Absolute Sound
Absolute Sound
Absolute Sound
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
f r o m t h e e d i t o r<br />
There’s a certain cynicism among a minority of audio-magazine readers<br />
regarding the integrity of the review process. This view, sometimes<br />
expressed on Internet forums, goes something like this: because<br />
reviewers enjoy the use of expensive equipment without paying for it,<br />
there’s a quid pro quo with the manufacturer that guarantees a favorable<br />
review. Those holding this belief mention this alleged arrangement casually, as<br />
though corruption were an automatic and integral aspect of magazine reviewing<br />
that everyone knows about and tacitly accepts.<br />
When I come across such comments, I don’t know whether to laugh or be outraged.<br />
Those holding such views have absolutely no basis for their position except<br />
an a priori assumption that something untoward must be going on. As someone who<br />
has written more than 350 product reviews, and presided as editor over the publication<br />
of another 400 or so, I’d like to share my experience, as well as outline The<br />
<strong>Absolute</strong> <strong>Sound</strong>’s policies regarding equipment loans.<br />
In my eleven years as a full-time reviewer and four years as Editor (two-and-ahalf<br />
years at TAS), I have never been approached by a manufacturer offering equipment,<br />
long-term loans of equipment, or any other compensation for favorable coverage.<br />
It just doesn’t happen. If such a practice existed, I think I’d be aware of it considering<br />
the large number of products I’ve reviewed over the past fifteen years. Of<br />
course, I can’t speak for other reviewers or publications, but this is my experience.<br />
The cynics may respond that even if there’s no overt quid pro quo, a favorable review<br />
makes the manufacturer amenable to a long-term loan of the product, and thus influences<br />
the reviewer. The reality is that I could spend an afternoon on the phone and<br />
assemble a reference-quality system of components on long-term loan—components<br />
entirely of my choosing, before a word was written, and with no promise of a favorable<br />
review. If virtually all products are available on long-term loan, how can there be any<br />
coercion by a single manufacturer to write a favorable review?<br />
But are long-term loans ethical? <strong>Absolute</strong>ly. Reviewers need reference-quality<br />
equipment with which to judge other reference-quality components—equipment<br />
they could never hope to afford. Moreover, equipment changes and is updated, and<br />
reviewers need to use the latest gear. Manufacturers see the value in lending equipment<br />
to reviewers after the review period has ended; not only is the product mentioned<br />
in subsequent issues, but the reviewer’s use of the product is an endorsement<br />
far more powerful than the review. Because reviewers can have virtually any products<br />
they want on a long-term basis, the ones they choose to live with are special<br />
indeed. Everyone wins: the manufacturer gets the exposure; the reviewer has the best<br />
tools available; and the reader is alerted to those products so good that the reviewer<br />
has chosen to live with them.<br />
There are two prerequisites that make this policy work. First, the magazine’s official<br />
stated policy must specify a time period from when the reviewer acquires the product<br />
to when the review appears in print and the product is ready for return to the manufacturer.<br />
At TAS, that period is six months. Second, when the manufacturer makes the<br />
inevitable call for the component’s return, the product goes back immediately.<br />
Products receive favorable reviews in TAS (and The Perfect Vision) for one reason—they<br />
deliver exceptional performance, value, or both. Anyone who says otherwise<br />
simply doesn’t know what he’s talking about.<br />
Robert Harley<br />
founder; chairman, editorial advisory board<br />
Harry Pearson<br />
editor-in-chief Robert Harley<br />
editor Wayne Garcia<br />
associate editor Jonathan Valin<br />
managing & music editor Bob Gendron<br />
acquisitions manager Neil Gader<br />
& associate editor<br />
copy editor Mark Lehman<br />
classical music Andrew Quint<br />
sub-editor<br />
equipment setup Michael Mercer<br />
editorial advisory board Sallie Reynolds<br />
advisor, cutting edge Atul Kanagat<br />
senior writers<br />
John W. Cooledge, Anthony H. Cordesman,<br />
Gary Giddins, Robert E. Greene, J. Gordon Holt,<br />
Fred Kaplan, Greg Kot, John Nork, Arthur S. Pfeffer,<br />
Paul Seydor, Kevin Whitehead, Roman Zajcew<br />
reviewers and contributing writers<br />
Soren Baker, Shane Buettner, Dan Davis, Frank Doris,<br />
Roy Gregory, Stephan Harrell, John Higgins, Sue Kraft,<br />
Mark Lehman, Arthur B. Lintgen, Anna Logg, David<br />
Morrell, Aric Press, Derk Richardson, Dan Schwartz,<br />
Gene Seymour, Aaron M. Shatzman, Alan Taffel<br />
design/production Design Farm, Inc.<br />
publisher/editor, AVGuide<br />
Chris Martens<br />
web producer Jerry Sommers<br />
<strong>Absolute</strong> Multimedia, Inc.<br />
chairman and ceo Thomas B. Martin, Jr.<br />
vice president/publisher Mark Fisher<br />
advertising reps Cheryl Smith<br />
(512) 439-6951<br />
Marvin Lewis, MTM Sales (718) 225-8803<br />
subscriptions, renewals, changes of address<br />
Phone (888) 732-1625 (U.S.) or (760) 745-2809<br />
(outside U.S.), e-mail<br />
absolutemultimedia@hutchins.com or write The<br />
<strong>Absolute</strong> <strong>Sound</strong>, Subscription Services, PO Box<br />
469024, Escondido, California 92046. Six issues: in<br />
the U.S., $42; Canada $45 (GST included); outside<br />
North America, $75 (includes air mail). Payments<br />
must be by credit card (Visa, MasterCard, American<br />
Express) or U.S. funds drawn on a U.S. bank, with<br />
checks payable to <strong>Absolute</strong> Multimedia, Inc.<br />
editorial matters<br />
Address letters to: The Editor, The <strong>Absolute</strong> <strong>Sound</strong>,<br />
PO Box 1768, Tijeras, New Mexico 87059, or e-mail<br />
rharley@absolutemultimedia.com.<br />
classified advertising<br />
Please use form in back of issue.<br />
newsstand distribution and local dealers<br />
Contact: IPD, 27500 Riverview Center Blvd., Ste.<br />
400, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, (239) 949-4450<br />
publishing matters<br />
Contact Mark Fisher at the address below or e-mail<br />
mfisher@absolutemultimedia.com.<br />
Publications Mail Agreement 40600599<br />
Return Undeliverbale Canadian Addresses to<br />
Station A / PO Box 54 / Windsor, ON N9A 6J5<br />
Email: info@theabsolutesound.com<br />
<strong>Absolute</strong> Multimedia, Inc.<br />
8121 Bee Caves Road, Suite 100<br />
Austin, Texas 78746<br />
phone (512) 439-6951 · fax (512) 439-6962<br />
e-mail tas@absolutemultimedia.com<br />
www.theabsolutesound.com<br />
copyright© <strong>Absolute</strong> Multimedia, Inc., Issue 148, June/July 2004.The <strong>Absolute</strong> <strong>Sound</strong><br />
(ISSN #0097-1138) is published bi-monthly, $42 per year for U.S. residents, <strong>Absolute</strong><br />
Multimedia, Inc. 8121 Bee Caves Road, Suite 100, Austin, TX 78746. Periodical Postage<br />
paid at Austin, TX, and additional mailing offices. Canadian publication mail account<br />
#1551566. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The <strong>Absolute</strong> <strong>Sound</strong>, Subscription<br />
Services, Box 3000, Denville, NJ 07834. Printed in the USA.<br />
4 THE ABSOLUTE SOUND ■ JUNE/JULY 2004