Download a PDF version of this article here - Flames of War
Download a PDF version of this article here - Flames of War
Download a PDF version of this article here - Flames of War
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Dacians<br />
A LOOk AT ThE LAST GREAT CONqUEST Of ROME By Paul Leach<br />
The Dacians have the dubious honor <strong>of</strong> serving as one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the last great conquests <strong>of</strong> Rome by none other<br />
than Emperor Trajan.<br />
His campaign memoirs are lost to us, but<br />
his famous column gives us a glimpse<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Dacians as they struggled against<br />
the might <strong>of</strong> the empire: siege weapons<br />
defend their forts, some warriors use<br />
scythe-bladed weapons, and their capped<br />
leaders would not look out <strong>of</strong> place in<br />
Persian steles. Greco-Roman writers shed<br />
limited light on <strong>this</strong> barbarian people<br />
who don’t quite fit the classical barbarian<br />
mold. Who were these Balkan tribes that<br />
doggedly fought against the Romans at<br />
the turn <strong>of</strong> the 2nd Century?<br />
ORIGINS<br />
The Dacians were an ancient people <strong>of</strong><br />
the Balkans region, concentrated in the<br />
northern and western areas <strong>of</strong> modern<br />
Romania. They, along with their Getae<br />
cousins, descended from the Gáva-<br />
Holihrad culture that emerged around the<br />
Carpathians after 1,000 BC. Celtic tribes<br />
proved a dominant influence upon the<br />
Dacians, especially during their zenith <strong>of</strong><br />
the 4th through 2nd Centuries BC, and so<br />
did the Sarmatians that migrated to the<br />
European limits <strong>of</strong> the eastern Greco-<br />
Roman world. Of course, other ethnic<br />
groups left their marks, including Greek<br />
and Thracian merchants and adventurers.<br />
The Hellenistic kingdom <strong>of</strong> Pontus,<br />
followed by the Roman Empire, brought<br />
about significant alterations to Dacian<br />
society, at least in regards to how the elite<br />
lived and governed in the two centuries<br />
before the complete demise <strong>of</strong> the Dacian<br />
kingdom in 106 AD.<br />
The Dacians were long believed to share<br />
deep roots with the Thracians, according<br />
to the earliest classical sources. Some<br />
modern studies wholeheartedly disagree<br />
Above: Dacians rush forward, falxes swinging overhead, to crash into the disciplined ranks <strong>of</strong> Roman Legionaires.<br />
with <strong>this</strong> assertion, even disputing that<br />
the Dacians spoke a Thracian dialect.<br />
Iranian elements appear in some place<br />
names and other words, but as the<br />
Dacians left no written records and the<br />
ancient ethnographers lack complete<br />
credibility in <strong>this</strong> matter, <strong>this</strong> issue<br />
remains unresolved.<br />
MATERIAL CULTURE<br />
The Dacians lived as agriculturists,<br />
raising animals and growing crops.<br />
Their economy benefited from extracting<br />
mineral wealth such as iron, salt, silver,<br />
and gold. While little gold has been<br />
found in archeological finds, Trajan<br />
reportedly captured an unbelievable<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> it upon the final conquest <strong>of</strong><br />
the Dacian kingdom. Their villages were<br />
little different from other contemporary<br />
European barbarian tribes, mostly<br />
consisting <strong>of</strong> wood-framed huts. Local<br />
sources manufactured the typical<br />
domestic accessories, such as pottery,<br />
utensils, and tools.
The Tropaeum Traiani is a monument built in 109 in then<br />
Moesia Inferior, to commemorate Roman Emperor Trajan’s<br />
victory over the Dacians, in 101, in the Battle <strong>of</strong> Tapae. The<br />
monument was erected on the place w<strong>here</strong> legio XXI Rapax<br />
had previously been crushed (92 AD).<br />
The power centers <strong>of</strong> the Dacian elite<br />
reflected strong relationships with the<br />
great states <strong>of</strong> their day. Most visibly<br />
<strong>this</strong> took shape in the form <strong>of</strong> stonework<br />
citadels and temples, erected in strategic<br />
river valleys and built in Hellenstic<br />
styles. Imported Greek goods and coins<br />
(likely from Black Sea tributary cities)<br />
circulated to these strongholds during<br />
the reign <strong>of</strong> the 1st Century BC Dacian<br />
king Burebista, and noticeable trade<br />
with Rome began around that time as<br />
well. The last half <strong>of</strong> the next century<br />
witnessed an increased influx <strong>of</strong> Roman<br />
coins, tools, and craftsmen, especially<br />
when the Dacians fell solidly within the<br />
orbit <strong>of</strong> the empire as a client state.<br />
SOCIETy AND RELIGION<br />
Two classes ruled the Dacians: the<br />
Tarabostes and the Capillati (also known<br />
as Pileati and Comati, respectively).<br />
The higher-ranked Tarabostes derived<br />
their name from the headpieces they<br />
wore, presumably both ornate helms and<br />
Phrygian caps. The Capillati name means<br />
‘long hair’. As the ancient sources only<br />
mention the two elite strata, it has been<br />
argued that they may be the only ‘true’<br />
Dacians.<br />
The Tarabostes exercised control from<br />
the wealthy regional/tribal centers and<br />
populated the limited ranks <strong>of</strong> royalty<br />
and priests. They closely linked temporal<br />
and religious power. The high priests<br />
maintained some measure <strong>of</strong> independent<br />
authority from (if not over) the nobility,<br />
including kings. They worshipped<br />
Zamolxis, a resurrected earth (or earthly)<br />
deity and believed in the immortal soul.<br />
The religion’s tenets espoused a purified<br />
lifestyle that allegedly proscribed the<br />
consumption <strong>of</strong> meat and wine. While the<br />
greater Dacian population might not have<br />
been monotheistic ad<strong>here</strong>nts <strong>of</strong> Zamolxis,<br />
documentary and archaeological<br />
evidence suggests his cult enjoyed state<br />
sponsorship and the uppermost classes<br />
set themselves apart spiritually as well as<br />
materially.<br />
The Capillati supervised “those<br />
who work with oxen,” according to<br />
Trajan’s physician, Kriton. Most likely<br />
these lesser Dacian elite were village<br />
chieftains, and possibly pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
warriors.<br />
ThE DACIANS AT WAR<br />
The Dacian arsenal is best known<br />
for the falx, a curved blade set into<br />
a wooden handle. Some were small<br />
enough to be wielded in one hand, but<br />
On the monument t<strong>here</strong> were 54 metopes (two pictured<br />
above) depicting Roman legions fighting against enemies;<br />
48 <strong>of</strong> these metopes are now preserved in the museum<br />
nearby. The monument was erected as a warning to the<br />
tribes outside <strong>this</strong> newly conquered province.<br />
the intimidating monsters were large<br />
blades with 3’ handles, akin to some<br />
kind <strong>of</strong> polearm. The terrible falx could<br />
understandably deliver vicious blows<br />
against even well-armored legionaries.<br />
It has long been believed that Trajan’s<br />
soldiers attempted to better defend<br />
themselves against <strong>this</strong> weapon by<br />
attaching ad hoc reinforcements to<br />
their helmets and adapting gladiator<br />
‘manicae’ (overlapping metal bands<br />
protecting the length <strong>of</strong> the arm) for<br />
military use. Recent reinterpretation <strong>of</strong><br />
archaeological evidence in other parts <strong>of</strong><br />
Europe suggests its use was not limited to<br />
Rome’s last wars with Dacia.<br />
The Dacians also used draco standards,<br />
most likely inspired by their Sarmatian<br />
neighbors. Open-mouthed metal-headed<br />
beasts (such as wolves and dragons)<br />
rested upon wooden poles, with<br />
windsocks attached to their backs. The<br />
Roman army utilized similar devices in<br />
later centuries.<br />
The Dacians defended their forts with<br />
bolt-throwing scorpions, captured or<br />
otherwise, during Trajan’s campaigns<br />
(and possibly earlier). Other Roman<br />
arms and equipment made their way into<br />
Dacian hands as well.
Above: Dacia and some <strong>of</strong> the surrounding Roman provinces, circa 100 AD.<br />
ThE AGE Of BUREBISTA<br />
The Dacian kingdom reached its height<br />
just prior to the middle <strong>of</strong> the 1st<br />
Century BC, coinciding with collapse<br />
<strong>of</strong> Mithradates Eupator’s Pontic realm<br />
and the ascension <strong>of</strong> its greatest ruler,<br />
Burebista. Positioned at the edge <strong>of</strong><br />
Greco-Roman world, the Dacian king<br />
took advantage <strong>of</strong> the power vacuum<br />
left by the Pontic state and assumed<br />
control <strong>of</strong> Greek cities on the western<br />
coasts <strong>of</strong> the Black Sea. Based on the<br />
archeological evidence mentioned<br />
previously, he assumed the role <strong>of</strong> Asian<br />
Hellenistic royalty - a King <strong>of</strong> Kings. To<br />
be sure, Burebista aggressively pursued<br />
all that such a title implied, engaging in<br />
diplomatic and martial conquests well<br />
beyond the Dacian heartland during his<br />
reign. His rule stretched as far east as the<br />
Dnieper River in southern Russia, as far<br />
west as Moravia, and - just possibly -<br />
as far north as the Vistula River in<br />
southern Poland.<br />
Burebista’s aggressive policies touched<br />
the Roman world on several occasions.<br />
Through the subject Bastarnae tribe <strong>of</strong><br />
the northeast Balkans, he successfully<br />
competed against Roman attempts to grab<br />
Histria, one <strong>of</strong> the Mithradates’ orphaned<br />
cities, in 61 BC. He also warred against<br />
the Celtic tribes on his northwestern<br />
reaches. Most he conquered, but the Boii<br />
joined the Helvetians in their exodus to<br />
Gaul, which initiated Caesar’s Gallic<br />
<strong>War</strong>s. Burebista wielded enough strength<br />
that Pompey sought his friendship during<br />
the Civil <strong>War</strong>s and Caesar planned an<br />
expedition against the fractured Dacian<br />
kingdom after Burebista’s death during<br />
an uprising in 45 BC.<br />
DACIA AND ThE EARLy<br />
ROMAN PRINCIPATE<br />
The rebellion that claimed Burebista’s<br />
life broke the core <strong>of</strong> the Dacian kingdom<br />
into four or five smaller kingdoms and<br />
the farthest reaches <strong>of</strong> the old kingdom<br />
slipped away. This did not mean that the<br />
Dacians and Romans ended their mutual<br />
Balkan affairs. Octavius sought an<br />
alliance with the Dacian king Cotiso prior<br />
to his assumption <strong>of</strong> the imperial title,<br />
but declared a more adversarial attitude<br />
towards the Dacians <strong>of</strong>f and on during<br />
his 40-year reign. The Dacians and<br />
Bastarnae suffered defeat at the hands <strong>of</strong><br />
Crassus the Younger, one <strong>of</strong> Augustus’<br />
political rivals, in 29 BC. The Romans<br />
victoriously fought against them again<br />
in the Pannonian <strong>War</strong> (13-11 BC), and<br />
reportedly settled 50,000 Dacians within<br />
Roman territory after a major campaign<br />
in 11-12 AD.<br />
Above: The Dacians fought hard against the Roman invaders in 101 AD, staving <strong>of</strong>f Trajan and his desire for personal glory.
The Dacians enjoyed mostly peaceful<br />
relations with the empire for the next<br />
70 years, benefiting from an increase in<br />
imported Roman goods. The Sarmatian<br />
Iazyges complicated things for all<br />
parties, warring against and allying<br />
with both the Romans and Dacians at<br />
different times. The Dacian kingdom<br />
retrenched in Transylvania before the<br />
middle <strong>of</strong> the century, about 40 AD. To<br />
Rome’s relief, they declined to interfere<br />
in the imperial wars <strong>of</strong> succession that<br />
originated in Nero’s death in the Year <strong>of</strong><br />
Four Emperors (69 AD), although they<br />
couldn’t but help themselves to minor<br />
raiding in Moesia.<br />
ThE AGE Of DECEBAL<br />
Decebal was the last great Dacian king.<br />
He came to power at the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />
Domitian’s Dacian wars in the mid/late<br />
80s and he fell with his kingdom 20 years<br />
later to Trajan. Roman historian Cassius<br />
Dio lauded Decebal for his diplomatic<br />
and strategic talents. The wily king<br />
managed to keep his power despite long<br />
odds and refused to let Rome humiliate<br />
him in its final triumph.<br />
Emperor Domitian began his war against<br />
King Duras and the Dacians in response<br />
to their spectacular plundering <strong>of</strong> Moesia<br />
in 86 AD (they even slew the provincial<br />
governor in battle). Cornelius Fuscus,<br />
the Praetorian Guard commander,<br />
successfully led the Roman army in its<br />
restorative operations in the devastated<br />
province, completely repelling the raiding<br />
warbands. In the wake <strong>of</strong> their reverses in<br />
Moesia, Duras stepped down and Decebal<br />
took the Dacian kingship and prepared<br />
for the inevitable punitive campaign even<br />
as he dispatched embassies to negotiate<br />
peace.<br />
The Romans invaded Dacia nevertheless,<br />
and the armies decisively clashed at<br />
a mountain pass in 87 AD. Decabal’s<br />
showdown with Fuscus ended<br />
disastrously for the Romans. The Dacians<br />
inflicted massive casualties (including<br />
Fuscus) on their enemy, and captured<br />
many prisoners, standards, and weapons.<br />
The following year Tettius Julianus<br />
waged a promising campaign, defeating<br />
the Dacians at Tapae (in Transylvania).<br />
The Romans stopped short <strong>of</strong> absolutely<br />
conquering Dacia and turned their<br />
attention to the troublesome Sarmatians,<br />
Marcomanni, and Quadi. Rome accepted<br />
Dacia as a client state, re-establishing<br />
peace and a flow <strong>of</strong> gifts, goods, and<br />
skilled craftsmen.<br />
Despite his submission to Domitian,<br />
Decebal still stood in a position <strong>of</strong> power.<br />
Friendship with Rome rarely failed<br />
to elevate one’s status, and surely he<br />
benefited from his client status. Cassius<br />
Dio advises us that his onerous pride<br />
and receipt <strong>of</strong> Roman stipends provoked<br />
Top: The Dacians were one <strong>of</strong> the few “barbarian tribes” that employed war machines.<br />
Above: As the Second Dacian <strong>War</strong> drew to a close only small pockets <strong>of</strong> resistance held out.<br />
Trajan to war at the turn <strong>of</strong> the century.<br />
Considering the lack <strong>of</strong> threatening<br />
Dacian activity, the roots <strong>of</strong> Trajan’s<br />
wars against Decebal sprang more from<br />
his desire for personal glory and than a<br />
necessary defense <strong>of</strong> the empire.<br />
Trajan waged his first bloody war with<br />
Dacia in 101-102, and the second in<br />
105-106. Despite the harsh terrain and<br />
foes, the massive Roman army (and its<br />
many auxiliaries and mercenaries) fought<br />
until much <strong>of</strong> Dacia accepted Trajan’s<br />
authority and Decebal surrendered short<br />
<strong>of</strong> his removal and the destruction <strong>of</strong> his<br />
capital, Sarmizegethusa. The short-lived<br />
peace witnessed both side preparing for<br />
war again, and the following campaign<br />
saw the destruction <strong>of</strong> the Dacian capital<br />
and the transformation <strong>of</strong> the kingdom<br />
into another Roman province. Decebal<br />
committed suicide before his capture<br />
and Trajan displayed his head in the<br />
triumphal march in Rome.<br />
GAMING ROME’S DACIAN WARS<br />
The Dacians <strong>of</strong>fer a lot <strong>of</strong> interesting<br />
options to players who enjoy games<br />
that match Roman armies against<br />
barbarian opponents. Seriously, how<br />
many <strong>of</strong> Rome’s tribal enemies normally<br />
employed siege artillery in their own<br />
defense? Any attempts to replicate<br />
Rome’s Dacian campaigns should include<br />
challenging elements such as rough/<br />
wooded terrain and fortifications, plus<br />
contingents <strong>of</strong> Sarmatian cavalry and<br />
other auxiliaries.
DACIAN ARMy LISTS<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> rulesets place the Dacians<br />
in some kind <strong>of</strong> ‘other’ category when it<br />
comes to interpreting how they should<br />
work on the tabletop. Essentially, most<br />
games focus on one or more <strong>of</strong> these<br />
attributes when it comes to differentiating<br />
them from other contemporary<br />
barbarians: weaponry, discipline, and<br />
adaptability.<br />
The famous Dacian falx sometimes<br />
assumes the role <strong>of</strong> a significant combat<br />
factor, usually meaning that players field<br />
at least one superior unit <strong>of</strong> warriors<br />
armed with the weapon. De Bellis<br />
Antiquitatis, <strong>War</strong>master Ancients, and<br />
<strong>War</strong>hammer Ancient Battles both note<br />
the falx in their army lists. The existence<br />
WARhAMMER ANCIENT BATTLES<br />
VARIANT DACIAN LISTS<br />
The Dacians appear as variant Barbarian armies in WAB,<br />
first under Mountain Tribesmen in the core rules, and in the<br />
Barbarian Tribes appendix <strong>of</strong> Armies <strong>of</strong> Antiquity. Units <strong>of</strong><br />
these light infantry warbands may be armed with falxes,<br />
which the rules equate with two-handed weapons or halberds.<br />
Neither list allows the purchase <strong>of</strong> siege artillery. With a few<br />
tweaks, players may create other playable <strong>version</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Dacian army. For example:<br />
• Players do not have to build entire units <strong>of</strong> falx-armed<br />
warriors, but may combine them with groups <strong>of</strong> infantry<br />
equipped with mixed weapons. Purchase shields, heavy<br />
<strong>of</strong> large Dacian formations strictly armed<br />
with falxes remains debatable, leaving<br />
the weapon’s impact on rules mechanics<br />
open to interpretation. The bow features<br />
prominently in many rules lists as well,<br />
usually in the hands <strong>of</strong> skirmishers.<br />
<strong>War</strong>master Ancients and <strong>War</strong>hammer<br />
Ancient Battles (WAB) both allow<br />
sizeable bodies <strong>of</strong> archers. Dacian army<br />
lists lack siege artillery in most game<br />
systems, with the notable exception <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>War</strong>master Ancients. Consider amending<br />
the unit rosters for scenarios in which<br />
the Dacians defend their homeland, and<br />
especially if they garrison fortifications.<br />
The most commonly addressed<br />
characteristic regards the Dacians’<br />
compatibility with the given game<br />
system’s warband rules, which typically<br />
give massed barbarian infantry an<br />
advantageous hard-charging shock value<br />
sometimes paired with tendencies toward<br />
compulsive moves and attacks. More<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten than not, the Dacians play the same<br />
as other barbarians in <strong>this</strong> respect for<br />
most miniature wargames. Some rulesets<br />
do not require the Dacians to make<br />
uncontrolled charges, differentiating them<br />
from other warband types.<br />
The Dacians fought well against the<br />
Roman armies that invaded their<br />
mountainous kingdom despite their<br />
eventual capitulation. Some rules handle<br />
them no differently from any other<br />
barbarian warband in rough ground and<br />
woods, while others treat them as light<br />
infantry types well-suited to such<br />
limiting ground.<br />
Above: The Dacians were very familiar with fighting in rough, forested terrain, the kind <strong>of</strong> terrain that broke up Roman formations.<br />
throwing spears, and javelins (+2 points per model).<br />
Note that no actual heavy throwing spears enter play,<br />
but their rules give the Dacians that extra punch.<br />
• Players may use up to 25% <strong>of</strong> the Dacian army points to<br />
purchase artillery, such as bolt throwers and catapults,<br />
in a siege scenario. This is WAB canon, per<br />
Siege & Conquest (p. 22).<br />
• Finally, players may use the Early Slavs list from the<br />
supplement Byzantium: Beyond the Golden Gate as a<br />
viable substitute. The Leadership values seem a bit low for<br />
the Dacians’ reputation, but the cavalry-to-infantry ratios,<br />
equipment options, and the Balkan Ruse special rule do much<br />
to commend its use.
COLLECTING A DACIAN ARMy<br />
Gamers and modelers do not need too<br />
look very hard to find miniature Dacians<br />
in a healthy range <strong>of</strong> scales, molded in<br />
metal and plastic (both s<strong>of</strong>t and hard).<br />
foundry, Old Glory, and <strong>War</strong>lord<br />
Games all market Dacian figures in<br />
25mm/28mm. foundry and <strong>War</strong>lord<br />
Games also include actual Dacian<br />
artillerists in their ranges, negating the<br />
need to supply stand-in or converted<br />
figures. Old Glory and Essex produce<br />
Dacian figures in 15mm. Magister<br />
Militum, Old Glory, and Pendraken<br />
mold them in 10mm, and Baccus 6mm<br />
has a Dacian range. haT Industries<br />
manufacture s<strong>of</strong>t plastic 1/72 scale<br />
Dacian figures. Collectors may obtain<br />
Sarmatian allies and foes as easily as they<br />
can purchase Dacian miniatures.<br />
Ancient Celt figures make great<br />
additions for a Dacian army. Their<br />
tribes not only existed at the edge <strong>of</strong><br />
the Dacian kingdom, but within it as<br />
well. Many tribal German miniatures<br />
pass can for rank and file Dacians so<br />
long as one avoids things that seem out<br />
<strong>of</strong> place (Suebian knots and fur jackets<br />
especially). A few Sarmatian infantry<br />
won’t spoil the look, either (Old Glory<br />
make them in 25mm/28mm scale). A<br />
good mix <strong>of</strong> appropriate miniatures<br />
stands to turn any Dacian army into a<br />
horde <strong>of</strong> barbarians that really sticks out<br />
on the table.<br />
CONVERSIONS<br />
Hard plastic miniatures brim with<br />
potential for easily creating awesome<br />
25mm/28mm Dacian characters equipped<br />
with Roman armor, shields, and weapons.<br />
PRIMARy SOURCES<br />
Cassius Dio (trans. Earnest Cary), Roman History (books<br />
67 & 68), Loeb Classical Library Harvard University Press,<br />
1914-1927<br />
Online public domain work: http://penelope.uchicago.edu/<br />
Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/home.html<br />
MODERN REfERENCES<br />
Gábor Vékony, Dacians-Romans-Romanians, Matthias<br />
Corvinus Publishing, Toronto-Buffalo, 2000 (Originally<br />
published by Akadémiai Kiadó/Budapest, 1989)<br />
Online English translation: http://www.hungarian-history.hu/<br />
lib/chk/index.htm<br />
This book critically sifts through ancient sources and<br />
modern studies <strong>of</strong> the Dacians, and presents some interesting<br />
thoughts on Berobista’s kingdom and its relation to the<br />
great Mithradates Eupator’s Pontic realm. It helps readers<br />
understand why the Dacian kingdom was much more than an<br />
exotic tribal confederation.<br />
Kimberly Kagan, Redefining Roman Grand Strategy, The<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Military History, Vol. 70, No. 2 (Apr., 2006), pp.<br />
It could not be any easier to plunder<br />
bits and pieces (including a helmeted<br />
head or two) for cherished leaders and<br />
champions. With a little work, one may<br />
draft Roman miniatures into their Dacian<br />
army. A suitably dynamic Roman <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />
figure only needs a piece <strong>of</strong> barbarian<br />
equipment to turn him into a chieftain or<br />
king: a Dacian head, possibly wearing a<br />
native cap or helmet; a falx or longsword;<br />
or a Dacian oval shield. Roman arms<br />
could make their way into Dacian<br />
hands through gifts, battle trophies, and<br />
deserters. <strong>War</strong>lord Games manufactures<br />
hard plastic Dacians, Celts, Early<br />
Imperial legionaries (some <strong>of</strong> the Veteran<br />
figures have manicae) and auxiliaries.<br />
<strong>War</strong>games factory <strong>of</strong>fer Caesarian<br />
legionaries, Early Imperial auxiliary<br />
cavalry, and Celts.<br />
These are some <strong>of</strong> Magister Militum’s 10mm Dacian<br />
range. Even at <strong>this</strong> small scale, the characteristic<br />
falx and s<strong>of</strong>t caps are clearly evident.<br />
In addition to their hard plastic Dacian <strong>War</strong>band, <strong>War</strong>lord Games also<br />
produces these great, metal Celtic Archers, perfect to use as Dacian allies.<br />
333-362, Society for Military History.<br />
Available online through JSTOR: http://www.jstor.org<br />
This <strong>article</strong> reviews and measures numerous military policies<br />
and actions <strong>of</strong> the Roman emperor, army, and state from<br />
a high-level perspective. It recommends that readers view<br />
Trajan’s campaigns against Dacia (as well as Mesopotamia)<br />
as wars <strong>of</strong> conquest and personal/imperial glory, as opposed<br />
to anything like a proactive defense against aggression or<br />
improved (easily guarded) boundaries.<br />
The Deva Museum <strong>of</strong> Dacian and Roman Civilization:<br />
http://museum.worldwidesam.net/index.html<br />
This interesting Romanian museum has a lot <strong>of</strong> online content<br />
for students <strong>of</strong> the period and wargamers. Of special interest<br />
is the virtual photographic and topographical map tour <strong>of</strong><br />
Dacian fortresses: http://museum.worldwidesam.net/en/<br />
sarmi/contents.htm