CHOBHAM COMMON NNR - Surrey Wildlife Trust
CHOBHAM COMMON NNR - Surrey Wildlife Trust
CHOBHAM COMMON NNR - Surrey Wildlife Trust
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
and horse riders creating tracks then abandoning them for new routes as they gullied<br />
and became impassable, causing wide scale erosion on the site. It is also reported<br />
that during the 1950’s and 1960’s visitors regularly took vehicles onto the Common<br />
further adding to the problem. An aerial photograph dated 1964 clearly shows severe<br />
erosion problems on Tank Hill and Staple Hill. By the time the County Council<br />
acquired the Common in 1968 there were nine car parks on the area covered by this<br />
plan. Initially the Council wished to develop a country park but these plans were soon<br />
dropped in favour of informal recreation and nature conservation. Erosion and<br />
disturbance continued to be serious problems through the nineteen seventies and<br />
eighties. By the late nineteen-eighties both walkers and riders were showing a<br />
marked preference for the growing network of high quality fire tracks. In 1992 a<br />
consultative process began to resolve long running conflicts of interest between<br />
horse riders and other users, and to rationalise the rights of way networks in order to<br />
meet the needs of visitors while protecting sensitive habitats and species. Following<br />
a public enquiry in 1996 the present network of rights of way and agreed horse rides<br />
which incorporates the fire track network was installed. Since then there have been<br />
few serious erosion problems and disturbance has been greatly reduced.<br />
Grazing was carried out using temporary fencing on five areas totalling 30 Ha<br />
between 1994 and 2000, with excellent results. There were plans to carry out<br />
extensive grazing on the Common, however the Secretary of State turned down an<br />
application to fence the northern section of the Common following a public inquiry in<br />
1998, as there were public concerns about permanent perimeter fencing and the<br />
inspector felt other options for establishing grazing had not been fully explored.<br />
There is a more detailed history of the Common in the 1998 Chobham Common<br />
Management Plan.<br />
1.6.4. Socio-economic use<br />
The Common is managed for nature conservation and informal recreation. Local<br />
shops, restaurants and public houses benefit from visitor use of the Common. Local<br />
stables benefit from their use of the Common. Heather turves from the Common are<br />
used by Queenwood Golf Course, who carry out works on the <strong>NNR</strong> in exchange for<br />
material.<br />
The Common has been used for filming since 1914. In the nineteen-fifties there was<br />
a semi-permanent film set at Tank Hill and as late as 1979 ten film units used the site<br />
in one year. Since the mid-nineteen-eighties filming has only been allowed where it<br />
does not interfere with the enjoyment of the Common by visitors and where it can be<br />
shown it will not damage the ecology or fabric of the site. At the time of writing the<br />
Common is used two or three times a year for television dramas, adverts or minor<br />
scenes for feature films.<br />
The possibility of brash from scrub management being utilised at the Slough<br />
Combined Heat and Power Station is currently being investigated.<br />
Approximately twenty-five per cent of visitors to the Common come from the<br />
surrounding villages. There is considerable local interest in the management of the<br />
Common. From 1879 to 1968 the Common was managed by the Chobham Common<br />
Preservation Committee, initially this was a committee elected by the Commoners to<br />
protect their interest but as the number of active commoners declined it became a<br />
committee of interested villagers. From 1968 until 1986 the Chobham Common<br />
Preservation Committee assisted <strong>Surrey</strong> County Council “as a consultative body<br />
rather than with any management responsibility” (Chobham Common Management<br />
14