06.04.2013 Views

Appendix E-6: Consultation - Part 1 - Loup Power District

Appendix E-6: Consultation - Part 1 - Loup Power District

Appendix E-6: Consultation - Part 1 - Loup Power District

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Loup</strong> River Hydroelectric Project April 13, 2012<br />

FERC Project No. 1256<br />

NUMBER COMMENT / COMMENT SUMMARY DISTRICT RESPONSE<br />

52<br />

53<br />

54<br />

55<br />

56<br />

57<br />

58<br />

59<br />

reduction in pallid sturgeon habitat.<br />

Project reductions in active channel area may affect pallid sturgeon habitats in two ways. Reduction in active channel area<br />

may affect the longitudinal distribution of habitats which in turn affect the presence or absence of species at large spatial<br />

scales (Rosenfeld 2003). Reductions in channel area may also reduce the lower Platte River's habitat capacity for a species<br />

which in turn affect species abundance (Rosenfeld 2003). These reductions in channel area may result in river segments<br />

that are unsuitable to pallid sturgeon, or suitability is so reduced that the river segment serves only as a migration corridor.<br />

The Project's removal of 24 percent of the sediment supply at the Project tailrace return could affect the development of<br />

channel sandbars and macroforms. Furthermore, the Project's release of clear water at the tailrace return would increase<br />

water clarity in the lower Platte River. The clear water returns would affect the pallid sturgeon which select for dark to<br />

very dark conditions, avoid areas of low turbidity, and have specialized physiological adaptations to turbid environments<br />

(Peters and Parham 2008b). The increase in water clarity would decrease habitat suitability and may increase predation<br />

pressure on individuals near the tailrace return (Peters and Parham 2008b).<br />

Project hydrocycling may also affect pallid sturgeon habitats.<br />

Elliot (2011) noted that deep water geomorphic classification (i.e., percent of deep water) was sensitive to discharge<br />

changes resulting from hydrocycling; therefore, it is reasonable to assume that hydrocycling similarly affects pallid<br />

sturgeon habitat.<br />

Service April 7, 2011, comments on the SISR identified Project hydrocycling effects to the connectivity to pallid sturgeon<br />

habitats.<br />

The most prominent Project effects to connectivity occur from February through June and in November. For certain<br />

months, Project effects to connectivity occur upstream to Study Site 4. These losses of connectivity at Study Site 3 could<br />

imply Project diversions potentially affecting pallid sturgeon habitat in the Platte River Bypass area. Project effects to<br />

habitat connectivity may reduce the capacity of the Platte River to support pallid sturgeon individuals. Reductions in<br />

habitat connectivity may also affect the spawning migration of pallid sturgeon in the Platte River between April and July<br />

when reproductive shovelnose and pallid sturgeon generally move upstream to spawn.<br />

It is likely that Project operations would not affect spawning behavior of the pallid sturgeon. DeLonay etal. (2009)<br />

identified potential long-term and short term cues for reproductive maturation and readiness to spawn. Day length is the<br />

likely long-term cue that is initiated months before a predictable spawning date. Of three potential short-term spawning<br />

cues (i.e., water temperature, discharge, day of year) water temperature is the most likely to affect the sensitivity of pallid<br />

sturgeon hormones, embryo development, and embryo survival. Since Project operations are not known to affect stream<br />

temperature in the Platte River, it is reasonable to conclude that Project operations would not affect spawning behavior.<br />

The Project may affect pallid sturgeon prey items by: a) flow and sediment-related effects to sustainability of habitats, b)<br />

flow and sediment-related effects to habitat quantity and quality, c) flow-related effects to habitat connectivity, and d)<br />

flow-related effects on primary production.<br />

Project reductions in channel area, reductions in suspended sediment, removal of sediment supply near the tailrace return<br />

may affect habitat quality and quantity of pallid sturgeon prey items.<br />

Project hydrocycling operations may affect habitat quality and connectivity of habitat for pallid sturgeon prey items.<br />

Project hydrocycling effects to primary production has been well documented. This effect would be realized for benthic<br />

invertebrates commonly consumed by juvenile pallid sturgeon as well as affecting small fishes commonly consumed by<br />

adults.<br />

University of Nebraska at Lincoln researchers have captured both stocked and wild pallid sturgeon upstream of the<br />

Elkhorn River confluence for all three sampling years and all three sampling time periods (i.e., spring, summer, and fall).<br />

Thus, implying that the Platte River provides habitat for the pallid sturgeon year round as opposed to providing seasonal<br />

habitat described in the DBA.<br />

12<br />

<strong>District</strong> analysis regarding this USFWS concern is included in Draft BA Section 6.3.2 and Section 6.3.9 (FLA <strong>Appendix</strong><br />

E-2).<br />

The USFWS’s definitive statement regarding clean water discharge impacts to the Platte River is speculative, not<br />

substantiated by associated turbidity sampling, and contrary to Project-specific study findings. Attachment B of the<br />

<strong>District</strong>’s November 23, 2011 response to USFWS Comment 3 on the Updated Study Report illustrates a lack of bed<br />

coarsening downstream of the Tailrace return: this suggests a lack of clear water, as clear water would result in bed<br />

coarsening. In addition, the <strong>District</strong> previously responded to a similar USFWS comments regarding sediment supply in,<br />

1) Attachment B of the <strong>District</strong>’s November 24, 2010 Response to Comments on the ISR (USFWS Comment 2 on<br />

Project Sediment-related Effects: Tailrace to North Bend) and 2) Attachment B, Pages 24 to 28 of the <strong>District</strong>’s May 11,<br />

2011 Response to Comments on the SISR.<br />

<strong>District</strong> analysis regarding this USFWS concern is included in Draft BA Section 6.3.2 and Section 6.3.9 (FLA <strong>Appendix</strong><br />

E-2).<br />

The <strong>District</strong> previously responded to a similar USFWS comment regarding the affects of hydrocycling on pallid<br />

sturgeon on Attachment B, Pages 13-16 of the <strong>District</strong>’s May 11, 2011 Response to Comments on the SISR.<br />

The <strong>District</strong> concurs with this USFWS conclusion.<br />

<strong>District</strong> analysis regarding this USFWS concern is included in Draft BA Section 6.3.8 and Section 6.3.9 (FLA <strong>Appendix</strong><br />

E-2).<br />

The <strong>District</strong>’s response to USFWC Comment No. 5 specifically addresses potential hydrocycling affects to the<br />

macroinvertebrate community of the lower Platte River.<br />

<strong>District</strong> analysis regarding this USFWS concern is included in Draft BA Section 6.3.2 and Section 6.3.9 (FLA <strong>Appendix</strong><br />

E-2).<br />

The reference to seasonal habitat has been removed from the Draft BA (FLA <strong>Appendix</strong> E-2).<br />

60 The Service cautions the use of angler-reported pallid sturgeon to determine the range of the species. The initial range of The <strong>District</strong> notes that the reference to angler reported sturgeon in the DBA is from Peters and Parham; which is a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!