05.04.2013 Views

SCOTTISH FREEMASONRY 1725-1810 ... - Lodge Prudentia

SCOTTISH FREEMASONRY 1725-1810 ... - Lodge Prudentia

SCOTTISH FREEMASONRY 1725-1810 ... - Lodge Prudentia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

view ignores the fact that the lodges composing the nascent Grand <strong>Lodge</strong> did<br />

not foresee the future expansion and popularity of Scottish freemasonry, nor did<br />

they consider the finer details of the style and content of masonic government.<br />

In any event, the invitations for the Grand Election which were sent on<br />

20 October suggest that there was a deliberate attempt to defend their unilateral<br />

decision to impose a structural and organizational hierarchy upon Scottish<br />

lodges. Kahler proposes that the founding four not only omitted other<br />

freemasons from the planning process, but they also failed to invite every known<br />

Scottish lodge. 53 The apparent justification for selective inclusion is that only<br />

“regular lodges” were to be included in the proceedings. 54 A mere twenty two<br />

days were allowed for the delivery and subsequent return of the invitations, thus<br />

reducing the number of lodges that might attend and possibly reject the idea of<br />

the Grand <strong>Lodge</strong>. 55 By 11 November 1736, only seven lodges had responded to<br />

the invitation. 56<br />

Four other lodges with surviving minutes for the year 1736 – No. 1(3)<br />

Aberdeen, No. 3 Scoon & Perth, No. 8 Journeymen Edinburgh, and No. 25 St<br />

Andrew – do not refer to the invitation or the subsequent formation of the Grand<br />

<strong>Lodge</strong>. Taking into consideration the relative non-existence of inter-lodge<br />

contact and the inefficiency of the eighteenth-century postal system, this lack of<br />

53 Kahler, “The Grand <strong>Lodge</strong> of Scotland,” 94.<br />

54 Ibid, 95. Kahler claims that the term “regular” is intentionally ambiguous and “it is possible<br />

that the lodges may have used it as an excuse to avoid inviting lodges they did not want to<br />

include,” Ibid.<br />

55 Acknowledgment of the invitation was expected by 11 November 1736.<br />

56 These lodges were Glasgow, Lanark, Greenock, Jedburgh, Melrose, Journeymen, and St<br />

Bride’s at Douglas. Ultimately, thirty-three lodges were present at its inception, although it is<br />

unclear as to how many of these actually received or acknowledged the invitation.<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!