06.04.2013 Views

BLACK TRUFFLE CULTIVATION AND COMPETING FUNGI - Inra

BLACK TRUFFLE CULTIVATION AND COMPETING FUNGI - Inra

BLACK TRUFFLE CULTIVATION AND COMPETING FUNGI - Inra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proceedings of the 7 th International Conference on Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products (ICMBMP7) 2011<br />

we observe very good results in truffle plantations established in large plains where there are<br />

cereals and vineyards cultivations without any oaks in hedge or woodlands near the plantations.<br />

Chemical fertilizers and soil fertility are not main factors to explain why some plantations cannot<br />

begin to trigger truffle production.<br />

After at least one century of agricultural abandonment, we observe many oak woodland<br />

surrounding truffle plantations. They have grown naturally and progressively. Nowadays, they<br />

are penalizing the truffle production. Their impact depends of the « contaminating reach » of the<br />

oaks (10 meters in average) and of the « power of contamination » of the oaks on the edge. If the<br />

oaks on the edge are grouped in woodlands, their power of contamination is stronger than if they<br />

are in hedge [15]. This situation underlines the necessity to build « truffle bastion » in order to<br />

keep all T. melanosporum strength (power = strength x number of producing truffle trees). In the<br />

heart of big truffle plantations, there is a “truffle bastion” protected against fungi coming from<br />

outside.<br />

The strength of the truffle is stated trough the concepts of « truffle virulence » or « truffle<br />

aggressiveness » which can be observed with “brûlés” spreading or gaining ground in good<br />

truffle plantations. In South-West of France, default of T. melanosporum “virulence” or<br />

“aggressiveness” is generally concomitant of 4 facts: 1) T. brumale is harvested instead of T.<br />

melanosporum, 2) T. melanosporum does not resist well during the drought, 3) truffle production<br />

has not durability in time (tree years in average in wild “truffières”), 4) harvest starts later in<br />

plantation after many years (as if there was an inertia to fruiting).<br />

After the characterization of the lack of the truffle virulence, we can propose the opposite<br />

arguments to define positive truffle virulence. Many experiences or trials are done at the Station<br />

of experimentation on the truffle at Cahors-Le Montat and in some truffle areas in France and<br />

abroad. For these trials, we study another factor which could be the impact of the domestic<br />

animals like sheep and horses. We had observations which involve these animals in exceptional<br />

truffle production fields. We can suggest an analogy with other mushrooms production: Agaricus<br />

campestris L. and Pleurotus eryngii (De Cand.:Fr.) Quélet need respectively in their grassland<br />

habitat cows and sheeps.<br />

We humbly recognize some explanations are still lacking. Why in 2006 (a good climatic<br />

year), the Lot district did produce 3 tons of truffles whereas its production was more that 300<br />

tons in 1906? This 100 factor seems to summarize this lost of “virulence” or “strength” of the<br />

black truffle. This decline is usually explained by the deterioration of the T. melanosporum<br />

ecosystem, consequences of changes in human activities, mainly agriculture, animal farming and<br />

forestry. With less traditional activity, oaks woodlands are more and more present with their<br />

fungi of forest ecology.<br />

Why is the black truffle less dominant than in the past, why does it defend less against its<br />

potential aggressors? This is the double question asked in the introduction. Does sick black<br />

truffle like other mushrooms suffer pathogen attacks like virus? This hypothesis is supported by<br />

some scientists [16] to explain the difficulty of truffle production. In this article, we favour that,<br />

during the abundance period, there were practices of mixed farming with organic matter<br />

restitution, biodiversity management. The rural world was entirely exploited and cultivated.<br />

Population density in the country was higher than today. Woodlands were rare and firewood was<br />

precious and collected. In limestone areas, landscapes were very open for the pioneer fungi like<br />

T. melanosporum: its “strength” or “virulence” was at the optimum. Furthermore, the harvesting<br />

pressure was lesser than nowadays, leaving in the soil a lot of truffle spores useful as natural<br />

inoculum. There were no inoculated controlled mycorrhized plants to sell and buy; nevertheless,<br />

there was an abundance of truffles.<br />

Section:<br />

Mycorrhizal mushrooms<br />

527

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!