02.04.2013 Views

NJGS - Bulletin 61-I. The Cretaceous Fossils of NJ - State of New ...

NJGS - Bulletin 61-I. The Cretaceous Fossils of NJ - State of New ...

NJGS - Bulletin 61-I. The Cretaceous Fossils of NJ - State of New ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18 CRETACEOUS FOSSILS<br />

it is possible that it is slightly older than the typical Red Bank (Oroot,<br />

Organist and Richards, 1954 p. 29). <strong>The</strong> Red Bank formation is, in part,<br />

the "red sand" <strong>of</strong> earlier writers.<br />

Tinton bed. Beds <strong>of</strong> green clayey and sandy glauconitic marl from<br />

10 to 20 feet in total thickness overlie the Red Bank in hfonmouth<br />

County. <strong>The</strong>se beds are frequently well indurated. <strong>The</strong>y were named<br />

by Weller (1904, p. 159) from Tinton Falls, N. J. <strong>The</strong> United <strong>State</strong>s<br />

Geological Survey regards the Tinton as a member <strong>of</strong> the Red Bank,<br />

but in view <strong>of</strong> faunal and lithological differences, the <strong>State</strong> Survey gives<br />

the Tinton formational rank.<br />

EOCENE. At the time that Weller prepared his report on'the<br />

<strong>Cretaceous</strong> fossils <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> Jersey the three next youngest formatione-the<br />

Hornerstolvn, Vineentown and Manasquan--were regarded as <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Cretaceous</strong> age and their faunas were discussed and illustrated in the<br />

1907 volume. Later, however, Cooke and Stephenson (1928) pointed out<br />

that the faunas <strong>of</strong> these three formations suggested an Eocene age.<br />

While there has been some difference <strong>of</strong> opinion regarding the exact correlation,<br />

most American writers have followed Cooke and Stephenson<br />

in placing the Hornerstown, Vincentown and Manasquan formations<br />

in the Tertiary.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Hornerstown, and to a lesser extent the Vincentown, contain species<br />

related to those <strong>of</strong> the Danian <strong>of</strong> Europe. Since the Danian is regarded<br />

by some as basal Paleocene and by others as uppermost <strong>Cretaceous</strong>,<br />

no convincing evidence for the age <strong>of</strong> these three formations<br />

can be reached by correlation with Europe.<br />

McLean (1952, 1953) beLieves that the foraminifera from the Vin=<br />

centown formation suggest a Paleocene age, but other workers have<br />

fa~rored a TVilcox age. <strong>The</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> the age <strong>of</strong> these three <strong>New</strong> Jersey<br />

formations is being studied by various workers and it is hoped that a<br />

more positive correlation can be worked out soon. Table 4 gives the<br />

correlation favored by the author.<br />

TABLE 4. Correlation <strong>of</strong> Eocene formations <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> Jersey with those<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Gulf Coast.<br />

NEW JERSEY GULF COAST<br />

Shark River Claiborne<br />

Manasquan Wilcox ( 9)<br />

Vineentown<br />

Midway (Paleocene)<br />

Hornerstown i<br />

Whatever be the age <strong>of</strong> the Hornerstown, it is apparent that it rests<br />

unconformably on the Tinton, Red Bank and Navesink formations progressively<br />

from northeast to southwest.<br />

Alternation <strong>of</strong> faunus. "<strong>The</strong> strata from the Magothy to the Tinton,<br />

inclusive, contain a complex assemblage <strong>of</strong> organisms with'two distinct<br />

facies. One <strong>of</strong> these, a Cucz~llaea fauna, characterizes the more glauconitic<br />

formations-the Iilerchantville, the Marshalltown, the Navesink, and the<br />

NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!