29.03.2013 Views

Professional briefing - The Journal Online

Professional briefing - The Journal Online

Professional briefing - The Journal Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Professional</strong> <strong>briefing</strong> Environment<br />

Links with the past<br />

A new bill in the Scottish<br />

Parliament proposes important<br />

changes in relation to listed<br />

or potentially listed buildings<br />

and ancient monuments<br />

<strong>The</strong> Historic Environment<br />

(Amendment) (Scotland) Bill 2010<br />

was introduced in the Scottish<br />

Parliament on 4 May. It amends the<br />

Historic Buildings and Ancient<br />

Monuments Act 1953, the Ancient<br />

Monuments and Archaeological Areas<br />

Act 1979 and the Planning (Listed<br />

Buildings and Conservation Areas)<br />

(Scotland) Act 1997. It addresses the<br />

Scottish Government’s aims of<br />

streamlining and clarifying the rules<br />

for managing and protecting<br />

Scotland’s historic environment.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill is of relevance for any<br />

solicitors advising in relation to a<br />

property development which affects<br />

a scheduled ancient monument, a<br />

listed building or building which<br />

may be subject to listing.<br />

Certificate that building not<br />

intended to be listed<br />

Of particular significance is s 18, which<br />

provides the right of “any person” to<br />

apply to Scottish ministers for a<br />

certificate that a particular building<br />

will not be listed for a period of five<br />

years. Following issue of the certificate,<br />

planning authorities may not serve a<br />

building preservation notice in respect<br />

of the building during this time.<br />

Any building, if of special<br />

architectural or historic interest, may be<br />

listed at any time by ministers. <strong>The</strong>re is<br />

no right of appeal. Other factors such<br />

as condition, implications for future<br />

use or financial issues are not relevant<br />

to the decision, which is a ministerial<br />

one taken on professional advice from<br />

Historic Scotland. Whilst the older a<br />

building the more likely it is to present<br />

a special interest, buildings erected in<br />

the last 40 years have been listed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> consequences of listing are<br />

likely to be delay, amendment and<br />

potential abandonment of property<br />

development, as not only is the<br />

building strongly protected against<br />

any works which may affect its<br />

www.lawscotjobs.co.uk<br />

Any building,<br />

if of special<br />

architectural<br />

or historic<br />

interest, may<br />

be listed at<br />

any time by<br />

ministers.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is no<br />

right of appeal<br />

character, but its setting is also<br />

protected. A measure of policy<br />

protection against “spot listing” is<br />

afforded in para 2.35 of Scottish<br />

Historic Environment Policy (July<br />

2009) (“SHEP”), which states that a<br />

building will not normally be listed<br />

once a planning application has been<br />

submitted, granted or planning<br />

permission is being implemented.<br />

<strong>The</strong> policy memorandum<br />

accompanying the bill states that s 18<br />

will provide certainty for owners<br />

and developers. This is the most<br />

controversial element of the bill and<br />

stakeholder responses raised issues<br />

concerning adequacy of resources to<br />

handle applications, clarity on the<br />

basis of assessment, relationship with<br />

building preservation notices, and<br />

whether the five-year period is too long.<br />

A similar provision exists in<br />

England under s 6 of the Planning<br />

(Listed Buildings and Conservation<br />

Areas) Act 1990 and such<br />

applications are generally known as<br />

“certificates of immunity”. In contrast<br />

to the Scottish bill which envisages an<br />

application at any time, under s 6 the<br />

application can only be made after<br />

planning permission has been<br />

applied for or has been granted. <strong>The</strong><br />

decision to award immunity follows<br />

an assessment by English Heritage<br />

and if immunity is refused, the<br />

building will normally be listed.<br />

This provision has not been widely<br />

used, probably because applications<br />

will inevitably create a delay and if<br />

unsuccessful will result in a listing<br />

that might not otherwise have<br />

occurred. Under the proposed<br />

Scottish amendments, prior to<br />

making an application, a professional<br />

judgment will need to be made on<br />

whether the building in question<br />

meets the criteria for listing under<br />

SHEP. <strong>The</strong> inclusion of a standard<br />

requirement to make an application<br />

in the context of property transactions<br />

appears to be unlikely, but an<br />

application should be considered<br />

where a building is unlisted but<br />

appears to meet the criteria for listing.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill provides no right of<br />

hearing or appeal in relation to an<br />

application, nor a time limit within<br />

which a certificate is to be issued.<br />

Scheduled ancient<br />

monuments (“SAMs”)<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill also restricts the “defence of<br />

ignorance” in the 1979 Act, increases<br />

the level of fine to £50,000 on<br />

conviction for undertaking<br />

unauthorised works, and allows any<br />

financial gain to be taken into account<br />

in sentencing. Ministers are also<br />

empowered to exercise rights of entry,<br />

serve enforcement notices, stop notices<br />

and temporary stop notices, and raise<br />

actions of interdict in respect of<br />

unauthorised works to SAMs.<br />

Listed buildings<br />

<strong>The</strong> same increased fines apply on<br />

conviction for undertaking<br />

unauthorised works on listed buildings,<br />

together with the application of fixed<br />

penalty notices as an alternative where<br />

that is appropriate. Planning authorities<br />

can decline to determine applications<br />

for consent where a similar application<br />

has been made within the previous two<br />

years. <strong>The</strong> right of an appellant to<br />

require a hearing or an inquiry<br />

following refusal of consent is to be<br />

removed, in line with similar changes<br />

in relation to planning applications.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are also new provisions for stop<br />

notices and temporary stop notices to<br />

halt unauthorised works.<br />

Where ministers or a planning<br />

authority undertake urgent works to a<br />

listed building, they may recover the<br />

costs against not only the original<br />

owner, but also (provided certain<br />

criteria are met) the new owner, who<br />

then has a right of recovery against the<br />

original owner. <strong>The</strong>se costs may also be<br />

secured by a charge over the property.<br />

Alastair McKie, Head of Planning &<br />

Environment, Anderson Strathern LLP<br />

July 2010 the<strong>Journal</strong> / 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!