CONCULSION Considering that even those who directly experience traumatic events, such as combat, do not all suffer psychosis or PTSD, it is comparable to say that certainly not all those who watch television will acquire Gerbner’s mean world syndrome, <strong>and</strong> not all those who suffer from the mean world syndrome are going to suffer from an anxiety disorder. However, it seems reasonable to assume that the constant array of disturbing images <strong>and</strong> warnings sent through the media is enough to invoke such responses in some individuals. Depictions of real threats should evoke more fear than dramatic portrayals of events that could never happen, since an elemental factor in the emotional response to certain stimuli might arise from viewers’ anticipation of future consequences to themselves. Moreover, depicted threatening agents that are considered to be proximate or imminent should evoke more fear than remote threats. However, threats that seem likely do not necessarily have to come from news content; it is quite possible that entertainment media can also trigger reality-based fear responses. For example, especially intense reactions to Jaws, a movie about shark attacks, were observed in people who saw the movie while vacationing at the seashore. 70 This notion brings us to the next chapter, which will briefly explore the effect of entertainment media in relation to the arousal of anxiety. NOTES 1 Leonard Downie Jr. <strong>and</strong> Rob Kaiser, The News About the News: American Journalism in 61
Peril (New York: Alfred A. Knoph, 2002), 22. 2 Ibid., 124. 3 George Gerbner, et al. “Growing Up with Television: Cultivation Processes,” in <strong>Media</strong> Effects: Advances in Theory <strong>and</strong> Research, ed. Jennings Bryant <strong>and</strong> Dolf Zillmann (Mahway, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002), 44. 4 Ibid., 45. 5 Gitlin, 6. 6 Ray Pratt, Projecting Paranoia: Conspiratorial Visions in American Film (Lawrence: <strong>University</strong> Press of Kansas, 2001), 20. 7 Gabriel Weimann, Communicating Unreality (Thous<strong>and</strong> Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 2000), 9. 8 Lawrence K. Grossman, The Electronic Republic (Penguin Books, 1995), 109. 9 B.J. Sigesmund, “September 11’s Cultural Impact,” Newsweek, <strong>Web</strong> Exclusive, 5 September 2002; available at http://www.msnbc.com/news/804212.asp. 10 Grossman, 89. 11 Wilkinson, 118. 12 Joanne Cantor, “Fright Reactions to Mass <strong>Media</strong>,” in <strong>Media</strong> Effects: Advances in Theory <strong>and</strong> Research, ed. Jennings Bryant <strong>and</strong> Dolf Zillmann (Mahway, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002), 288. 13 Cantor, 289-90. 14 Ibid. 15 Ibid. 16 Altheide, 32. 17 Altheide, 27. 18 Maxwell McCombs <strong>and</strong> Amy Reynolds, “News Influence on Our Pictures of the World,” in <strong>Media</strong> Effects: Advances in Theory <strong>and</strong> Research, ed. Jennings Bryant <strong>and</strong> Dolf Zillmann (Mahway, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002), 2. 19 Ibid. 20 W. Lance Bennett, News: The Politics of Illusion (New York: Longman Publishing Co., 2001), 235. 21 Pratt, 21. 22 Cohl, 16. 23 Altheide, 26. 24 Barry Glassner, The Culture of <strong>Fear</strong> (New York: Basic Books, 1999), xxi. 25 Wilkinson, 6. 26 Furedi, 53. 27 Roger D. Wimmer <strong>and</strong> Joseph R. Dominick, Mass <strong>Media</strong> Research: An Introduction, 6 th ed. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 2000). 28 Furedi, 7. 29 George Gerbner, “Global <strong>Media</strong> Mayhem,” Global <strong>Media</strong> Journal 1 no. 1 (Fall 2002). 30 Ross, 73. 31 Altheide, 42. 32 Bennett, 13. 33 Max Frankel, “The Oxygen of Our Liberty,” September 11, 2001, The Poynter Institute (Kansas City, MO: Andrews McMeel, 2001), xi. 34 Altheide, 41. 35 Jennings Bryant <strong>and</strong> Dorina Miron, “Entertainment as <strong>Media</strong> Effect,” in <strong>Media</strong> Effects: Advances in Theory <strong>and</strong> Research, ed. Jennings Bryant <strong>and</strong> Dolf Zillmann (Mahway, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002), 572-3. 36 Cohl, 15 37 Carla Brooks Johnston, Screened Out, (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2000), xi. 62
- Page 1 and 2:
MEDIA INDUCED FEAR AND ANXIETY A Th
- Page 3 and 4:
MEDIA INDUCED FEAR AND ANXIETY Laur
- Page 5 and 6:
CHAPTER 4: ENTERTAINMENT………
- Page 7 and 8:
“nothing is what it seems,” and
- Page 9 and 10:
dangers to our health, the environm
- Page 11 and 12:
assault, from fear of contracting c
- Page 13 and 14:
shootings, many residents of the ar
- Page 15 and 16: conducted by the RAND Corporation o
- Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER 2: FEAR, ANXIETY AND RISK W
- Page 19 and 20: person but signify something entire
- Page 21 and 22: Sports show there is a Sports Disas
- Page 23 and 24: was suspended for pretending to sho
- Page 25 and 26: individual personalities rather tha
- Page 27 and 28: used to describe a person’s menta
- Page 29 and 30: 11, may cause people to feel anxiou
- Page 31 and 32: when the danger is no longer presen
- Page 33 and 34: The possibility of recurrence Altho
- Page 35 and 36: anxiety. 67 However, it was sociolo
- Page 37 and 38: experts in the field of risk. 73 Th
- Page 39 and 40: examine the American media, its con
- Page 41 and 42: MA: Perseus Books, 1999). 74 Wilkin
- Page 43 and 44: Generally, the term media is meant
- Page 45 and 46: entertain rather than inform and it
- Page 47 and 48: Television is a rapid information s
- Page 49 and 50: more evidence of the severity and d
- Page 51 and 52: and hazard from the media than they
- Page 53 and 54: environment, our neighbors, childre
- Page 55 and 56: H. Aaron Cohl asserts that people l
- Page 57 and 58: MEDIA EFFECTS Despite evidence that
- Page 59 and 60: of risk factors by presenting graph
- Page 61 and 62: seen most recently dominate people
- Page 63 and 64: outcome rather than probability sec
- Page 65: viewers are more likely to buy new
- Page 69 and 70: CHAPTER 4: ENTERTAINMENT Halloween
- Page 71 and 72: television is a contradiction in te
- Page 73 and 74: Why, when people understand that wh
- Page 75 and 76: movie, the news magazine gave the i
- Page 77 and 78: and a missing intern with whom he w
- Page 79 and 80: as a result of watching a movie. Al
- Page 81 and 82: this country. Perhaps we were so bl
- Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 5: CASE STUDY - SEPTEMBER 1
- Page 85 and 86: Directly after the attacks, many su
- Page 87 and 88: MEDIA’S ROLE A Gallup Poll conduc
- Page 89 and 90: exposure to such violent images. So
- Page 91 and 92: distress, the only variable with si
- Page 93 and 94: from the WTC, victims running from
- Page 95 and 96: on a television drama like Law and
- Page 97 and 98: NOTES 1 Graham. 2 Marshall, Randall
- Page 99 and 100: increase people’s sense of vulner
- Page 101 and 102: 1. APPENDIX A How did you first lea
- Page 103 and 104: 5. 4. 16 15% 1 1% 2 2% 1 1% 0 0% 10
- Page 105 and 106: 15 14% 0 0% 109 100% 7. Check all o
- Page 107 and 108: 9. 108 100% Was anyone close to you
- Page 109 and 110: 13. 14. 23 21% 2 2% 109 100% How di
- Page 111 and 112: 17. Check all of the following symp
- Page 113 and 114: 19. 100% Check all of the following
- Page 115 and 116: 21. After September 11, how did you
- Page 117 and 118:
25. Gender 1 1% 17 15% 29 26% 39 35
- Page 119 and 120:
28. Racial Background 14 13% 65 59%
- Page 121 and 122:
BIBLIOGRAPHY Allen, Colin. “Real
- Page 123 and 124:
Hassett, Afton L. and Leonard H. Si
- Page 125 and 126:
Marshall, Marc N. Elliott, Annie J.