07.04.2013 Views

Absolute Sound

Absolute Sound

Absolute Sound

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

f r o m t h e e d i t o r<br />

There’s a certain cynicism among a minority of audio-magazine readers<br />

regarding the integrity of the review process. This view, sometimes<br />

expressed on Internet forums, goes something like this: because<br />

reviewers enjoy the use of expensive equipment without paying for it,<br />

there’s a quid pro quo with the manufacturer that guarantees a favorable<br />

review. Those holding this belief mention this alleged arrangement casually, as<br />

though corruption were an automatic and integral aspect of magazine reviewing<br />

that everyone knows about and tacitly accepts.<br />

When I come across such comments, I don’t know whether to laugh or be outraged.<br />

Those holding such views have absolutely no basis for their position except<br />

an a priori assumption that something untoward must be going on. As someone who<br />

has written more than 350 product reviews, and presided as editor over the publication<br />

of another 400 or so, I’d like to share my experience, as well as outline The<br />

<strong>Absolute</strong> <strong>Sound</strong>’s policies regarding equipment loans.<br />

In my eleven years as a full-time reviewer and four years as Editor (two-and-ahalf<br />

years at TAS), I have never been approached by a manufacturer offering equipment,<br />

long-term loans of equipment, or any other compensation for favorable coverage.<br />

It just doesn’t happen. If such a practice existed, I think I’d be aware of it considering<br />

the large number of products I’ve reviewed over the past fifteen years. Of<br />

course, I can’t speak for other reviewers or publications, but this is my experience.<br />

The cynics may respond that even if there’s no overt quid pro quo, a favorable review<br />

makes the manufacturer amenable to a long-term loan of the product, and thus influences<br />

the reviewer. The reality is that I could spend an afternoon on the phone and<br />

assemble a reference-quality system of components on long-term loan—components<br />

entirely of my choosing, before a word was written, and with no promise of a favorable<br />

review. If virtually all products are available on long-term loan, how can there be any<br />

coercion by a single manufacturer to write a favorable review?<br />

But are long-term loans ethical? <strong>Absolute</strong>ly. Reviewers need reference-quality<br />

equipment with which to judge other reference-quality components—equipment<br />

they could never hope to afford. Moreover, equipment changes and is updated, and<br />

reviewers need to use the latest gear. Manufacturers see the value in lending equipment<br />

to reviewers after the review period has ended; not only is the product mentioned<br />

in subsequent issues, but the reviewer’s use of the product is an endorsement<br />

far more powerful than the review. Because reviewers can have virtually any products<br />

they want on a long-term basis, the ones they choose to live with are special<br />

indeed. Everyone wins: the manufacturer gets the exposure; the reviewer has the best<br />

tools available; and the reader is alerted to those products so good that the reviewer<br />

has chosen to live with them.<br />

There are two prerequisites that make this policy work. First, the magazine’s official<br />

stated policy must specify a time period from when the reviewer acquires the product<br />

to when the review appears in print and the product is ready for return to the manufacturer.<br />

At TAS, that period is six months. Second, when the manufacturer makes the<br />

inevitable call for the component’s return, the product goes back immediately.<br />

Products receive favorable reviews in TAS (and The Perfect Vision) for one reason—they<br />

deliver exceptional performance, value, or both. Anyone who says otherwise<br />

simply doesn’t know what he’s talking about.<br />

Robert Harley<br />

founder; chairman, editorial advisory board<br />

Harry Pearson<br />

editor-in-chief Robert Harley<br />

editor Wayne Garcia<br />

associate editor Jonathan Valin<br />

managing & music editor Bob Gendron<br />

acquisitions manager Neil Gader<br />

& associate editor<br />

copy editor Mark Lehman<br />

classical music Andrew Quint<br />

sub-editor<br />

equipment setup Michael Mercer<br />

editorial advisory board Sallie Reynolds<br />

advisor, cutting edge Atul Kanagat<br />

senior writers<br />

John W. Cooledge, Anthony H. Cordesman,<br />

Gary Giddins, Robert E. Greene, J. Gordon Holt,<br />

Fred Kaplan, Greg Kot, John Nork, Arthur S. Pfeffer,<br />

Paul Seydor, Kevin Whitehead, Roman Zajcew<br />

reviewers and contributing writers<br />

Soren Baker, Shane Buettner, Dan Davis, Frank Doris,<br />

Roy Gregory, Stephan Harrell, John Higgins, Sue Kraft,<br />

Mark Lehman, Arthur B. Lintgen, Anna Logg, David<br />

Morrell, Aric Press, Derk Richardson, Dan Schwartz,<br />

Gene Seymour, Aaron M. Shatzman, Alan Taffel<br />

design/production Design Farm, Inc.<br />

publisher/editor, AVGuide<br />

Chris Martens<br />

web producer Jerry Sommers<br />

<strong>Absolute</strong> Multimedia, Inc.<br />

chairman and ceo Thomas B. Martin, Jr.<br />

vice president/publisher Mark Fisher<br />

advertising reps Cheryl Smith<br />

(512) 439-6951<br />

Marvin Lewis, MTM Sales (718) 225-8803<br />

subscriptions, renewals, changes of address<br />

Phone (888) 732-1625 (U.S.) or (760) 745-2809<br />

(outside U.S.), e-mail<br />

absolutemultimedia@hutchins.com or write The<br />

<strong>Absolute</strong> <strong>Sound</strong>, Subscription Services, PO Box<br />

469024, Escondido, California 92046. Six issues: in<br />

the U.S., $42; Canada $45 (GST included); outside<br />

North America, $75 (includes air mail). Payments<br />

must be by credit card (Visa, MasterCard, American<br />

Express) or U.S. funds drawn on a U.S. bank, with<br />

checks payable to <strong>Absolute</strong> Multimedia, Inc.<br />

editorial matters<br />

Address letters to: The Editor, The <strong>Absolute</strong> <strong>Sound</strong>,<br />

PO Box 1768, Tijeras, New Mexico 87059, or e-mail<br />

rharley@absolutemultimedia.com.<br />

classified advertising<br />

Please use form in back of issue.<br />

newsstand distribution and local dealers<br />

Contact: IPD, 27500 Riverview Center Blvd., Ste.<br />

400, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, (239) 949-4450<br />

publishing matters<br />

Contact Mark Fisher at the address below or e-mail<br />

mfisher@absolutemultimedia.com.<br />

Publications Mail Agreement 40600599<br />

Return Undeliverbale Canadian Addresses to<br />

Station A / PO Box 54 / Windsor, ON N9A 6J5<br />

Email: info@theabsolutesound.com<br />

<strong>Absolute</strong> Multimedia, Inc.<br />

8121 Bee Caves Road, Suite 100<br />

Austin, Texas 78746<br />

phone (512) 439-6951 · fax (512) 439-6962<br />

e-mail tas@absolutemultimedia.com<br />

www.theabsolutesound.com<br />

copyright© <strong>Absolute</strong> Multimedia, Inc., Issue 148, June/July 2004.The <strong>Absolute</strong> <strong>Sound</strong><br />

(ISSN #0097-1138) is published bi-monthly, $42 per year for U.S. residents, <strong>Absolute</strong><br />

Multimedia, Inc. 8121 Bee Caves Road, Suite 100, Austin, TX 78746. Periodical Postage<br />

paid at Austin, TX, and additional mailing offices. Canadian publication mail account<br />

#1551566. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The <strong>Absolute</strong> <strong>Sound</strong>, Subscription<br />

Services, Box 3000, Denville, NJ 07834. Printed in the USA.<br />

4 THE ABSOLUTE SOUND ■ JUNE/JULY 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!