02.04.2013 Views

A Supplemental HCVF Assessment on the Sumatran Tiger ...

A Supplemental HCVF Assessment on the Sumatran Tiger ...

A Supplemental HCVF Assessment on the Sumatran Tiger ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FINAL REPORT <strong>Tiger</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>HCVF</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Supplemental</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Assessment</str<strong>on</strong>g> – Serapung FMU<br />

9 Appendices<br />

Appendix I - SmartWood Scope for <strong>Tiger</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Supplemental</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Assessment</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

The following suggested scope for <strong>the</strong> tiger supplemental assessment is taken from<br />

page 64 of <strong>the</strong> SmartWood <str<strong>on</strong>g>HCVF</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Assessment</str<strong>on</strong>g> Report for <strong>the</strong> Serapung FMU.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Supplemental</str<strong>on</strong>g> study to determine <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> indicative <str<strong>on</strong>g>HCVF</str<strong>on</strong>g> area to<br />

<strong>the</strong> survival and l<strong>on</strong>g-term viability of a tiger populati<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> area.<br />

Objective:<br />

5 To evaluate <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> defined area of forest within <strong>the</strong> Serapung<br />

unit towards maintenance of a tiger populati<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> wider area.<br />

Study Area:<br />

5 The coastal strip between Tanjung Datuk at <strong>the</strong> mouth of <strong>the</strong> Kampar river to<br />

<strong>the</strong> next river channel entering <strong>the</strong> sea, at Pulau Tadi (Refer map), extending 10<br />

km inland from <strong>the</strong> coast.<br />

5 C<strong>on</strong>tained within this study area is a 5,884 ha block of forest within <strong>the</strong> FMU.<br />

Implementati<strong>on</strong>:<br />

5 The study will be c<strong>on</strong>ducted by an independent specialist team, lead by a<br />

recognized expert in tiger ecology and rapid survey techniques.<br />

Scope of Work:<br />

5 Determine <strong>the</strong> estimated size of this tiger populati<strong>on</strong><br />

5 Evaluate <strong>the</strong> habitat utilizati<strong>on</strong> and distributi<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> populati<strong>on</strong> within <strong>the</strong> study<br />

area.<br />

5 Evaluate <strong>the</strong> populati<strong>on</strong>’s comparative utilizati<strong>on</strong> of different habitat types: peat<br />

swamp forest, coastal alluvial bench forests, sec<strong>on</strong>dary habitats and farmlands.<br />

5 Taking into account current and future land use of <strong>the</strong> wider area, determine <strong>the</strong><br />

l<strong>on</strong>g term viability of this populati<strong>on</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> area (and primary habitats)<br />

required to support it.<br />

5 Determine if <strong>the</strong> defined forest block within <strong>the</strong> FMU c<strong>on</strong>stitutes an integral part<br />

of <strong>the</strong> area and habitat required to support <strong>the</strong> tiger populati<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> l<strong>on</strong>g term.<br />

Outputs:<br />

5 A report detailing <strong>the</strong> findings of <strong>the</strong> study<br />

Timeframe:<br />

5 3 – 6 m<strong>on</strong>ths<br />

Budget:<br />

5 To be developed with identified specialist team.<br />

<strong>Sumatran</strong> <strong>Tiger</strong> C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Program Pg 67/68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!