06.04.2013 Views

Hybrid rice in India.pdf

Hybrid rice in India.pdf

Hybrid rice in India.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Hybrid</strong> <strong>rice</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong><br />

Dr A S Hariprasad<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal Scientist<br />

Directorate of Rice Research<br />

Hyderabd-50030


Rice In <strong>India</strong><br />

• A Staple food crop that holds the key for<br />

food security (43%)<br />

• Occupies 44 M. ha (22% of cropped area)<br />

• Annual production of 99 M t<br />

• A source of livelihood for millions<br />

• Earns foreign exchange of Rs.12000 crores<br />

Rice is life for <strong>India</strong>ns


HYBRID RICE RESEARCH<br />

Systematic, goal oriented program <strong>in</strong>itiated by the ICAR<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1989, <strong>in</strong> collaboration with IRRI, through a national<br />

network.<br />

UNDP/FAO supported the program dur<strong>in</strong>g 1991-2002<br />

MRF support to fill the critical gaps s<strong>in</strong>ce 1996<br />

ICAR supported the programme under National<br />

Agricultural Technology Project (NATP) till 2005<br />

No fund<strong>in</strong>g support from 2005-09


Karjat<br />

National <strong>Hybrid</strong> Rice<br />

Research Network<br />

Delhi, Pantnagar, Faizabad, Karnal,<br />

Kapurthala<br />

DRR, Hyderabad<br />

SRC & CC<br />

Mandya, Maruteru, Coimbatore<br />

Cuttack, Ch<strong>in</strong>sur<br />

ah


Effective L<strong>in</strong>kages<br />

IRRI UNDP<br />

MRF<br />

Seed Production<br />

Network<br />

ICAR<br />

Research<br />

Network<br />

FAO<br />

Technology Transfer<br />

Network


<strong>Hybrid</strong> Rice breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Approaches<br />

Three l<strong>in</strong>e or CMS system<br />

Two L<strong>in</strong>e or EGMS System<br />

One L<strong>in</strong>e or Apomixis


Steps <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hybrid</strong> Rice Development<br />

Test Cross Nursery<br />

Re-test Cross Nursery<br />

Observational Yield Trials<br />

Station Trials<br />

National Trials


Evaluation of <strong>Hybrid</strong>s<br />

IHRT<br />

AVT-1<br />

AVT-2<br />

Release


Evaluation of <strong>Hybrid</strong>s<br />

• Total hybrids evaluated : 2000<br />

• <strong>Hybrid</strong>s Released : 43<br />

• Public Sector hybrids : 28<br />

• Private Sector hybrids : 15<br />

• Central Releases : 20<br />

• State Releases : 23


<strong>Hybrid</strong> Released by CVRC<br />

Public Sector Private Sector<br />

KRH-2 PHB-71 (Pioneer) PA 6201 (Pro-Agro)<br />

Pusa RH-10 PA 6129 (Pro Agro) PA 6444 (Pro Agro)<br />

DRRH-2 RH-204 (Parry Monsanto) Ganga (Paras Co.)<br />

Sahyadri-4 Suruchi (Mahyco) JKRH-401 (JK Agri.)<br />

DRRH-3 GK 5003 (Ganga Kaveri) DRH 775 (Metahelix)<br />

HRI 157 (Pro Agro) PAC 835 (Advanta)<br />

PAC 837 (Advanta) NK-5251 (Syngenta)<br />

US 312 (Seed Works)


Popular hybrids grown <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Country<br />

KRH-2 PHB-71<br />

Pusa RH 10 Sahyadri<br />

PA-6201 JKRH-401<br />

PA- 6444<br />

In addition to these released hybrids 30-40<br />

truthfully labeled hybrids from private sector<br />

are be<strong>in</strong>g cultivated <strong>in</strong> the country.


Most adaptable high yield<strong>in</strong>g hybrids<br />

KRH-2<br />

PA 6444 PHB-71


First aromatic <strong>rice</strong> hybrid


<strong>Hybrid</strong> with medium slender gra<strong>in</strong> type<br />

DRRH-3<br />

Year DFF Yield Advantage (%)<br />

(kg/ha) over BPT 5204<br />

2005 103 5739 18<br />

2006 101 5539 20<br />

2007 98 6051 30<br />

Mean 101 5776 23<br />

DRRH-3<br />

BPT-5204


Promis<strong>in</strong>g hybrids identified <strong>in</strong> Multilocational trials<br />

(3 seasons; 125 locations)<br />

<strong>Hybrid</strong><br />

Mean Yield<br />

(t/ha)<br />

Yield Adv<br />

(t/ha)<br />

KRH-2 5.52 0.92<br />

PHB-71 5.35 0.73<br />

Sahyadri 5.29 0.67<br />

PA-6201 5.20 0.58<br />

NSD-2 5.17 0.56


1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Area under <strong>Hybrid</strong> Rice ('000 ha)<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


Enhancement of heterosis-<br />

different approaches<br />

Improvement of parental l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Exploitation of <strong>in</strong>ter sub- specific<br />

heterosis<br />

Two l<strong>in</strong>e breed<strong>in</strong>g


Development of Restorers<br />

Cross Number of l<strong>in</strong>es Freq. of R<br />

(%)<br />

Developed Tested<br />

R x R 350 150 63<br />

R x R x R 160 105 58<br />

R x PR 480 250 41<br />

R x (PR x R) 140 90 52<br />

R x (PR x PR) 135 80 39<br />

Promis<strong>in</strong>g R-l<strong>in</strong>e


Type of<br />

cross<br />

Development of ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ers<br />

Number of l<strong>in</strong>es Freq.<br />

Developed Tested<br />

of B (%)<br />

B 1 x B 2 405 200 65<br />

B 1 x PM 150 75 40<br />

B 1x(B 2xB 3) 135 60 56<br />

B 1x(PM x B 2) 120 70 48<br />

B 1x(PM 1<br />

xPM 2)<br />

115 55 41<br />

B 1 x PM//PM 126 40 35<br />

Promis<strong>in</strong>g B-l<strong>in</strong>e


Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er<br />

L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Development of CMS l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

CMS<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Days to<br />

maturity<br />

Stigma<br />

Exsertion (%)<br />

Out cross<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(%) on<br />

A l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

B l<strong>in</strong>e A L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

MI. 15-1-8-1-3 DRR 4A 126 32 84 62<br />

MI. 15-4-3-1-1-4 DRR 5A 132 30 86 65<br />

MI. 15-5-5-2-3 DRR 6A 140 36 79 59<br />

MI. 15-5-3-5-2 DRR 7A 145 25 90 68<br />

SC 5 113-1 DRR 8A 131 24 80 57<br />

MI. 15-1-10-1-1 DRR 9A 132 34 85 69


High Stigma exsertion <strong>in</strong> new CMS l<strong>in</strong>es


Gene pools developed<br />

Population No. of l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Restorer Population<br />

Added Developed<br />

DRCP 101 12 125<br />

DRCP 102 10 115<br />

DRCP 103 14 110<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er population<br />

DRCP 104 08 70<br />

DRCP 105 10 90<br />

DRCP 104 08 70


Magnitude of heterosis <strong>in</strong> Rice<br />

Indica x japonica<br />

Indica x javanica<br />

japonica x javanica<br />

<strong>in</strong>dica x <strong>in</strong>dica<br />

japonica x japonica


Why two-l<strong>in</strong>e breed<strong>in</strong>g?<br />

• An alternative to three-l<strong>in</strong>e system—to exploit hybrid<br />

vigour (Yuan, 1998).<br />

• Risk <strong>in</strong> excessive dependence on s<strong>in</strong>gle source of<br />

CMS WA based.<br />

• Seed Production most difficult and laborious.<br />

• Parental l<strong>in</strong>e development/improvement-most<br />

cumbersome.<br />

25


TGMS and two-l<strong>in</strong>e hybrid<br />

Based on the<br />

discovery of<br />

P(T)GMS mutant<br />

Male sterility<br />

controlled by 1 or 2<br />

pairs of recessive<br />

gene(s)<br />

Temperature<br />

high<br />

low<br />

Sterile<br />

F1 Seed<br />

Production<br />

Partial Sterility<br />

Fertile<br />

S-l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Multiplication<br />

Reproductive Upper Limit<br />

Critical Sterility Po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Critical Fertility Po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Reproductive Lower Limit<br />

Model of Sterility / Fertility Expression for TGMS Rice


<strong>Hybrid</strong> Resistant Tolerant<br />

KRH-1 - Blast<br />

DRRH-1 Blast<br />

KRH-2* Blast, -<br />

Sheath rot<br />

Sahyadri - BLB<br />

NSD-2* Blast, BLB, Sheath rot<br />

PHB-71* - Blast, BLB, BPH<br />

PA-6201 Blast BPH<br />

HRI-120* Blast, BLB, Sheath rot, BPH,<br />

(6444) WBPH Gall midge<br />

Pusa RH-10* BLB, BPH<br />

RH-204* BPH, WBPH<br />

* <strong>Hybrid</strong>s hav<strong>in</strong>g multiple resistance


<strong>Hybrid</strong> <strong>rice</strong> Seed Production


<strong>Hybrid</strong> Rice Seed Production package<br />

<strong>Hybrid</strong> seed production<br />

activity generates<br />

additional employment<br />

of 65 person days/ha<br />

and most of them are<br />

women.<br />

Activity<br />

Seed Rate<br />

Nursery<br />

Row ratio<br />

Number of<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs/hi<br />

Spac<strong>in</strong>g<br />

GA 3<br />

Application<br />

Supplement<br />

ary<br />

poll<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Rogu<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Seed yield<br />

Seed Parent : 15 kg/ha Pollen Parent : 6 kg/ha<br />

Sparse seedl<strong>in</strong>g (30 g/m2 ) to ensure multi tillered (4-5)<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> 25 days<br />

2B : 8A for CMS multiplication<br />

2R : 10 A for hybrid seed production<br />

2 seedl<strong>in</strong>gs/hill for seed parent<br />

3 seedl<strong>in</strong>gs/hill for pollen parent<br />

Male : Male – 30 cm; Male : Female – 20 cm<br />

Female : Female – 15 cm ; Plant : Plant – 15 cm<br />

45-60 g/ha <strong>in</strong> 500 lit of water at 5% head<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> two<br />

split doses on consecutive days<br />

Two-three times a day at peak anthesis dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

flower<strong>in</strong>g phase<br />

Twice dur<strong>in</strong>g vegetative phase based on morphological<br />

characters<br />

1.5-2.0 t/ha<br />

Particulars


Southern Region<br />

Region<br />

Eastern<br />

UP, Bihar, Jharkhand, Chhattisgar<br />

h, Punjab and Haryana<br />

North-western and western<br />

Region<br />

Approximate area : 13,00,000 ha<br />

Percentage<br />

80<br />

15<br />

05


Expected area coverage under hybrid<br />

Year<br />

Area (m.<br />

hectare)<br />

<strong>rice</strong><br />

<strong>Hybrid</strong> seed<br />

required (‘000 t)<br />

Area required for<br />

hybrid seed<br />

production (‘000 ha)<br />

2007 1.1 17 11<br />

2008 1.4 21 14<br />

2009 2.0 30 20<br />

2010 2.5 37.5 25<br />

2011 3.0 45 30


Others (4)<br />

Maharashtra (8) Karnataka (8)<br />

AP Karimnagar<br />

& Warangal (80)<br />

Seed produced (Region wise)


<strong>Hybrid</strong> <strong>rice</strong> seed produced (2009)<br />

public<br />

3.2%<br />

private<br />

96.8%


Private sector seed companies with more than 100<br />

hectares of seed production (2009)<br />

1. Pro-Agro (Bayer Bio science) 19. PHB Biogene (Pioneer)<br />

2. Mahyco 20. Advanta <strong>India</strong><br />

3. Bioseed 21. Nath Seed Company<br />

4. Syngenta 22. Zuari Seeds Ltd.<br />

5. Ganga Kaveri Seed 23. Indo-American Seed<br />

6. Monsanto (<strong>India</strong>) Ltd. 24. Nuzuveedu Seeds<br />

7. J.K. Agri. Genetics Ltd. 25. Vikkis Agro-Tech Ltd.<br />

8. Nature’s Great Seed International Ltd. 26. Kaveri Seeds<br />

9. Shakti Seeds (P) Ltd. 27. Manisha Agri Biotech (P) Ltd.<br />

10. U.S. Agri-Genetics 28. Kanakadurga Seeds<br />

11. Hygene Seed Technologies 29. Vibha Agro-Tech. Ltd.<br />

12. Agro Seed Company 30. Star Agro-Tech Company<br />

13. Seed Tech Company 31. Chand <strong>Hybrid</strong> Seed Company<br />

14. Roh<strong>in</strong>i Seeds (P) Ltd. 32. EG Technologies<br />

15. Rallis <strong>Hybrid</strong> Seeds 33. Kesari Seeds<br />

16. Siri Seeds 34. Sriram Seeds<br />

17. A.P. Quality Seeds 35. Dhanya Seeds<br />

18. Maruthi Seeds Company 36. Delta Seeds Company


Public-Private Partnership MOUs with<br />

Private Seed Companies<br />

<strong>Hybrid</strong> Developed by<br />

MOU with no.<br />

of companies<br />

DRRH-2, DRRH-3 DRR, Hyderabad 11<br />

Pusa RH-10 IARI, New Delhi 15<br />

PSD-1 & 3 GBPUAT, Pantnagar 01<br />

CORH-3 TNAU, Coimbatore 01<br />

Ajay &<br />

Rajalakshmi<br />

CRRI, Cuttack 02<br />

KRH-2 UAS, Mandya 01<br />

Sahyadri-1 BSKKV, Karjat 01<br />

JRH-4, JRH-5 JNKV, Jabalpur 01


Resources generated from MOUs<br />

DRR<br />

<strong>Hybrid</strong> Company Amount (Rs.<br />

Lakhs)<br />

DRRH-2<br />

DRRH-3<br />

Sampoorna Seeds Ltd.,<br />

CP Seeds (<strong>India</strong>) Pvt. Ltd.<br />

Bioseed Research <strong>India</strong> Pvt. Ltd.<br />

DevGen Seeds<br />

Kaveri Seeds Company Ltd<br />

IFSSA<br />

Ankur Seeds Pvt. Ltd<br />

Ganga Kaveri Seeds Pvt. Ltd<br />

9.00 +<br />

17.00


Role of DRR <strong>in</strong> popularization of<br />

<strong>Hybrid</strong> Rice Technology<br />

Seed production technology perfected<br />

9000 Front L<strong>in</strong>e Demonstrations (FLDs) were<br />

conducted through out the country to popularize the<br />

hybrid <strong>rice</strong> technology<br />

Five hundred tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

programmes were<br />

organized and more than<br />

15000 persons were<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> seed<br />

production technology


Molecular marker technology is be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

effectively <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to the hybrid<br />

<strong>rice</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g programme<br />

<strong>Hybrid</strong> purity test<br />

Screen<strong>in</strong>g of genotypes/varieties for Rf and<br />

WCG genes<br />

Incorporation of biotic stress resistance <strong>in</strong><br />

parental l<strong>in</strong>es of released hybrids


Detection of off-types <strong>in</strong> hybrid seed lots us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

DNA test<br />

500<br />

250<br />

Marker (bp)<br />

Parent 1 (CMS)<br />

<strong>Hybrid</strong><br />

Parent 2 (Restorer)<br />

<strong>Hybrid</strong><br />

<strong>Hybrid</strong><br />

Off-type<br />

<strong>Hybrid</strong><br />

<strong>Hybrid</strong><br />

<strong>Hybrid</strong><br />

<strong>Hybrid</strong><br />

Off-type<br />

<strong>Hybrid</strong>


600 bp<br />

400 bp<br />

A new multiplex marker to analyze allelic status at the wide<br />

compatibility gene locus- S5<br />

Indica Japonica Neutral<br />

M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 M<br />

M – 100 bp ladder<br />

1 – W1263<br />

2 – TKM6<br />

3 – IR36<br />

4 – IR64<br />

5 – Nipponbare<br />

6 - Akihikari<br />

7 – Koshihikari<br />

8 – Taipei309<br />

9 – Nag<strong>in</strong>a22<br />

10 – Dular<br />

11 – Ketan Nangka<br />

12 – Tetep<br />

M – 100 bp ladder<br />

The marker can clearly dist<strong>in</strong>guish WC genotypes from others………..


Major Challenges<br />

Meet<strong>in</strong>g wide range of gra<strong>in</strong> quality requirement<br />

Lack of availability of long duration hybrids for<br />

shallow lowlands and coastal areas.<br />

Marg<strong>in</strong>al heterosis which is still unattractive<br />

Lack of specific resistance to major pests &<br />

diseases.<br />

Higher seed cost


Future Research Strategies<br />

Develop<strong>in</strong>g hybrids with acceptable gra<strong>in</strong> quality<br />

Develop<strong>in</strong>g long duration hybrids for shallow lowlands<br />

and coastal areas<br />

Development of hybrids for less water and sal<strong>in</strong>e<br />

conditions<br />

Enhanc<strong>in</strong>g magnitude of heterosis<br />

Incorporat<strong>in</strong>g resistance to major pests and diseases.<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g seed production package to reduce seed cost<br />

Intensify<strong>in</strong>g transfer of technology efforts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!