the cathar crucifix - The Shroud of Turin

number of nails, and the location of the lance wound, the Cathars should have embraced
at least one of these ancient teachings, and yet, they did precisely the opposite.
The Cathars believed in two distinct deities, one good who made spiritual things
and the other evil who created the things of this world. 58 Because they deemed mankind
itself the work of the devil, the Cathars professed that Jesus had inhabited a simulacrum;
i.e., a mere representation of a human body. 59 Consequently, they preached that Christ
had been a ghost 60 who only appeared human and, consistent with Docetic heresies,
claimed that neither his death nor his resurrection had been a physical reality. 61 Having
rejected the reality of Christ’s incarnation, the Cathars were logically compelled to
disclaim the Eucharist, 62 the doctrine of transubstantiation, 63 and the Mass with its
sacrifices of the altar. 64
Once they had repudiated Christ’s human nature, the Cathars should have viewed
his crucifixion as nothing more than a mirage, and yet they were palpably frightened by
the event and claimed that the Cross should inspire horror, since it had formed the
instrument of Jesus’ humiliation. As noted by medieval scholar, Zoë Oldenbourg, such
reasoning demonstrates that the Cathars did, in fact, attach much more importance to the
Crucifixion than is generally supposed and that they believed, in some way or other, in
the real sufferings of Jesus and his death on the cross. 65
Finally, given their rejection of the Eucharist and the Mass, the Cathars should not
have claimed to possess Christ’s transubstantiated body, and yet they did invite the leader
of the Albigensian Crusade to see the body of Christ that had become flesh and blood in
the hands of their priest. 66
5