29.03.2013 Views

Professional briefing - The Journal Online

Professional briefing - The Journal Online

Professional briefing - The Journal Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> answer proposed by Raymond<br />

McLennan is that we should all be<br />

forced to carry out pro bono work.<br />

But what is the question?<br />

Raymond suggests that our<br />

competition in the future will not<br />

be Tesco but will be the likes of<br />

charitable bodies such as the<br />

Salvation Army and others.<br />

He says that to compete with this,<br />

we should act now. Raymond has,<br />

also, told me of his view that, to<br />

retain clients, the profession needs<br />

to innovate and market itself.<br />

I’m not writing here, merely, to<br />

counter Raymond’s argument about<br />

pro bono work. Raymond is right<br />

about some things. We do need to<br />

market ourselves. We do need to<br />

innovate. I shall return to this later.<br />

<strong>The</strong> definition of “pro bono” is<br />

“done for the public good without<br />

compensation”, and words that I<br />

would associate with this are<br />

“charitable”, “generous”, “kindly”,<br />

“open-palmed” – all words relating<br />

to the giving of something out of<br />

an internal desire to do good.<br />

I think a lot of us do pro bono<br />

work. I certainly do. I have done<br />

myriads of free 15-minute<br />

diagnostic interviews.<br />

Although my wife<br />

would doubt it, I<br />

must have some of this<br />

“cognitive surplus”. In<br />

addition, I publicise the<br />

good work that my staff and<br />

I do for charity. As a result, the<br />

message has come over that I am,<br />

after all, human, that I care, that I am<br />

approachable and I am not a toff.<br />

<strong>The</strong> point, however, is that I do it<br />

because I want to do it. If I am forced<br />

www.lawscotjobs.co.uk<br />

Bruce<br />

de Wert<br />

Bruce de Wert is a<br />

solicitor with more<br />

than 25 years’<br />

experience. Apart from<br />

his traditional practice<br />

at Georgesons,<br />

Wick and Thurso, he<br />

is also the owner of<br />

www.scotwills.co.uk<br />

and his most recent<br />

innovation,<br />

www.myscottish<br />

divorce.co.uk<br />

to do it, it is no longer “pro bono”<br />

and the pleasure will come out of it.<br />

As I have said to Raymond, his<br />

proposal is both repugnant and<br />

immoral. To be forced to do<br />

something for nothing is slavery:<br />

“the subjection of a person to another<br />

person, especially in being forced into<br />

work”. To force those in our employ<br />

to do pro bono work would be to be<br />

complicit in slavery. Can we presume<br />

that, being pro bono, no payment<br />

would be expected by our employees?<br />

If that were not bad enough,<br />

I glean from our correspondence<br />

that the anticipation is that, with<br />

this pro bono work, we will change<br />

the public perception of solicitors.<br />

It won’t. In fact, it would have a<br />

negative impact on the public regard<br />

for the profession. He is inviting the<br />

Government to force us to do<br />

something – thereby implying<br />

that we don’t do it already.<br />

Raymond has his finger on the<br />

button here, though. <strong>The</strong>re is a real<br />

problem with the public perception<br />

of solicitors. It can be stated as “all<br />

solicitors are rogues... except mine”.<br />

Why is this? It is a marketing issue.<br />

It’s because we don’t get our act<br />

together and drip feed the public with<br />

all the good news stories that exist.<br />

I do it, but Raymond has a point<br />

– it needs to be done collectively.<br />

In my view, the profession,<br />

through the Law Society, should<br />

employ someone permanently<br />

dedicated to this task of changing<br />

perceptions as to who we are and<br />

what we do. It will take some time,<br />

but I have no doubt whatsoever<br />

that we would be successful.<br />

<strong>The</strong> other point raised by<br />

Raymond is that of innovation.<br />

We certainly need to innovate.<br />

Doing things the way we have<br />

always done it, just because we’ve<br />

always done it that way, will not cut<br />

the mustard in the future.<br />

Raymond does not think Tesco<br />

would be our competitors. I think that<br />

they (and others like them) will. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

do not think the way we do. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

probably will not produce a better<br />

product, but they will innovate and<br />

they will, very definitely, market their<br />

products much better than we do.<br />

On his blog, Raymond quotes Sam<br />

Walton, Founder of Wal-Mart, owners<br />

of Asda: “<strong>The</strong>re is only one boss: the<br />

customer. And he can fire everybody<br />

in the company from the chairman<br />

on down simply by spending his<br />

money somewhere else.”<br />

I couldn’t agree more.<br />

We certainly need to innovate.<br />

Doing things the way we have<br />

always done it, just because we’ve<br />

always done it that way, will not<br />

cut the mustard in the future<br />

July 2010 the<strong>Journal</strong> / 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!