26.03.2013 Views

Compatible Peirce decompositions of Jordan triple systems - MSP

Compatible Peirce decompositions of Jordan triple systems - MSP

Compatible Peirce decompositions of Jordan triple systems - MSP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COMPATIBLE PEIRCE DECOMPOSITIONS OP JORDAN TRIPLE SYSTEMS 89<br />

EXAMPLE 5.6. It is somewhat surprising that 1/2 is necessary<br />

for lifting in <strong>triple</strong> <strong>systems</strong>, but one can give a "generic" example<br />

<strong>of</strong> a non-liftable tripotent. One can calculate that there is no<br />

integral polynomial g(t) 6 Z odd [ί] such that g(l) = 1 and g(t) — g(tf is<br />

divisible by (ί - t B )\ Thus if B=Z o ^[i\^tZ[s] (s=ί 2 ), L = (l-s)B=<br />

ί(l - s)Z[s] = (t - f)Z[s], JBΓ = (ί - tJB = β (l - sfB then J = J3/JSΓ—><br />

JB/L = J has nil (even trivial) kernel LjK, yet e = t is a tripotent<br />

in J with no covering tripotent β = #(*) in /. Thus lifting is not<br />

always possible in <strong>triple</strong> <strong>systems</strong>. •<br />

REMARK 5.7. The lift e obtained from an arbitrary x may not<br />

be the "correct" one. For example, if e is the "correct" cover <strong>of</strong><br />

e and we choose a preimage x = e — w = e — (w 2 + w t + w 0) for<br />

w teKΓ\ Jiifi) (for trivial K = Ker π: J -> J), then one easily computes<br />

χ 2n+l = e _ ( Wi + Wi + n ^ + w *^ ( n > Q> w , = p( e ) W2y K2<br />

= 0) .<br />

Therefore p(sc) = Σ «n^ 2n+1<br />

= (Σ α«)(β - (wx+w2)) - aQwQ- Σ nan(w2+w%) covers e iff Σ a<br />

n = l I n<br />

general / = β — (^2 + ^ + z0) is tripotent<br />

for ZtβKΓl Ji(e) iff ^o = z2 + rf = 0 (P(/) - / = « - P(e)« - {βe^} =<br />

(« 2 + «! + 30) — 0&! + 22; 2 + zt) by triviality <strong>of</strong> K), so p(α?) = / is a<br />

tripotent cover <strong>of</strong> e iff<br />

In this case<br />

Σ α» = 1, «o^o = 0, {1 + 2 Σ ^«n) (w 2 + ^) = 0 .<br />

Thus in general we cannot get rid <strong>of</strong> the components w x and w 2 , so<br />

no lift feΦ[x] is the correct lift β. •<br />

Once we can lift a single idempotent, we can without further<br />

ado lift a countable family <strong>of</strong> orthogonal idempotents. It is not<br />

clear that we can always lift compatible families. We will be able<br />

to lift certain families intermediate between orthogonal and compatible.<br />

A linearly-ordered family {ej <strong>of</strong> tripotents is hierarchical if<br />

β > a implies e β lies in one <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Peirce</strong> spaces Ji(e a ). An important<br />

special case is that <strong>of</strong> an orthogonal family (e β e J 0 (e a )) or a<br />

collinear family (e β e J^O), or more generally an orthogonal-collinear<br />

family where any two e a , e β are either orthogonal or collinear. It<br />

is easy to see by (1.8(iii)) that any hierarchical family is compatible.<br />

COUNTABLE LIFTING PROPOSITION 5.8. If J^J is a projection<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Jordan</strong> algebras with nil kernel, then any finite or countable<br />

hierarchical family e u e 2, <strong>of</strong> idempotents in J can be lifted to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!