Airman Scholar Sp05-1.indd - United States Air Force Academy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Weapons,” The Humanist 63, (2003): 35. 4. Colorado Springs Gazette, 27 September 2003. 5. Wayne LeBaron, America’s Nuclear Legacy ( New York: Nova Science Publishers, 1998), 7. 6. Ibid, 10. 7. Ibid. 8. Ibid, 11. 9. Ibid, 6. 10. James Kitfield, “The Pros and Cons of New Nuclear Weapons,” National Journal 35 (2003): 2566. 11. Ibid. 12. Robert W. Nelson, “Low-Yield Earth-Penetrating Nuclear Weapons,” Journal of the Federation of American Scientists 54, no. 1 (2001): 1-8. 13. Ibid. 14. Ibid. 15. Henry Kelly and Ivan Oelrich. 2003. Will New Nuclear Weapons Make us More Secure? [on-line]. Washington, D.C.: Federation of American Scientists; available from http://www.fas.org/ssp/docs/030916-newnukes; Internet; accessed 30 October 2003. 16. Ibid. 17. Swomley, “World Domination”, 35. 18. Jonathan Medalia. 2003. Nuclear Earth Penetrator Weapons [on-line]. Washington, D.C.: Federation of American Scientists; available from http://www.fas.org/spp/ starwars/crs/RS20834.pdf; Internet; accessed 30 October 2003. 19. Ibid. 20. Ibid. 21. Kitfield, “The Pros and Cons”, 2566. 92 22. Medalia, Penetrator Weapons. 23. Kitfield, “The Pros and Cons”, 2566. 24. Medalia, Penetrator Weapons. 25. Andrew Koch. 2003. US Considers Major Changes to Strategic Weapons [on-line]. Alexandria, VA: Jane’s Defence Weekly; available from http://ebird.dtic. mil/Sept2003/s20030915217115.html; Internet; accessed 10 October 2003. 26. Kelly, More Secure. 27. Colorado Springs Gazette, 27 September 2003. 28. Medalia, Penetrator Weapons. 29. Julain Coman. 2003. Pentagon Wants ‘Mini- Nukes’ to Fight Terrorists [on-line]. Washington, D.C.: London Sunday Telegraph; available from http://ebird.afis. osd.mil/ebfiles/s20031027228041.html; Internet; accessed 30 October 2003. 30. Ibid. 31. Kitfield, “The Pros and Cons”, 2566. 32. Zhu Iizhen. 2003. US Plots to Develop Small Nukes [on-line]. Beijing, China: People’s Daily; available from http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200308/13/ eng20030813_122264.shtml; Internet; accessed 30 October 2003. 33. Kelly, More Secure. 34. Coman, Fight Terrorists. 35. Richard Rhodes, The Making of the Atomic Bomb (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1986), 451. 36. Ibid, 667. 37. Ibid, 673. 38. Ibid, 692. 39. Ibid, 696. 40. Kevin O’Neill, “Building the Bomb,” in Atomic
Audit, ed. Stephen I. Schwartz (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1998), 58. 41. Ibid, 83. 42. Ibid, 78. 43. Ibid, 83. 44. Michael Levi, “Nuclear Bunker Buster Bombs,” Scientific American 291 (Aug 2004): 74. 45. Ibid, 66. 46. Ibid. 47. Nelson, 2. 48. Levi, 67. 49. Ibid. 50. Ibid. 51. Ibid. 52. Ibid. 53. John Deutch, “A Nuclear Posture for Today,” Foreign Affairs 84 (Jan/Feb 2005): 51. 54. Levi, 68. 55. Ibid. 56. Kitfield, “The Pros and Cons”, 2566. Bibliography Alexander, Brian, and Alistair Millar, ed. Tactical Nuclear Weapons. Washington, D.C.: Brasseys, Inc., 2003. Colorado Springs Gazette, 27 September 2003 Coman, Julian. 2003. Pentagon Wants ‘Mini-Nukes’ to Fight Terrorists [on-line]. Washington, D.C.: London Sunday Telegraph; available from 93 http://ebird.afis.osd.mil/ebfiles/s20031027228041. html; Internet; accessed 30 October 2003. Deutch, John. “A Nuclear Posture for Today.” Foreign Affairs 84 (Jan/Feb 2005): 49-61. Freedman, Lawrence. The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1981. Gray, Colin S. Modern Strategy. Oxford: University Press, 1999. Kellerhals, Merle D. 2003. Congress Agrees to Let Pentagon Study Low-Yield Nuclear Weapons [on-line]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of State; available from http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/terror/ texts/03052300.htm; Internet; accessed 30 October 2003. Kelly, Henry and Ivan Oelrich. 2003. Will New Nuclear Weapons Make us More Secure? [online]. Washington, D.C.: Federation of American Scientists; available from http://www.fas.org/ssp/docs/030916-newnukes; Internet; accessed 30 October 2003. Kitfield, James. “The Pros and Cons of New Nuclear Weapons.” National Journal 35 (2003): 2566. Koch, Andrew. 2003. US Considers Major Changes to Strategic Weapons [on-line]. Alexandria, VA: Jane’s Defence Weekly; available from http://ebird.dtic.mil/Sept2003/s20030915217115. html; Internet; accessed 10 October 2003. Levi, Michael. “Nuclear Bunker Buster Bombs.” Scientific American 291 (Aug 2004): 66-74. Iizhen, Zhu. 2003. US Plots to Develop Small Nukes [online]. Beijing, China: People’s Daily; available from http://english.peopledaily.com. cn/200308/13/eng20030813_122264.shtml; Internet; accessed 30 October 2003. LeBaron, Wayne. America’s Nuclear Legacy. New York: Nova
Page 1 and 2:
In this issue… This publication i
Page 3 and 4:
IS MISSILE DEFENSE A GOOD IDEA? By
Page 5 and 6:
Several United States Congressmen a
Page 7 and 8:
WHERE DO PRIORITIES LIE, WITH MEN O
Page 9 and 10:
Sprague had to give the order to ma
Page 11 and 12:
“THE ANATOMY OF CLOSE AIR SUPPORT
Page 13 and 14:
consider multiple possible answers
Page 15 and 16:
The CAS skeletal system provides ab
Page 17 and 18:
Combat Plans division “builds”
Page 19 and 20:
Diagnosis All the systems I have di
Page 21 and 22:
unwilling to let go of it option to
Page 23 and 24:
Command and Staff College, 1998), 2
Page 25 and 26:
y government’s myriad postmodern
Page 27 and 28:
MORALLY BOUND TO NATIONAL SECURITY
Page 29 and 30:
over others through exploitation of
Page 31 and 32:
fighting. Sun Tzu stated “that th
Page 33 and 34:
changed in nature or psychology sin
Page 35 and 36:
esulted in 73 thousand Iraqis reach
Page 37 and 38:
mander or Geographic Combatant Comm
Page 39 and 40:
support operations. Instead of bein
Page 41 and 42: tions, Joint Pub 3-35. Washington,
Page 43 and 44: 93 Ibid. 94 Ibid. 95 Ibid. 96 Celin
Page 45 and 46: an essential element in how the U.S
Page 47 and 48: that it avoids the heated issue of
Page 49 and 50: satellites as high as 1,000 km exce
Page 51 and 52: to blame. Tracking the signal is di
Page 53 and 54: or violating international agreemen
Page 55 and 56: 2 Clayton K. S. Chun, Shooting Down
Page 57 and 58: NO COERCION HERE: THE SOVIET MILITA
Page 59 and 60: was an attack on Islam. 27 Radical
Page 61 and 62: Asia in general and Afghanistan in
Page 63 and 64: Brassey’s, 2002). Bodansky, Yosse
Page 65 and 66: ETHICS IN WARFARE By C3C David Schi
Page 67 and 68: war perfectly. Besides utterly deva
Page 69 and 70: The political nature of war is esse
Page 71 and 72: Why is coercion important, however?
Page 73 and 74: 50,000 regular troops. The army of
Page 75 and 76: forces. Airpower was a shock to the
Page 77 and 78: ase to mop up after the airpower ha
Page 79 and 80: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks go
Page 81 and 82: FALLOUT: THE QUESTION OF NEXT GENER
Page 83 and 84: cent civilians and noncombatants th
Page 85 and 86: taining a robust deterrent against
Page 87 and 88: of the men in the armies which I ha
Page 89 and 90: onmental hazard and risking the liv
Page 91: is not nearly deep enough for the e
Page 95 and 96: may have a fundamental breakdown be
Page 97 and 98: improved over time. After three yea
Page 99 and 100: preparation that the enemy cannot m
Page 101: man to, “Love each other as I hav
show all

Airman Scholar Sp05-1.indd - United States Air Force Academy

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?