29.03.2013 Views

Coulsfield reports civil justice as ripe for review Coulsfield reports ...

Coulsfield reports civil justice as ripe for review Coulsfield reports ...

Coulsfield reports civil justice as ripe for review Coulsfield reports ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

editorial<br />

The Society’s call on the Executive to set up an independent complaintshandling<br />

body is a bold move which will need to be backed up with<br />

some straight talking on difficult issues that remain<br />

BITING THE BULLET<br />

Peter Nicholson<br />

A solicitor with over<br />

twenty years’ experience<br />

in legal publishing, Peter<br />

is the editor of the Journal<br />

of the Law Society of<br />

Scotland<br />

www.journalonline.co.uk<br />

All or nothing on complaints<br />

So the Society h<strong>as</strong> taken the plunge.<br />

Having failed to convince the<br />

Executive that it w<strong>as</strong> worth working<br />

on the present (relatively new)<br />

complaints system, in the face of the<br />

tide of opinion favouring an overtly<br />

independent body, the Council h<strong>as</strong><br />

taken the plunge and called <strong>for</strong> a<br />

completely new body to be set up.<br />

Despite the volte-face, there is a<br />

certain logic to the position that if<br />

more than just amendment is to<br />

happen, we should go the whole hog.<br />

The “gateway” system, under which an<br />

outside body would decide which<br />

complaints were admissible be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

<strong>for</strong>warding to the Society <strong>for</strong><br />

investigation, still h<strong>as</strong> its supporters,<br />

but would fall short of the<br />

independence test dear to those who<br />

believe that public confidence<br />

demands nothing less.There must be<br />

some risk that it would add to the<br />

time taken to deal with complaints<br />

without silencing the critics of Societyled<br />

investigation.<br />

The announcement resulted in some<br />

unusually positive leader comment in<br />

the press, and will be welcomed by<br />

those within the profession who have<br />

previously supported divesting the<br />

Society of complaints handling on the<br />

view not le<strong>as</strong>t that it is a thankless t<strong>as</strong>k<br />

of which the profession would be well<br />

shot.Those who have taken the<br />

opposite position and defended the<br />

Society-run system cannot be said to<br />

have been proved wrong, and all<br />

The potential burden... brings the whole<br />

access to <strong>justice</strong> issue into contention<br />

credit is due to the staff who have<br />

pushed through the improved<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance in the face of rising<br />

numbers of complaints but who now<br />

face an uncertain future; but it w<strong>as</strong><br />

always going to be an uphill t<strong>as</strong>k in the<br />

current climate to preserve an inhouse<br />

system.<br />

It is to be hoped that this declaration<br />

of intent to work with the Executive<br />

(whose own policy choice h<strong>as</strong> still to<br />

be announced) will be met with an<br />

equally constructive response. As w<strong>as</strong><br />

quickly recognised, some thorny issues<br />

remain – such <strong>as</strong> disciplinary matters,<br />

public funding and who pays within<br />

the profession.The potential burden<br />

especially on smaller practices brings<br />

the whole access to <strong>justice</strong> issue into<br />

contention.Truly we have a seamless<br />

web here.<br />

Digital baby’s first year…<br />

It is already over a year since the<br />

Journal’s dedicated website,<br />

wwwjournalonline.co.uk, w<strong>as</strong> launched<br />

by Connect Communications with the<br />

financial support provided by the<br />

Society. From the outset it h<strong>as</strong> been<br />

able to break news more or less<br />

instantly, <strong>as</strong> most recently with the<br />

announcement on complaints just<br />

discussed. Over the year, technical<br />

adjustments to the site have incre<strong>as</strong>ed<br />

its e<strong>as</strong>e of use, and made it possible<br />

<strong>for</strong> individual articles and news items<br />

to feature <strong>as</strong> hits on a general internet<br />

search. As a result the number of visits<br />

to the site, <strong>as</strong> reported monthly, h<strong>as</strong><br />

soared.Yet we know that many<br />

practitioners still do not appreciate<br />

the site’s potential. So on the off<br />

chance that you find yourself with an<br />

idle moment at or near a computer at<br />

some point over the Christm<strong>as</strong> break,<br />

give it a go – you may be ple<strong>as</strong>antly<br />

surprised.<br />

…<strong>as</strong> parent reaches<br />

Significant Age<br />

And finally… with this issue the<br />

Journal completes its 50th volume.<br />

The milestone will be marked with a<br />

little more than this modest<br />

announcement: you will have heard<br />

that the Society’s Annual Conference<br />

on 10 March,“Get Connected”, h<strong>as</strong> a<br />

communication theme in honour of<br />

the anniversary. And development of<br />

the Journal <strong>as</strong> a topical and<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mative organ will continue.<br />

Meantime we must take the<br />

opportunity to thank all those who<br />

have helped the Journal reach its half<br />

century, and especially those who<br />

regularly give of their valuable time to<br />

keep the Journal truly a members’<br />

magazine.To all our readers and<br />

writers, a very happy Christm<strong>as</strong> and a<br />

successful year in 2006.<br />

The Journal: December 2005 : 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!