a psycholinguistic analysis on comprehension disorder - Digilib UIN ...

may be Hansen has a good talent in that sector, and then possible for him to get that
opportunity, it will be probably not a sudden deviation of one’s train of thought, but
in this utterance he uses the deviation statement in his response to his friends
conversation as in (1.6), in which it makes the addressee felt confused and strange
because it was unrelated with their topic.
The utterance in (data: 1) is caused by his hallucination. Because when he
looked to a Neilson’s tie, he saw sight which spouts on to the tie and he believed that
there were mathematical explanations for how bad that tie was, even thought it was
not actually present.
In this case, there are 4 utterances that are found in the dialog of the movie
which have the same type with the data above; they are data (8.2), (9.2), (14.2) and
(25.4).
Conversation 2:
Hansen : a thousand pardon. I simply assumed you were the waiter.
John Nash : Hansen. Honest mistake. Well, Martin Hansen. It is Martin, isn't it?
Hansen : Why, yes, John, it is.
John Nash : I imagine you're getting quite used to miscalculation. I've read your pre-prints...
Both of them. The one on Nazi ciphers, and the other one on non-linear equation, and I am supremely
confident that there is not a single seminal or innovative idea in either one of them. Enjoy your punch.
(data: 2)
(Chuckles)
John Nash, Bender and Neilson were conversing while drinking, and then
come Sol who comes late, he introduces him self to John Nash and greeted other
guests in the party. Martin Hansen also came toward them. Suddenly, Hansen asked a
glass for drink to John Nash, because he thought that he was a waiter. But John Nash
said that he was not a waiter, and then Hansen said that he simply assumed that he
46