03.04.2013 Views

Fungi Fimicoli Italici - Mycosphere-online journal

Fungi Fimicoli Italici - Mycosphere-online journal

Fungi Fimicoli Italici - Mycosphere-online journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

vate ascospores (with an equatorial groove<br />

bordered by two ridges), and no anamorph,<br />

Gymnascella an unappendiculate telaperidium,<br />

sometimes with intervals of thick-walled<br />

hyphae, ascospores smooth or with an equatorial<br />

groove or ridge and/or polar thickenings,<br />

and no or arthroconidial anamorphs, Gymnoascoideus,<br />

a reticuloperidium lacking appendages,<br />

smooth ascospores with a petaloid<br />

arrangement inside the asci, and an arthroconidial<br />

anamorph, Gymnoascus s.str., an appendiculate<br />

reticuloperidium, smooth asco-spores,<br />

and no anamorph.<br />

Von Arx (1986) stated that the presence<br />

or absence of a peridium and peridial appendages<br />

are inadequate to circumscribe genera in<br />

Gymnoascaceae, as some species can develop a<br />

normal peridium in natural conditions and<br />

completely lack it in subcultures. Starting from<br />

this assumption, he conceived Gymnoascus in a<br />

much broader sense than Currah (1985) and<br />

emended it, including Acitheca, Arachniotus,<br />

Gymnascella, and Gymnoascoideus in this<br />

genus. He also accepted Narasimhella with its<br />

often stipitate ascomata, unequally bivalvate,<br />

hyaline rather than pigmented ascospores, and<br />

asci not born from croziers.<br />

Although von Arx (1987) attempted a<br />

new classification of the Gymnoascaceae,<br />

based on ascospore morphology, Currah’s<br />

(1985) systematics was widely followed for<br />

many years and re-examined with the introduction<br />

of molecular techniques and phylogenetic<br />

studies.<br />

Unlike the assumption by Currah (1985,<br />

1994) that Gymnoascaceae are polyphyletic,<br />

data of Bowman et al. (1996) and Sugiyama et<br />

al. (1999) from small subunit rDNA genes<br />

sequences were consistent with a monophyletic<br />

descendance of this family.<br />

Subsequent studies (Sugiyama &<br />

Mikawa 2001, Sugiyama et al. 2002), based on<br />

large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences, confirmed<br />

the monophyletic nature of the Gymnoascaceae,<br />

but also proved that within a major<br />

clade, species are grouped in four subclades,<br />

Gymnascella is not monophyletic, and “the<br />

ascospore morphology and phylogenetic structure<br />

are incongruent”.<br />

These latest results have induced<br />

Lumbsch & Huhndorf (2007) to keep independent<br />

the genera accepted by Currah (1985) and<br />

380<br />

also include in Gymnoascaceae Narasimhella,<br />

Kraurogymnocarpa Udagawa & Uchiyama<br />

(1999), Mallochia Arx & Samson (1986), and<br />

Orromyces Sur & G.R. Ghosh (Ghosh & Sur<br />

1985). Kraurogymnocarpa and Mallochia have<br />

bivalvate, respectively aculeate-tuberculate and<br />

spiny ascospores, an atypical feature in Gymnoascaceae,<br />

the former has also a reticuloperidium<br />

with pointed appendages, the latter lacks<br />

peridial hyphae. According to Sigler et al.<br />

(1998) the monotypic Orromyces, with its<br />

pitted ascospores and spiralate peridial appendages<br />

is a synonym of Uncinocarpus queenslandicus<br />

(Apinis & R.G. Rees) Sigler in<br />

Onygenaceae.<br />

A phylogenetic analysis of the ITS region<br />

and 5.8S ribosomal DNA gene sequences (Solé<br />

et al. 2002) proved that the majority of collections<br />

isolated in pure culture, and classified by<br />

Currah (1985) and von Arx (1986) as Arachniotus,<br />

Gymnascella, Gymnoascoideus, Gymnoascus,<br />

and Narasimhella, forms a monophyletic<br />

clade. Molecular data, in combination<br />

with morphological features, supported the proposal<br />

to unify these taxa under the prior genus<br />

Gymnoascus, to which a key was also provided<br />

(Solé et al. 2002).<br />

After Solé et al. (2002), I conceive Gymnoascus<br />

in a broad sense, and under this name I<br />

classify my Italian collections of Gymnoascaceae.<br />

I also provide the following key to genera<br />

of Gymnoascaceae, and to species of Gymnoascus<br />

s.l. from Italy:<br />

1) Peridium a complete net of thick-walled<br />

hyphae (reticuloperidium) with pointed<br />

appendages ............................................ 2<br />

1*) Peridium of thin- or thick-walled hyphae.<br />

Appendages, when present, different in<br />

shape. Gymnoascus s.l. .......................... 3<br />

2) Ascospores aculeate-tuberculate, bivalvate<br />

......................... Kraurogymnocarpa<br />

2*) Ascospores smooth .................... Acitheca<br />

3) Peridium a complete net of thick-walled<br />

hyphae. Ascospores 3V.5–4 × 3.5–4 ×<br />

2.5–3 µm ................................................ 4<br />

3*) Peridial hyphae thin-walled (telaperidium),<br />

or thick-walled and forming an<br />

incomplete net (incompositoperidium).<br />

Ascospores larger .................................. 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!