03.04.2013 Views

Field emission scanning electron microscopy a high-resolution ...

Field emission scanning electron microscopy a high-resolution ...

Field emission scanning electron microscopy a high-resolution ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Clay Minerals (1997) 32, 197-203<br />

<strong>Field</strong> <strong>emission</strong> <strong>scanning</strong> <strong>electron</strong><br />

<strong>microscopy</strong> a <strong>high</strong>-<strong>resolution</strong> technique<br />

for the study of clay minerals in sediments<br />

J. M. HUGGETT AND H. F. SHAW<br />

Department of Geology, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, SW7 2BP, UK<br />

(Received 5 April 1996; revised 23 August 1996)<br />

ABSTRACT: The use of field <strong>emission</strong> <strong>electron</strong> <strong>microscopy</strong> for the study of clay mineral<br />

petrography in mudrocks and sandstones is discussed. The methodology including sample<br />

preparation is outlined and three examples of the application of the technique are described: the<br />

formation of authigenic illite in mudrocks, the multiple generation of authigenic illites in sandstones<br />

and the effects of KC1 drilling muds on shale fabrics. In the study of authigenic illite formation in<br />

Palaeocene mudrocks from the North Sea, the FESEM analyses have demonstrated the formation of<br />

illites with increasing burial depth that conventional SEM and XRD analyses had failed to show. The<br />

FESEM analyses of the authigenic illites in Carboniferous sandstones from the southern North Sea<br />

revealed at least three different habits representing different generation episodes rather than one illite<br />

formation event.This has important repercussions with regard to the interpretation of stable isotope<br />

and dating data for the illites. Significant petrographic changes in shales after treatment with KCI<br />

drilling muds have been observed from FESEM analyses, suggesting reactivity between the shales<br />

and the KC1 muds.<br />

High-<strong>resolution</strong> field <strong>emission</strong> <strong>scanning</strong> <strong>electron</strong><br />

<strong>microscopy</strong> (FESEM) is achieved through use of a<br />

field <strong>emission</strong> gun (FEG) in place of the more<br />

conventional tungsten hairpin or LaB6 filaments. A<br />

<strong>resolution</strong> of 0.5 nm has been achieved under ideal<br />

conditions and 5 nm is regularly achieved at 30 kV<br />

with conducting materials (Fig. 1). However, with<br />

insulating materials such as rocks this figure is<br />

closer to 50 nm. The amount of clay data which can<br />

be acquired using back-scatter or conventional<br />

secondary <strong>electron</strong> imaging techniques is limited<br />

by the <strong>resolution</strong> of such instruments. For clay<br />

mineral studies the optimal <strong>resolution</strong> is 0.5 p.m for<br />

back-scattered <strong>electron</strong> <strong>microscopy</strong> (BSEM) or 2.5<br />

nm for conventional secondary <strong>electron</strong> <strong>microscopy</strong><br />

(CSEM) compared with 0.5 nm for FESEM (Table<br />

1). Good quality photomicrographs can be obtained<br />

at a magnification of x 2,000 for BSEM, x 5,000<br />

for CSEM and x 30,000 for FESEM. In favourable<br />

circumstances (i.e. observations of electrically<br />

conducting materials rather than rock samples),<br />

9 1997 The Mineralogical Society<br />

photomicrographs of acceptable quality can be<br />

obtained at x 15,000 magnification for CSEM<br />

and 50,000 for FESEM. In view of the <strong>high</strong>-<br />

<strong>resolution</strong> imaging offered by FESM observations,<br />

it is surprising that FESEM has not been more<br />

widely adopted for the petrographic analysis of fine<br />

grained rocks.<br />

METHODOLOGY<br />

A field <strong>emission</strong> gun produces an <strong>electron</strong> beam<br />

with an extremely <strong>high</strong> current density, obtained by<br />

applying an intense electric field to a tungsten<br />

single crystal with a needle-shaped tip. Unlike the<br />

conventional thermal <strong>emission</strong> gun this requires<br />

ultra <strong>high</strong> vacuum (10 -1~ Torr). The FEG is often<br />

referred to as the <strong>high</strong> brightness gun because the<br />

<strong>emission</strong> source for <strong>electron</strong>s is extremely small<br />

and because the number of <strong>electron</strong>s emitted per<br />

unit area is much greater than with other types of<br />

<strong>electron</strong> guns. This, together with the much


198 J. M. Huggett and H. F. Shaw<br />

50-<br />

(nm)<br />

~10<br />

"-I<br />

O<br />

03<br />

CE<br />

1 9<br />

W-hairpin filament<br />

LaBs<br />

FEG<br />

I I I I I I I<br />

5 10 15 20 25 30 35<br />

Accelerating voltage (kV)<br />

FIG. 1. Accelerating voltage vs. <strong>resolution</strong> for different types of <strong>electron</strong> source (JEOL, 1994).<br />

narrower range of emitted <strong>electron</strong> energies than is<br />

obtained with thermal <strong>emission</strong> guns, permits <strong>high</strong><br />

<strong>resolution</strong> at low kV (Fig. 1). The ability to work at<br />

low kV is particularly valuable for ultra-thin clay<br />

mineral particles which would appear to be<br />

'<strong>electron</strong> transparent' at <strong>high</strong> kV. For FESEM<br />

examination it is not always necessary to apply a<br />

conductive coating, particularly if working at very<br />

low kV, but for most clay work 10 kV is about the<br />

optimum and a conductive coating is preferred. The<br />

specimens should have either gold-palladium or<br />

platinum coatings of 30-40 nm thickness as the<br />

gold coating used in conventional SEM is too<br />

coarse and can be observed as a mosaic-like pattern<br />

on the sample surface thus obscuring morphological<br />

features. This is demonstrated by comparing the<br />

micrographs in Figs. 2 and 3. A Polaron 5000 series<br />

coater with a two minute coating time and normal<br />

FIG. 2. FESEM of chlorite-smectite in a Palaeocene mudrock. This sample was coated with gold rather than<br />

platinum and the mosaic-like pattern of the coating is clearly visible on all surfaces.


0<br />

e~<br />

9<br />

9<br />

e.<br />

9<br />

==<br />

9<br />

o<br />

e~<br />

9<br />

9<br />

e.<br />

.o<br />

.&<br />

e.<br />

o<br />

<<br />

e~<br />

.o<br />

Z<br />

<strong>Field</strong> <strong>emission</strong> <strong>electron</strong> <strong>microscopy</strong><br />

C) eq<br />

9 o<br />

0 o<br />

o<br />

~ 6<br />

o<br />

.~ o<br />

.~ .o<br />

r<br />

:><br />

r<br />

[I<br />

II<br />

g2<br />

9<br />

II<br />

199


200 J. M. Huggett and H. F. Shaw<br />

~l~tm<br />

Fro. 3. Micrographs of a Palaeocene mudrock succession, central North Sea. (A) BSEM of a mudrock buried to<br />

2 kin. Organic matter (black) and mica (e.g. arrow) define the laminated fabric. The diffuse matrix is<br />

predominantly clay, but individual particles are not resolved; (B) CSEM of same mudrock sample shown in (A);<br />

(C) FESEM image of the same sample as (B); (D) CSEM of mudrock buried to approximately 3 km; (E) FESEM<br />

image of the same sample as (D), showing 'illitic' overgrowths not visible at the lower magnification;<br />

(F) HRTEM lattice fringe image of illite plate with overgrowth shown in (E) nucleated at a dislocation site in the<br />

plate.


esistance at 20 mA, was used to provide the gold-<br />

palladium and platinum coatings.<br />

The <strong>electron</strong> microscopes used in our studies<br />

were a JEOL 6400F with an Oxford Instruments<br />

<strong>high</strong> purity germanium energy dispersive X-ray<br />

detector at the Centre for Microscopy and<br />

Microanalysis, University of Queensland, and a<br />

Hitachi $800 (without a microanalyser) at the<br />

Natural History Museum, London.<br />

EXAMPLES<br />

Authigenic illite formation in mudrocks<br />

Until recently, X-ray diffraction (XRD) has been<br />

the principal investigative tool in mudrock diagen-<br />

esis, with the result that identification of authigenic<br />

minerals has often been by inference rather than<br />

observation. Now, FESEM, BSEM, CSEM and<br />

<strong>high</strong>-<strong>resolution</strong> transmission <strong>electron</strong> <strong>microscopy</strong><br />

(HRTEM) have been used to examine Palaeocene<br />

mudrocks from a North Sea well, which have been<br />

buried to between 2 and 3 km (see Huggett, 1995).<br />

The XRD analysis of the clay fractions of these<br />

mudrocks indicates that they are composed<br />

predominantly of illite and illite-smectite, with<br />

minor kaolinite and chlorite. The composition of<br />

the illite-smectite is typically 40-50% smectite and<br />

is regularly interstratified. The texture and relation-<br />

ships between the matrix, silt-size grains and<br />

organic matter are best observed in BSEM images<br />

(Fig. 3a). However, from Fig. 3a it is clear that<br />

BSEM is inadequate to observe individual clay<br />

particles. At 2 km depth the clay comprises flakes<br />

with the ragged appearance typical of detrital clay<br />

in both CSEM (Fig. 3b) and FESEM images<br />

(Fig. 3c). At ~ 3 km depth the clay fabric appears<br />

indistinguishable in CSEM images from that seen at<br />

2 km (Fig. 3d). However, in FESEM images of<br />

samples at 3 km depth, wispy overgrowths on illitic<br />

clay particles are a ubiquitous, if minor, component<br />

of the mudrocks (Fig. 3e). The precise chemical<br />

composition of these particles is uncertain as the<br />

particles were too small for collection of X-ray<br />

spectra, though HRTEM lattice fringe images<br />

confirm that they are indeed illite overgrowths on<br />

platy particles (Fig. 3f). The FESEM examination<br />

of samples from intermediate depths indicates that<br />

there is an overall increase in the proportion of<br />

wispy clay overgrowths with depth. The FESEM<br />

analyses have thus revealed the formation of<br />

diagenetic illites in these mudrocks that increases<br />

<strong>Field</strong> <strong>emission</strong> <strong>electron</strong> <strong>microscopy</strong> 201<br />

with depth, which conventional XRD and SEM<br />

analysis had previously failed to show.<br />

Multiple generations (?) of authigenic fibrous<br />

illite in sandstones<br />

The FESEM examination of authigenic fibrous<br />

illite in Westphalian sandstones from wells in the<br />

southern North Sea has revealed the existence of at<br />

least three morphological types (Figs. 4a & b).<br />

Previous conventional SEM analysis of these<br />

samples had not revealed these variations in illite<br />

morphology. It is possible that these morphological<br />

variations represent different generations of illite<br />

formation. If this interpretation is correct, it could<br />

have important petrographic significance regarding<br />

authigenic illite formation. It could also affect the<br />

interpretation of K/Ar dating and stable isotope<br />

analyses of authigenic illite separates. Such<br />

analyses are made on the basis that the separated<br />

illites represent a single illite formation event in<br />

any one sample. The FESEM observations of the<br />

illites in the Westphalian sandstones show that there<br />

could be several illite formation events.<br />

Effects of KC1 drilling muds on shale fabrics<br />

The effects of KC1 drilling muds on a range of<br />

shales were examined during work carried out<br />

jointly with Eniricerche in Milan, Italy. Figures 5a<br />

and b show samples of a shale composed<br />

predominantly of detrital illite-smectite, examined<br />

before and after being reacted with KC1 drilling<br />

mud at 60~ for two weeks. One effect of the<br />

treatment is shown in Fig. 5b with small fibrous<br />

overgrowths on the platy illite-smectite particles.<br />

The composition of the fibrous overgrowths is<br />

uncertain, as they are too small to be analysed in<br />

situ or to be separated for XRD analysis. Small and<br />

co-workers have demonstrated how fibrous and<br />

platy illite can be grown experimentally in<br />

sandstones in the presence of K-beating solutions<br />

(Small et al., 1992; Small & Manning, 1993). Using<br />

these experimental data as a precedent, it seems<br />

possible that the KC1 muds might have interacted<br />

with the detrital illite-smectite to produce the<br />

fibrous (illitic?) clay overgrowths observed in the<br />

FESEM photomicrographs. However, all that can be<br />

reported here is the observation of these fibrous<br />

overgrowths and any interpretation of the processes<br />

leading to their formation can only be conjectural at<br />

this stage.


202 J. M. Huggett and H. F. Shaw<br />

FIc. 4. FESEM micrographs of illitic clays in Westphalian sandstones from the southern North Sea. (A) Spectrum<br />

of illite morphologies: A -- bladed illite; B -- composite bladed illite; C -- platy illite. Fibrous illite arrowed.<br />

(B) Detail of area adjacent to B in Fig. 4a showing bladed illite (I) and a later generation of cross-cutting fibrous<br />

illites (black arrow) and what appears to be tabular (coalesced plates?) morphologies (arrowed 2).<br />

FIG. 5. FESEM micrographs of a shale (A) before and (B) after treatment with KCI drilling fluid at 60~ for two<br />

weeks.


<strong>Field</strong> <strong>emission</strong> <strong>electron</strong> <strong>microscopy</strong> 203<br />

CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES<br />

In this paper we have attempted to demonstrate the<br />

usefulness of FESEM for the study of clay fabrics<br />

in sedimentary rocks. The better <strong>resolution</strong> of the<br />

FESEM gives it significant advantages over<br />

CSEM and BSEM for the detailed observation of<br />

clay fabrics. Apart from adding to our knowledge<br />

of the clay petrography, these more detailed<br />

observations can also influence how we interpret<br />

other types of clay data, e.g. the isotopic and K/At<br />

of illites.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

Work using the JEOL 6400F at the University of<br />

Queensland Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis<br />

was carried out by JMH during a visit funded by the<br />

British Council. Sue Barnes of the Natural History<br />

Museum (London) is thanked for assistance with the<br />

FESEM work done there. We should also like to thank<br />

Dr Luigi Cononico of Eniricerche SpA Milan and Dr<br />

John Berry for allowing us to use photomicrographs<br />

from their studies.<br />

Huggett J.M. (1995) Formation of authigenic illite in<br />

Palaeocene mudrocks from the Central North Sea: a<br />

study by <strong>high</strong> <strong>resolution</strong> <strong>electron</strong> <strong>microscopy</strong>. Clays<br />

Clay Miner. 43, 682-692.<br />

JEOL (1994) Multipurpose digital FE SEM. Product<br />

Information Document SM21.<br />

Mackinnon I.D.R. (1990) Introduction to <strong>electron</strong> beam<br />

techniques. Pp. 2-13 in: Electron-Optical Methods<br />

in Clay Science, CMS Workshop Lectures 2 (I.D.R.<br />

Mackinnon, editor) Clay Minerals Society, Boulder,<br />

Co., USA.<br />

Small J.S., Hamilton D.L. & Habesch S. (1992)<br />

Experimental simulation of clay precipitation within<br />

reservoir sandstones 2: mechanisms of illite forma-<br />

tion and controls on morphology. J. Sed. Pet. 62,<br />

520-529.<br />

Small J.S. & Manning D.A.C. (1993) Laboratory<br />

reproduction of morphological variation in petro-<br />

leum reservoir clays; monitoring of fluid composi-<br />

tion during illite precipitation. Pp. 181-212 in:<br />

Geochemistry of Clay-Pore Fluid Interactions<br />

(D.A.C. Manning, P.L.Hall & C.R. Hughes, editors)<br />

The Mineralogical Society Series No 4, Chapman &<br />

Hall.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!