to signing<br />
this Land Use Agreement.<br />
For a very poor short-term gain, this Agreement would forever damage<br />
<strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> interests over ALL their native title lands.<br />
We should explain again why this Agreement is so bad, and why<br />
Wirlumurra and Ron Bower’s pushing to sign this Agreement is<br />
wrong. Some of these things are complicated, but they will have enormous<br />
impact on our future, and so it is vital we try to understand:<br />
● The FMG Agreement is not just for the Solomon Mine in the <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong><br />
#1 Claim area, but also covers all future FMG leases and<br />
operations over the original Determination Area. There are already<br />
about 55 FMG tenements pegged in both the new Claim Area and<br />
the old Determination Area – half of <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> country!<br />
● The PRIMARY BENEFICIARIES in the Agreement FMG has drafted<br />
are the Wirlumurra <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> Aboriginal Corporation (WYAC).<br />
So the only <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> people getting money, will be those chosen<br />
by WYAC! Ned Cheedy and others have rejected this Agreement<br />
outright – does this mean he will not get anything?<br />
● WYAC has no right to negotiate this Agreement for themselves,<br />
because under the Native Title Act the SEVEN <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> people<br />
who are named as the applicant on the <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> Native Title<br />
Claim – Ned Cheedy, Sylvia Allan, Thomas Jacob, Mavis Pat, Aileen<br />
Sandy, Alum Cheedy, Michael Woodley – are required to act jointly<br />
to agree on any Agreement with FMG.<br />
● Wirlumurra claim that Sylvia Allan, Mavis Pat and Aileen Sandy support<br />
the FMG Agreement – but Ned Cheedy, Thomas Jacob, Alum<br />
Cheedy, and Michael Woodley (the majority of applicants) do not<br />
agree.<br />
● SIGNING AWAY PROCEDURAL RIGHTS: Procedural rights<br />
under the Native Title Act are the RIGHT TO OBJECT to the<br />
grant of mining exploration licences and miscellaneous licences for<br />
railways; and the RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE the terms under which<br />
<strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> will consent to the grant of any other tenements, such<br />
as mining leases.<br />
● With the RIGHT TO OBJECT signed away in this Agreement, FMG<br />
would be able to get any mining tenements they want, now and<br />
in the future, anywhere in the claim area or the determination<br />
area. FMG does not say how many tenements it<br />
wants, nor where they might be located, so THIS IS A BLANK<br />
CHEQUE. <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> are being asked to consent now to something<br />
that is not known to FMG or them!<br />
● GIVING FMG POWER TO DO DEALS WITH 3RD PARTIES: The<br />
proposed Agreement also gives FMG power to sell or license tenements<br />
on <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> country to any third party with whom FMG<br />
deals now or in the future.<br />
● So FMG’s proposed agreement is asking the <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> to consent<br />
to an uncertain future – to the grant of anything and everything<br />
that FMG or anyone else (who has an agreement with FMG)<br />
wants in <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> traditional country, at any time in the future.<br />
● SIGNING AWAY SUBSTANTIVE RIGHTS OF THE ORIGINAL<br />
NATIVE TITLE DETERMINATION: Substantive rights under the<br />
Native Title Act are those rights given by the Determination of the<br />
Federal Court in the original <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> native title claim. These<br />
SUBSTANTIVE rights recognise that the <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> People hold<br />
the right to visit, conduct ceremony on, camp on, and gather traditional<br />
resources and bush tucker within the <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> Native<br />
Title Area.<br />
— 5 —<br />
● By signing the Wirlumurra-FMG Agreement the <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> are<br />
giving away or suspending their “SUBSTANTIVE” native title rights<br />
to visit their country and so on, in the <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> Determination<br />
Area that falls under FMG’s mining operations (or those of<br />
any of its future partners) – including on country to the south<br />
and south-east of the Millstream, parts of Coolawanyah and Mt<br />
Florance Pastoral, and unallocated Crown Land between those<br />
two Pastoral Leases.<br />
● So, in signing the Wirlumurra-FMG Agreement the <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong><br />
will forego not only their PROCEDURAL rights to OBJECT<br />
to FMG tenements in the Determination area, but also their<br />
SUBSTANTIVE native title rights to enjoy their country in the<br />
Determination area.<br />
● The Wirlumurra-FMG Agreement provides no compensation<br />
for the loss or impairment of SUBSTANTIVE native title rights<br />
that our elders fought so hard for – only a small payment for<br />
loss of PROCEDURAL rights.<br />
● This is how FMG is trying to pull the wool over Wirlumurra<br />
eyes – and how Wirlumurra are being tricked.<br />
● The Wirlumurra-FMG Agreement stops the current generation<br />
of <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> People, and all of their future ancestors, from<br />
ever claiming any compensation for the loss or impairment of<br />
their substantive native title rights. Wirlumurra want to give<br />
FMG a free giveaway.<br />
BUT IT GETS WORSE:<br />
● SIGNING AWAY SUBSTANTIVE RIGHTS IN THE YIND-<br />
JIBARNDI #1 CLAIM AREA: We must remember, the <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong><br />
#1 Claim, has not yet been determined, and that<br />
it could be many times more powerful than the original determination<br />
if – as is likely – EXCLUSIVE POSSESSION native title is<br />
granted to parts of the <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> native Title Claim area.<br />
● The proposed Wirlumurra-FMG Agreement will be disastrous in<br />
destroying the promise of these powerful EXCLUSIVE rights!<br />
● So, as well as wiping out rights gained by our elders in the first<br />
Claim, the Wirlumurra-FMG Agreement will wipe out compensation<br />
for the loss of any EXCLUSIVE NATIVE TITLE rights<br />
recognised by the Federal Court in <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> #1 – for current<br />
and all future generations of <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> People.<br />
● MCGLEW ADMITS – THAT IF NO AGREEMENT IS<br />
SIGNED – A DETERMINATION OF NATIVE TITLE<br />
IN THE YINDJIBARNDI #1 CLAIM COULD MAKE<br />
FMG PAY COMPENSTATION:<br />
In a letter Blair McGlew wrote to YAC on 30 November 2010<br />
he said: “The three mining leases that will start the Solomon<br />
project have now been granted to Fortescue by the State.<br />
Fortescue is now under no obligation to pay any royalty in<br />
respect of these tenements, nor any other compensation in<br />
respect of these tenements prior to <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> obtaining a<br />
determination of native title...”.<br />
● This COMPENSATION is the compensation that FMG would<br />
have to pay for any loss or impairment of substantive native<br />
title rights, which were recognised by the Federal Court in the<br />
<strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> #1 claim.<br />
● CHEATED OUT OF FUTURE RIGHTS: How it is fair and reasonable<br />
to ask the <strong>Yindjibarndi</strong> People to give up not only their<br />
PROCEDURAL rights; but also all SUBSTANTIVE rights under<br />
FMG’s current or future projects, for nothing more than a weak<br />
“procedural rights compensation package”?<br />
● This is why so many have called this FMG Agreement ROBBERY.