06.04.2013 Views

Appendix E-6: Consultation - Part 1 - Loup Power District

Appendix E-6: Consultation - Part 1 - Loup Power District

Appendix E-6: Consultation - Part 1 - Loup Power District

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

number of areas that possess very limited or<br />

marginal habitat were not included in the<br />

survey. These sites have generally been<br />

surveyed in the past and it has been determined<br />

that there is a low likelihood of birds occupying<br />

them. They include some isolated sandpits and<br />

minor river systems, such as the Little Blue<br />

River. It is believed that inclusion of these areas<br />

would have had minimal impact on totals<br />

recorded during the 2006 Census.<br />

While it serves as a useful baseline, it is difficult<br />

to know whether the survey results represent the<br />

actual number of birds in Nebraska. While this<br />

year’s effort to determine detection probability<br />

is a positive step forward, there is perhaps the<br />

need to standardize other portions of the survey<br />

so that long-term inferences can be made from<br />

the data. This may be difficult, given<br />

Nebraska’s varied habitat types and the various<br />

methods (e.g. airboat, foot, canoe) used to<br />

survey areas. Standardization of some aspects<br />

would be useful, however, particularly when<br />

there are personnel changes.<br />

All survey participants deserve a great deal of<br />

credit for the effort and time that they put into<br />

the 2006 survey. <strong>Part</strong>icipants include: Kari<br />

Andresen, Diane Beachly, Mark Czaplewski,<br />

Kathy DeLara, Leslie Farnham, Kristy Hajny,<br />

Robert Harms, Michael Hart, Renae Held, Jim<br />

Jenniges, Joel Jorgensen, Justin King, Elizabeth<br />

Murray, Sean O’Brien, Dan Roberts, Soren<br />

Rundquist, Matt Schwartz, Robin Smith, Dugan<br />

Smith, Martha Tacha, Chris Thody, Gareth<br />

Welke, Erica Wilson, Gabriel Wilson, and<br />

Stephen Wilson.<br />

Comparison of Census Numbers 1<br />

1991 1996 2001 2006<br />

Total<br />

398 375 308 893 2<br />

Adults<br />

1 Missouri River data are included in all totals.<br />

2 This is the total from a single survey at each site; if more than<br />

one survey was conducted, we count only results from the first<br />

survey during the census window.<br />

Detectability Study<br />

Sites Included<br />

First<br />

Count<br />

Second<br />

Count<br />

Central Platte River, Sandy<br />

Channels/Johnson Pit<br />

6 6<br />

Central Platte (RM 230-235) 2 2<br />

Lower Platte River, Cullom<br />

(New Pit)<br />

0 0<br />

Lower Platte River,<br />

Plattsmouth Pit 1<br />

0 0<br />

Lower Platte River, Arps<br />

East Pit<br />

0 0<br />

Lower Platte River, Arps<br />

West Pit<br />

0 0<br />

Lower Platte River,<br />

Lux S&G 1<br />

6 6<br />

Lower Platte River, Western<br />

Fremont Pit 1<br />

6 5<br />

Lower Platte River, Ginger<br />

Cove Pit (Valley #11) 1 3 3<br />

Lower Platte River, Mallard<br />

Pit at Valley 1<br />

1 2<br />

Central Platte River, Central<br />

S&G, Grand Island<br />

0 0<br />

North Platte River, Lake<br />

McConaughy, Dam to Vans E<br />

North Platte River, Lake<br />

127 107<br />

McConaughy, Cedar View to<br />

W end<br />

North Platte River, Lake<br />

0 0<br />

McConaughy, S side Vans to<br />

W end<br />

3 33<br />

Elkhorn River, Central S&G<br />

Norfolk #92<br />

2 2<br />

Elkhorn River, Pilger S&G,<br />

Norfolk Pit<br />

0 0<br />

Central Platte River, Grigsby<br />

Pit<br />

7 4<br />

Lower Platte River, Dolezal<br />

Pit East<br />

0 0<br />

1 Replicate survey was conducted first (outside of Census<br />

window) so second survey was used to calculate official state<br />

total.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!