07.04.2013 Views

An overview of vis-nir-swir field spectroscopy - Spectral International

An overview of vis-nir-swir field spectroscopy - Spectral International

An overview of vis-nir-swir field spectroscopy - Spectral International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

________________________________________________________________<br />

AN OVERVIEW OF VIS-NIR-SWIR<br />

FIELD SPECTROSCOPY AS APPLIED<br />

TO PRECIOUS METALS<br />

EXPLORATION<br />

By<br />

Phoebe Hauff<br />

________________________________________________________________<br />

Page 1


________________________________________________________________<br />

AN OVERVIEW OF VIS-NIR-SWIR FIELD SPECTROSCOPY AS APPLIED TO<br />

PRECIOUS METALS EXPLORATION<br />

Phoebe L. Hauff<br />

<strong>Spectral</strong> <strong>International</strong> Inc., P.O. Box 1027, Arvada, CO., 80001<br />

303 403 8383 pusa@rmi.net www.pimausa.com<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Field portable Reflectance Spectroscopy has made a major impact on the<br />

exploration industry because it has changed the way geologists think about their<br />

rocks and about the different alteration systems and relationships between<br />

associated minerals. It has opened new <strong>vis</strong>tas for the <strong>field</strong> geologist. It allows<br />

him now to "think out <strong>of</strong> the box" and not be tied to models that are not quite his<br />

deposit type. Portable spectrometers at the outcrop, in the core shack, in the<br />

open pit, give the explorationist instant information about rocks that may all have<br />

similar physical appearances. Portable spectrometers provide in-situ data that<br />

allows the geologist to immediately integrate several data sets - geophysics,<br />

geochemistry and mineralogy - in the <strong>field</strong> - at the outcrop, where this information<br />

can be quickly applied to a better understanding <strong>of</strong> what is physically observed -<br />

instant gratification. This was not possible before their invention. Reflectance<br />

<strong>spectroscopy</strong> is changing the nomenclature <strong>of</strong> exploration and allowing<br />

geologists to look at mineral associations that provide more in depth<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> not only the rocks themselves, but the processes that have<br />

altered them into the precious metal resources so important to the world.<br />

This paper will therefore present an <strong>overview</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>vis</strong>ible through SWIR (Short<br />

Wave Infrared) <strong>field</strong> <strong>spectroscopy</strong> with a brief summary <strong>of</strong> theory and<br />

applications. Emphasis is placed on alteration systems, especially those<br />

associated with low and high sulfidation gold deposits, porphyries, kimberlites,<br />

skarns, IOCG (iron oxide copper gold) and unconformity uranium deposits, all <strong>of</strong><br />

which are major successes for reflectance <strong>spectroscopy</strong>.<br />

Introduction -<br />

Many innovations have occurred in exploration and mining that have contributed<br />

to assisting the industry to find more precious metals resource and to find it<br />

faster. One such innovative technology is that <strong>of</strong> VIS-NIR-SWIR (Visible – Near-<br />

Infrared - Short-wave Infrared) reflectance <strong>spectroscopy</strong>. Its use has caused<br />

major changes in the way exploration is done and how explorationists think as<br />

now they are provided with instant information about the minerals in their rocks.<br />

2


________________________________________________________________<br />

The utilization <strong>of</strong> this range (350 to 2500nm) <strong>of</strong> the Electromagnetic Spectrum for<br />

mineral exploration comes out <strong>of</strong> remote sensing needs as does the invention<br />

and subsequent refinements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>field</strong> spectrometers, which have become the<br />

prime vehicles for this methodology. Initial <strong>field</strong> units from the GER Mark series<br />

(Geophysical Environmental Resources <strong>of</strong> Millbrook New York) to the ASD<br />

classics and FieldSpec Pros were developed using solar illumination to<br />

correspond to the satellite and airborne sensors for which they provided ground<br />

truth or verification.<br />

With the addition <strong>of</strong> an internal light source to eliminate the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

atmospheric water spectra, users quickly discovered that the portable<br />

spectrometers had so many more applications then just ground truthing remotely<br />

sensed data and the technology came into its own.<br />

Although there are numerous companies <strong>of</strong>fering instruments in the Visible and<br />

short wave infrared for applications ranging from vegetation, water, forestry,<br />

wood products, paint, carpets, wheat protein content, pharmaceuticals, forensics,<br />

plastics, oil, among others, most are not portable to the <strong>field</strong> nor general enough<br />

for geologic applications. GER was the company with the Mark series <strong>of</strong> <strong>field</strong><br />

spectrometers, who has always been more involved in the general remote<br />

sensing side <strong>of</strong> the application rather then specifically targeting the mining<br />

industry. Alex Goetz, at that time <strong>of</strong> Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Ron Lyon <strong>of</strong><br />

Stanford University, Larry Rowan <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Geological Survey, Robert Agar <strong>of</strong><br />

AGARS, Australia, Jon Huntington, CSIRO, Australia, Fred Kruse <strong>of</strong> AIG, Floyd<br />

Sabins <strong>of</strong> Chevron, Jim Taranik <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Nevada-Reno, and the<br />

present author, among hundreds <strong>of</strong> others, have all used this instrument for<br />

mostly geologic, but some exploration and mining, applications. At issue has<br />

always been the solar illumination and the corresponding atmospheric water<br />

interference bands that mask out vital components and absorption features in the<br />

mineral spectra. This interference made the application less attractive for<br />

alteration characterization. Even 15 years ago, the solar illumination-based<br />

technology was the best available.<br />

With the introduction <strong>of</strong> the internal light source, the PIMA-II <strong>field</strong> spectrometer by<br />

Integrated Spectronics <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia, in the early 1990s, the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

portability and <strong>field</strong> characterization <strong>of</strong> alteration took on a new perspective and<br />

many new applications. Over 200 PIMAs, the majority <strong>of</strong> which are still<br />

operational, were pioneering devices for developing new methods <strong>of</strong> alteration<br />

mapping, core logging, drill well targeting, and <strong>field</strong> reconnaissance. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

major mining companies worldwide adopted this new technology and utilized it<br />

well for new discoveries and in-depth knowledge <strong>of</strong> their alteration systems.<br />

In the late 1990s, ASD Inc. (formerly <strong>An</strong>alytical <strong>Spectral</strong> Devices, Inc.)<br />

introduced their FieldSpec Pro. This instrument did have an internal light<br />

source probe on it. It was upgraded in 2005 to the “FR3”, which had a refined<br />

probe. Neither <strong>of</strong> these instruments were designed for the minerals industry, but<br />

3


________________________________________________________________<br />

were designed more for general remote sensing with solar illumination as the<br />

prime light source. It was the appearance <strong>of</strong> the ASD TerraSpec in 2004 with<br />

its flexible and innovative design specifically for minerals and mining that has<br />

brought cutting edge, fast, fiber-optic data collection into the <strong>field</strong> and core shack.<br />

This paper will review the concepts <strong>of</strong> reflectance <strong>spectroscopy</strong>, and look at the<br />

more practical information that can be obtained from the <strong>vis</strong>ible, near-infrared,<br />

and short-wave infrared regions <strong>of</strong> spectra, beyond just simple mineral<br />

identification. Routine applications such as core logging, <strong>field</strong> reconnaissance,<br />

pit mapping, and remote sensing ground truth will be illustrated with examples.<br />

Selected alteration systems for gold, porphyries, diamonds, unconformity<br />

uranium, IOCGs and skarns will be summarized from a spectral perspective and<br />

mini-case studies discussed, space permitting.<br />

REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY<br />

Spectroscopy is the study <strong>of</strong> the interaction between energy as electromagnetic<br />

radiation (EMR) and matter. Radiation can be absorbed, emitted or scattered by<br />

matter.<br />

Reflectance <strong>spectroscopy</strong> can be defined as the technique that uses the energy<br />

in the Visible (0.4-0.7), Near-Infrared (0.7-1.0) and Short-Wave Infrared (1.0-2.5<br />

µm) wavelength regions <strong>of</strong> the electromagnetic spectrum (Figure 1) to analyze<br />

minerals.<br />

Figure 1. – Highly generalized cartoon <strong>of</strong> the EMS showing the various regions that<br />

are covered by <strong>field</strong> portable spectrometers. Source unknown.<br />

The science and techniques <strong>of</strong> reflectance <strong>spectroscopy</strong> are based on the<br />

spectral properties <strong>of</strong> materials. Certain atoms and molecules absorb energy as<br />

a function <strong>of</strong> their atomic structures. (Hunt, 1977 and Goetz et al, 1982).<br />

4


________________________________________________________________<br />

In the <strong>vis</strong>ible region, this is caused by electronic transitions such as Crystal Field<br />

Effects (atomic energy level transitions), Charge Transfer (inter-element<br />

electronic transitions), Conduction Band Transitions (electron transfer over<br />

spatially close energy levels) and Color Center Phenomenon (lattice defect<br />

induced energy levels). . Much <strong>of</strong> this simply involves release <strong>of</strong> energy when an<br />

electron changes energy levels in an atom.<br />

Absorption features in the SWIR region are a function <strong>of</strong> the composition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mineral. They are a manifestation <strong>of</strong> energy absorption within the crystal lattice<br />

from vibrational state transitions. Because these vibrational states correspond to<br />

distinct energy levels, the absorption features occur at well-defined wavelength<br />

positions. The energy levels that define these wavelengths are a function <strong>of</strong> the<br />

size <strong>of</strong> the ionic radii <strong>of</strong> the cations bonded to different molecules. The bonds will<br />

vibrate at different wavelengths as a function <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the bond. Because<br />

the bond lengths between a specific atom and molecule will be consistent, it is<br />

possible to predict compositions and compositional changes in minerals being<br />

analyzed by the wavelengths and wavelength shifts. (Hunt, 1977)<br />

The transitions between energy levels and compositional differences are<br />

manifested by absorption features at defined wavelengths. The common<br />

absorption feature positions are listed in Table I.<br />

TABLE I – MAJOR ABSORPTION FEATURES<br />

POSITION MECHANISM MINERAL GROUP<br />

~1.4 µm OH and WATER CLAYS, SULFATES<br />

HYDROXIDES,<br />

ZEOLITES<br />

~1.56 µm NH4 NH4 SPECIES<br />

~1.,8 µm OH SULFATES<br />

~1.9 µm WATER SMECTITE<br />

2.02, 2.12 µm NH4 NH4 SPECIES<br />

~2.2 µm AL-OH CLAYS,.<br />

SULFATES, MICAS<br />

~2.29 Fe-OH Fe-CLAYS<br />

~2.31 Mg-OH Mg-CLAYS,<br />

ORGANICS<br />

~2.324 Mg-OH CHLORITES<br />

-2<br />

~2.35 +/- µm CO3<br />

CARBONATES<br />

~2.35+ Fe-OH Fe-CHLORITES<br />

The absorption features occur within a reflectance spectrum, with wavelength<br />

positions and distinctive pr<strong>of</strong>iles that can be used to identify mineral and organic<br />

phases. These are shown in Figure 2 below.<br />

Each mineral has a distinctive spectral signature, composed <strong>of</strong> several<br />

absorption features, which is a function <strong>of</strong> composition, crystallinity,<br />

5


________________________________________________________________<br />

concentration, water content and environmental considerations. For mineral<br />

identification, that signature is compared against characterized references for a<br />

validated identification. This can be done manually by using wavelength tables<br />

and overlaying references on the unknown or it can be done using computer<br />

algorithms operating against a database <strong>of</strong> references (i.e., a spectral library).<br />

For best results these libraries must be set up for specific deposit types, and not<br />

allow the algorithm to make a wrong choice.<br />

Figure 2 – Example absorption spectrum. The units for the horizontal scale are in<br />

nanometers or microns while the vertical scale is percent reflectance. The absorption<br />

figure shown is a doublet, with two minima or lowest points <strong>of</strong> the feature. Each<br />

minimum has a distinctive wavelength, which is a function <strong>of</strong> the chemical<br />

composition. “FWHM” means Full Width at Half Maximum. It can be used for<br />

symmetry determinations that are related to crystallinity.<br />

Although the computer algorithms are useful for data management and<br />

organization, care must be taken when using them for phase identification and<br />

quantification. There are many unaddressed variables and non-user chosen<br />

identifications are not always accurate. Additionally, important information on<br />

crystallinity, water, organics, and iron, among other things, is lost.<br />

VISIBLE RANGE SIGNATURES<br />

There is an abundance <strong>of</strong> information to be gained from the <strong>vis</strong>ible region <strong>of</strong> the<br />

EMS. This is one <strong>of</strong> the features that makes the full-range spectrometers so<br />

valuable. Figure 3 shows some <strong>of</strong> the cations that are recognizable by colors<br />

and corresponding minerals. Although the <strong>vis</strong>ible range is constrained from 300-<br />

6


________________________________________________________________<br />

720nm, there is additional and complimentary information in the NIR (700 nm to<br />

1000 nm).<br />

Figure 3. – The plot shows some <strong>of</strong> the more common cations that can be identified in<br />

the <strong>vis</strong>ible range.<br />

For example, chlorites are more detectable in the <strong>vis</strong>ible range because there is<br />

less interference from other species compared to in the SWIR range where their<br />

signal is usually low unless chlorites are the dominant phase. Iron oxyhydroxides<br />

(Figure 4) have many distinctive features that allow them to be discriminated<br />

from each other. This allows a discrimination <strong>of</strong> pH zoning and something not<br />

easily done before. The nickel cation also has diagnostic features in the <strong>vis</strong>ible<br />

range that can be detected in nickel laterite deposits and correlated to the ore<br />

zones. Chrome in kimberlite minerals such as chrome diopside and G-10<br />

garnets make <strong>spectroscopy</strong> invaluable to the identification <strong>of</strong> indicator minerals.<br />

Manganese is also detectable through features in the <strong>vis</strong>ible range.<br />

Garnets, pyroxenes, olivine, selected iron and copper oxides, hydroxides,<br />

sulfates, and for heavy element carbonates, a NIR major absorption feature.<br />

7<br />

Fe2+ Fe2+ chlorites<br />

Fe3+ hematite, goethite<br />

Ni Chrysoprase<br />

Cr Cr-diopside<br />

Mn Mn-chlorite<br />

Mn rhodonite<br />

Mn rhodocrosite


________________________________________________________________<br />

A<br />

USGS References<br />

Figure 4 – The plots in [A] show the classic three most common iron minerals encountered in<br />

exploration; jarosite, hematite and goethite. Stronger acidic minerals are shown in [B]. These<br />

include, from top to bottom, schwertmannite, jarosite, copiapite, coquimbite and melanterite.<br />

Rare Earth elements (REE) have<br />

very distinctive signatures in the<br />

<strong>vis</strong>ible region as can be seen in<br />

Figure 5. Rare Earth minerals<br />

include such species as bastnesite<br />

(CeFCO 3 ), monzonite (Ce, La,Y,Th)<br />

PO 4 , and xenotime (YPO 4 ). The<br />

two most famous REE mines in the<br />

world are located at Mountain Pass,<br />

California and Bayan Obo, China.<br />

8<br />

SPECMIN References<br />

B<br />

Figure 5 – Plots <strong>of</strong> europium, neodymium oxide,<br />

samarium oxide, praseodymium oxide from the<br />

USGS reference library.


________________________________________________________________<br />

SWIR RANGE SIGNATURES<br />

The <strong>field</strong> spectrometers are probably the best tools invented in the last 10 years,<br />

aside from GPS, for <strong>field</strong> reconnaissance and core logging. They can be taken<br />

to the <strong>field</strong>, to the pit and to the outcrops. They operate from a backpack or from<br />

the <strong>field</strong> vehicle. They can be set up in a <strong>field</strong> camp, in a core shack, or on an<br />

outcrop. They are versatile and flexible and provide the explorationist with “on<br />

the spot”, in-situ information, right at the outcrop, so there is instant gratification<br />

and instant knowledge <strong>of</strong> the composition <strong>of</strong> the outcrop or the drill core.<br />

Alteration types are instantly identified, mixtures are seen, zoning can be tracked,<br />

mineral transition zones characterized. Ten years ago, this was just becoming a<br />

possibility. Now it can be done in a tenth <strong>of</strong> a second.<br />

What can be seen? Table II, from Thompson and Thompson (1996) summarizes<br />

the majority <strong>of</strong> the common infrared-active minerals that can be detected in the<br />

SWIR range.<br />

Table II – Summary <strong>of</strong> Infrared Active Minerals with SWIR Absorption Features<br />

Environment <strong>of</strong> formation Standard terminology SWIR active mineral assemblage (key minerals are in bold)<br />

Intrusion-related<br />

High-sulfidation epithermal<br />

Low-sulfidation epithermal<br />

Mesothermal<br />

Potassic (biotite-rich), K silicate,<br />

biotitic<br />

Biotite (phlogopite), actinolite, sericite, chlorite, epidote,<br />

muscovite, anhydrite<br />

Sodic, sodic-calcic Actinolite, clinopyroxene (diopside), chlorite, epidote, scapolite<br />

Phyllic, sericitic Sericite (muscovite-illite), chlorite, anhydrite<br />

Intermediate argillic, sericite-<br />

chlorite-clay (SCC), argillic<br />

Sericite (illite-smectite), chlorite, kaolinite (dickite),<br />

montmorillonite, calcite, epidote<br />

Advanced argillic Pyrophyllite, sericite, diaspore, alunite, topaz, tourmaline,<br />

dumortierite, zunyite<br />

Greisen Topaz, muscovite, tourmaline<br />

Skarn Clinopyroxene, wollastonite, actinolite-tremolite, vesuvianite, epidote,<br />

serpentinite-talc, calcite, chlorite, illite-smectite, nontronite<br />

Propylitic Chlorite, epidote, calcite, actinolite, sericite, clay<br />

Advanced argillic — acid sulphate Kaolinite, dickite, alunite, diaspore, pyrophyllite, zunyite<br />

Argillic, intermediate argillic Kaolinite, dickite, montmorillonite, illite-smectite<br />

Propylitic Calcite, chlorite, epidote, sericite, clay<br />

“Adularia” — sericite, sericitic,<br />

argillic<br />

Advanced argillic —<br />

acid-sulphate (steam-heated)<br />

Sericite, illite-smectite, kaolinite, chalcedony, opal,<br />

montmorillonite, calcite, dolomite<br />

Kaolinite, alunite, cristobalite<br />

(opal, chalcedony), jarosite<br />

Propylitic, zeolitic Calcite, epidote, wairakite, chlorite,<br />

illite-smectite, montmorillonite<br />

Carbonate Calcite, ankerite, dolomite, muscovite (Cr-/V-rich), chlorite<br />

Chloritic Chlorite, muscovite, actinolite<br />

Biotitic Biotite, chlorite<br />

Sediment-hosted gold Argillic Kaolinite, dickite, illite<br />

Volcanogenic massive sulfide<br />

Sediment-hosted massive sulfide<br />

Sericitic Sericite, chlorite, chloritoid<br />

Chloritic Chlorite, sericite, biotite<br />

Carbonate Dolomite, siderite, ankerite, calcite, sericite, chlorite<br />

Tourmalinite Tourmaline, muscovite<br />

Carbonate <strong>An</strong>kerite, siderite, calcite, muscovite<br />

Sericitic Sericite, chlorite<br />

Albitic Chlorite, muscovite, biotite<br />

Minerals are grouped by assemblages <strong>of</strong> alteration minerals, and keyed to commonly used terminology; Complete assemblages are in<br />

Thompson and Thompson (1996)<br />

9


________________________________________________________________<br />

The SWIR method does not detect minerals per se, but the vibrational energy <strong>of</strong><br />

the chemical bonds between atom and molecule in the octahedral layer <strong>of</strong> a<br />

compound. This gives more flexibility in detecting amorphous materials.<br />

Therefore, it is possible to detect Si-OH bonds and thus look at amorphous<br />

silicas, such as opaline phases.<br />

SWIR is also very sensitive to water, which will be illustrated in a later section.<br />

This is particularly valuable when tracking fluid migration through a deposit.<br />

The common molecules detected are H2O, OH, CO3, and NH4. Selected sulfates<br />

are seen when an OH bond is present, as are phosphates (Figure 6). Table II<br />

lists most <strong>of</strong> the common infrared-active<br />

minerals. The groups most likely<br />

encountered, with selected mineral<br />

examples, include clays (illite,<br />

illite/smectite, kaolinite, smectites,<br />

dickite) and all pyllosilicates, carbonates<br />

(calcite, dolomite, ankerite, siderite,<br />

malachite, azurite, cerrusite), micas<br />

(muscovite, biotite, phlogopite,<br />

paragonite), chlorites (Mg, Fe, Al),<br />

Sulfates (alunite, jarosite, gypsum, Fesulfates),<br />

tourmaline (schorl, elbaite,<br />

dravite, rubellite), amphiboles (tremolite,<br />

actinolite, hornblende), pyroxenes<br />

(diopside, augite, hypersthene), garnets<br />

(pyrope, almandine, grossularite),<br />

pyroxinoids (rhodonite, sodalite)<br />

selected silicates (talc, topaz, scapolite,<br />

pyrophyllite, zunyite, epidote, olivine,<br />

serpentines, dumortierite , idocrase)<br />

evaporates (sulfates, niter, anhydrite,<br />

gypsum, borax minerals),hydroxides<br />

(diaspore, brucite), zeolites (stilbite,<br />

heulendite, clinoptilolite), and silica<br />

(opal, quartz, sinter)<br />

pl<br />

Figure 6. – These are plots <strong>of</strong><br />

common alteration minerals.<br />

(Thompson et al, 1999).<br />

Limits <strong>of</strong> detection will vary with the<br />

matrix composition and the active versus<br />

inactive components. It varies between<br />

mineral mixtures. It is very difficult to do<br />

accurate quantitative mixtures without first<br />

building calibration files <strong>of</strong> percentage<br />

mixtures.<br />

10


________________________________________________________________<br />

SPECTRAL INFORMATION<br />

Field Spectrometers, whether they are based on an integrating sphere or fiber<br />

optic cable, allow the collection and presentation <strong>of</strong> spectral data. Although the<br />

primary objective <strong>of</strong> this operation is the identification <strong>of</strong> the minerals found in<br />

different alteration systems, there is other information that can be obtained from<br />

the data and which is <strong>of</strong> great significance in the interpretation <strong>of</strong> the spectral<br />

information. These include chemical substitution, crystallinity, effects <strong>of</strong> water,<br />

paragenesis and temperature.<br />

CHEMISTRY<br />

The ability to discern compositional differences in mineral groups that have solid<br />

solution substitution is very useful. Some examples are the carbonates,<br />

amphiboles, chlorites, illite/micas, tourmalines, smectite clays, alunites, all <strong>of</strong><br />

which exhibit wavelength shifts with cation substitution (Figure 7A, 7B, and 7C).<br />

A B<br />

Figure 7 – The spectral plots in [A] are for alunites <strong>of</strong> different compositions from Ca to Na<br />

to K to NH4. Note that the diagnostic feature ranges from 1495nm for Ca to 1460nm for<br />

NH4 . In Figure 7B, the diagnostic wavelength shift occurs in the 2330 nm range for Mgchlorites<br />

shifting to 2350+ for Fe-chlorites. The carbonate group is shown in [C]. These<br />

mineral show a significant shift with different cation compositions ranging from (top to<br />

bottom) aragonite (Ca), Dolomite (Mg, Ca), calcite (Ca), rhodocrosite (Mg), stronianite (Sr),<br />

magnesite (Mg), cerrusite (Pb), siderite (Fe), ankerite (fe, Mg), malachite (Cu), and azurite<br />

(Cu).<br />

11<br />

C


________________________________________________________________<br />

IRON OXYHYDROXIDES AND SULFATES<br />

Iron oxides, hydroxides, oxyhydroxides and sulfates are very important not only<br />

to precious metals exploration, but also in the determination <strong>of</strong> oxidation states<br />

and acid drainage creation potential. They can be used in the <strong>field</strong> to provide<br />

approximate pH's in an environment, especially along a stream, as shown in the<br />

cartoon below. The three most common iron minerals are plotted in Figure 9.<br />

PYRITE<br />

SOURCE<br />

SPRING<br />

PH = 2.3-2.8<br />

JAROSITE<br />

KFe III (SO4)(OH)6<br />

melanterite<br />

copiapite<br />

Bigham et al, 1996<br />

pH = 3<br />

pH = 4<br />

SCHWERTMANNITE<br />

Figure 8 - This cartoon shows pH changes along a stream from a sulfide metals source through<br />

neutralization <strong>of</strong> acid waters by dilution and volume effects.<br />

703<br />

Fe8 III O8(SO4)(OH)6<br />

745<br />

766<br />

862<br />

894<br />

920<br />

Source: US Geological Survey data base.<br />

pH = 4<br />

12<br />

No jarosite<br />

FERRIHYDRITE<br />

~Fe3O8.4H2O<br />

pH = 6<br />

pH = 7<br />

STREAM<br />

GOETHITE<br />

α = FeOOH<br />

Lepidocrocite<br />

Maghemite<br />

Figure 9 - The three most<br />

common iron minerals<br />

encountered in gold and copper<br />

deposits are jarosite, goethite<br />

and hematite. The plot shows<br />

spectral pr<strong>of</strong>iles and<br />

wavelengths for these minerals<br />

in the <strong>vis</strong>ible range, where most<br />

<strong>of</strong> their diagnostic features<br />

occur. The emission features<br />

are more consistent and<br />

reproducible then the<br />

absorption features. These<br />

features all have a range.<br />

These minerals are usually<br />

mixtures <strong>of</strong> each other and<br />

therefore a wavelength range is<br />

more applicable to defining<br />

them.


435<br />

________________________________________________________________<br />

430<br />

430<br />

468<br />

430<br />

B<br />

560<br />

518<br />

IRON OXIDES OXYHYDROXIDES<br />

795<br />

782<br />

769<br />

761<br />

748<br />

920<br />

855<br />

961<br />

922<br />

959<br />

ACID IRON SULFATES<br />

733<br />

682<br />

655<br />

713<br />

776<br />

874<br />

871<br />

917<br />

927<br />

A<br />

Lepidocrocite<br />

Ferrihydrite<br />

Maghemite<br />

Goethit<br />

Hematite<br />

Schwertmannite<br />

Jarosite<br />

Copiapite<br />

Coquimbite<br />

Melanterite<br />

13<br />

Figure 10 - For most <strong>of</strong> these iron<br />

species, the definitive features are<br />

found in the <strong>vis</strong>ible region. The more<br />

common iron oxides and hydroxides are<br />

plotted in Figure 10A and include<br />

lepidocrocite, ferrihydrite, maghemite.<br />

Goethite and hematite.<br />

The iron sulfates are very useful for help<br />

in determining pH <strong>of</strong> their environment<br />

and potential acid drainage factors.<br />

They are plotted in Figures 10B for<br />

Visible range and 10C for SWIR range<br />

and include schwertmannite, jarosite,<br />

copiapite, coquimbite and melanterite.<br />

Except for jarosite, they show mostly<br />

water features in the SWIR. A full range<br />

spectrometer is therefore essential for<br />

their definitive identification.<br />

C<br />

Schwertmannite<br />

Jarosite<br />

Copiapite<br />

Coquimbite<br />

Melanterite


________________________________________________________________<br />

<strong>An</strong>other perspective <strong>of</strong> this shift is the aluminum substitution in illites and Al-micas.<br />

Figure 11- Aluminum content <strong>of</strong> illites can be<br />

estimated from the 2.2 µm absorption<br />

feature, which shifts relative to the percent<br />

aluminum present. There appears to be a<br />

deposit-specific correlation in that when<br />

illite/”sericite”/muscovite alteration is present,<br />

there are higher amounts <strong>of</strong> aluminum<br />

apparently associated with the ore zones.<br />

This also has been documented by Post and<br />

Noble (1993) and their data is plotted below<br />

against spectral wavelength values collected<br />

from their published samples.<br />

Figure 13 – Selected Georgia kaolinites,<br />

showing decreasing crystallinity down the<br />

plot. Crystallinity index is based on work<br />

done by Murray and Lyons (1956). Note<br />

how water content increases with<br />

decreasing crystallinity.<br />

14<br />

Figure 12- Feature positions for a cross section<br />

<strong>of</strong> muscovites and illites from SPECMIN range<br />

from 2198nm to 2212 nm, with the majority falling<br />

within 2200-2204 nm.<br />

The illites plotted in Figure 9 are from different<br />

environments and from top to bottom are [A] Hog<br />

Ranch, Nevada, epithermal gold deposit; [B]<br />

Chuquicamata, Chile, porphyry copper; [C]<br />

Leadville, Colorado, gold vein system; [D]<br />

Cananea, Mexico, porphyry copper deposit; [E]<br />

Round Mountain, Nevada, disseminated gold<br />

deposit; [F, G, H] sedimentary illites from Illinois<br />

shales.<br />

Degree <strong>of</strong> crystallinity can be determined<br />

from change in the pr<strong>of</strong>ile, using a<br />

calibration data set for comparison<br />

(Figure 13 ).<br />

Note how the kaolinite doublet in the<br />

2200 nm region s<strong>of</strong>tens and broadens<br />

from a sharp, well-defined minimum to a<br />

shoulder as ordering decreases.<br />

This change in pr<strong>of</strong>ile can be<br />

mathematically defined and utilized as an<br />

index. It is a function <strong>of</strong> random and<br />

sporadic filling <strong>of</strong> metal sites in the<br />

octahedral layer <strong>of</strong> the mineral. Empty<br />

and random sites decrease order and,<br />

therefore, the sharpness <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ile.


________________________________________________________________<br />

PARAGENESIS AND WATER<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>iles also give information related to paragenesis and, indirectly, temperature<br />

(Figure 15). Broad, open absorption features coupled with large water features<br />

such as those found in smectites, zeolites, and opaline silica minerals indicate<br />

ambient to low temperatures from low energy environments. As the pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

sharpens and becomes well defined, such as in muscovites, pyrophyllite,<br />

epidote, and dickite, the temperature <strong>of</strong> formation increases and the crystal<br />

lattice becomes ordered in a high-energy environment.<br />

Figure 15 - plots showing changes in pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

As a function <strong>of</strong> ordering in the crystal lattice,<br />

From broad, low temperature smectites to<br />

higher temperature mica and pyrophyllite.<br />

15<br />

Figure 14 - A very important series is the<br />

one from montmorillonite (A) through to<br />

muscovite [I]. This goes through mixed<br />

layer smectite/illite [B] and illite/smectite<br />

[C, D] to illite [E, F, G, H]. The plot<br />

summaries the species in this series and<br />

shows the information that can be gained<br />

by the wavelength shift indicating<br />

changes in aluminum content. This is<br />

the most complicated series commonly<br />

worked with in alteration systems.<br />

Changes in water content, pr<strong>of</strong>ile shape<br />

and wavelength are all subtle between<br />

the different species in the series. They<br />

are difficult to distinguish and can only<br />

be differentiated by comparison against<br />

references.<br />

Figure 16 - plots different water sites from<br />

channel water in beryl to molecular water<br />

in gypsum to zeolite channel water to<br />

interlayer water in smectite to surface<br />

water.


________________________________________________________________<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> water present also can be tracked relative to pr<strong>of</strong>ile and wavelength<br />

(Figure 16). As seen in the figure, different types <strong>of</strong> water (channel, structural,<br />

interlayer, surface, silica, encapsulated), have different pr<strong>of</strong>iles which provide<br />

information about how the water was formed and where it resides.<br />

II. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Applications Examples<br />

Outcrop mapping - Pamel<br />

Pamel: <strong>An</strong> alteration study <strong>of</strong> the Pamel prospect in the Western Cordillera<br />

<strong>of</strong> Peru was conducted for Candente Resource Corp. The results from<br />

approximately 12 samples were integrated with geologic information and<br />

outcrop patterns. Based on 3 days work, combined with the previous<br />

geologic data, an alteration map was created for the property. The results<br />

clearly showed distinct alteration zones and helped delineate zones <strong>of</strong><br />

interest (Figure 17). The alteration varies, from silicification to alunite-dickite,<br />

to alunite-kaolinite, to kaolinite dominant, and outward to sericite, illite,<br />

and chlorite. Small amounts <strong>of</strong> diaspore, topaz, and tourmaline were also<br />

noted locally (Thompson et al., 1999).<br />

Figure 17. - alteration map created by A. Thompson from PIMA outcrop samples.<br />

16


________________________________________________________________<br />

Core Logging<br />

<strong>Spectral</strong> core logging is one <strong>of</strong> the major applications <strong>of</strong> reflectance<br />

<strong>spectroscopy</strong>. Figure 18 presents a spectral core log..<br />

HIGH SULFIDATION SYSTEM DRILL HOLE :: GOLD vs MINERALOGY<br />

DEPTH Wave Au Kl Dik Alk Ill Sm Sil Jar Ch ALT Minerals<br />

40 2206 0.005 x x 1 Jarosite, trace gyp, illite?<br />

68 2206 0.005 x x 1 Illite + silica<br />

74 2206 0.009 tr x x 1 Illite, silica tr gyp tr kaolinite<br />

80 2206 0.024 x x x 1 Illite -> kaolinite, gyp, silica<br />

81 2204 0.024 x x 1 Illite, gypsum - - jarosite?<br />

94 2210 0.007 x 1 Illite<br />

100a 2206 0.013 x x 1 Illite, jarosite<br />

117 2206 0.008 x 1 Illite<br />

124 2204 0.025 x x 1 Illite jarosite<br />

140 2212 0.005 x x 1 Illite, jarosite, gypsum?<br />

146 2192 0.011 x x 1 Illite, silica<br />

150 2164 0.011 x 1 Kaolinite<br />

164 2166 0.099 x 1 Kaolinite, well x/n<br />

170 2168 0.099 x 1 Kaolinite, MW<br />

173 2180 1.473 x x x 4 Dickite, alunite, kaolinite<br />

175 2180 1.473 x x 4 Alunite + dickite<br />

178 2170 1.473 x x 5 Alunite + silica<br />

181 2177 0.133 x x x 4 Dickite and alunite silica<br />

182 2181 0.133 x tr 3 Dickite, trace alunite<br />

183 2180 0.133 x 3 Dickite<br />

186 2166 0.035 x 1 Best kaolinite<br />

196 2167 0.013 x x 1 Kaolinite + silica<br />

204 2167 0.005 x 1 Kaolinite<br />

214 2177 0.099 x tr 1 Kaolinite tr dickite<br />

218 2166 0.099 x x 1 Kaolinite - poor illite<br />

224 2166 0.016 tr x 1 Smectite + minor kaolinite<br />

229 2167 0.016 x 1 Kaolinite<br />

235 2164 0.196 x 1 Kaolinite - still wet<br />

238 2164 0.196 x 1 Kaolinite<br />

244 2164 0.007 x 1 Kaolinite<br />

Pit Bench Mapping - Blast Holes<br />

Considerable information can be gained through the analysis <strong>of</strong> blast holes in an<br />

open pit mine. Although blast holes are assayed, in-situ mineralogical analysis<br />

can provide alteration types, which if spectrally defined, will give the metallurgist<br />

information needed for efficient mill recovery or heap leach pad blending.<br />

17<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

F<br />

Figure 18 - <strong>An</strong> Excel chart<br />

that shows mineralogy<br />

against alteration type<br />

against gold assay values.<br />

Plotting the minerals in this<br />

way gives an excellent<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> gold related to<br />

mineralogy. The alteration<br />

classifications are<br />

indigenous to the high<br />

sulfidation system and<br />

represent mineral<br />

associations.<br />

Figure 19 - This plot is a compilation <strong>of</strong><br />

different alteration types from a copper<br />

mine, defined using <strong>spectroscopy</strong>.<br />

These include [A] muscovite, [B]<br />

weathered muscovite shown by large<br />

water feature, [C] illite with very minor<br />

kaolinite overprint, [D] illite - kaolinite<br />

mixture, [E] kaolinite – illite mixture, [F]<br />

kaolinite. By matching metallurgical<br />

data to the clay type, it was possible to<br />

determine that too much kaolinite<br />

would cause recovery losses.


________________________________________________________________<br />

ALTERATION SYSTEMS FROM THE SPECTRAL PERSPECTIVE<br />

The more common deposits that can be defined by reflectance <strong>spectroscopy</strong><br />

include epithermal gold, low and high sulfidation systems; porphyries,<br />

kimberlites, IOCG (Iron Oxide-Copper-Gold), skarns, and uranium (both<br />

sandstone hosted sediment and unconformity types). Although there are<br />

numerous other deposit and alteration types that can be analyzed successfully<br />

with this method, space constraints allow only an <strong>overview</strong> <strong>of</strong> the above list.<br />

This section therefore presents a very brief definition <strong>of</strong> the deposit type,<br />

reference to a graphic model, list the better-known deposit examples, and<br />

discuss the alteration from the spectral perspective. The information presented<br />

here as background to the deposit type and alteration systems has been<br />

compiled from references and from websites.<br />

Definition <strong>of</strong> deposit type<br />

EPITHERMAL GOLD - LOW SULFIDATION<br />

Epithermal gold deposits form in hydrothermal systems related to volcanic<br />

activity. These systems, while active, discharge to the surface as hot springs or<br />

fumaroles. Epithermal gold deposits occur largely in volcano-plutonic arcs<br />

(island arcs as well as continental arcs) associated with subduction zones, with<br />

ages similar to those <strong>of</strong> volcanism. The deposits form at shallow depth,


________________________________________________________________<br />

Boiling <strong>of</strong> liquid in the LS geothermal environment leads to precipitation <strong>of</strong> gold<br />

in veins accompanied by a variety <strong>of</strong> features such as adularia and bladed<br />

calcite cementing coll<strong>of</strong>orm and brecciated quartz. Silica sinters may be the<br />

surface expression <strong>of</strong> such veins and may be accompanied by nearby zones <strong>of</strong><br />

surficial steam-heated acid alteration<br />

These deposits form in both subaerial, predominantly felsic, volcanic <strong>field</strong>s in<br />

extensional and strike-slip structural regimes and island arc or continental<br />

andesitic stratovolcanoes above active subduction zones. Near-surface<br />

hydrothermal systems, ranging from hot springs at surface to deeper, structurally<br />

and permeability focused fluid flow zones are the sites <strong>of</strong> mineralization. The ore<br />

fluids are relatively dilute and cool solutions that are mixtures <strong>of</strong> magmatic and<br />

meteoric fluids. Mineral deposition takes place as the solutions undergo cooling<br />

and degassing by fluid mixing, boiling, and decompression.<br />

http://www.em.gov.bc.ca/mining/Geolsurv/MetallicMinerals/MineralDepositPr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

s/pr<strong>of</strong>iles/h05.htm Panteleyev (1996):<br />

Model for Low Sulfidation Epithermal Vein Systems<br />

Figure 20 - Figure shows a model for a low-sulfidation epithermal gold system. Note distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> alteration zoning and know deposits. (Corbett and Leach, 1998)<br />

19


________________________________________________________________<br />

Major Global Deposits<br />

EL PEÑON, Chile MARTA, Peru<br />

ESQUEL, Argentina ROUND MOUNTAIN, Nevada<br />

CERRO VANGUARDIA, Argentina COMSTOCK, Virginia City, Nevada<br />

HISHIKARI, Japan SLEEPER, Nevada<br />

GOSAWONG , Indonesia MIDAS, Nevada<br />

KUPOL, Russia WAIHI , New Zealand<br />

ROSIA MONTANA, Romania GOLDEN CROSS, New Zealand<br />

LIHIR, PNG CERRO BAYO, Chile<br />

TRES CRUCES, Peru KORI KOLLO, Bolivia<br />

COMMON ALTERATION MINERALS in LOW SULFIDATION SYSTEMS<br />

ILLITE KAOLINITE CHLORITES<br />

ILLITE/SMECTITE BUDDINGTONITE EPIDOTE<br />

Montmorillonite ADULARIA* ZEOLITES<br />

QUARTZ CALCITE HEMATITE<br />

*Adularia is not infrared active.<br />

Alteration types associated with Low Sulfidation Systems<br />

Silicification is extensive in ores as multiple generations <strong>of</strong> quartz and<br />

chalcedony and commonly is accompanied by adularia and calcite. Pervasive<br />

silicification in vein envelopes is flanked by sericite-illite-kaolinite assemblages.<br />

Intermediate argillic alteration [kaolinite-illite-montmorillonite (smectite)] forms<br />

adjacent to some veins; advanced argillic alteration (kaolinite-alunite) may form<br />

along the tops <strong>of</strong> mineralized zones. Propylitic alteration dominates at depth and<br />

peripherally. Panteleyev, A.(1996). Buddingtonite can also be present.<br />

QSA Quartz-Sericite-<br />

Adularia<br />

Figure 21 - Plot shows illite, mixed layer<br />

illite/smectite, montmorillonite, quartz, calcite,<br />

dolomite, kaolinite and pyrite.<br />

20<br />

Silicic<br />

Figure 22 - Silicic alteration is pervasive<br />

replacement <strong>of</strong> the rock by silica minerals.<br />

Minerals include opal, chalcedony, quartz,<br />

hematite, and pyrite.


________________________________________________________________<br />

This assemblage also contains adularia. The chemical bonds for feldspars are<br />

not detectable in the SWIR range. This varies from alteration around veins,<br />

fractures and permeable zones to selective replacement <strong>of</strong> plagioclase in<br />

alteration envelopes.<br />

Figure 23 - QSA alteration plot shows quartz, illite,<br />

muscovite with quartz, and pyrite.<br />

Argillic<br />

QSA Quartz-Sericite-Adularia<br />

This type <strong>of</strong> alteration occurs as wall rock alteration around veins and<br />

replacement zones in permeable lithologies. This may show the change in<br />

aluminum content and temperature change away from the vein in a progression<br />

from illite illite/smectite smectite. Carbonates are also important in these<br />

systems and may reflect condensation <strong>of</strong> CO2 from deeper boiling zones.<br />

In these systems is also seen amethyst, quartz pseudomorphs after calcite,<br />

barite, fluorite, Ca-Mg-Mn-Fe carbonate minerals such as rhodochrosite.<br />

Panteleyev (1996):<br />

21<br />

Argillic<br />

Figure 24 - Argillic alteration plot shows<br />

illite, illite/smectite, montmorillonite,<br />

calcite, dolomite, kaolinite, and pyrite.


________________________________________________________________<br />

Steam Heated Argillic<br />

This alteration type is found above the water table and forms an extensive area.<br />

It is related to the condensation and oxidation <strong>of</strong> gases (H2S). It is found in<br />

geothermal areas with mud pots, fumeroles and native sulfur.<br />

Weathered outcrops are <strong>of</strong>ten characterized by resistant quartz ± alunite 'ledges'<br />

and extensive flanking bleached, clay-altered zones with supergene alunite,<br />

jarosite, and other limonite minerals. Panteleyev (1996):<br />

Propyllitic<br />

Steam Heated Argillic<br />

Figure 25 - Steam Heated Argillic alteration<br />

plots sulfur, pyrite, chalcedony, opal,<br />

kaolinite, alunite and jarosite.<br />

Propylitic alteration occurs in the outer zone <strong>of</strong> alteration around a deposit. It can<br />

have regional extension.<br />

22<br />

Propylitic<br />

Figure 26 - This plot <strong>of</strong> propylitic alteration shows<br />

Mg-Chlorite, Fe-Chlorite, epidote, illite/smectite,<br />

zeolite. Montmorillonite and calcite.


________________________________________________________________<br />

Definition <strong>of</strong> deposit type<br />

HIGH SULFIDATION SYSTEMS<br />

High sulphidation Au + Cu ore systems develop from the reaction with host rocks<br />

<strong>of</strong> hot acidic magmatic fluids to produce characteristic zoned alteration and later<br />

sulphide and Au + Cu + Ag deposition. Ore systems display permeability controls<br />

governed by lithology, structure and breccias and changes in wall rock alteration<br />

and ore mineralogy with depth <strong>of</strong> formation. One <strong>of</strong> the challenges is to<br />

distinguish the mineralized systems from a group <strong>of</strong> generally non-economic<br />

acidic alteration styles including lithocaps or barren shoulders, steam heated,<br />

magmatic solfatara and acid sulphate alteration.<br />

Original definitions (Heald et al.,1987) suggest that epithermal deposits formed at<br />

temperatures < 300°C and therefore at shallow depths, typically < 1 km.<br />

The term epithermal is therefore used in <strong>field</strong> exploration studies to describe Au ±<br />

Ag ± Cu deposits formed in magmatic arc environments (including rifts) at<br />

shallow depths, most typically above the level <strong>of</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> porphyry Cu-Au<br />

deposits (typically < 1 km), although in many instances associated with<br />

subvolcanic intrusions. Higher level epithermal deposits are commonly formed<br />

later in a deposit paragenesis, and may be telescoped upon deeper earlier<br />

formed deposits, including in some instances porphyry systems which are older,<br />

or part <strong>of</strong> the same overall magmatic event (e.g., Lihir, Corbett et al., 2001b). In<br />

strongly dilational structural environments porphyry-related systems may be<br />

telescoped outwards into the deeper “epithermal” environment (e.g., Cadia,<br />

Maricunga Belt).<br />

In brief, high sulphidation deposits develop in settings where volatile rich<br />

magmatic fluids rise to higher crustal levels without significant interaction<br />

with the host rocks or ground waters. Volatiles (SO2) evolved from the<br />

depressurising fluids oxidize to form a two stage hot acid fluid, the initial stage<br />

<strong>of</strong> which reacts with the host rocks to produce the characteristic zoned acidic<br />

alteration at epithermal crustal levels (Corbett and Leach, 1998). A later liquiddominated<br />

fluid phase deposits sulphides which are characterised by pyrite<br />

with enargite, or the latter’s low temperature polymorph luzonite.<br />

Magmatic rocks are interpreted to represent the ultimate source <strong>of</strong> ore fluids as<br />

demonstrated by the commonly association <strong>of</strong> HS deposits with felsic domes<br />

and phreatomagmatic breccias within flow-dome complexes. Many HS deposits<br />

display associations with porphyry Cu-Au systems <strong>of</strong> similar ages (Nena), or are<br />

collapsed upon and form part <strong>of</strong> the porphyry ores. Fluids responsible for the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> HS deposits rarely evolve to Au- rich lower sulphidation style ores.<br />

23


________________________________________________________________<br />

Model for High Sulfidation Gold Systems<br />

Figure 24 - FUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIYiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu<br />

Figure 27 - Model for High Sulfidation Gold System showing alteration zones and feeder<br />

structure. Source: Henley and Ellis, 1983<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Well Known Deposits - Distribution<br />

GOLDFIELD , Nevada ZIJINSHAN, China<br />

YANACOCHA, Peru SIPAN, Peru<br />

SUMMITVILLE, Colorado TAMBO, Chile<br />

LEPANTO, Phillipines TANTAHUATAY, Peru<br />

PASCUA-LLAMA, Chile-Argentina AQUA RICA, Argentina<br />

PIERINA, Peru QUIMSACOCHA, Ecuador<br />

PUEBLO VIEJO, Dominican Republic MARTABE, Indonesia<br />

ALTA CHACAMA< Peru VELADERO, Argentina<br />

LA COIPA, Chile RODIQUILAR, Spain<br />

MULATOS, Mexico FURTEI, Sardinia<br />

ALTERATION TYPES (Corbett 2000)<br />

Acid alteration contains a suite <strong>of</strong> minerals formed in low-pH conditions (e.g.,<br />

kaolin-dickite, alunite, pyrophyllite, dickite) and may be grouped as styles<br />

including: Barren high sulphidation alteration described as lithocaps or barren<br />

shoulders are a common source <strong>of</strong> difficulty for explorationists, especially as<br />

these may crop out in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> low and high-sulphidation epithermal Au and<br />

also porphyry Cu-Au mineralization. Barren shoulders comprise a class <strong>of</strong> nonmineralized<br />

advanced argillic (silica-alunite + pyrophyllite etc.) alteration derived<br />

24


________________________________________________________________<br />

from magmatic volatiles venting from intrusive sources at depth (Corbett and<br />

Leach, 1998). These alteration zones are characterized by high temperature<br />

minerals such as pyrophyllite-diaspore, zunyite, topaz, locally including<br />

corundum and andalusite. Silica characteristically occurs as a massive form<br />

rather than vuggy silica, typical <strong>of</strong> mineralized high sulphidation deposits.<br />

Examples include Lookout Rocks, Horse Ivaal at Frieda River, Vuda, and Alum<br />

Mountain. Lithocaps (Sillitoe (1995, 1999) may extend to higher crustal levels,<br />

include additional lower temperature argillic alteration, and are interpreted<br />

(Sillitoe, op cit) to locally conceal epithermal or porphyry mineralization.<br />

Shoulders and lithocaps crop out as variably dipping bodies termed ledges<br />

developed by the exploitation <strong>of</strong> permeable lithologies (typically flat dipping), or<br />

dilatant structures (typically steep dipping). These alteration zones are<br />

distinguished from mineralized high sulphidation systems in the <strong>field</strong> by the lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> vuggy silica and generally coarse grained and higher temperature layered<br />

silicates (e.g., alunite, pyrophyllite, dickite). The presence <strong>of</strong> high temperature<br />

alteration minerals such as alunite or corundum is distinctive. PIMA, Terraspec<br />

and XRD studies are therefore useful for the delineation <strong>of</strong> alteration zonation<br />

and pro<strong>vis</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> vectors towards where mineralization should occur in ore<br />

systems.<br />

25


________________________________________________________________<br />

Alteration Types Associated with High Sulfidation Systems<br />

Vuggy Silica<br />

This alteration type occurs in structural zones or as replacement bodies in<br />

permeable lithologies, usually in the core <strong>of</strong> zones <strong>of</strong> advanced argillic alteration.<br />

This extreme form <strong>of</strong> acid leaching occurs in the higher levels <strong>of</strong> epithermal<br />

deposits. It is also found in the upper parts <strong>of</strong> telescoped porphyry systems.<br />

Figure 28 - Vuggy Silica Alteration shows alunite,<br />

jarosite, quartz, sulfur, pyrite, hematite.<br />

Silicic<br />

Vuggy Silica<br />

Silicification adds silica to a vuggy, acid leached rock and fills the vugs created<br />

through intense leaching. Silicification is common in high sulfidation systems. It<br />

can be confused with intense quartz stockwork at the top <strong>of</strong> some porphyry<br />

deposits.<br />

. Advanced Argillic<br />

This alteration type is found in the upper regions <strong>of</strong> a high sulfidation system. It<br />

can occur in the lithocap <strong>of</strong> a porphyry system.<br />

The progressive neutralization and cooling <strong>of</strong> high sulphidation fluids by rock<br />

reaction produces alteration moving away from the core in which zonation is<br />

characterized progressively outwards by mineral assemblages dominated by:<br />

alunite, pyrophyllite, kaolin, and illitic and chloritic clays (Corbett and Leach,<br />

26<br />

Silicic<br />

Figure 29 - The silicic alteration plot shows quartz,<br />

chalcedony, alunite, barite, hematite, pyrite.<br />

Barite has only water features and does not have<br />

a diagnostic spectrum.


________________________________________________________________<br />

1998). Mineralogies dominated by pyrophyllite-diaspore-dickite may be<br />

indicative, but not exclusively, <strong>of</strong> higher temperature (deeper) conditions,<br />

whereas lower temperature (opaline) pervasive silicification or alunite-kaolin<br />

dominate in cooler (higher level) settings. Similarly, thin alteration zones may<br />

suggest that fluid conditions have changed rapidly, possibly in a quenched higher<br />

level system (or distal to the fluid upflow), whereas wide zonation characterizes<br />

slower changing fluid conditions more typical <strong>of</strong> deeper levels (or more proximal<br />

to the fluid upflow).<br />

Figure 30 - Advanced Argillic Alteration spectra show<br />

pyrophyllite, topaz, zunyite, dickite, alunite, quartz,<br />

hematite, and pyrite.<br />

27<br />

Figure 31 - Intermediate Argillic Alteration shows<br />

kaolinite, illite, illite/smectite, montmorillonite, quartz,<br />

pyrite


________________________________________________________________<br />

Argilic — Intermediate Argillic<br />

This alteration zone is found between propylitic and and advanced argillic. It can<br />

be progressive outward from illite illite/smectite montmorillonite. It may<br />

also show gradations from illite + illite/smectite into a chlorite envelope<br />

around the illite vein (Comstock Lode, Virginia City, Nv).<br />

Figure 32 - Argillic alteration contains<br />

kaolinite, illite, illite/smectite,<br />

montmorillonite, quartz, and pyrite.<br />

Propylitic Alteration<br />

Propylitic can be regional, but it is usually found in the outer-most alteration<br />

zone. It will show different wavelengths for the chlorites as opposed to those<br />

chlorites in the intermediate argillic suite.<br />

28<br />

Figure 33 - Propylitic Alteration shows Mg-Chlorite,<br />

Fe-chlorite, epidote, calcite, pyrite.


________________________________________________________________<br />

Porphyry Copper Deposits<br />

Porphyry copper deposits form at 2-5 km below the earth's surface at<br />

temperatures <strong>of</strong> >500-600 degreed C from hypersaline (40-60 wt % NaCl equiv.)<br />

near neutral magmatic fluids (Hedenquist and Lowenstein, 1994). Aqueous<br />

magmatic vapors containing CO2, SO2, H2S, and HCl separate from fluids and<br />

ascend to the surface. Ore bodies range in size from several hundred meters to<br />

more than a kilometer in diameter. Grades tend to be low, and the ore minerals<br />

are usually disseminated through a quartz stockwork within the upper part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

host porphyry intrusive.<br />

Alteration around the ore body is usually concentric and may be described by the<br />

Lowell and Guilbert (1970) model for porphyry copper deposits. Zoned<br />

assemblages that were formed as reactive, metal-bearing magmatic fluid, which<br />

moved away from the intrusion, cooled and reacted with the country rock.<br />

In the core <strong>of</strong> the deposit, over the mineralizing intrusion, there is a potassic zone<br />

(biotite + magnetite ± orthoclase ± albite ± anhydrite ± chalcopyrite ± bornite)<br />

which represents late magmatic K-metasomatism <strong>of</strong> the host intrusives. This<br />

passes upwards into extensive quartz stockwork and a transitional zone<br />

characterized by intermediate argillic alteration (chlorite + hematite/sulfides +<br />

quartz ± illite).<br />

This is usually overprinted by the phyllic zone which dominates the stockwork.<br />

The phyllic zone is acid-leached and characterized by quartz + sericite +<br />

tourmaline + pyrite ± chalcopyrite. The sericite may be composed <strong>of</strong> either illite +<br />

montmorillonite or fine grained muscovite. Above the phyllic zone, the rock is<br />

capped by an advanced argillic zone where leaching is oxidized acidic water<br />

(generated by the absorption <strong>of</strong> magmatic vapor in to meteoric waters) has been<br />

particularly intense and may reach to the paleosurface. It is characterized by the<br />

assemblage quartz + alunite ± pyrophyllite ± kaolinite/dickite. Surrounding the<br />

potassic, intermediate/phyllic and advanced argillic zones is the deuterically<br />

(propylitic) altered country rock. The propylitic zone is characterized by green<br />

coloration and the assemblage: chlorite + epidote ± albite ± actinolite ± calcite ±<br />

hematite.<br />

Hypogene copper sulphide mineralization is characterized by chalcopyrite<br />

[although bornite occurs when the sulfur activity is low as indicated by the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> pyrite]. Magnetite is common in the potassic zone and pyrite in<br />

phyllic zone in the advanced argillic zone, sulphides have been decomposed and<br />

leached, or replaced by limonite.<br />

Supergene leaching <strong>of</strong> hypogene alteration and mineralization occurs after the<br />

hydrothermal event. It is distinguished here from weak secondary alteration (due<br />

to later near neutral meteoric water percolation) which does not produce strong<br />

leaching, but may result in a modest overprint <strong>of</strong> montmorillonite, kaolinite, in the<br />

29


________________________________________________________________<br />

hypogene and supergene zones. The principal mechanism <strong>of</strong> strong supergene<br />

leaching is the oxidation <strong>of</strong> pyrite in water, which produces limonite and<br />

generates sulphuric acid. The effect <strong>of</strong> this acid on acid stable hypogene<br />

minerals (quartz, alunite, kaolinite) is subtle. However, there may be<br />

decomposition <strong>of</strong> biotite and feldspars in the potassic zone. Feldspars and<br />

chlorite in the propylitic zone and illite in the phyllic zone, producing a supergene<br />

leached cap that is characterized by the assemblage quartz + alunite + kaolinite<br />

+ gypsum. This is not always easy to distinguish from the hypogene leached cap<br />

<strong>of</strong> the advanced argillic zone.<br />

Figure 34<br />

Infrared Active Alteration Minerals Associated with Porphyries<br />

Infrared-active alteration minerals associated with porphyries include quartz,<br />

sericite/muscovite, biotite, phlogopite, anhydrite/gypsum, magnetite, actinolite,<br />

chlorite, epidote, calcite, clay minerals (illite, kaolinite, smectite), tourmaline.<br />

Gangue minerals in mineralized veins are mainly quartz with lesser biotite,<br />

sericite, magnetite, chlorite, calcite, epidote, anhydrite and tourmaline. Leached<br />

cap and lithocap minerals can include jarosite, alunite, pyrophyllite, diaspore,<br />

zunyite, topaz and dickite.<br />

30


________________________________________________________________<br />

Alteration types associated with Porphyry Copper Deposits<br />

ALTERATION MINERALOGY:<br />

Early formed alteration can be overprinted by younger assemblages. Central and<br />

early formed potassic zones (K-feldspar and biotite) commonly coincide with ore.<br />

This alteration can be flanked in volcanic host rocks by biotite-rich rocks that<br />

grade outward into propylitic rocks. The biotite is a fine-grained, “shreddy”<br />

looking secondary mineral that is commonly referred to as an early developed<br />

biotite (EDB) or a “biotite hornfels”. These older alteration assemblages in<br />

cupriferous zones can be partially to completely overprinted by later biotite and<br />

K-feldspar and then phyllic (quartz-sericite-pyrite) alteration, less commonly<br />

argillic, and rarely, in the uppermost parts <strong>of</strong> some ore deposits, advanced argillic<br />

alteration (kaolinite-pyrophyllite) . Panteleyev (1995):<br />

Potassic - biotite rich Alteration (Thompson and Thompson, 1996)<br />

This alteration type is found in the core <strong>of</strong> porphyry deposits. It may form large<br />

peripheral alteration zone in wall rocks (without K-spar) and zones out to<br />

propylitic alteration. Minerals include biotite, phlogopite, K-spar, magnetite,<br />

quartz, anhydrite, albite-sodic plagioclase, actinolite, rutile, apatite, sericite,<br />

chlorite, and epidote.<br />

Figure 35 - Potassic alteration shows<br />

Actinolite, biotite, phlogopite, epidote, ironchlorite,<br />

Mg-chlorite, muscovite, quartz,<br />

anhydrite, magnetite.<br />

31<br />

Figure 36 - Potassic - K-silicate alteration<br />

includes "albite", anhydrite, quartz, muscovite<br />

and epidote.


________________________________________________________________<br />

Potassic - K-silicate<br />

This alteration occurs in the core <strong>of</strong> porphyry systems, particularly when hosted<br />

by felsic intrusions - granodiorite, quartz monzonite,granite, seyenite. Minerals<br />

include K-feldspar, quartz, albite, muscovite, anhydrite, epidote. Feldspars do<br />

not have detectable bonds in the SWIR region and therefore their pr<strong>of</strong>iles do not<br />

have distinctive features.<br />

Sodic, Sodic-Calcic<br />

Occurs with minor mineralization in the deeper parts <strong>of</strong> some porphyry systems<br />

and is a host to mineralization in porphyry deposits associated with alkaline<br />

intrusions.<br />

albite, actinolite, diopside, quartz, magnetite, titanite, chlorite, epidote , scapolite<br />

Figure 37 - Sodic- Calcic alteration plots<br />

Albite, actinolite, Fe-chlorite, epidote,<br />

Mg-chlorite, marialite, mizzonite,<br />

diopside, quartz, magnetite.<br />

32<br />

Figure 38 - Phyllic alteration includes:<br />

Illite, muscovite, iron chlorite, Mgchlorite,<br />

gypsum, anhydrite, quartz,<br />

pyrite.


________________________________________________________________<br />

Phyllic<br />

Phyllic alteration commonly forms a peripheral halo around the core <strong>of</strong> porphyry<br />

deposits. It may overprint earlier potassic alteration and may host substantial<br />

mineralization. Detectable minerals include muscovite, illite, quartz, pyrite,<br />

chlorite, hematite, and anhydrite.<br />

Intermediate Argillic<br />

Intermediate argillic alteration generally forms a structurally controlled to<br />

widespread overprint on other types <strong>of</strong> alteration in many porphyry systems. The<br />

detectable minerals include illite, muscovite, dickite, kaolinite, Fe-chlorite, Mgchlorite,<br />

epidote, montmorillonite, calcite, and pyrite.<br />

Figure 39 - Intermediate argillic alterations<br />

contains muscovite, illite, chlorite, kaolinite,<br />

dickite, montmorillonite, calcite, epidote, and<br />

pyrite.<br />

33<br />

Figure 40 - Advanced argillic alteration for a<br />

porphyry system will contain higher temperature<br />

minerals such as Topaz, pyrophyllite, andalusite,<br />

dumortierite, tourmaline, along with alunite,<br />

diaspore, quartz, hematite, and pyrite.


________________________________________________________________<br />

Advanced Argillic<br />

This is an intense alteration phase, <strong>of</strong>ten in the upper part <strong>of</strong> porphyry systems.<br />

It can also form envelopes around pyrite-rich veins that cross cut other alteration<br />

types. The minerals associated with this type are higher temperature and include<br />

pyrophyllite, quartz, andalusite, diaspore, corundum, alunite, topaz, tourmaline,<br />

dumortierite, pyrite, and hematite.<br />

Propylitic<br />

Forms the outermost alteration zone at intermedite to deep levels in the porphyry<br />

system. It can be mineralogically zoned from inner actinolite-rich to out epidote<br />

rich facies. chlorite, epidote, albite, calcite, actinolite, illite, clay pyrite<br />

Figure 41 - Propylitic alteration for porphyry systems<br />

includes; Fe- chlorite, Mg-chlorite, epidote, actinolite,<br />

calcite, illite, montmorillonite, albite, and pyrite.<br />

34<br />

Figure 42 - Copper carbonates in porphyry<br />

systems can include azurite, malachite,<br />

aurichalcite, and rosasite.


ARSENATES<br />

________________________________________________________________<br />

Supergene<br />

Secondary (supergene) zones carry chalcocite, covellite and other Cu2S minerals<br />

(digenite, djurleite, etc.), chrysocolla, native copper and copper oxide, carbonate<br />

and sulphate minerals. Oxidized and leached zones at surface are marked by<br />

ferruginous “cappings” with supergene clay minerals, limonite (goethite, hematite<br />

and jarosite) and residual quartz. Panteleyev, A. (1995):<br />

Minerals include: antlerite, bisbeeite, brochantite, chalcoalumite, claringbullite,<br />

conichalcite, crednerite, cuprite, delafossite, graemite, nantokite, paramelaconite,<br />

paratacamite, rosasite and spangolite, aurichalcite, connellite, cyanotrichite,<br />

malachite and shattuckite are additional supergene copper. Those available in<br />

the database are plotted in this section.<br />

The best way to display the variations in the supergene environment is by group.<br />

The following plots are divided into copper carbonates, chlorides, arsenates,<br />

phosphate, silicates and sulfates.<br />

CHLORIDES<br />

Figure 43 - Copper chlorides includes<br />

atacamite, connellite, and cumengite.<br />

ARSENATES<br />

35<br />

PHOSPHATES<br />

Figure 44 - Copper phosphates include<br />

libelhenite, pseudomalachite, and<br />

turquoise.<br />

Figure 45 - Copper arsenates<br />

include bayldonite, chenevixite,<br />

conichalcite, clinoclase and<br />

olivenite.


________________________________________________________________<br />

SILICATES<br />

Figure 46 - Copper silicates include chrysocolla,<br />

dioptase, papagoite, and shattuckite<br />

36<br />

SULFATES<br />

Figure 47 - Copper sulfates include antlerite,<br />

brochantite, chalcanthite, cyanotrichite,<br />

kroehnite, spangolite.


________________________________________________________________<br />

LEACHED CAP<br />

Minerals in the leached cap environment include alunite, kaolinite, illite, diaspore,<br />

iron oxides, copper sulfates, and copper hydroxides.<br />

Figure 48 - Leach cap minerals include goethite,<br />

hematite, jarosite, kaolinite, chrysocolla,<br />

antlerite, brochantite, diaspore, turquoise.<br />

alunite.<br />

Exotic copper mineralization is a complex hydrochemical process linking<br />

supergene enrichment, lateral copper transport, and precipitation <strong>of</strong> copper oxide<br />

minerals in the drainage network <strong>of</strong> a porphyry copper deposit.<br />

37<br />

Figure 49 - Other leach cap minerals are copper<br />

bearing and include atacamite, azurite, malachite,<br />

chrysocolla, kaolinite.


________________________________________________________________<br />

DIAMONDS - KIMBERLITES<br />

DEPOSIT DEFINITION<br />

Kimberlites are a group <strong>of</strong> volatile-rich (dominantly carbon dioxide) potassic<br />

ultrabasic rocks. Commonly, they exhibit a distinctive inequigranular texture<br />

resulting from the presence <strong>of</strong> macrocrysts (and in some instances megacrysts)<br />

set in a fine-grained matrix. The megacryst/macrocryst assemblage consists <strong>of</strong><br />

rounded anhedral crystals <strong>of</strong> magnesian ilmenite, Cr-poor titanian pyrope, olivine,<br />

Cr-poor clinopyroxene, phlogopite, enstatite and Ti-poor chromite. Olivine is the<br />

dominant member <strong>of</strong> the macrocryst assemblage. The matrix minerals may<br />

include second generation euhedral primary olivine and/or phlogopite, together<br />

with perovskite, spinel (titaniferous magnesian aluminous chromite, titanian<br />

chromite, members <strong>of</strong> the magnesian ulvospinel-ulvospinel-magnetite series),<br />

diopside (Al- and Ti- poor), monticellite, apatite, calcite, and primary late-stage<br />

serpentine (commonly Fe rich). Some kimberlites contain late-stage phlogopites.<br />

The replacement <strong>of</strong> early-formed olivine, phlogopite, monticellite, and apatite by<br />

deuteric serpentine and calcite is common. Evolved members <strong>of</strong> the clan may be<br />

devoid <strong>of</strong>, or poor in, macrocrysts, and composed essentially <strong>of</strong> calcite,<br />

serpentine, and magnetite together with minor phlogopite, apatite, and<br />

perovskite. (From Mitchell 1986)<br />

http://www.geology.ubc.ca/research/diamonds/kopylova/intro/morphology.html<br />

Kimberlites can be divided into 3 distinct units based on morphology and<br />

petrology. These units are: 1) Crater Facies Kimberlite ,2) Diatreme Facies<br />

Kimberlite; 3) Hypabyssal Facies Kimberlite (Mitchell 1986). Kimberlite occurs<br />

in the Earth's crust in vertical structures known as kimberlite pipes.<br />

Kimberlites are divided into Group I (basaltic) and Group II (micaceous)<br />

kimberlites, along mineralogical grounds, the difference in mineralogy being<br />

caused by the preponderance <strong>of</strong> water versus carbon dioxide. Group I<br />

kimberlites are <strong>of</strong> CO2-rich ultramafic potassic igneous rocks dominated by a<br />

primary mineral assemblage <strong>of</strong> forsteritic olivine, magnesian ilmenite, chromian<br />

pyrope, almandine-pyrope, chromian diopside, phlogopite, enstatite and <strong>of</strong> Tipoor<br />

chromite. Group-II kimberlites (or orangeites) are ultrapotassic, peralkaline<br />

rocks rich in volatiles (dominantly H2O). The distinctive characteristic <strong>of</strong><br />

orangeites is phlogopite macrocrysts and microphenocrysts, together with<br />

groundmass micas that vary in composition from phlogopite to Fe-rich<br />

phlogopite.<br />

38


________________________________________________________________<br />

Figure 50<br />

DEPOSIT MODEL<br />

Diamonds are mined in about 25 countries. India was the initial source, followed<br />

by Brazil and then South Africa. Africa is the richest continent for diamond<br />

mining, accounting for roughly 49% <strong>of</strong> world production. The major sources are in<br />

the south with lesser concentrations in the west-central part <strong>of</strong> the continent. The<br />

major producing countries are Congo Republic (Zaire), Botswana, South Africa,<br />

<strong>An</strong>gola, Namibia, Ghana, Central African Republic, Guinea, Mali, Sierra Leone,<br />

Tanzania and Zimbabwe. Canada is starting to come on line now with Ekati and<br />

Diavik.in the northern part <strong>of</strong> the country. Australia has one producing mine, the<br />

Argyle. There are major resources in Russia. The United States has very minor<br />

deposits in Colorado, Wyoming and Arkansas.<br />

(http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/diamonds/other.html)<br />

39


________________________________________________________________<br />

ALTERATION MINERALS<br />

Common alteration minerals associated with kimberlites include: Carbonates,<br />

Phlogopite, Biotite, chlorites, Serpentine, richterite, other amphiboles, talc,<br />

septechlorite, smectite, saponite, apophyllite, zeolites (analcime), vermiculite.<br />

Figure 51 - This plots shows Serpentine,<br />

calcite, magnesite, phlogopite, biotite,<br />

chamosite, clinochlore, saponite, Mgsilicate,<br />

vermiculite, Fe-amphibole.<br />

INDICATOR MINERALS<br />

Several minerals, when found in glacial sediments, are useful indicators <strong>of</strong> the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> kimberlite, and to a certain extent, an evaluation <strong>of</strong> the diamond<br />

potential <strong>of</strong> kimberlite. These minerals are far more abundant in kimberlite than<br />

diamond, survive glacial transport, and are <strong>vis</strong>ually and chemically distinct. Crpyrope<br />

(purple colour, kelyphite rims), eclogitic garnet (orange-red), Cr-diopside<br />

(pale to emerald green), Mg-ilmenite (black, conchoidal fracture), chromite<br />

40<br />

Figure 52 - Other alteration minerals include<br />

pyrope garnet, richterite, phlogopite, olivine,<br />

diopside. Cr-diopside


________________________________________________________________<br />

(reddish-black, irregular to octahedral crystal shape), and olivine (pale yellowgreen)<br />

are the most commonly used kimberlite indicator minerals in drift<br />

prospecting. Kimberlite indicator minerals are recovered from the medium to very<br />

coarse sand-sized fraction <strong>of</strong> glacial sediments, and analyzed by electron<br />

microprobe to confirm their identification.<br />

(source: http://sts.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/page1/miner/kirk/indic.htm)<br />

Garnets<br />

Pyrope, Almandine, Grossular<br />

Diopside<br />

Chrome-diopside, diopside<br />

Others to consider<br />

Zircon, Olivine, Orthopyroxenes (Harzburgite?),Chromite??, Ilmenite??,<br />

Perovskite??<br />

Figure 53 - This plot includes<br />

almandine, grossularite, pyrope garnets;<br />

diopside, Cr-diopside, and olivine. Figure 54 - Garnet comparisons<br />

\<br />

41<br />

The indicator garnet for the presence <strong>of</strong> diamonds in<br />

kimberlites is a G-10. This has a diagnostic chrome<br />

feature in the <strong>vis</strong>ible, indicated by the arrow.


________________________________________________________________<br />

DEPOSIT TYPE DEFINITION<br />

SKARNS<br />

http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~meinert/aboutskarn.html#Definitions<br />

There are many definitions and usages <strong>of</strong> the word "skarn". Skarns can form<br />

during regional or contact metamorphism and from a variety <strong>of</strong> metasomatic<br />

processes involving fluids <strong>of</strong> magmatic, metamorphic, meteoric, and/or marine<br />

origin. They are found adjacent to plutons, along faults and major shear zones, in<br />

shallow geothermal systems, on the bottom <strong>of</strong> the seafloor, and at lower crustal<br />

depths in deeply buried metamorphic terranes. What links these diverse<br />

environments, and what defines a rock as skarn, is the mineralogy. This<br />

mineralogy includes a wide variety <strong>of</strong> calc-silicate and associated minerals but<br />

usually is dominated by garnet and pyroxene.<br />

The composition and texture <strong>of</strong> the protolith tend to control the composition and<br />

texture <strong>of</strong> the resulting skarn. In contrast, most economically important skarn<br />

deposits result from large-scale metasomatic transfer, where fluid composition<br />

controls the resulting skarn and ore mineralogy.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the more fundamental controls on skarn size, geometry, and style <strong>of</strong><br />

alteration is the depth <strong>of</strong> formation.<br />

Major skarn types:<br />

Fe Skarns ,Au Skarns, W Skarns, Cu Skarns, Zn Skarns, Mo Skarns.<br />

The vast majority <strong>of</strong> skarn deposits are associated with magmatic arcs related to<br />

subduction beneath continental crust. Plutons range in composition from diorite<br />

to granite although differences among the main base metal skarn types appear to<br />

reflect the local geologic environment (depth <strong>of</strong> formation, structural and fluid<br />

pathways) more than fundamental differences <strong>of</strong> petrogenesis (Nakano et al.,<br />

1994). In contrast, gold skarns in this environment are associated with<br />

particularly reduced plutons that may represent a restricted petrologic history.<br />

42


________________________________________________________________<br />

ALTERATION TYPES ASSOCIATED WITH SKARNS<br />

RETROGRADE ALTERATON<br />

The term retrograde alteration refers to an alteration stage in which higher<br />

temperature, generally anhydrous, minerals are replaced by lower temperature,<br />

generally hydrous, minerals. In some cases this process is largely metamorphic,<br />

i.e. the bulk composition stays roughly the same but mineral "A" is replaced by<br />

mineral "B". In other cases, retrograde alteration is concurrent with strong<br />

metasomatism, such as during mineralization with various sulfide minerals<br />

Retrograde skarn mineralogy, in the form <strong>of</strong> epidote, amphibole, chlorite, and<br />

other hydrous phases, typically is structurally controlled and overprints the<br />

prograde zonation sequence. Thus, there <strong>of</strong>ten is a zone <strong>of</strong> abundant hydrous<br />

minerals along fault, stratigraphic, or intrusive contacts. This superposition <strong>of</strong><br />

later phases can be difficult to discriminate from a spatial zonation sequence due<br />

to progressive reaction <strong>of</strong> a metasomatic fluid.<br />

SKARN MODEL<br />

Figure 55 - Zonation <strong>of</strong> most skarns reflects the geometry <strong>of</strong> the pluton<br />

contact and fluid flow. Such skarns are zoned from proximal endoskarn to<br />

proximal exoskarn, dominated by garnet. More distal skarn usually is more<br />

pyroxene-rich and the skarn front, especially in contact with marble, may be<br />

dominated by pyroxenoids or vesuvianite. Meinert, L.D., 1992<br />

43


________________________________________________________________<br />

In general, retrograde alteration is more intense and more pervasive in shallower<br />

skarn systems. In some shallow, porphyry copper-related skarn systems,<br />

extensive retrograde alteration almost completely obliterates the prograde garnet<br />

and pyroxene skarn (Einaudi, 1982a,b)<br />

Porphyry copper Skarn<br />

Alteration potassic alteration<br />

phillic alteration<br />

advanced argillic alteration<br />

propylitic alteration<br />

Figure 56 - From Murakami (2005)<br />

The main differences between amphiboles in different skarn types are variations<br />

in the amount <strong>of</strong> Fe, Mg, Mn, Ca, Al, Na, and K. Amphiboles from Au, W, and Sn<br />

skarns are progressively more aluminous (actinolite-hastingsite-hornblende),<br />

amphiboles from Cu, Mo, and Fe skarns are progressively more iron-rich in the<br />

tremolite-actinolite series, and amphiboles from zinc skarns are both Mn-rich and<br />

Ca-deficient, ranging from actinolite to dannemorite. For a specific skarn deposit<br />

or group <strong>of</strong> skarns, compositional variations in less common mineral phases,<br />

such as idocrase, bustamite, or olivine, may provide insight into zonation patterns<br />

or regional petrogenesis (e.g. Giere, 1986; Silva and Siriwardena, 1988;<br />

Benkerrou and Fonteilles, 1989).<br />

44<br />

Prograde<br />

Retrograde<br />

Vein system A vein:biotite vein<br />

Dominant in sallower part <strong>of</strong><br />

B vein:Quartz-molybdenite (no alteration halo skarn system<br />

along vein)<br />

C vein:chlorite (or green smectite bearing<br />

mixed layer clay) + sulfides (partly pyrite<br />

+molybdenite)<br />

D vein: phillic alteration (sericite alteration<br />

along Quartz vein)<br />

Related intrusion Generally, porphyry, sometimes depend on<br />

depth <strong>of</strong> formation<br />

Depend on depth <strong>of</strong> formation


________________________________________________________________<br />

PROGRADE ALTERATION<br />

The minerals found in prograde systems include: Scapolite-meionite, scapolitemarialite,<br />

scapolite-mizzonite, diopside, hedenbergite, olivine, rhodonite,<br />

grossularite, andradite, wollastonite, vesuvianite<br />

Figure 57 - Scapolite-meionite, scapolite-marialite, scapolite-mizzonite, diopside, hedenbergite,<br />

olivine, rhodonite, grossularite, andradite, wollastonite, and vesuvianite.<br />

45


________________________________________________________________<br />

RETROGRADE SKARN ALTERATION<br />

Retrograde alteration commonly replaces earlier skarn alteration, but may also<br />

affect adjacent wallrock, which is many cases is limestone.<br />

The minerals observed in these suites include illite/smectite, montmorillonite,<br />

nontronite, pyrite, epidote, clinozoisite, tremolite ->actinolite, prehnite, chlorite,<br />

vesuvianite, biotite, phlogopite, quartz, calcite, dolomite, ankerite, siderite, Fedolomite.<br />

These are plotted in Figures 58, 59, and 60.<br />

CLAY SERIES<br />

Figure 58 - Illite, Illite/smectite,<br />

montmorillonite, nontronite, and pyrite.<br />

46<br />

CARBONATE SERIES<br />

Figure 59 - <strong>An</strong>kerite, calcite, dolomite,<br />

Fe-dolomite, and siderite.


________________________________________________________________<br />

Figure 60 - Actinolite, tremolite, epidote,<br />

clinozoisite, Fe-Chlorite, Mg-chlorite,<br />

biotite, phlogopite, vesuvianite, and<br />

prehnite<br />

47<br />

Figure 61 - Forsterite, serpentine, talc, calcite,<br />

tremolite, and magnetite<br />

MAGNESIUM SKARN<br />

Magnesium skarns are developed as<br />

metasomatic replacements <strong>of</strong> dolomitic<br />

limestone. High temperature magnesium<br />

skarns are characterized by forsterite, and<br />

diopside and low temperature magnesium<br />

skarns contain serpentine and talc. Both <strong>of</strong><br />

which occur as retrograde minerals after<br />

forsterite and clinopyroxene.<br />

Figure 61 plots forsterite, serpentine, talc,<br />

calcite, tremolite, magnetite.


________________________________________________________________<br />

Definition <strong>of</strong> deposit type<br />

IRON OXIDE COPPER GOLD (IOCG)<br />

Iron oxide copper-gold (IOCG) deposits encompass a wide spectrum <strong>of</strong> sulphidedeficient<br />

low-Ti magnetite and/or hematite ore bodies <strong>of</strong> hydrothermal origin<br />

where breccias, veins, disseminations and massive lenses with polymetallic<br />

enrichments (Cu, Au, Ag, U, REE, Bi, Co, Nb, P) are genetically associated with,<br />

but either proximal or distal to large-scale continental, A- to I-type magmatism,<br />

alkaline-carbonatite stocks, and crustal-scale fault zones and splays. The<br />

deposits are characterized by more than 20% iron oxides. Their lithological hosts<br />

and ages are non-diagnostic but their alteration zones are, with calcic-sodic<br />

regional alteration superimposed by focused potassic and iron oxide alterations.<br />

The deposits form at shallow to mid crustal levels in extensional, anorogenic or<br />

orogenic, continental settings such as intracratonic and intra-arc rifts, continental<br />

magmatic arcs and back-arc basins. Margins <strong>of</strong> Archean craton where arcs and<br />

successor arcs were developed appear to be particularly fertile.<br />

http://gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/mindep/synth_dep/iocg/index_e.php<br />

The 3810 Mt Olympic Dam deposit in Australia is the deposit that guides most<br />

mineral exploration worldwide (Hitzman et al., 1992; Western Mining Corporation,<br />

2003). Currently known metallogenic IOCG districts occur in Precambrian<br />

shields worldwide as well as in Circum-Pacific regions (e.g., Carlon, 2000;<br />

Fourie, 2000; Porter, 2000, 2002a and papers therein; Strickland and Martyn,<br />

2002; Gandhi, 2004c; G<strong>of</strong>f et al., 2004).<br />

The recognition <strong>of</strong> this deposit type was triggered by the 1975 discovery <strong>of</strong> the<br />

giant Olympic Dam deposit in Australia (Roberts and Hudson, 1983) followed by<br />

the discovery <strong>of</strong> Starra (1980), La Candelaria (1987), Osborne (1988), Ernest-<br />

Henry (1991), and Alemao (1996). The early discoveries served to define this<br />

group <strong>of</strong> deposits as the IOCG deposit type in the 1990s (Hitzman et al., 1992).<br />

source: Mineral Deposits <strong>of</strong> Canada<br />

Source: Iron Oxide Copper-Gold (+/-Ag,+/-Nb,+/-REE,+/-U) Deposits: A Canadian<br />

Perspective<br />

Louise Corriveau Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> Canada<br />

http://gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/mindep/synth_dep/iocg/index_e.php<br />

This appears to be a website publication only.<br />

48


________________________________________________________________<br />

IOCG PROPOSED MODELS<br />

Figure 62 - Schematic illustrations <strong>of</strong> flow paths and hydrothermal features for alternative models for IOCG deposits. Shading in arrows<br />

indicates predicted quartz precipitation (veining) for different paths in different quartz-saturated rocks which provides a useful<br />

first-order indication <strong>of</strong> path (cf,. Barton el al., 1997, Barton and Johnson,2000)..<br />

________________________________________________________________<br />

Page 49


________________________________________________________________<br />

ALTERATION<br />

Following is a summary <strong>of</strong> alteration zoning associated with many IOCG<br />

deposits. Please note that reflectance <strong>spectroscopy</strong> does not detect the silicate<br />

bonds found in the feldspars.<br />

The principal ore minerals are hematite (specularite, botryoidal hematite and<br />

martite), low-Ti magnetite, bornite, chalcopyrite, chalcocite and pyrite.<br />

Subordinate ones include Ag-, Cu-, Ni-, Co-, U-arsenides, autunite, bastnaesite,<br />

bismuthinite, brannerite, britholite, carrolite, cobaltite, c<strong>of</strong>finite, covellite, digenite,<br />

florencite, loellingite, malachite, molybdenite, monazite, pitchblende, pyrrhotite,<br />

sulphosalts, uraninite, xenotime, native bismuth, copper, silver and gold, Ag-, Bi-,<br />

Co-telluride, and vermiculite.<br />

Gangue mineralogy consists principally <strong>of</strong> albite, K-feldspar, sericite, carbonate,<br />

chlorite, quartz (crypto-crystalline in some cases), amphibole, pyroxene, biotite<br />

and apatite (F- or REE-rich) with accessory allanite, barite, epidote, fayallite,<br />

fluorite, ilvaite, garnet, monazite, perovskite, phlogopite, rutile, scapolite, titanite,<br />

and tourmaline. The amphibole includes Fe-, Cl-, Na- or Al-rich hornblende<br />

(edenite), actinolite, grunerite, hastingsite, and tschermakitic or alkali amphibole.<br />

Carbonates include calcite, ankerite, siderite and dolomite. Late-stage veins<br />

contain fluorite, barite, siderite, hematite and sulphides.<br />

There are 3-6 alteration types associated with IOCG deposits. These include<br />

sodic, sodic-calcic, potassic, quartz-tourmaline, and albite-calcite. Figure 63<br />

shows the minerals associated with the different alteration types.<br />

MINERAL Sodic Sodic-calcic Potassic Qzt-Tourmaline Albite-Calcite<br />

albite<br />

K-spar<br />

amphiboles<br />

bastnaesite (REE carbonates)<br />

biotite<br />

calcite<br />

chlorite<br />

epidote<br />

garnet (andradite, Fe-rich garnet)<br />

hematite<br />

monazite<br />

muscovite<br />

quartz<br />

scapolite<br />

tourmaline<br />

magnetite<br />

Figure 63 – Minerals associated with alteration types for IOCG deposits.<br />

________________________________________________________________<br />

Page 50


________________________________________________________________<br />

Sodic Alteration. The minerals are albite, magnetite, and epidote.<br />

Sodic<br />

Alteration<br />

Figure 64 - With sodic alteration,<br />

<strong>spectroscopy</strong> sees magnetite and epidote.<br />

Sodic-Calcic Alteration early stages<br />

There is strong albitization (± clinopyroxene, titanite, calc-silicate (clinopyroxene,<br />

amphibole, garnet) - alkali feldspar (K-feldspar, albite) ± Fe-Cu sulphides, and<br />

various assemblages including albite, actinolite, magnetite, apatite and late<br />

epidote. Ca-rich host-rocks are present, with Fe-rich garnet-clinopyroxene ±<br />

scapolite skarn.<br />

Scapolite-actinolite-magnetite<br />

Albite - actinolite-magnetite<br />

Albite-chlorite-epidote-calcite<br />

This is very complex system or systems.<br />

Iron Stage<br />

This stage is largely sterile except for iron ore and apatite. There is an influx <strong>of</strong><br />

magnetite ± biotite.<br />

51<br />

Sodic-Calcic<br />

Figure 65 – Sodic-calcic alteration is more complex.<br />

The plot shows actinolite, iron-chlorite, epidote,<br />

diopside, magnetite, mizzonite, marialite, calcite<br />

and pyrope.


________________________________________________________________<br />

The minerals include<br />

iron oxide (magnetite and hematite), iron carbonate (siderite and<br />

ankerite) and iron silicate (chlorite and amphibole, in particular grunerite<br />

and hastingsite).<br />

IRON STAGE<br />

Figure 66 - The iron stage <strong>of</strong> alteration shows<br />

biotite, iron-chlorite, cummingtonite, ankerite,<br />

siderite, hematite, and magnetite.<br />

Potassic Alteration<br />

The main ore stage is associated with potassium-iron alteration zones in which<br />

either sericite (at Olympic Dam and Prominent Hill) or K-feldspar (most common)<br />

prevail as the potassic-bearing phase.<br />

K-feldspar-biotite-pyrite-chalcopyrite<br />

At Olympic Dam,<br />

Potassic alteration occurs with hematite, sericite, chlorite, carbonate ± Fe-Cu<br />

sulphides ± uraninite, pitchblende and REE (bastnaesite) minerals prevail. It is<br />

locally superimposed on a magnetite-biotite alteration (Reynolds, 2000; Skirrow<br />

et al., 2002). The intense chloritization destroys the biotite. Quartz, fluorite,<br />

barite, carbonate, orthoclase, epidote and tourmaline can also be present.<br />

Titanite, monazite, perovskite and rutile may occur. The main uranium mineral is<br />

uraninite (pitchblende) with lesser c<strong>of</strong>finite and brannerite.<br />

52<br />

POTASSIC ALTERATION<br />

Figure 67 - Potassic is the most<br />

complex <strong>of</strong> the alteration phases. It<br />

includes tourmaline, biotite, iron-chlorite,<br />

epidote, REE-carbonate, monazite,<br />

muscovite, calcite, hematite, quartz.


________________________________________________________________<br />

Quartz-Tourmaline Alteration<br />

The minerals in this suite include tourmaline-magnetite-quartzchalcopyrite-pyrite,<br />

chlorite, and chalcopyrite.<br />

Quartz-Tourmaline<br />

Alteration<br />

Figure 68 - Quartz-tourmaline alteration<br />

plot with magnetite, quartz, tourmaline,<br />

and Fe-chlorite.<br />

Albite-Calcite Alteration<br />

This phase is post ore - retrograde.<br />

The minerals include albite-calcite-bornite-chalcocite and dolomite in<br />

quartz veining.<br />

53<br />

Albite-Calcite<br />

Figure 69 - Albite-calcite alteration is post-ore<br />

and contains calcite, dolomite, and quartz.


________________________________________________________________<br />

UNCONFORMITY URANIUM DEPOSITS<br />

Unconformity-associated uranium (U) deposits consist <strong>of</strong> pods, veins, and semimassive<br />

replacements <strong>of</strong> uraninite which are overlain by zoned, quartz<br />

dissolution, kaolinite, sudoite, illite, dravite, quartz alteration halos and located<br />

near unconformities between Paleo- to Mesoproterozoic siliciclastic basins and<br />

metamorphic basement.<br />

In major producing basins (e.g. Athabasca, Kombolgie) the 1-2 km, flat-lying,<br />

and apparently un-metamorphosed, mainly fluvial strata include red to pale tan<br />

quartzose conglomerate, arenite and mudstone deposited from ~1730 to > Au, Pt, Cu, REE and Fe.<br />

(Source: by C.W. Jefferson1, D.J. Thomas2, S.S. Gandhi1, P. Ramaekers3, G.<br />

Delaney4, D. Brisbin2, C. Cutts5, P. Portella5, and R.A. Olson6: Mineral<br />

Deposits <strong>of</strong> Canada, Unconformity Associated Uranium Deposits<br />

http://gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/mindep/synth_dep/uranium/index_e.php)<br />

The paleo-weathered basement immediately below the Athabasca Group has a<br />

vertical pr<strong>of</strong>ile ranging from a few centimeters up to 70 meters thick, with much<br />

deeper pockets and slivers developed along fault zones. The following<br />

description is after Macdonald (1980, 1985). The regolith is variably affected by<br />

diagenetic iron reduction resulting in a bleached zone at the top, interpreted as<br />

hematite removal from the upper "red zone" <strong>of</strong> the paleo-weathered basement<br />

section. This bleached zone, always present immediately below the<br />

unconformity, is composed <strong>of</strong> buff-colored clay and quartz. It crosscuts and<br />

therefore post-dates the red zone beneath. Below this, the upper portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

regolith pr<strong>of</strong>ile exhibits a strong red hematitic alteration that grades into<br />

underlying greenish chloritic alteration. In pr<strong>of</strong>iles developed on the basement<br />

meta-arkose, a white zone <strong>of</strong> white clay replacement <strong>of</strong> feldspars and mafic<br />

minerals separates the red and green zones. A downward progression from this<br />

kaolinite to illite and chlorite is common through the regolith pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />

Discussion continues regarding the respective contributions <strong>of</strong> paleo-weathering,<br />

diagenesis and hydrothermal processes to the alteration preserved at the<br />

unconformity. Cuney et al. (2003) stated that the regolith may represent a redox<br />

front controlled by the degree <strong>of</strong> percolation <strong>of</strong> the oxidized diagenetic brines in<br />

the basement, and that the lack <strong>of</strong> Ce-anomalies is not in favour <strong>of</strong> a lateritic<br />

54


________________________________________________________________<br />

origin. It is here preferred that the red-green alteration was indeed regional, a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> lateritic weathering as proposed by Macdonald (1980), and was<br />

overprinted by hydrothermal alteration (the white zone <strong>of</strong> Macdonald) that<br />

increases in intensity close to and is genetically related to the bleaching<br />

alteration associated with U deposits (Macdonald, 1985). This interpretation is<br />

based on <strong>field</strong> relationships noted by Macdonald (the white zone transects down<br />

across the red and green along fractures).<br />

Deposit Distribution<br />

The new uranium production is likely to come from deposits in Canada, Australia,<br />

Niger, the United States, and Kazakhstan.<br />

Table III - Global Distribution <strong>of</strong> Uranium Deposits<br />

Olympic Dam Australia breccia<br />

Jabiluka Australia unconformity<br />

Ranger Australia unconformity<br />

Kintyre Australia<br />

Athabasca, Thelon Canada unconformity<br />

Kazakhstan sandstone<br />

Niger, sandstone<br />

Uzbekistan, sandstone<br />

Franceville Basin Gabon sandstone<br />

Karoo Basin). South Africa sandstone<br />

Wyoming, New Mexico USA Sandstone<br />

Alteration mineralogy and geochemistry<br />

Alteration mineralogy and geochemistry <strong>of</strong> Australian and Canadian unconformity<br />

associated deposits and their host rocks in the Athabasca and Thelon basins,<br />

and the Kombolgie Basin have been compared by Miller and LeCheminant<br />

(1985), Kotzer and Kyser (1995), Kyser et al. (2000) and Cuney et al. (2003).<br />

Early work on alteration mineralogy in the Athabasca Basin is exemplified by<br />

Hoeve and Quirt (1984), and Wasilyuk (2002) has set the modern framework <strong>of</strong><br />

exploration clay mineralogy. Intense clay alteration zones surrounding deposits<br />

such as Cigar Lake constitute natural geological barriers to U migration in ground<br />

waters (Percival et al., 1993) and are important geotechnical factors in mining<br />

and ore processing (<strong>An</strong>drade, 2002) Figure 70.<br />

Alteration halos are developed mainly in the siliciclastic strata and range between<br />

two distinctive end member types: 1) quartz dissolution + illite ( NE Athabasca)<br />

55


________________________________________________________________<br />

(Percival, 1989; <strong>An</strong>drade 2002; Cuney et al., 2003), and 2) silicified (Q2) +<br />

kaolinite + dravite (Key Lake, McArthur River) (Matthews et al. 1997, Harvey and<br />

Bethune, 2000).<br />

Ore-related illitic alteration is reflected in anomalously high illite proportions<br />

(Hoeve et al. 1981a, b, Hoeve and Quirt 1984, Percival et al., 1993) and resultant<br />

anomalous K2O/Al203 ratios in the sandstone (Earle and Sopuck 1989). Sudoite,<br />

an Al-Mg-rich di-tri, octahedral chlorite (Percival and Kodama, 1989), is present<br />

in both alteration types. Local silicification fronts are also present in some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

larger de-silicified alteration systems, e.g. Cigar Lake (<strong>An</strong>drade 2002).<br />

Deposit-related silicification (Q2 event), recorded notably by drusy quartz-filled<br />

fractures (McGill et al. 1993) and pre-ore tombstone-style silicification (Q1; Yeo<br />

et al. 2001b; Mwenifumbo et al., 2004, 2005), are particularly intense in<br />

Athabasca sandstone sequences above or proximal to basement quartzite. The<br />

tombstone silicification <strong>of</strong> the Athabasca Group preserves diagenetic hematite<br />

and dickite (Mwenifumbo et al. 2005) and microbial laminae (Yeo et al. 2005a)<br />

very close to the McArthur River deposit.<br />

Figure 70 - Two end-member sandstone alteration models for egress-type deposits in the eastern<br />

Athabasca Basin (modified from Matthews et al. 1997, Wasyliuk, 2002 and Quirt, 2003). UC =<br />

unconformity, Reg = regolith pr<strong>of</strong>ile grading from red hematitic saprolite down through green<br />

chloritic alteration to fresh basement gneiss, Up-G = upper limit <strong>of</strong> graphite preserved in footwall<br />

alteration zone. Cap = secondary black-red earthy hematite capping ore bodies. Fresh = fresh<br />

basement: Fe-Mg chlorite biotite paragneiss.<br />

Illite-kaolinite-chlorite alteration halos are up to 400 m wide at the base <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sandstone, thousands <strong>of</strong> meters in strike length, and several hundreds <strong>of</strong> meters<br />

vertical extent above deposits (Wasilyuk, 2002, for McArthur River; Kister et al.,<br />

56


________________________________________________________________<br />

2003, for Shea Creek; and Bruneton, 1993, for Cigar Lake). This alteration<br />

typically envelops the main ore-controlling structures, forming plume-shaped or<br />

flattened elongate bell-shaped halos that taper gradually upward from the base <strong>of</strong><br />

the sandstone (Hoeve and Quirt, 1987) Figure 70. Potassium, magnesium and<br />

aluminum ratios are diagnostic <strong>of</strong> the different clay types.<br />

Hydrothermal, ore-related alteration effects are superimposed on pre-existing<br />

alteration assemblages, including the paleo-weathering alteration recorded by<br />

the red-green pr<strong>of</strong>ile below the basal unconformity, and the initial detrital clay<br />

mineralogy that is locally preserved in silicified zones (Mwenifumbo et al., 2005).<br />

This has led to confusion as to which process generated the red-green transition<br />

at the basement-sandstone unconformity. Ore-related white clay alteration is<br />

superimposed on the red hematitic paleo-weathering alteration (McDonald,<br />

1980). Very dark coarse grained hematite alteration forms a cap over ore<br />

deposits such as Cigar Lake (<strong>An</strong>drade 2002).. This very dense, crystalline,<br />

hydrothermal hematite alteration contrasts with the brick red, fine-grained<br />

hematite that is interpreted as a detrital or very early diagenetic mineral, and is<br />

intimately interlayered with clay minerals to form micro-laminae in oncoidal<br />

hematite beds (Yeo et al., 2005a).<br />

Figure 71 - Simplified mineral paragenesis <strong>of</strong> the Paleo- to Mesoproterozoic Athabasca, Thelon<br />

and Kombolgie basins, after Figure 10.21 <strong>of</strong> Kyser et al. (2000). The ages <strong>of</strong> primary uraninite,<br />

the first deposition <strong>of</strong> U in a given deposit, may be different for different deposits, hence U1<br />

(~1500-1600) and U1' (~1350-1400) might both be primary in the Athabasca Basin. Depositional<br />

ages in the Athabasca Group are Zv: U-Pb on volcanic zircon in Wolverine Point Formation, and<br />

Os-Re: primary organic matter in Douglas Formation.<br />

57


________________________________________________________________<br />

INFRARED ACTIVE ALTERATION MINERALS ATHABASCA BASIN<br />

Figure 72 - The common alteration minerals found in the Athabasca Basin deposits include<br />

dravite (magnesi<strong>of</strong>oitite Mg end member), illite, kaolinite and dickite.<br />

Figure 73 - Chlorites found in the Athabasca<br />

suite. Mg-chlorite and the unique sudoite are<br />

plotted.<br />

58<br />

Figure 74 - Other minerals observed are quartz,<br />

hematite, monazite (REE), dolomite and siderite.


________________________________________________________________<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Starting with the PIMA, it took about four hard years to introduce the technology<br />

to the industry. It was very alien to users initially, as most universities do not<br />

teach infrared analytical methods. Those that do, usually treat the subject very<br />

briefly, as most departments do not have expensive infrared instrumentation.<br />

Once applications, case studies, spectral libraries, some simple mineral<br />

identification s<strong>of</strong>tware, and a well-documented training course and manuals were<br />

developed, it became easier to sustain the method.<br />

As more and more companies utilized the technology, word spread via the<br />

"grapevine". Most companies would not cite PIMA analyses in their public<br />

presentations and papers. They all considered reflectance <strong>spectroscopy</strong> their<br />

"secret weapon".<br />

With the introduction <strong>of</strong> the TerraSpec, some <strong>of</strong> the secrecy has dissipated and<br />

companies are more willing to acknowledge the application <strong>of</strong> reflectance<br />

<strong>spectroscopy</strong> to their exploration programs. Additionally, VNIR analysis has been<br />

used for over 10 years and is no longer so exotic.<br />

Spectroscopy is used for <strong>field</strong> and core reconnaissance, core logging, target<br />

generation, vectoring, blast hole logging, and remote sensing ground truth. It has<br />

its biggest successes in epithermal gold systems, porphyry, IOCG, skarns,<br />

kimberlites and unconformity uranium.<br />

Reflectance Spectroscopy has changed the way exploration is done, how core is<br />

targeted, drilled and logged and alteration systems modeled. It has made some<br />

impact on mine metallurgy, grade control and production. It has opened the<br />

important world <strong>of</strong> alteration mineralogy to a rapid, non-invasive, identification <strong>of</strong><br />

alteration minerals in-situ and instantly, in the <strong>field</strong>, in the core shack, on the pit<br />

benches and faces and underground in the tunnels. It has expanded the<br />

geologist’s knowledge about the minerals in alteration systems, their<br />

associations, and the environments in which they form, therefore leading to a<br />

better and more predictive understanding <strong>of</strong> mineral deposits. Now, clays,<br />

phyllosilicates, and carbonates, minerals that have similar physical appearances<br />

and have always been difficult to identify by hand lens, are known in 3, 5, or 10<br />

seconds. This analysis can be in-situ in the <strong>field</strong>, at the outcrop, and/or in the<br />

core shack.<br />

Reflectance <strong>spectroscopy</strong> has been used by all the major and many smaller<br />

companies in some capacity. There are nearly 400 instruments in the industry<br />

between the different manufacturers. Following is a partial list <strong>of</strong> companies who<br />

own or have owned spectrometers and many have more than one (apologies to<br />

those left <strong>of</strong>f the list) : Alamos Gold, Almaden, <strong>An</strong>glo American, <strong>An</strong>glo-Gold-<br />

Ashanti, Barrick, BHP, Balkan Minerals, Battle Mountain, Billiton, Bolnisi,<br />

Buenaventura, Codelco, Collahausi, Cornerstone, CRA, Crystallex, Cyprus, De<br />

Beers, Depromisa, El Dorado, Formicruz, Gencor, GoldCorp, Gold<strong>field</strong>s,<br />

Gryphon Gold, Hecla, Hemlo, Homestake, Hochschilds, Iamgold, Incor, Inmet,<br />

59


________________________________________________________________<br />

Ivanhoe, Kennecott, Lac, La Coipa, Linear Gold, Mantos Blancos, Mantos Oro,<br />

Metallica, Metallic Ventures, Mineral Mapping, Minera Paramount, Minnova,<br />

Newcrest, Newmont Exploration, Newmont Gold, New Sleeper, Noranda,<br />

Normandy Posieden, North, Nova Gold, Oro Candente, Oro Peru, Penoles,<br />

Phelps Dodge, Placer Dome, QVX, Rio Tinto, Romarco, Santa Fe, Southern<br />

Peru Copper, Teck-Cominco, WMC, and Western States.<br />

Many more companies have either rented instruments or used consultants who<br />

have done spectral analysis for them.<br />

The uranium companies are where <strong>spectroscopy</strong> makes a major contribution to<br />

drill target and core logging <strong>of</strong> alteration to vector to mineralization. The<br />

alteration minerals and clays occur in unique relationships to ore and<br />

<strong>spectroscopy</strong> is the major way to define these relationships and establish<br />

vectors. The companies include Areva, Cameco, Can-Alaska, Forum Uranium,<br />

Jabiru, JNR, Triex, Uranium City, Uravan, Uex. There are over 30 instruments in<br />

Canada and Australia dedicated to this task alone.<br />

DeBeers funded the original PIMA development and then used close to 20<br />

PIMAs to characterize alteration in kimberlite pipes globally. G-10 garnets, as<br />

diamond indicators, have a distinctive chrome feature in the <strong>vis</strong>ible, easily<br />

analyzed by the Terraspec.<br />

The alteration model for Pierina was done with the PIMA. Newmont at<br />

Yanacocha evolved from PIMA core logging into using the Terraspec to<br />

define their alteration and drill taregets. Novagold used the FieldSpec Pro (FR)<br />

at Donlin Creek, as did Barrick at Alta Chicama and Ivanhoe at Oyu Tolgoi. It<br />

goes on with Lac and Barrick in the El Indio belt where they redefined alteration<br />

and mineralization episodes finding major advanced argillic alteration throughout<br />

the belt; Placer Dome logged core at La Coipa. At Valedaro, in Argentina, no<br />

hole was drilled before adjoining holes had been checked with the spectrometer<br />

as they had discovered a unique silica signature associated with gold zones. At<br />

Tres Cruces in Peru, Oro Peru defined mineralized zones and degrees <strong>of</strong><br />

alteration using the presence <strong>of</strong> ammonia in illite or buddingtonite. Noranda and<br />

Rio Tinto use their FR's for remote sensing ground truth, as has Buenaventura,<br />

Newmont, Teck-Cominco, WMC and Barrick..<br />

Perhaps the greatest use for <strong>spectroscopy</strong> is in core logging. One <strong>of</strong> the major<br />

success stories, as mentioned, is in the unconformity uranium deposits where<br />

companies have to drill blind targets through glacial till and sandstone down<br />

through the unconformity, where the ore lies, to the basement. The alteration<br />

mineralogy zoning is very diagnostic relative to proximity to ore. The<br />

spectrometers are the most rapid, economic way to vector to the ore bodies and<br />

define them.<br />

Reflectance <strong>spectroscopy</strong> has become a robust method, routinely used in a wide<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> applications in the industry,<br />

60


________________________________________________________________<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

This paper is dedicated to all those <strong>field</strong> geologists who persevered from PIMA to<br />

Terraspec; who collected thousands <strong>of</strong> spectra and applied their new found<br />

knowledge to better understanding their deposits and alteration systems. I<br />

acknowledge all <strong>of</strong> you for your individual and collective contributions to this<br />

wonderful discipline <strong>of</strong> <strong>field</strong> <strong>spectroscopy</strong>.<br />

A special acknowledgement to Graham Hunt, who gave me the first taste <strong>of</strong><br />

reflectance <strong>spectroscopy</strong> years ago at the U.S. Geological Survey. Also to<br />

Alexander F.H. Goetz, who has not only given me knowledge and opportunity,<br />

but taught me a great deal about instrumentation and was supportive in the<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> the fabulous TerraSpec. <strong>An</strong>d to the Team <strong>of</strong> engineers, scientists,<br />

and technical support people at <strong>An</strong>alytical <strong>Spectral</strong> Devices who created the<br />

Terraspec.<br />

Acknowledgement as well to Terry Cocks <strong>of</strong> Australia, who with his CSIRO<br />

colleagues, created the PIMA, the first innovative step in this mini-revolution.<br />

<strong>An</strong>other special salute to <strong>An</strong>ne Thompson, whose tireless and absolutely top<br />

notch efforts through the years has made reflectance <strong>spectroscopy</strong> an accepted<br />

analytical tool for all those Canadian Juniors doing very grassroots exploration,<br />

pioneers in their own rights.<br />

The reader also is referred to the paper “Alteration Mapping in Exploration:<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> Short-Wave Infrared (SWIR) Spectroscopy”, by <strong>An</strong>ne J.B.<br />

Thompson. Phoebe L. Hauff and Audrey Robitaille, SEG Newsletter, 1999,<br />

Number 39, published by the Society <strong>of</strong> Economic Geologists, Littleton,<br />

Colorado.<br />

REFRENCES<br />

<strong>An</strong>drade, N., 2002, Geology <strong>of</strong> the Cigar Lake uranium deposit; in <strong>An</strong>drade, N.,<br />

Breton, G., Jefferson, C.W., Thomas, D.J. Tourigny, G., Wilson, W., and<br />

Yeo, G.M., eds., The Eastern Athabasca Basin and its uranium deposits,<br />

Field Trip A-1 Guidebook: Geological Association <strong>of</strong> Canada and<br />

Mineralogical Association <strong>of</strong> Canada, Saskatoon, May 24-26, 2002, p. 53-<br />

72.<br />

Barton, M.D., and Johnson, D.A., 1996, Evaporitic-source model for igneousrelated<br />

Fe-oxide-(REE-Cu-Au-U) mineralization: Geology, v. 24, p. 259-<br />

262.<br />

61


________________________________________________________________<br />

Barton, M.D., and Johnson, D.A., 2000,, Alternative brine sources for Fe-oxide (-<br />

Cu-Au) systems: Implications for hydrothermal alteration and metals, in<br />

Porter, T.M., ed., Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related<br />

deposits: A global perspective: PGC Publishing, Adelaide, v. 1, p. 43-60.<br />

Barton, M.D., and Johnson, D.A., 2004, Footprints <strong>of</strong> Fe-oxide (-Cu-Au) systems:<br />

SEG 2004 Predictive Mineral Discovery Under Cover - Extended<br />

Abstracts, Centre for Global Metallogeny, The University <strong>of</strong> Western<br />

Australia, v. 33, p. 112-116.<br />

Benkerrou, C., and Fonteilles, M., 1989, Vanadian garnets in calcareous<br />

metapelites and skarns at Coat an Noz, Belle Isle en Terre (Cotes du<br />

Nord), France: Amer. Mineralogist, v. 74, p. 852-858.<br />

Bruneton, P. 1993, Geological environment <strong>of</strong> the Cigar Lake uranium deposit:<br />

Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Earth Sciences 30, p. 653-673.<br />

Carlon, C.J., 2000, Iron oxide systems and base metal mineralisation in northern<br />

Sweden, in Porter, T.M., ed., Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and<br />

related deposits: A global perspective: PGC Publishing, Adelaide, v. 1, p.<br />

283-296.<br />

Clark, R.N., King, T., Klefwa, M., Swayze, G.A., and Vergo, N., 1990, High<br />

spectral resolution reflectance <strong>spectroscopy</strong> <strong>of</strong> minerals: Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Geophysical Research, v. 95, no. B-8, p. 12,653–12,680.<br />

Corbett, G. J., 2001a, Styles <strong>of</strong> epithermal gold-silver mineralisation: ProEXPLO<br />

2001 Conference, Lima, Peru, published as CD.<br />

Corbett, G.J., 2001b, Pacific rim Epithermal gold mineralisation: in Hancock, G.,<br />

ed., Geology, exploration and mining conference, July 2001, Port<br />

Moresby, Papua New Guinea, Proceedings: Parkville, The Australasian<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Mining and Metallurgy, p. 56-68.<br />

Corbett, in prep, Structure in porphyry Cu-Au and epithermal Au exploration:<br />

Applied Structural Geology Conference, Australian Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Geoscientists Kalgoorlie, September 2002.<br />

Corbett, G.J., and Hayward, S.B., 1994, The Maragorik high sulphidation Cu/Au<br />

system - an update, in Rogerson, R., ed., Geology, exploration and mining<br />

conference, June 1994, Lae, Papua New Guinea, proceedings: Parkville,<br />

The Australasian Institute <strong>of</strong> Mining and Metallurgy, p. 125-129.<br />

Corbett, G.J., and Leach, T.M., 1998, Southwest Pacific rim gold-copper<br />

systems: Structure, alteration and mineralisation: Economic Geology,<br />

Special Publication 6, 238 p., Society <strong>of</strong> Economic Geologists.<br />

Corbett, G.J., Leach, T.M., Thirnbeck, M., Mori, W., Sione, T., Harry, K., Digan,<br />

K., and Petrie P., 1994, The geology <strong>of</strong> porphyry-related mesothermal vein<br />

gold mineralisation north <strong>of</strong> Kainantu, Papua New Guinea, in Rogerson,<br />

R., ed., Geology, exploration and mining conference, June 1994, Lae,<br />

Papua New Guinea, proceedings: Parkville, The Australasian Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Mining and Metallurgy, p. 113-124.<br />

Corbett, G.J., Leach, T.M., Stewart, R., and Fulton, B., 1995, The Porgera gold<br />

deposit: Structure, alteration and mineralisation, in Pacific Rim Congress<br />

95, 19-22 November 1995, Auckland, New Zealand, proceedings: Carlton<br />

South, The Australasian Institute <strong>of</strong> Mining and Metallurgy, p. 151-156.<br />

62


________________________________________________________________<br />

Corbett, G., Hunt, S., Cook, A., Tamaduk, P., & Leach T., 2001, Geology <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ladolam gold deposit, Lihir Island, from exposures in the Minifie open pit<br />

in Hancock, G., ed., Geology, exploration and mining conference, July<br />

2001, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea, Proceedings: Parkville, The<br />

Australasian Institute <strong>of</strong> Mining and Metallurgy, p. 69-78.<br />

Cuney, M., Brouand, M., Cathelineau, M., Derome, D., Freiberger, R., Hecht, L.,<br />

Kister, P., Lobaev, V., Lorilleux, G., Peiffert, C. and Bastoul, A.M., 2003,<br />

What parameters control the high grade - large tonnage <strong>of</strong> the Proterozoic<br />

unconformity related uranium deposits? in Uranium Geochemistry 2003,<br />

<strong>International</strong> Conference, April 13-16 2003, Proceedings, , ed., M. Cuney;<br />

Unité Mixte de Recherche CNRS 7566 G2R, Université Henri Poincaré,<br />

Nancy, France, p. 123-126.<br />

Earle, S. and Sopuck, V., 1989, Regional lithogeochemistry <strong>of</strong> the eastern part <strong>of</strong><br />

the Athabasca Basin uranium province, Saskatchewan; in . Muller-Kahle ,<br />

E., ed.,Uranium resources and geology <strong>of</strong> North America: <strong>International</strong><br />

Atomic Energy Agency, TECDOC-500, p. 263-269<br />

Einaudi, M.T., 1982a, Descriptions <strong>of</strong> skarn associated with porphyry copper<br />

plutons, southwestern North America, in Titley, S.R. (Ed.), Advances in<br />

Geology <strong>of</strong> the Porphyry Copper Deposits, Southwestern North America:<br />

Univ. Arizona Press, p. 139-184.<br />

Einaudi, M.T., 1982b, General Features and Origin <strong>of</strong> Skarns Associated with<br />

Porphyry Copper Plutons, southwestern North America; in Advances in<br />

Geology <strong>of</strong> the Porphyry Copper Deposits, Southwestern U.S., S.R.Titley,<br />

Editor; Univ. Arizona Press, pages 185-209.<br />

Jefferson, C.W., D.J. Thomas, S.S. Gandhi, P. Ramaekers, G. Delaney , , D.<br />

Brisbin, C. Cutts, P. Portella, and R.A. Olson ,, , 2006, in Mineral Deposits <strong>of</strong><br />

Canada , Unconformity Associated Uranium Deposits: Geological Survey<br />

<strong>of</strong> Canada website publication,<br />

http://gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/mindep/synth_dep/uranium/index_e.php#ref<br />

Fourie, P.J., 2000, The Vergenoeg fayalite iron-oxide fluorite deposit, South<br />

Africa: Some new aspects, in Porter, T.M., ed., Hydrothermal iron oxide<br />

copper-gold and related deposits: A global perspective: PGC Publishing,<br />

Adelaide, v. 1, p. 309-320.<br />

Gandhi, S.S. (compiler), 2004c, World distribution <strong>of</strong> iron oxide +/- Cu +/- Au +/-<br />

U deposits: World Minerals Geoscience Database Project, Geological<br />

Survey <strong>of</strong> Canada, unpublished database.<br />

Giere, R., 1986, Zirconolite, allanite and hoegbomite in a marble skarn from the<br />

Bergell contact aureole; implications for mobility <strong>of</strong> Ti, Zr and REE:<br />

Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, v. 93, p. 459-470.<br />

Goetz AF, Rowan LC, Kingston MJ., 1982, Mineral Identification from Orbit: Initial<br />

Results from the Shuttle Multispectral Infrared Radiometer, Dec 3;<br />

218(4576):1020-1024.Links.<br />

G<strong>of</strong>f, B.H., Weinberg, R., Groves, D.I., Vielreicher, N.M., and Fourie, P.J., 2004,<br />

The giant Vergenoeg fluorite deposit in a magnetite-fluorite-fayalite-REE<br />

pipe: a hydrothermally-altered carbonatite-related pegmatoid?: Mineralogy<br />

and Petrology, v. 80, p. 173-199.<br />

63


________________________________________________________________<br />

Harvey, S.E. and Bethune, K., 2000, Paleotopography and clay mineral alteration<br />

associated with the Deilmann uranium orebody, Key Lake, Saskatchewan;<br />

in Summary <strong>of</strong> Investigations 2000, Volume 2, Saskatchewan Geological<br />

Survey, Saskatchewan Energy and Mines Miscellaneous Report 2000-4.2,<br />

p. 181-190.<br />

Heald, P., Foley, N.K., and Hayba, D.O., 1987, Comparitive anatomy <strong>of</strong> volcanichosted<br />

epithermal deposits: Acid-Sulfate and adularia-sericite types:<br />

Economic Geology v.82, p. 1-26.<br />

Hedenquist J.W. and Lowenstern J.B. (1994) The role <strong>of</strong> magmas in the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> hydrothermal ore deposits. Nature 370, 519-526.<br />

Henley, R.W., and Ellis, A.J., 1983, Geothermal systems, ancient and modern; a<br />

geochemical review: Earth Science Review. 19, 1-50.<br />

Hitzman, M.W., Oreskes, N., and Einaudi, M.T., 1992, Geological characteristics<br />

and tectonic setting <strong>of</strong> Proterozoic iron oxide (Cu-U-Au-LREE) deposits:<br />

Precambrian Research, v. 58, p. 241-287.<br />

Hoeve, J., Rawsthorn, K. and Quirt, D., 1981a, Uranium metallogenetic studies:<br />

Collins Bay B Zone, II. Clay mineralogy; in J.E., Christopher and<br />

MacDonald , R., eds., Summary <strong>of</strong> Investigations, 1981: Saskatchewan<br />

Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Report 81-4, p. 73-75.<br />

Hoeve, J., Rawsthorn, K. and Quirt, D., 1981b, Uranium metallogenetic studies:<br />

clay mineral stratigraphy and diagenesis in the Athabasca Group; in J.E.,<br />

Christopher and MacDonald , R., eds., Summary <strong>of</strong> Investigations 1981:<br />

Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Report 81-4, p. 76-89.<br />

Hoeve, J., and Quirt, D.H., 1984, Mineralization and host rock alteration in<br />

relation to clay mineral diagenesis and evolution <strong>of</strong> the Middle-Proterozoic,<br />

Athabasca Basin, northern Saskatchewan, Canada: Saskatchewan<br />

Research Council, SRC Technical Report 187, 187 p.<br />

Hoeve, J., and Quirt, D.H., 1987, A stationary redox front as a critical factor in the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> high-grade, unconformity-type uranium ores in the Athabasca<br />

basin, Saskatchewan, Canada: Bulletin de Minéralogie, v. 110, p. 157-<br />

171.<br />

Hunt, G.R., 1977, <strong>Spectral</strong> signatures <strong>of</strong> particulate minerals in the <strong>vis</strong>ible and<br />

near infrared; Geophysics, 42, 501-513.<br />

Hunt, G.R. and R. P. Ashley, 1979, Spectra <strong>of</strong> altered rocks in the <strong>vis</strong>ible and<br />

near infrared, Economic Geology 1979 74: 1613-1629.<br />

Kister, P., Laverret, E., Cuney, M., Vieillard, P. and Quirt, D., 2003, 3D<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> alteration minerals associated with unconformity-type<br />

mineralization: <strong>An</strong>ne Zone, Shea Creek deposit (Saskatchewan,<br />

Canada);in Cuney, M., ed., Uranium Geochemistry 2003, <strong>International</strong><br />

Conference, April 13-16 2003, Proceedings: Unité Mixte de Recherche<br />

CNRS 7566 G2R, Université Henri Poincaré, Nancy, France, p. 197-200<br />

Kotzer, T. and Kyser, T.K., 1995, Fluid history <strong>of</strong> the Athabasca Basin and its<br />

relation to diagenesis, uranium mineralization and paleohydrology:<br />

Chemical Geology 120, p. 45-89.<br />

64


________________________________________________________________<br />

Kyser, K., 2000, Fluids and Basin Evolution: Mineralogical Association <strong>of</strong><br />

Canada, Short Course Series Volume 28, Calgary 2000 (Series Editor<br />

Robert Raeside), 262 p.<br />

Lowell, J.D., and Guilbert, J.M., 1970, Lateral and vertical alteration -mineralization<br />

zoning in porphyry ore deposits: Econonomic Geology, 65,<br />

373-408.<br />

Macdonald, C., 1980, Mineralogy and geochemistry <strong>of</strong> a Precambrian regolith in<br />

the Athabasca Basin; M.Sc. Thesis: University <strong>of</strong> Saskatchewan, 151 p.,<br />

Macdonald, C., 1985, Mineralogy and geochemistry <strong>of</strong> the sub-Athabasca<br />

regolith near Wollaston Lake; in T.I.I. Sibbald and W. Petruk ,<br />

eds.,Geology <strong>of</strong> Uranium Deposits, Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the CIM-SEG Uranium<br />

Symposium, September 1981: The Canadian Institute <strong>of</strong> Mining and<br />

Metallurgy, Special Volume 32., p. 155-158.<br />

McGill, B., Marlatt, J., Matthews, R., Sopuck, V., Homeniuk, L. and Hubregtse, J.,<br />

1993, The P2 North uranium deposit Saskatchewan, Canada. Exploration<br />

and Mining Geology, v. 2, no. 4, p. 321-331<br />

Matthews, R., Koch, R., Leppin, M., Powell, B. and Sopuck, V., 1997, Advances<br />

in integrated exploration for unconformity uranium deposits in western<br />

Canada; in Geophysics and Geochemistry at the Millenium, Proceedings<br />

<strong>of</strong> Exploration '97, Toronto, Sept. 1997, p. 993-1002.<br />

Meinert, L.D., 1992, Skarns and skarn deposits: Geoscience Canada, v. 19, p.<br />

145-162.<br />

Miller, A. R. and LeCheminant, A.N., 1985, Geology and uranium metallogeny <strong>of</strong><br />

Proterozoic supracrustal successions, central District <strong>of</strong> Keewatin, N.W.T.<br />

with comparisons to northern Saskatchewan; in T.I. Sibbald and W.<br />

Petruk, eds.,Geology <strong>of</strong> Uranium Deposits: Canadian Institute <strong>of</strong> Mining<br />

and Metallurgy, Special Volume 32, p. 167-185.<br />

Mitchell, R.H. 1986. Kimberlites: Mineralogy, Geochemistry and Petrology.<br />

Plenum Publishing Company, New York, 442 pp<br />

Murray, H.H., and Lyon, S.C., 1956, Further Correlations <strong>of</strong> Kaolinite Crystallinity<br />

with Chemical and Physical Properties, 8 th National Conference on Clays<br />

and Clay minerals.<br />

Mwenifumbo, C.J., Elliott, B.E., Jefferson, C.W., Bernius, G. R., and Pflug, K.A.,<br />

2004, Physical rock properties from the Athabasca Group: designing<br />

geophysical exploration models for unconformity uranium deposits;<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Geophysics, V. 55, p. 117-135.<br />

Mwenifumbo, C.J., Percival, J.B., Bernius, G., Elliott, B., Jefferson, C.W.,<br />

Wasyliuk, K. and Drever, G., 2005, Comparison <strong>of</strong> geophysical,<br />

mineralogical and stratigraphic attributes in drill holes MAC-218 and RL-<br />

88, McArthur River uranium camp, Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan; in<br />

Jefferson, C.W., and Delaney, G. , eds., EXTECH IV: Geology and<br />

Uranium EXploration TECHnology <strong>of</strong> the Proterozoic Athabasca Basin,<br />

Saskatchewan and Alberta: Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> Canada, Bulletin 588<br />

(also Saskatchewan Geological Society, Special Publication 17;<br />

Geological Association <strong>of</strong> Canada, Mineral Deposits Di<strong>vis</strong>ion, Special<br />

Publication 4), in prep.<br />

65


________________________________________________________________<br />

Nakano, T., Yoshino, T., Shimazaki, H., and Shimizu, M., 1994. Pyroxene<br />

composition as an indicator in the classification <strong>of</strong> skarn deposits.<br />

Economic Geology, 89, p. 1567-1580.<br />

Panteleyev, A.(1996): Epithermal Au-Ag: Low Sulphidation, in Selected British<br />

Columbia Mineral Deposit Pr<strong>of</strong>iles, Volume 2 - Metallic Deposits,<br />

Lefebure, D.V. and Hõy, T, Editors, British Columbia Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Employment and Investment, Open File 1996-13, pages 41-44.<br />

Percival, J.B., 1989, Clay mineralogy, geochemistry and partitioning <strong>of</strong> uranium<br />

within the alteration halo <strong>of</strong> the Cigar Lake uranium deposit,<br />

Saskatchewan, Canada: Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. PhD<br />

Thesis, 343 p.<br />

Percival, J.B. and Kodama, H., 1989, Sudoite from Cigar Lake, Saskatchewan:<br />

Canadian Mineralogist 27, p. 633-641.<br />

Percival, J.B., Bell, K. and Torrance, J.K., 1993, Clay mineralogy and isotope<br />

geochemistry <strong>of</strong> the alteration halo at the Cigar Lake uranium deposit:<br />

Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Earth Sciences 30, 689-704<br />

Porter, T.M. (ed), 2000, Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related<br />

deposits: A global perspective, Volume 1: PGC Publishing, Adelaide, 349<br />

p.<br />

Porter, T.M. (ed), 2002a, Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related<br />

deposits: A global perspective, Volume 2: PGC Publishing, Adelaide, 377<br />

p.<br />

Post, J. L. and Noble, P. N., 1993. The near-infrared combination band<br />

frequencies <strong>of</strong> dioctahedral smectites, micas, and illites. Clays and Clay<br />

Minerals, 41 (6):<br />

Quirt, D.H., 2003, Athabasca unconformity-type uranium deposits: one deposit<br />

type with many variations;in Cuney, M., ed., Uranium Geochemistry 2003,<br />

<strong>International</strong> Conference, April 13-16 2003, Proceedings: Unité Mixte de<br />

Recherche CNRS 7566 G2R, Université Henri Poincaré, Nancy, France,<br />

p. 309-312.<br />

Reynolds, L.J., 2000, Geology <strong>of</strong> the Olympic Dam Cu-U-Au-Ag-REE deposit, in<br />

Porter, T.M., ed., Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related<br />

deposits: A global perspective: PGC Publishing, Adelaide, v. 1, p. 93-104.<br />

Roberts, D.E., and Hudson, G.R.T., 1983, The Olympic Dam copper-uraniumgold-silver<br />

deposit, Roxby Downs, South Australia: Economic Geology, v.<br />

78, p. 799-822.<br />

Sillitoe, R.H., 1995, The influence <strong>of</strong> magmatic-hydrothermal models on<br />

exploration strategies for volcano-plutonic arcs. In: Thompson, J.F.H. (ed):<br />

Magmas, fluids and ore deposits. Mineralogical Association <strong>of</strong> Canada<br />

Short Course Series, 23, 511-525.<br />

Sillitoe, R.H., 1999, Styles <strong>of</strong> high sulfidation gold, silver and copper<br />

mineralization in porphyry and epithermal environments. In: Weber, G.,<br />

(ed): Australian Institute Minerals Metallurgy, PacRim'99, Bali, Indonesia,<br />

10-13 October, Proceedings, 29-44.<br />

66


________________________________________________________________<br />

Silva, K.K.M.W., and Siriwardena, C.H.E.R., 1988, Geology and the origin <strong>of</strong> the<br />

corundum-bearing skarn at Bakamuna, Sri Lanka: Mineralium Deposita, v.<br />

23, p. 186-190.<br />

Skirrow, R.G., Bastrakov, E., Raymond, O.L., Davidson, G., and Heithersay, P.,<br />

2002, The geological framework, distribution and controls <strong>of</strong> Fe-Oxide Cu-<br />

Au mineralisation in the Gawler Craton, South Australia, in Porter, T.M.,<br />

ed., Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related deposits: A global<br />

perspective: PGC Publishing, Adelaide, v. 2, p. 33-47.<br />

Strickland, C., and Martyn, J.E., 2002, The Guelb Moghrein Fe-oxide coppergold-cobalt<br />

deposit and associated mineral occurrences, Mauritania: A<br />

geological introduction, in Porter, T.M., ed., Hydrothermal iron oxide<br />

copper-gold and related deposits: A global perspective: PGC Publishing,<br />

Adelaide, v. 2, p. 275-291.<br />

Thompson. <strong>An</strong>ne J.B. ,Phoebe L. Hauff and Audrey Robitaille, 1999, Alteration<br />

Mapping in Exploration: Application <strong>of</strong> Short-Wave Infrared (SWIR)<br />

Spectroscopy SEG Newsletter, 1999, Number 39, published by the<br />

Society <strong>of</strong> Economic Geologists, Littleton, Colorado.<br />

Thompson, A.J.B. , and Thompson, J.F.H. , 1996, Atlas <strong>of</strong> alteration: A<br />

<strong>field</strong> and petrographic guide to hydrothermal alteration minerals:<br />

Geological Association <strong>of</strong> Canada, Mineral Deposits Di<strong>vis</strong>ion, 119 p.<br />

Wasyliuk, K., 2002, Petrogenesis <strong>of</strong> the kaolinite-group minerals in the<br />

eastern Athabasca basin <strong>of</strong> northern Saskatchewan: Applications to<br />

uranium mineralization; M. Sc. Thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Saskatchewan,<br />

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, 140 p.<br />

Western Mining Corporation, 2003, WMC Resources business performance<br />

report, Western Mining Corporation, 60 p.<br />

Yeo, G., Percival, J.B., Jefferson, C.W., Ickert, R., and Hunt, P., 2005a,<br />

Environmental significance <strong>of</strong> oncoids and crypto-microbial laminates from<br />

the Late Paleoproterozoic Athabasca Group, Saskatchewan and Alberta;<br />

in Jefferson, C.W. and Delaney, G. , eds., EXTECH IV: Geology and<br />

Uranium EXploration TECHnology <strong>of</strong> the Proterozoic Athabasca Basin,<br />

Saskatchewan and Alberta: Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> Canada, Bulletin 588<br />

(also Saskatchewan Geological Society, Special Publication 17;<br />

Geological Association <strong>of</strong> Canada, Mineral Deposits Di<strong>vis</strong>ion, Special<br />

Publication 4). (in prep).<br />

Yeo, G.M., Ramaekers, P., Jefferson, C.W., Bernier, S., Catuneanu, O., Collier,<br />

B., Kupsch, B., Long, D.G.F., and Post, R., 2005b, Comparison <strong>of</strong> lower<br />

Athabasca Group stratigraphy among deposystems, Saskatchewan and<br />

Alberta; in Jefferson, C.W. and Delaney, G. , eds., EXTECH IV: Geology<br />

and Uranium EXploration TECHnology <strong>of</strong> the Proterozoic Athabasca<br />

Basin, Saskatchewan and Alberta: Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> Canada, Bulletin<br />

588 (also Saskatchewan Geological Society, Special Publication 17;<br />

Geological Association <strong>of</strong> Canada, Mineral Deposits Di<strong>vis</strong>ion, Special<br />

Publication 4). (in prep).<br />

67


________________________________________________________________<br />

SELECTED REFERENCES<br />

Belperio, A., and Freeman, H., 2004, Common geological characteristics <strong>of</strong> Prominent<br />

Hill and Olympic Dam - Implications for iron oxide copper-gold exploration<br />

models. Australian Institute <strong>of</strong> Mining Bulletin, Nov-Dec. Issue, p. 67-75.<br />

Campbell, L.S., and Henderson, P., 1997, Apatite paragenesis in the Bayan Obo REE-<br />

Nb-Fe ore deposit, Inner Mongolia, China: Lithos, v. 42, p. 89-103.<br />

Chao, E.C.T., Back, J.M., Minkin, J.A., Tatsumoto, M., Wang Junwen, Conrad, J.E.,<br />

McKee, E.H., Hou Zonglin, Meng Qingrun, and Huang Shengguang, 1997, The<br />

sedimentary carbonate-hosted giant Bayan Obo REE-Fe-Nb ore deposit <strong>of</strong> Inner<br />

Mongolia, China: A cornerstone example for giant polymetallic ore deposits <strong>of</strong><br />

hydrothermal origin: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2143.<br />

Cross, K.C., Daly S.J., and Flint, R.B., 1993, Olympic Dam deposit, in Drexel, J.F.,<br />

Preiss, W.V., and Parker, A.J., eds., The geology <strong>of</strong> South Australia: South<br />

Australia Department <strong>of</strong> Mines and Energy Bulletin 54, v. 1, p. 132-138.<br />

Crowley, J.K. , 1984, Near infrared reflectance <strong>of</strong> zunyite: Implications for <strong>field</strong><br />

mapping and remote-sensing detection <strong>of</strong> hydrothermally altered high<br />

alumina rocks: Economic Geology, v. 79, p. 553–557.<br />

——1996, Mg- and K- bearing borates and associated evaporites at Eagle Borax<br />

Spring, Death Valley, Califonia: A spectroscopic exploration: Economic<br />

Geology, v. 91, p. 622–635.<br />

——1999, Association <strong>of</strong> magnesium-rich clay minerals and borate deposits: A<br />

potential remote sensing guide for borate mineral exploration?: <strong>International</strong><br />

Conference on Applied Geologic Remote Sensing, 13th, Vancouver, B.C.,<br />

March 1 – 3, 1999, ERIM <strong>International</strong> Inc., Proceedings, p. I-255–262.<br />

Daliran, F., 2002, Kiruna-type iron oxide-apatite ores and "apatitites" <strong>of</strong> the Bafq district,<br />

Iran, with an emphasis on the REE geochemistry <strong>of</strong> their apatites, in Porter, T.M.,<br />

ed., Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related deposits: A global<br />

perspective: PGC Publishing, Adelaide, v. 2, p. 303-320.<br />

Denniss A.M., Colman, T. B., Cooper, D.C., Hatton, W.A., and Shaw, M.H., 1999,<br />

The combined use <strong>of</strong> PIMA and VULCAN technology for mineral deposit<br />

evaluation at Parys Mountain mine, <strong>An</strong>glesey, UK: <strong>International</strong><br />

Conference on Applied Geologic Remote Sensing, 13th, Vancouver, B.C.,<br />

March 1 – 3, 1999, ERIM <strong>International</strong> Inc., Proceedings, p. I-25–32.<br />

Frietsch, R., Rapunen, H., and Vokes, F.M., 1979, The ore deposits in Finland, Norway<br />

and Sweden - a review: Economic Geology, v. 74, p. 975-1001.<br />

Gandhi, S.S., 2003, <strong>An</strong> <strong>overview</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Fe oxide-Cu-Au deposits and related deposit<br />

types: CIM Montreal 2003 Mining Industry Conference and Exhibition, Canadian<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Mining, Technical Paper, CD-ROM.<br />

Gandhi, S.S. (compiler), 2004c, World distribution <strong>of</strong> iron oxide +/- Cu +/- Au +/- U<br />

deposits: World Minerals Geoscience Database Project, Geological Survey <strong>of</strong><br />

Canada, unpublished database.<br />

Gandhi, S.S., and Bell, R.T., 1993, Metallogenic concepts to aid exploration for the giant<br />

Olympic Dam-type deposits and their derivatives, in Maurice, Y.T., ed.,<br />

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 8th quadrennial international association on the genesis <strong>of</strong><br />

ore deposits symposium: E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart,<br />

Germany, p. 787-802.<br />

68


________________________________________________________________<br />

Gow, P.A., Wall, V.J., Oliver, N.H.S., and Valenta, R.K., 1994, Proterozoic iron oxide<br />

(Cu-U-Au-REE) deposits: Further evidence <strong>of</strong> hydrothermal origins: Geology, v.<br />

22, p. 633-636.<br />

Grove, C.I. , Hook, S. , and Paylor, E.D. , 1992, Laboratory reflectance spectra <strong>of</strong><br />

160 minerals, 0.4 to 2.5 micrometers: Pilot Land Data System, Jet Propulsion<br />

Laboratory, Pasadena, California, JPL Publication 92-2.<br />

Groves, D.I., and Vielreicher, N.M., 2001, The Phalabowra (Palabora) carbonatitehosted<br />

magnetite-copper sulfide deposit, South Africa: <strong>An</strong> end-member <strong>of</strong> the<br />

iron-oxide copper-gold-rare earth element deposit group?: Mineralium Deposita,<br />

v. 36, p 189-194.<br />

Hauff, P.L., 1993, SPECMIN Mineral Identification System and <strong>Spectral</strong> Library,<br />

v. 1 and 2.: Arvada, Colorado, <strong>Spectral</strong><strong>International</strong>, Inc., 600 p.<br />

Haynes, D.W., 2000, Iron oxide copper (-gold) deposits: Their position in the ore deposit<br />

spectrum and modes <strong>of</strong> origin, in Porter, T.M., ed., Hydrothermal iron oxide<br />

copper-gold and related deposits: A global perspective: PGC Publishing,<br />

Adelaide, v. 1, p. 71-90.<br />

Hitzman, M.C., 2000, Iron oxide-Cu-Au deposits: What, where, when, and why?, in<br />

Porter, T.M., ed., Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related deposits: A<br />

global perspective: PGC Publishing, Adelaide, v. 1, p. 9-25.<br />

Hitzman, M.W., Oreskes, N., and Einaudi, M.T., 1992, Geological characteristics and<br />

tectonic setting <strong>of</strong> Proterozoic iron oxide (Cu-U-Au-LREE) deposits: Precambrian<br />

Research, v. 58, p. 241-287.<br />

Hunt, G.R. and Ashley, R.P., 1979, Spectra <strong>of</strong> altered rocks in the <strong>vis</strong>ible and near<br />

infrared: Economic Geology, v. 74, p. 1613–1629.<br />

Hunt, G.R., and Salisbury, J.W., 1970, Visible and near-infrared spectra <strong>of</strong> minerals<br />

and rocks: I. Silicate minerals: Modern Geology, v. 1, p. 23–30.<br />

——1971, Visible and near-infrared spectra <strong>of</strong> minerals and rocks: II. Carbonates:<br />

Modern Geology, v. 2, p. 283–300.<br />

Hunt, G.R., Salisbury, J.W., and Lenh<strong>of</strong>f, C.J., 1971a, Visible and near-infrared<br />

spectra <strong>of</strong> minerals and rocks: III. Oxides and hydroxides: Modern<br />

Geology, v. 2, p. 195–205.<br />

——1971b, Visible and near-infrared spectra <strong>of</strong> minerals and rocks: IV. Sulphides and<br />

sulphates: Modern Geology, v. 3, p. 1–14.<br />

——1971c, Visible and near-infrared spectra <strong>of</strong> minerals and rocks: VI. Additional<br />

silicates: Modern Geology, v. 4, p. 85–106.<br />

Huston, D.L., Kamprad, J., and Brauhart, C., 1999, Definition <strong>of</strong> high-temperature<br />

alteration zones with PIMA: <strong>An</strong> example from the Panorama VHMS district,<br />

central Pilbara Craton: Australian Geological Survey Organisation Research<br />

Newsletter, v. 30, p. 10–12.<br />

Injoque, J.E., 2002, Fe oxide-Cu-Au deposits in Peru, an integrated view, in Porter, T.M.,<br />

ed., Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related deposits: A global<br />

perspective: PGC Publishing, Adelaide, v. 2, p. 97-113.<br />

Kodama, H., 1985, Infrared spectra <strong>of</strong> minerals; reference guide to identification and<br />

characterization <strong>of</strong> minerals for the study <strong>of</strong> soils: Research Branch<br />

Agriculture Canada, Technical Bulletin1985-1E, 197 p.<br />

Kruse, F.A. and Hauff, P. L., 1991, Identification <strong>of</strong> illite polytype zoning in<br />

disseminated gold deposits using reflectance <strong>spectroscopy</strong> and X-ray<br />

diffraction — potential for mapping with imaging spectrometers: IEEE<br />

Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, v. 29, p. 1101–1104.<br />

69


________________________________________________________________<br />

Lyon, R.J.P., 1962, Minerals in the Infrared — A critical bibliography: Stanford,<br />

California, Stanford Research Institute, 76p.<br />

Marel, H.W. and Beutelspacher, H., 1976, Atlas <strong>of</strong> infrared <strong>spectroscopy</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

clay minerals and their admixtures: Amsterdam, Elsevier, 396 p.<br />

Marsh, S.E. and McKeon, J.B., 1983, Integrated analysis <strong>of</strong> high- resolution <strong>field</strong> and<br />

airborne spectroradiometer data for alteration mapping: Economic Geology, v.<br />

78, p. 618–632.<br />

Martinez-Alonso, S.E., Goetz, A.F.H., Atkinson, W.W., Kruse, F.A and Eberl, D.D.,<br />

1999, Multiscale study <strong>of</strong> infrared spectra <strong>of</strong> clay minerals: from ab<br />

initio quantum calculations to hyperspectral remote sensing:<br />

<strong>International</strong> Conference on Applied Geologic Remote Sensing, 13th,<br />

Vancouver, B.C., March 1 – 3, 1999, ERIM <strong>International</strong> Inc., Proceedings, p. I-<br />

174–181.<br />

Mark, G., Oliver, N.H.S., Williams, P.J., Valenta, R.K., and Crookes, R.A., 2000, The<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> the Ernest Henry Fe-oxide-(Cu-Au) hydrothermal system, in Porter,<br />

T.M., ed., Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related deposits: A global<br />

perspective: PGC Publishing, Adelaide, v. 1, 123-136.<br />

Marschik, R., and Fontboté, L., 2001, The Candelaria-Punta del Cobre iron oxide Cu-Au<br />

(-Zn-Ag) deposits, Chile: Economic Geology, v. 96, p. 1799-1826.<br />

Mathur, R., Marschik, R., Ruiz, J., Munizaga, F., Leveille, R.A., and Martin, W., 2002,<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> mineralization <strong>of</strong> the Candelaria Fe oxide Cu-Au deposit and the origin <strong>of</strong><br />

the Chilean iron belt, based on Re-Os isotopes: Economic Geology, v. 97, p. 59-<br />

71.<br />

Naslund, H.R., Henríquez, F., Nyström, J.O., Vivallo, W., and Dobbs, F.M., 2002,<br />

Magmatic iron ores and associated mineralisation: Examples from the Chilean<br />

high <strong>An</strong>des and coastal Cordillera, in Porter, T.M., ed., Hydrothermal iron oxide<br />

copper-gold and related deposits: A global perspective: PGC Publishing,<br />

Adelaide, v. 2, p. 207-226.<br />

Passos, R.V., and de Souza Filho, C.R., 1999, Spectro-mineral mapping using<br />

<strong>field</strong> <strong>spectroscopy</strong> and the geometry <strong>of</strong> hydrothermal alteration zones<br />

associated with mesothermal gold mineralization: A case study in the Brumal<br />

Deposit, Quadrilatero, Ferrifero, Brazil: <strong>International</strong> Conference on Applied<br />

Geologic Remote Sensing, 13th, ERIM <strong>International</strong> Inc., Proceedings, p. I-73–<br />

80.<br />

Porter, T.M. (editor), 2000, Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related deposits: A<br />

global perspective, Volume 1: PGC Publishing, Adelaide, 349 p.<br />

Porter, T.M. (editor), 2002a, Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related deposits:<br />

A global perspective, Volume 2: PGC Publishing, Adelaide, 377 p.<br />

Ray, G.E., and Lefebure, D.V., 2000, A synopsis <strong>of</strong> iron oxide ± Cu ± Au ± P ± REE<br />

deposits <strong>of</strong> the Candelaria-Kiruna-Olympic Dam family: British Columbia Ministry<br />

<strong>of</strong> Energy and Mines, Geological Fieldwork 1999, Paper 2000-1, p. 267-272.<br />

Reeve, J.S., Cross, K.C., Smith, R.N., and Oreskes, N., 1990, The Olympic Dam<br />

copper-uranium-gold-silver deposit, South Australia, in Hughes, F., ed., Geology<br />

<strong>of</strong> mineral deposits <strong>of</strong> Australia and Papua New Guinea: Australian Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Mining and Metallurgy Monograph 14, p. 1009-1035.<br />

Ryan, P.J., Lawrence, A.L., Jenkins, R.A., Matthews, J.P., Zamora, J.C., Marino, E., and<br />

Urqueta, I., 1995, The Candelaria copper-gold deposit, Chile, in Pierce, F.W.,<br />

and Bolm, J.G., eds., Porphyry copper deposits <strong>of</strong> the American Cordillera:<br />

Arizona Geological Society Digest, v 20, p. 625-645.<br />

70


________________________________________________________________<br />

Shen, X.C., Dunlop, A.C., and Cohen, D.R., 1999, Characterization <strong>of</strong> residual and<br />

transported regolith pr<strong>of</strong>iles using the PIMA-II (abs): The Association <strong>of</strong><br />

Exploration Geochemists, <strong>International</strong> Geochemical Exploration Symposium,<br />

19th,Vancouver, B.C., April, 1999, Program and Abstracts, p. 137–138.<br />

Sillitoe, R.H., 2003, Iron oxide-copper-gold deposits: an <strong>An</strong>dean view: Mineralium<br />

Deposita, v. 38, p. 787-812.<br />

Vielreicher, N.M., Groves, D.I., and Vielreicher, R.M., 2000, The Phalabowra (Palabora)<br />

deposit and its potential connection to iron-oxide copper-gold deposits <strong>of</strong> Olympic<br />

Dam type, in Porter, T.M., ed., Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related<br />

deposits: A global perspective: PGC Publishing, Adelaide, v. 1, p. 321-329.<br />

Zhang, G., Pan, Y. and Chen, N., 1998, Short wave infrared (SWIR) reflectance<br />

spectroscopic study <strong>of</strong> kaolinite-group minerals at the Athabasca basin,<br />

Saskatchewan [abs]: Geological Association <strong>of</strong> Canada and Mineralogical<br />

Association <strong>of</strong> Canada AbstractVolume, Quebec 1998, Abstracts, p. A-203.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!