02.04.2013 Views

NJGS - Bulletin 61-I. The Cretaceous Fossils of NJ - State of New ...

NJGS - Bulletin 61-I. The Cretaceous Fossils of NJ - State of New ...

NJGS - Bulletin 61-I. The Cretaceous Fossils of NJ - State of New ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CRETACEOUS FORhl:\TIONS OF NEW JERSEY1<br />

by Horace Q. Richards<br />

Lower Crataceous. No deposits <strong>of</strong> Early <strong>Cretaceous</strong> age are known<br />

to crop out in <strong>New</strong> Jersey. <strong>The</strong> three formations <strong>of</strong> the Potomac group,<br />

the Patuxent (predominately a sand), the Arundel (clay) and the<br />

Patapsco (predominately a sand) are widely distributed in the area<br />

immediately to the south, but have not been reported from the surface<br />

in <strong>New</strong> Jersey. <strong>The</strong>re is a difference <strong>of</strong> opinion regarding the age <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Potomac group. It has generally been placed in the Lower <strong>Cretaceous</strong><br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> fossil plants. More recently, Anderson (1948) and<br />

Spangler and Peterson (1950) placed the Patuxent in the Lower Cre-<br />

taceous and the Aruudel and Patapsco in the Upper Cretaeeous. On a<br />

reexamination <strong>of</strong> the fossil plants, Dorf (1952) rejects the Upper Cre-<br />

taceous dating and places the entire group in the Lower <strong>Cretaceous</strong>.<br />

Dryden, (quoted by Johnson and Richards, 1952 p. 2153) on the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> heavy mineral studies, states that the lower section <strong>of</strong> the deep well<br />

at Salem, N. J. penetrated into the Lower <strong>Cretaceous</strong>. This.is the only<br />

record <strong>of</strong> the Lower <strong>Cretaceous</strong> in <strong>New</strong> Jersey.<br />

Raritan formation. <strong>The</strong> Raritan formation was first named by Con-<br />

rad (1869, p. 360), but was redefined and restricted by Clark (1904) to<br />

exclude those beds now assigned to the Rlagothy. <strong>The</strong> Raritan formation<br />

consists chiefly <strong>of</strong> alternating layers <strong>of</strong> sand and clay. <strong>The</strong> clays are<br />

<strong>of</strong> various colors from nearly white to steel-blue, red and black; some<br />

beds are sandy and at times considerable quantities <strong>of</strong> pyrite and lignite<br />

are included. Some <strong>of</strong> the sands are nearly pure quartz, while others<br />

are micaceous, liguitie or arkosic.<br />

In Middlesex County, the Raritan formation has been divided into<br />

seven beds but it is probable that they are rather local in distribution.<br />

<strong>The</strong> older and newer termiuologies are given below:<br />

Kummel and Knapp, 1904 Barksdale, et al, 1943<br />

7. Amboy Stoneware Clay Amboy stoneware clay (top)<br />

6. Sand Bed No. 3 Old Bridge sand member<br />

5. South Anlboy Fire Clay South Amboy fire clay<br />

4. Feldspar-Kaolin Sand Bed Sayreville sand member<br />

3. Woodbridgc clay Woodbridge clay<br />

2. Fire Sand No. 1 Farrington sand member<br />

1. Raritan Fire and Terracotta Raritan fire clay (bottom)<br />

(Potter's) Clay<br />

In the vicinity <strong>of</strong> Raritan Bay, the Raritan formation can easily be<br />

distinguished from the overlying Magothy, but this separation is much<br />

more difficult farther to the southwest. Consequently many geological<br />

maps combine the two formations.<br />

-<br />

'This chapter L, partly adapted from WeUer (1901). Lewb md Kumrnel (1940). S~anslcr<br />

and Petenon (19501 and Johnson and Richard. (1962).<br />

NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!